Tobacco Acquisition and Cigarette Brand Selection among Youth

Objective: To study the acquisition of tobacco and the development of cigarette brand selection among youth. To compare four methods of measuring brand preference among underage smokers. Design: Individual interviews were conducted with youths to elicit their past and present experiences with tobacc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tobacco control 1994-12, Vol.3 (4), p.334-338
Hauptverfasser: DiFranza, Joseph R., Eddy, Jennifer J., Brown, Linda F., Ryan, Jennifer L., Bogojavlensky, Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 338
container_issue 4
container_start_page 334
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 3
creator DiFranza, Joseph R.
Eddy, Jennifer J.
Brown, Linda F.
Ryan, Jennifer L.
Bogojavlensky, Ann
description Objective: To study the acquisition of tobacco and the development of cigarette brand selection among youth. To compare four methods of measuring brand preference among underage smokers. Design: Individual interviews were conducted with youths to elicit their past and present experiences with tobacco. Setting: A high school and public places in Massachusetts, USA. Subjects: A convenience sample of 721 youths, aged 10-17 years. Results: Friends were the source of the subject's first cigarette in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of the subjects were smoking three or fewer cigarettes per day when they first purchased tobacco. The first brand smoked was the first regular brand chosen in 67% of cases, and 51% of smokers were still smoking the same brand as their first cigarette. Ultra-low tar and generic brands were unpopular among youths. Questions concerning the favourite brand, brand usually purchased, last brand smoked, and friend's favourite brand produced very similar brand preference results for full-priced brands. However, only the question concerning the last brand smoked seemed to assess the use of generic brands accurately. Conclusions: Brand loyalty is usually established with the first cigarette. There is a clear economic advantage to a tobacco company if the first brand smoked by a child is one of its brands. Children related making their brand selection to the influences of print advertising, free sampling, promotional items, package design, and the implied health benefits of reduced-tar brands.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tc.3.4.334
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1759365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20207102</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20207102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1894-c2b836d49487fdbb2ceddbb0bfa19a9524c777b546afa6803811865a3e27c8dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsb98KshRmT3LxmoVCLLyi4sC5chUwm005pJzVJC_57p4wUXB0u57vf4iB0TXBBCIi7ZAsoWAHATtCIMKFyAKJO0QiXguWMCzhHFzGuMCYgORmh-7mvjLU-m9jvXRvb1PouM12dTduFCS4llz2Gw_3h1s4O7cZ3i-zL79LyEp01Zh3d1V-O0efz03z6ms_eX96mk1luiSpZbmmlQNSsZEo2dVVR6-o-cNUYUpqSU2allBVnwjRGKAyKECW4AUelVXUNY_QweLe7auNq67oUzFpvQ7sx4Ud70-r_Tdcu9cLvNZG8BMF7we0gsMHHGFxz_CVYH5bTyWrQTPfL9fDNAK9i8uFIUkyxJJjCL4MwbEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tobacco Acquisition and Cigarette Brand Selection among Youth</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DiFranza, Joseph R. ; Eddy, Jennifer J. ; Brown, Linda F. ; Ryan, Jennifer L. ; Bogojavlensky, Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>DiFranza, Joseph R. ; Eddy, Jennifer J. ; Brown, Linda F. ; Ryan, Jennifer L. ; Bogojavlensky, Ann</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To study the acquisition of tobacco and the development of cigarette brand selection among youth. To compare four methods of measuring brand preference among underage smokers. Design: Individual interviews were conducted with youths to elicit their past and present experiences with tobacco. Setting: A high school and public places in Massachusetts, USA. Subjects: A convenience sample of 721 youths, aged 10-17 years. Results: Friends were the source of the subject's first cigarette in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of the subjects were smoking three or fewer cigarettes per day when they first purchased tobacco. The first brand smoked was the first regular brand chosen in 67% of cases, and 51% of smokers were still smoking the same brand as their first cigarette. Ultra-low tar and generic brands were unpopular among youths. Questions concerning the favourite brand, brand usually purchased, last brand smoked, and friend's favourite brand produced very similar brand preference results for full-priced brands. However, only the question concerning the last brand smoked seemed to assess the use of generic brands accurately. Conclusions: Brand loyalty is usually established with the first cigarette. There is a clear economic advantage to a tobacco company if the first brand smoked by a child is one of its brands. Children related making their brand selection to the influences of print advertising, free sampling, promotional items, package design, and the implied health benefits of reduced-tar brands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tc.3.4.334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Brand loyalty ; Brand preferences ; Brands ; Business structures ; Children ; Cigarette smoking ; Cigarettes ; Marketing ; Minors ; Vending machines</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 1994-12, Vol.3 (4), p.334-338</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 Tobacco Control</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1894-c2b836d49487fdbb2ceddbb0bfa19a9524c777b546afa6803811865a3e27c8dd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20207102$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20207102$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DiFranza, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddy, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Linda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogojavlensky, Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Tobacco Acquisition and Cigarette Brand Selection among Youth</title><title>Tobacco control</title><description>Objective: To study the acquisition of tobacco and the development of cigarette brand selection among youth. To compare four methods of measuring brand preference among underage smokers. Design: Individual interviews were conducted with youths to elicit their past and present experiences with tobacco. Setting: A high school and public places in Massachusetts, USA. Subjects: A convenience sample of 721 youths, aged 10-17 years. Results: Friends were the source of the subject's first cigarette in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of the subjects were smoking three or fewer cigarettes per day when they first purchased tobacco. The first brand smoked was the first regular brand chosen in 67% of cases, and 51% of smokers were still smoking the same brand as their first cigarette. Ultra-low tar and generic brands were unpopular among youths. Questions concerning the favourite brand, brand usually purchased, last brand smoked, and friend's favourite brand produced very similar brand preference results for full-priced brands. However, only the question concerning the last brand smoked seemed to assess the use of generic brands accurately. Conclusions: Brand loyalty is usually established with the first cigarette. There is a clear economic advantage to a tobacco company if the first brand smoked by a child is one of its brands. Children related making their brand selection to the influences of print advertising, free sampling, promotional items, package design, and the implied health benefits of reduced-tar brands.</description><subject>Brand loyalty</subject><subject>Brand preferences</subject><subject>Brands</subject><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Minors</subject><subject>Vending machines</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsb98KshRmT3LxmoVCLLyi4sC5chUwm005pJzVJC_57p4wUXB0u57vf4iB0TXBBCIi7ZAsoWAHATtCIMKFyAKJO0QiXguWMCzhHFzGuMCYgORmh-7mvjLU-m9jvXRvb1PouM12dTduFCS4llz2Gw_3h1s4O7cZ3i-zL79LyEp01Zh3d1V-O0efz03z6ms_eX96mk1luiSpZbmmlQNSsZEo2dVVR6-o-cNUYUpqSU2allBVnwjRGKAyKECW4AUelVXUNY_QweLe7auNq67oUzFpvQ7sx4Ud70-r_Tdcu9cLvNZG8BMF7we0gsMHHGFxz_CVYH5bTyWrQTPfL9fDNAK9i8uFIUkyxJJjCL4MwbEQ</recordid><startdate>19941201</startdate><enddate>19941201</enddate><creator>DiFranza, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Eddy, Jennifer J.</creator><creator>Brown, Linda F.</creator><creator>Ryan, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Bogojavlensky, Ann</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941201</creationdate><title>Tobacco Acquisition and Cigarette Brand Selection among Youth</title><author>DiFranza, Joseph R. ; Eddy, Jennifer J. ; Brown, Linda F. ; Ryan, Jennifer L. ; Bogojavlensky, Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1894-c2b836d49487fdbb2ceddbb0bfa19a9524c777b546afa6803811865a3e27c8dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Brand loyalty</topic><topic>Brand preferences</topic><topic>Brands</topic><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Minors</topic><topic>Vending machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DiFranza, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eddy, Jennifer J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Linda F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogojavlensky, Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DiFranza, Joseph R.</au><au>Eddy, Jennifer J.</au><au>Brown, Linda F.</au><au>Ryan, Jennifer L.</au><au>Bogojavlensky, Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tobacco Acquisition and Cigarette Brand Selection among Youth</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><date>1994-12-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>334</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>334-338</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>Objective: To study the acquisition of tobacco and the development of cigarette brand selection among youth. To compare four methods of measuring brand preference among underage smokers. Design: Individual interviews were conducted with youths to elicit their past and present experiences with tobacco. Setting: A high school and public places in Massachusetts, USA. Subjects: A convenience sample of 721 youths, aged 10-17 years. Results: Friends were the source of the subject's first cigarette in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of the subjects were smoking three or fewer cigarettes per day when they first purchased tobacco. The first brand smoked was the first regular brand chosen in 67% of cases, and 51% of smokers were still smoking the same brand as their first cigarette. Ultra-low tar and generic brands were unpopular among youths. Questions concerning the favourite brand, brand usually purchased, last brand smoked, and friend's favourite brand produced very similar brand preference results for full-priced brands. However, only the question concerning the last brand smoked seemed to assess the use of generic brands accurately. Conclusions: Brand loyalty is usually established with the first cigarette. There is a clear economic advantage to a tobacco company if the first brand smoked by a child is one of its brands. Children related making their brand selection to the influences of print advertising, free sampling, promotional items, package design, and the implied health benefits of reduced-tar brands.</abstract><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1136/tc.3.4.334</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 1994-12, Vol.3 (4), p.334-338
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1759365
source Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Brand loyalty
Brand preferences
Brands
Business structures
Children
Cigarette smoking
Cigarettes
Marketing
Minors
Vending machines
title Tobacco Acquisition and Cigarette Brand Selection among Youth
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A56%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tobacco%20Acquisition%20and%20Cigarette%20Brand%20Selection%20among%20Youth&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=DiFranza,%20Joseph%20R.&rft.date=1994-12-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=334&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=334-338&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tc.3.4.334&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E20207102%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20207102&rfr_iscdi=true