Some high pitched thoughts on chest examination
Observation reveals that about half of chest physicians use the stethoscope bell when auscultating the lungs and the other half use the diaphragm. None directly apply their ears. Despite extensive reading we have not encountered an evidence based answer to the question “Should normal mortals use the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Postgraduate medical journal 2001-10, Vol.77 (912), p.617-620 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 620 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 912 |
| container_start_page | 617 |
| container_title | Postgraduate medical journal |
| container_volume | 77 |
| creator | WELSBY, P D EARIS, J E |
| description | Observation reveals that about half of chest physicians use the stethoscope bell when auscultating the lungs and the other half use the diaphragm. None directly apply their ears. Despite extensive reading we have not encountered an evidence based answer to the question “Should normal mortals use the bell or diaphragm?” This unanswered question thus prompted an acoustical odyssey. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/pmj.77.912.617 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1742158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A79410201</galeid><sourcerecordid>A79410201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-67567036a0b20a43ee1e4dbc47200aa0a05080b0f04eb0efd2981f624026bbbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd-L1DAQx4Mo3t7qq49SEIQD25ukadK-CMfi7_MEf9xrSNppm7VN1qaV8783xy53KgeSh8DMZ-Y7M19CnlDIKM3F6W7cZlJmFWWZoPIeWVEuqhRkIe6TFUDO0oLL_Igch7AFoLnk9CE5orSQsbpckdMvfsSkt12f7Oxc99gkc--Xrp9D4l0SA2FO8EqP1unZeveIPGj1EPDx4V-Tb69ffd28Tc8_vXm3OTtPTSHonIo4gIRcaDAMNM8RKfLG1FwyAK1BQwElGGiBowFsG1aVtBWMAxPGGMzX5OW-724xIzY1unnSg9pNdtTTL-W1VX9nnO1V538qKjmjRRkbPD80mPyPJW6hRhtqHAbt0C9BSUqrUkARwWf_gFu_TC4uF3uVtGRxtGvqxZ7q9IDKutZH1bpDh1HcO2xtDJ_JilNg8cxrkt6Bx9fgaOu7-GzP15MPYcL2ZlMK6tpoFY1WUqpotIpGx4Knf97nFj84ezuBDTNe3eT19F0JmctCXVxu1MeLD7nYXH5W7yN_sudNFPqP-G8yYr77</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781822985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some high pitched thoughts on chest examination</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>WELSBY, P D ; EARIS, J E</creator><creatorcontrib>WELSBY, P D ; EARIS, J E</creatorcontrib><description>Observation reveals that about half of chest physicians use the stethoscope bell when auscultating the lungs and the other half use the diaphragm. None directly apply their ears. Despite extensive reading we have not encountered an evidence based answer to the question “Should normal mortals use the bell or diaphragm?” This unanswered question thus prompted an acoustical odyssey.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/pmj.77.912.617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11571368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Auditory Perception ; Auscultation ; Auscultation - methods ; Chest ; History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Methods ; Periodic health examinations ; Physical diagnosis ; Physiological aspects ; Respiratory Sounds - diagnosis ; Stethoscopes ; Stethoscopes - history</subject><ispartof>Postgraduate medical journal, 2001-10, Vol.77 (912), p.617-620</ispartof><rights>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2001 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-67567036a0b20a43ee1e4dbc47200aa0a05080b0f04eb0efd2981f624026bbbe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-67567036a0b20a43ee1e4dbc47200aa0a05080b0f04eb0efd2981f624026bbbe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1742158/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1742158/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27928,27929,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11571368$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WELSBY, P D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EARIS, J E</creatorcontrib><title>Some high pitched thoughts on chest examination</title><title>Postgraduate medical journal</title><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><description>Observation reveals that about half of chest physicians use the stethoscope bell when auscultating the lungs and the other half use the diaphragm. None directly apply their ears. Despite extensive reading we have not encountered an evidence based answer to the question “Should normal mortals use the bell or diaphragm?” This unanswered question thus prompted an acoustical odyssey.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auscultation</subject><subject>Auscultation - methods</subject><subject>Chest</subject><subject>History, 19th Century</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Periodic health examinations</subject><subject>Physical diagnosis</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Respiratory Sounds - diagnosis</subject><subject>Stethoscopes</subject><subject>Stethoscopes - history</subject><issn>0032-5473</issn><issn>1469-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd-L1DAQx4Mo3t7qq49SEIQD25ukadK-CMfi7_MEf9xrSNppm7VN1qaV8783xy53KgeSh8DMZ-Y7M19CnlDIKM3F6W7cZlJmFWWZoPIeWVEuqhRkIe6TFUDO0oLL_Igch7AFoLnk9CE5orSQsbpckdMvfsSkt12f7Oxc99gkc--Xrp9D4l0SA2FO8EqP1unZeveIPGj1EPDx4V-Tb69ffd28Tc8_vXm3OTtPTSHonIo4gIRcaDAMNM8RKfLG1FwyAK1BQwElGGiBowFsG1aVtBWMAxPGGMzX5OW-724xIzY1unnSg9pNdtTTL-W1VX9nnO1V538qKjmjRRkbPD80mPyPJW6hRhtqHAbt0C9BSUqrUkARwWf_gFu_TC4uF3uVtGRxtGvqxZ7q9IDKutZH1bpDh1HcO2xtDJ_JilNg8cxrkt6Bx9fgaOu7-GzP15MPYcL2ZlMK6tpoFY1WUqpotIpGx4Knf97nFj84ezuBDTNe3eT19F0JmctCXVxu1MeLD7nYXH5W7yN_sudNFPqP-G8yYr77</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>WELSBY, P D</creator><creator>EARIS, J E</creator><general>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Some high pitched thoughts on chest examination</title><author>WELSBY, P D ; EARIS, J E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b561t-67567036a0b20a43ee1e4dbc47200aa0a05080b0f04eb0efd2981f624026bbbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auscultation</topic><topic>Auscultation - methods</topic><topic>Chest</topic><topic>History, 19th Century</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Periodic health examinations</topic><topic>Physical diagnosis</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Respiratory Sounds - diagnosis</topic><topic>Stethoscopes</topic><topic>Stethoscopes - history</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WELSBY, P D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EARIS, J E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WELSBY, P D</au><au>EARIS, J E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some high pitched thoughts on chest examination</atitle><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>912</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>617-620</pages><issn>0032-5473</issn><eissn>1469-0756</eissn><abstract>Observation reveals that about half of chest physicians use the stethoscope bell when auscultating the lungs and the other half use the diaphragm. None directly apply their ears. Despite extensive reading we have not encountered an evidence based answer to the question “Should normal mortals use the bell or diaphragm?” This unanswered question thus prompted an acoustical odyssey.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine</pub><pmid>11571368</pmid><doi>10.1136/pmj.77.912.617</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0032-5473 |
| ispartof | Postgraduate medical journal, 2001-10, Vol.77 (912), p.617-620 |
| issn | 0032-5473 1469-0756 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1742158 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Acoustics Auditory Perception Auscultation Auscultation - methods Chest History, 19th Century History, 20th Century Humans Methods Periodic health examinations Physical diagnosis Physiological aspects Respiratory Sounds - diagnosis Stethoscopes Stethoscopes - history |
| title | Some high pitched thoughts on chest examination |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T06%3A29%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20high%20pitched%20thoughts%20on%20chest%20examination&rft.jtitle=Postgraduate%20medical%20journal&rft.au=WELSBY,%20P%20D&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=912&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=617-620&rft.issn=0032-5473&rft.eissn=1469-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/pmj.77.912.617&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA79410201%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781822985&rft_id=info:pmid/11571368&rft_galeid=A79410201&rfr_iscdi=true |