Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults

STUDY OBJECTIVES To identify groups within the UK male and female population who report similar patterns of diet. DESIGN National representative dietary survey, using seven day weighed dietary records, of men and women aged 16–64 years living in private households in Great Britain in 1986–7. Cluster...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2001-01, Vol.55 (1), p.29-37
Hauptverfasser: Pryer, J A, Nichols, R, Elliott, P, Thakrar, B, Brunner, E, Marmot, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)
container_volume 55
creator Pryer, J A
Nichols, R
Elliott, P
Thakrar, B
Brunner, E
Marmot, M
description STUDY OBJECTIVES To identify groups within the UK male and female population who report similar patterns of diet. DESIGN National representative dietary survey, using seven day weighed dietary records, of men and women aged 16–64 years living in private households in Great Britain in 1986–7. Cluster analysis was used to aggregate participants into diet groups. SETTING Great Britain. PARTICIPANTS 1087 men and 1110 women. RESULTS 93% of men and 86% of women fell into one of four distinct diet groups. Among men the most prevalent diet group was “beer and convenience food” (34% of the male population); second was “traditional British diet” (18%); third was “healthier but sweet diet” (17.5%) and fourth was “healthier diet “ (17%). Among women, the most prevalent diet group was “ traditional British diet” (32%); second, was “healthy cosmopolitan diet” (25%); third was a “convenience food diet” (21%); and fourth was “healthier but sweet diet” (15%). There were important differences in nutrient profile, sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics between diet groups. CONCLUSIONS Cluster analysis identified four diet groups among men and four among women, which differed not only in terms of reported dietary intakes, but also with respect to nutrient, social and behavioural profiles. The groups identified could provide a useful basis for development, monitoring and targeting of public health nutrition policy in the UK.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jech.55.1.29
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1731768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A77059874</galeid><jstor_id>25569350</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A77059874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b669t-5a835f5c3ec7c412da4dba76b54ff68ca36a608bbafa356278408ac0b195614d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd2LEzEUxQdR3Lr65qsyILgvTk0mk68Xodt1VVwU1w_El3Ank2lTZ5KapKL_vSkt3VUWk4eE3B_n5txTFA8xmmJM2POV0csppVM8reWtYoIbjqqaE3G7mCDckAoh-vWouBfjCuUrr-Xd4gjnVctGTIrZmTUJwu9yDSmZ4GIJo3eLEkoHyXoHQxnAdX4sI4zrwZS-L0-DTTYuS-g2Q4r3izs9DNE82J_Hxefzl5_mr6uL96_ezGcXVcuYTBUFQWhPNTGa6wbXHTRdC5y1tOl7JjQQBgyJtoUeCGU1Fw0SoFGLJWW46chx8WKnu960o-m0cSnAoNbBjvn_yoNVf1ecXaqF_6kwJ5gzkQWe7gWC_7ExManRRm2GAZzxm6g4okyius7gk3_Ald-EPIqYtbiUVBKypZ7tqAUMRlnX-9xVL4wzubl3prf5ecazqhS8yXh1A553Z0arb-L38jr4GIPpD04xUtvg1TZ4RanCqpYZf3x9OlfwPulrpiBqGPqcqrbxwAnGsaCZerSjVjH5cKjWNI-GUHTlwsZkfh3qEL4rxgmn6t2Xufp2fvn29OP8g7rM_MmOb8fV_w38AQJ025U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779959332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Pryer, J A ; Nichols, R ; Elliott, P ; Thakrar, B ; Brunner, E ; Marmot, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Pryer, J A ; Nichols, R ; Elliott, P ; Thakrar, B ; Brunner, E ; Marmot, M</creatorcontrib><description>STUDY OBJECTIVES To identify groups within the UK male and female population who report similar patterns of diet. DESIGN National representative dietary survey, using seven day weighed dietary records, of men and women aged 16–64 years living in private households in Great Britain in 1986–7. Cluster analysis was used to aggregate participants into diet groups. SETTING Great Britain. PARTICIPANTS 1087 men and 1110 women. RESULTS 93% of men and 86% of women fell into one of four distinct diet groups. Among men the most prevalent diet group was “beer and convenience food” (34% of the male population); second was “traditional British diet” (18%); third was “healthier but sweet diet” (17.5%) and fourth was “healthier diet “ (17%). Among women, the most prevalent diet group was “ traditional British diet” (32%); second, was “healthy cosmopolitan diet” (25%); third was a “convenience food diet” (21%); and fourth was “healthier but sweet diet” (15%). There were important differences in nutrient profile, sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics between diet groups. CONCLUSIONS Cluster analysis identified four diet groups among men and four among women, which differed not only in terms of reported dietary intakes, but also with respect to nutrient, social and behavioural profiles. The groups identified could provide a useful basis for development, monitoring and targeting of public health nutrition policy in the UK.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.1.29</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11112948</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Beef ; Beverages ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; British ; Cluster Analysis ; Clustering ; Cod ; Coffee ; Diet ; Diet Records ; Diet Surveys ; Diet, Reducing ; Energy Intake ; Fat intake ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Food ; Food and nutrition ; Food consumption ; Fruit juices ; Fruits ; General populations ; Households ; Humans ; Liver ; Male ; Margarine ; Medical sciences ; Men ; Mens health ; Middle Aged ; Nutrients ; Population ; Prepared foods ; Prevention and actions ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Research Report ; Research Reports ; Sex Factors ; sociodemographic variables ; Tea ; United Kingdom ; Vegetables ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2001-01, Vol.55 (1), p.29-37</ispartof><rights>Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2001 Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b669t-5a835f5c3ec7c412da4dba76b54ff68ca36a608bbafa356278408ac0b195614d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25569350$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25569350$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=867185$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11112948$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pryer, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakrar, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmot, M</creatorcontrib><title>Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>STUDY OBJECTIVES To identify groups within the UK male and female population who report similar patterns of diet. DESIGN National representative dietary survey, using seven day weighed dietary records, of men and women aged 16–64 years living in private households in Great Britain in 1986–7. Cluster analysis was used to aggregate participants into diet groups. SETTING Great Britain. PARTICIPANTS 1087 men and 1110 women. RESULTS 93% of men and 86% of women fell into one of four distinct diet groups. Among men the most prevalent diet group was “beer and convenience food” (34% of the male population); second was “traditional British diet” (18%); third was “healthier but sweet diet” (17.5%) and fourth was “healthier diet “ (17%). Among women, the most prevalent diet group was “ traditional British diet” (32%); second, was “healthy cosmopolitan diet” (25%); third was a “convenience food diet” (21%); and fourth was “healthier but sweet diet” (15%). There were important differences in nutrient profile, sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics between diet groups. CONCLUSIONS Cluster analysis identified four diet groups among men and four among women, which differed not only in terms of reported dietary intakes, but also with respect to nutrient, social and behavioural profiles. The groups identified could provide a useful basis for development, monitoring and targeting of public health nutrition policy in the UK.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>British</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Cod</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet Records</subject><subject>Diet Surveys</subject><subject>Diet, Reducing</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Fat intake</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food and nutrition</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Fruit juices</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>General populations</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Margarine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Prepared foods</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>sociodemographic variables</subject><subject>Tea</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd2LEzEUxQdR3Lr65qsyILgvTk0mk68Xodt1VVwU1w_El3Ank2lTZ5KapKL_vSkt3VUWk4eE3B_n5txTFA8xmmJM2POV0csppVM8reWtYoIbjqqaE3G7mCDckAoh-vWouBfjCuUrr-Xd4gjnVctGTIrZmTUJwu9yDSmZ4GIJo3eLEkoHyXoHQxnAdX4sI4zrwZS-L0-DTTYuS-g2Q4r3izs9DNE82J_Hxefzl5_mr6uL96_ezGcXVcuYTBUFQWhPNTGa6wbXHTRdC5y1tOl7JjQQBgyJtoUeCGU1Fw0SoFGLJWW46chx8WKnu960o-m0cSnAoNbBjvn_yoNVf1ecXaqF_6kwJ5gzkQWe7gWC_7ExManRRm2GAZzxm6g4okyius7gk3_Ald-EPIqYtbiUVBKypZ7tqAUMRlnX-9xVL4wzubl3prf5ecazqhS8yXh1A553Z0arb-L38jr4GIPpD04xUtvg1TZ4RanCqpYZf3x9OlfwPulrpiBqGPqcqrbxwAnGsaCZerSjVjH5cKjWNI-GUHTlwsZkfh3qEL4rxgmn6t2Xufp2fvn29OP8g7rM_MmOb8fV_w38AQJ025U</recordid><startdate>200101</startdate><enddate>200101</enddate><creator>Pryer, J A</creator><creator>Nichols, R</creator><creator>Elliott, P</creator><creator>Thakrar, B</creator><creator>Brunner, E</creator><creator>Marmot, M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Group</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200101</creationdate><title>Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults</title><author>Pryer, J A ; Nichols, R ; Elliott, P ; Thakrar, B ; Brunner, E ; Marmot, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b669t-5a835f5c3ec7c412da4dba76b54ff68ca36a608bbafa356278408ac0b195614d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>British</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Cod</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet Records</topic><topic>Diet Surveys</topic><topic>Diet, Reducing</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Fat intake</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food and nutrition</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Fruit juices</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>General populations</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Margarine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Prepared foods</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>sociodemographic variables</topic><topic>Tea</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pryer, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thakrar, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunner, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmot, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pryer, J A</au><au>Nichols, R</au><au>Elliott, P</au><au>Thakrar, B</au><au>Brunner, E</au><au>Marmot, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2001-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>29-37</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>STUDY OBJECTIVES To identify groups within the UK male and female population who report similar patterns of diet. DESIGN National representative dietary survey, using seven day weighed dietary records, of men and women aged 16–64 years living in private households in Great Britain in 1986–7. Cluster analysis was used to aggregate participants into diet groups. SETTING Great Britain. PARTICIPANTS 1087 men and 1110 women. RESULTS 93% of men and 86% of women fell into one of four distinct diet groups. Among men the most prevalent diet group was “beer and convenience food” (34% of the male population); second was “traditional British diet” (18%); third was “healthier but sweet diet” (17.5%) and fourth was “healthier diet “ (17%). Among women, the most prevalent diet group was “ traditional British diet” (32%); second, was “healthy cosmopolitan diet” (25%); third was a “convenience food diet” (21%); and fourth was “healthier but sweet diet” (15%). There were important differences in nutrient profile, sociodemographic and behavioural characteristics between diet groups. CONCLUSIONS Cluster analysis identified four diet groups among men and four among women, which differed not only in terms of reported dietary intakes, but also with respect to nutrient, social and behavioural profiles. The groups identified could provide a useful basis for development, monitoring and targeting of public health nutrition policy in the UK.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>11112948</pmid><doi>10.1136/jech.55.1.29</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-005X
ispartof Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2001-01, Vol.55 (1), p.29-37
issn 0143-005X
1470-2738
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1731768
source PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; JSTOR
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Algorithms
Beef
Beverages
Biological and medical sciences
Body Mass Index
British
Cluster Analysis
Clustering
Cod
Coffee
Diet
Diet Records
Diet Surveys
Diet, Reducing
Energy Intake
Fat intake
Feeding Behavior
Female
Food
Food and nutrition
Food consumption
Fruit juices
Fruits
General populations
Households
Humans
Liver
Male
Margarine
Medical sciences
Men
Mens health
Middle Aged
Nutrients
Population
Prepared foods
Prevention and actions
Public health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Research Report
Research Reports
Sex Factors
sociodemographic variables
Tea
United Kingdom
Vegetables
Women
title Dietary patterns among a national random sample of British adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T04%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dietary%20patterns%20among%20a%20national%20random%20sample%20of%20British%20adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Pryer,%20J%20A&rft.date=2001-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=29-37&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.55.1.29&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA77059874%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779959332&rft_id=info:pmid/11112948&rft_galeid=A77059874&rft_jstor_id=25569350&rfr_iscdi=true