Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora
BACKGROUND Congenital nasolacrimal obstruction is usually the result of failure of canalisation of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. The most common outcome is spontaneous resolution, but some children do require surgical treatment by probing. Probing is a blind procedure with a recognised fa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 2001-03, Vol.85 (3), p.314-318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 314 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | MacEwen, C J Young, J D H Barras, C W Ram, B White, P S |
description | BACKGROUND Congenital nasolacrimal obstruction is usually the result of failure of canalisation of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. The most common outcome is spontaneous resolution, but some children do require surgical treatment by probing. Probing is a blind procedure with a recognised failure rate. METHODS In 52 lacrimal systems of 40 children nasal endoscopy was combined with a “stepwise” systematic probing in an attempt to improve the outcome and reduce the number of repeat procedures. RESULTS Combined nasal endoscopy and probing improved the understanding of outflow obstruction in young children. The success of the procedure depended upon the level of the obstruction within the outflow system. Formation of a false passage was seen in six cases (15%). The probe was rerouted under direct visualisation in these cases to form a functioning passage. Reasons for failure were identified in those who did not have a successful outcome and only one repeat procedure was required. CONCLUSION Using nasal endoscopy the area of lacrimal outflow obstruction at the lower end of the nasolacrimal duct can be observed directly and it is possible to guide the progress of probing under direct vision. This gives better information about the nature of the obstruction, minimises the formation of false passages, and allows a wider range of treatment options under a single anaesthetic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.85.3.314 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1723899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4012626231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-8ca2b099f621929cf89ca7b62d0ddb1aa14cd9023c6fc80acdefc9986282165e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2r1DAYhYso3vHqzrUEBN3YMR_TpNkIMviFV0XQ6zK8TdI2Y5vUpFXvvzfjDOPVhYsQwnlycvKeorhP8JoQxp82u7CuqzVbM7K5UazIhtclxULeLFYYY1ESwslZcSelXT5STsTt4owQSiljYlW4SxgWi0KLPCQYkPUmJB2mKwTeoCmGxvkOOY_m3iLjoPMhufRbHMFDZ0fr5_113bvBROvRDzf3SAffWe_mvePkpj5EuFvcamFI9t5xPy8-v3zxafu6vPjw6s32-UXZVJjPZa2BNljKllMiqdRtLTWIhlODjWkIANloIzFlmre6xqCNbbWUNac1Jbyy7Lx4dvCdlma0Rud8EQY1RTdCvFIBnPpb8a5XXfiuiKCsljIbPDoaxPBtsWlWo0vaDgN4G5akBOYVwZxk8OE_4C4s0efPZS8h88rTztSTA6VjSCna9hSFYLVvUOUGVV0ppnKDGX9wPf4f-FjZtVchaRjaCF67dOLq_SxwpsoD5dJsf55UiF8VF0xU6v3lVpGPnL39It-pbeYfH_hm3P0_4C_avsEh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779177617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>MacEwen, C J ; Young, J D H ; Barras, C W ; Ram, B ; White, P S</creator><creatorcontrib>MacEwen, C J ; Young, J D H ; Barras, C W ; Ram, B ; White, P S</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Congenital nasolacrimal obstruction is usually the result of failure of canalisation of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. The most common outcome is spontaneous resolution, but some children do require surgical treatment by probing. Probing is a blind procedure with a recognised failure rate. METHODS In 52 lacrimal systems of 40 children nasal endoscopy was combined with a “stepwise” systematic probing in an attempt to improve the outcome and reduce the number of repeat procedures. RESULTS Combined nasal endoscopy and probing improved the understanding of outflow obstruction in young children. The success of the procedure depended upon the level of the obstruction within the outflow system. Formation of a false passage was seen in six cases (15%). The probe was rerouted under direct visualisation in these cases to form a functioning passage. Reasons for failure were identified in those who did not have a successful outcome and only one repeat procedure was required. CONCLUSION Using nasal endoscopy the area of lacrimal outflow obstruction at the lower end of the nasolacrimal duct can be observed directly and it is possible to guide the progress of probing under direct vision. This gives better information about the nature of the obstruction, minimises the formation of false passages, and allows a wider range of treatment options under a single anaesthetic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.85.3.314</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11222337</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; children ; congenital epiphora ; Dacryocystorhinostomy ; Decision making ; Diseases of eyelid, conjunctiva and lacrimal tracts ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy - methods ; Failure ; Female ; Fluorescein ; Fluorescent Dyes ; Humans ; Infant ; Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - congenital ; Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - diagnosis ; Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; nasal endoscopy ; Ophthalmology ; Original articles - Clinical science ; Physiology ; probing ; Prognosis ; Remission, Spontaneous ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 2001-03, Vol.85 (3), p.314-318</ispartof><rights>British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2001 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-8ca2b099f621929cf89ca7b62d0ddb1aa14cd9023c6fc80acdefc9986282165e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1723899/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1723899/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=899860$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11222337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacEwen, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, J D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barras, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, P S</creatorcontrib><title>Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND Congenital nasolacrimal obstruction is usually the result of failure of canalisation of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. The most common outcome is spontaneous resolution, but some children do require surgical treatment by probing. Probing is a blind procedure with a recognised failure rate. METHODS In 52 lacrimal systems of 40 children nasal endoscopy was combined with a “stepwise” systematic probing in an attempt to improve the outcome and reduce the number of repeat procedures. RESULTS Combined nasal endoscopy and probing improved the understanding of outflow obstruction in young children. The success of the procedure depended upon the level of the obstruction within the outflow system. Formation of a false passage was seen in six cases (15%). The probe was rerouted under direct visualisation in these cases to form a functioning passage. Reasons for failure were identified in those who did not have a successful outcome and only one repeat procedure was required. CONCLUSION Using nasal endoscopy the area of lacrimal outflow obstruction at the lower end of the nasolacrimal duct can be observed directly and it is possible to guide the progress of probing under direct vision. This gives better information about the nature of the obstruction, minimises the formation of false passages, and allows a wider range of treatment options under a single anaesthetic.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>congenital epiphora</subject><subject>Dacryocystorhinostomy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diseases of eyelid, conjunctiva and lacrimal tracts</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorescein</subject><subject>Fluorescent Dyes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - congenital</subject><subject>Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>nasal endoscopy</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Original articles - Clinical science</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>probing</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Remission, Spontaneous</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2r1DAYhYso3vHqzrUEBN3YMR_TpNkIMviFV0XQ6zK8TdI2Y5vUpFXvvzfjDOPVhYsQwnlycvKeorhP8JoQxp82u7CuqzVbM7K5UazIhtclxULeLFYYY1ESwslZcSelXT5STsTt4owQSiljYlW4SxgWi0KLPCQYkPUmJB2mKwTeoCmGxvkOOY_m3iLjoPMhufRbHMFDZ0fr5_113bvBROvRDzf3SAffWe_mvePkpj5EuFvcamFI9t5xPy8-v3zxafu6vPjw6s32-UXZVJjPZa2BNljKllMiqdRtLTWIhlODjWkIANloIzFlmre6xqCNbbWUNac1Jbyy7Lx4dvCdlma0Rud8EQY1RTdCvFIBnPpb8a5XXfiuiKCsljIbPDoaxPBtsWlWo0vaDgN4G5akBOYVwZxk8OE_4C4s0efPZS8h88rTztSTA6VjSCna9hSFYLVvUOUGVV0ppnKDGX9wPf4f-FjZtVchaRjaCF67dOLq_SxwpsoD5dJsf55UiF8VF0xU6v3lVpGPnL39It-pbeYfH_hm3P0_4C_avsEh</recordid><startdate>20010301</startdate><enddate>20010301</enddate><creator>MacEwen, C J</creator><creator>Young, J D H</creator><creator>Barras, C W</creator><creator>Ram, B</creator><creator>White, P S</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010301</creationdate><title>Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora</title><author>MacEwen, C J ; Young, J D H ; Barras, C W ; Ram, B ; White, P S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-8ca2b099f621929cf89ca7b62d0ddb1aa14cd9023c6fc80acdefc9986282165e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>congenital epiphora</topic><topic>Dacryocystorhinostomy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diseases of eyelid, conjunctiva and lacrimal tracts</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorescein</topic><topic>Fluorescent Dyes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - congenital</topic><topic>Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>nasal endoscopy</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Original articles - Clinical science</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>probing</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Remission, Spontaneous</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacEwen, C J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, J D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barras, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ram, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, P S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacEwen, C J</au><au>Young, J D H</au><au>Barras, C W</au><au>Ram, B</au><au>White, P S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2001-03-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>314</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>314-318</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND Congenital nasolacrimal obstruction is usually the result of failure of canalisation of the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. The most common outcome is spontaneous resolution, but some children do require surgical treatment by probing. Probing is a blind procedure with a recognised failure rate. METHODS In 52 lacrimal systems of 40 children nasal endoscopy was combined with a “stepwise” systematic probing in an attempt to improve the outcome and reduce the number of repeat procedures. RESULTS Combined nasal endoscopy and probing improved the understanding of outflow obstruction in young children. The success of the procedure depended upon the level of the obstruction within the outflow system. Formation of a false passage was seen in six cases (15%). The probe was rerouted under direct visualisation in these cases to form a functioning passage. Reasons for failure were identified in those who did not have a successful outcome and only one repeat procedure was required. CONCLUSION Using nasal endoscopy the area of lacrimal outflow obstruction at the lower end of the nasolacrimal duct can be observed directly and it is possible to guide the progress of probing under direct vision. This gives better information about the nature of the obstruction, minimises the formation of false passages, and allows a wider range of treatment options under a single anaesthetic.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>11222337</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.85.3.314</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 2001-03, Vol.85 (3), p.314-318 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1723899 |
source | PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Child Child, Preschool children congenital epiphora Dacryocystorhinostomy Decision making Diseases of eyelid, conjunctiva and lacrimal tracts Endoscopy Endoscopy - methods Failure Female Fluorescein Fluorescent Dyes Humans Infant Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - congenital Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - diagnosis Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases - surgery Male Medical sciences nasal endoscopy Ophthalmology Original articles - Clinical science Physiology probing Prognosis Remission, Spontaneous Reoperation - statistics & numerical data Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A38%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20nasal%20endoscopy%20and%20probing%20in%20the%20diagnosis%20and%20management%20of%20children%20with%20congenital%20epiphora&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=MacEwen,%20C%20J&rft.date=2001-03-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=314&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=314-318&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.85.3.314&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4012626231%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779177617&rft_id=info:pmid/11222337&rfr_iscdi=true |