Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits

AIMS/BACKGROUND An ideal keratoprosthesis (KPro) would closely resemble a donor corneal button in terms of its surgical handling, optics, and capacity to heal with host tissue in order to avoid many of the complications associated with the KPros which are currently in clinical use. This study was ca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of ophthalmology 1998-01, Vol.82 (1), p.18-25
Hauptverfasser: Hicks, Celia R, Chirila, Traian V, Clayton, Anthony B, Fitton, J Helen, Vijayasekaran, Sarojini, Dalton, Paul D, Lou, Xia, Platten, Sharon, Ziegelaar, Brian, Hong, Ye, Crawford, Geoffrey J, Constable, Ian J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title British journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 82
creator Hicks, Celia R
Chirila, Traian V
Clayton, Anthony B
Fitton, J Helen
Vijayasekaran, Sarojini
Dalton, Paul D
Lou, Xia
Platten, Sharon
Ziegelaar, Brian
Hong, Ye
Crawford, Geoffrey J
Constable, Ian J
description AIMS/BACKGROUND An ideal keratoprosthesis (KPro) would closely resemble a donor corneal button in terms of its surgical handling, optics, and capacity to heal with host tissue in order to avoid many of the complications associated with the KPros which are currently in clinical use. This study was carried out to assess the long term clinical outcomes on implantation of the core and skirt poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) KPro in animals. METHODS 20 KPros were made and implanted as full thickness corneal replacements into rabbits and followed for up to 21 months to date. RESULTS 80% of the prostheses have been retained, with a low incidence of complications such as cataract, glaucoma, and retroprosthetic membrane formation which are frequently associated with KPro surgery. CONCLUSIONS KPros of this type may offer promise in the treatment of patients for whom penetrating keratoplasty with donor material carries a poor prognosis. Refinement of the KPro and further animal trials, including implantation into abnormal corneas, are however mandatory before human implantation could be planned.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjo.82.1.18
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1722337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79779582</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-7fdf3c2a07f7f01f4996d19f03e4a2172655919f89508c980e1f766e7f2445663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOj5WroWC4kY65qZtHhtBBl8ouNF1SDuJk7FtxiQV_PdmcBgfC1fh5B6-3JOD0CHgMUBBz-u5G3MyhjHwDTSCkvKcYCY20QhjzHIACjtoN4R5koQC20bboiooZ-UI3U9a29tGtZnXYWhjyJzJbLdoVR9VtK5f6jjT2WRmvW1V9qq9im7hXUi3wYbM9plXdW1j2EdbRrVBH6zOPfR8ffU0uc0fHm_uJpcPeV1SGnNmpqZoiMLMMIPBlELQKQiDC10qAozQqhJJc1Fh3giONRhGqWaGlGVFabGHLr64i6Hu9LTRffSqlQtvO-U_pFNW_p70diZf3LtMbFIULAFOVwDv3gYdouxsaHSbQms3BMkEY6LiJBmP_xjnbvB9CpdYjIuiFLDEnX25mvQrwWuzXgWwXDYkU0OSEwkSeHIf_dx-7V1VkuYnq7kKqRfjVd_YsLYRLFiifGeou_m_730Cn-OlUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778934917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hicks, Celia R ; Chirila, Traian V ; Clayton, Anthony B ; Fitton, J Helen ; Vijayasekaran, Sarojini ; Dalton, Paul D ; Lou, Xia ; Platten, Sharon ; Ziegelaar, Brian ; Hong, Ye ; Crawford, Geoffrey J ; Constable, Ian J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Celia R ; Chirila, Traian V ; Clayton, Anthony B ; Fitton, J Helen ; Vijayasekaran, Sarojini ; Dalton, Paul D ; Lou, Xia ; Platten, Sharon ; Ziegelaar, Brian ; Hong, Ye ; Crawford, Geoffrey J ; Constable, Ian J</creatorcontrib><description>AIMS/BACKGROUND An ideal keratoprosthesis (KPro) would closely resemble a donor corneal button in terms of its surgical handling, optics, and capacity to heal with host tissue in order to avoid many of the complications associated with the KPros which are currently in clinical use. This study was carried out to assess the long term clinical outcomes on implantation of the core and skirt poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) KPro in animals. METHODS 20 KPros were made and implanted as full thickness corneal replacements into rabbits and followed for up to 21 months to date. RESULTS 80% of the prostheses have been retained, with a low incidence of complications such as cataract, glaucoma, and retroprosthetic membrane formation which are frequently associated with KPro surgery. CONCLUSIONS KPros of this type may offer promise in the treatment of patients for whom penetrating keratoplasty with donor material carries a poor prognosis. Refinement of the KPro and further animal trials, including implantation into abnormal corneas, are however mandatory before human implantation could be planned.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.82.1.18</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9536874</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bioprosthesis ; Cell adhesion &amp; migration ; Cornea - surgery ; Intraoperative Complications ; Medical sciences ; Optics ; Original articles - Clinical science ; Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate ; Postoperative period ; Prosthesis Failure ; Prosthesis Fitting - methods ; Rabbits ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 1998-01, Vol.82 (1), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 1998 British Journal of Ophthalmology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-7fdf3c2a07f7f01f4996d19f03e4a2172655919f89508c980e1f766e7f2445663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1722337/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1722337/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2097183$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9536874$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Celia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirila, Traian V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton, Anthony B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitton, J Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayasekaran, Sarojini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platten, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegelaar, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constable, Ian J</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>AIMS/BACKGROUND An ideal keratoprosthesis (KPro) would closely resemble a donor corneal button in terms of its surgical handling, optics, and capacity to heal with host tissue in order to avoid many of the complications associated with the KPros which are currently in clinical use. This study was carried out to assess the long term clinical outcomes on implantation of the core and skirt poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) KPro in animals. METHODS 20 KPros were made and implanted as full thickness corneal replacements into rabbits and followed for up to 21 months to date. RESULTS 80% of the prostheses have been retained, with a low incidence of complications such as cataract, glaucoma, and retroprosthetic membrane formation which are frequently associated with KPro surgery. CONCLUSIONS KPros of this type may offer promise in the treatment of patients for whom penetrating keratoplasty with donor material carries a poor prognosis. Refinement of the KPro and further animal trials, including implantation into abnormal corneas, are however mandatory before human implantation could be planned.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bioprosthesis</subject><subject>Cell adhesion &amp; migration</subject><subject>Cornea - surgery</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Original articles - Clinical science</subject><subject>Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Prosthesis Fitting - methods</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLxDAUhYMoOj5WroWC4kY65qZtHhtBBl8ouNF1SDuJk7FtxiQV_PdmcBgfC1fh5B6-3JOD0CHgMUBBz-u5G3MyhjHwDTSCkvKcYCY20QhjzHIACjtoN4R5koQC20bboiooZ-UI3U9a29tGtZnXYWhjyJzJbLdoVR9VtK5f6jjT2WRmvW1V9qq9im7hXUi3wYbM9plXdW1j2EdbRrVBH6zOPfR8ffU0uc0fHm_uJpcPeV1SGnNmpqZoiMLMMIPBlELQKQiDC10qAozQqhJJc1Fh3giONRhGqWaGlGVFabGHLr64i6Hu9LTRffSqlQtvO-U_pFNW_p70diZf3LtMbFIULAFOVwDv3gYdouxsaHSbQms3BMkEY6LiJBmP_xjnbvB9CpdYjIuiFLDEnX25mvQrwWuzXgWwXDYkU0OSEwkSeHIf_dx-7V1VkuYnq7kKqRfjVd_YsLYRLFiifGeou_m_730Cn-OlUg</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Hicks, Celia R</creator><creator>Chirila, Traian V</creator><creator>Clayton, Anthony B</creator><creator>Fitton, J Helen</creator><creator>Vijayasekaran, Sarojini</creator><creator>Dalton, Paul D</creator><creator>Lou, Xia</creator><creator>Platten, Sharon</creator><creator>Ziegelaar, Brian</creator><creator>Hong, Ye</creator><creator>Crawford, Geoffrey J</creator><creator>Constable, Ian J</creator><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits</title><author>Hicks, Celia R ; Chirila, Traian V ; Clayton, Anthony B ; Fitton, J Helen ; Vijayasekaran, Sarojini ; Dalton, Paul D ; Lou, Xia ; Platten, Sharon ; Ziegelaar, Brian ; Hong, Ye ; Crawford, Geoffrey J ; Constable, Ian J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b466t-7fdf3c2a07f7f01f4996d19f03e4a2172655919f89508c980e1f766e7f2445663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bioprosthesis</topic><topic>Cell adhesion &amp; migration</topic><topic>Cornea - surgery</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Original articles - Clinical science</topic><topic>Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Prosthesis Fitting - methods</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hicks, Celia R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirila, Traian V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton, Anthony B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitton, J Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayasekaran, Sarojini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalton, Paul D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lou, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platten, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziegelaar, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hong, Ye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Geoffrey J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Constable, Ian J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hicks, Celia R</au><au>Chirila, Traian V</au><au>Clayton, Anthony B</au><au>Fitton, J Helen</au><au>Vijayasekaran, Sarojini</au><au>Dalton, Paul D</au><au>Lou, Xia</au><au>Platten, Sharon</au><au>Ziegelaar, Brian</au><au>Hong, Ye</au><au>Crawford, Geoffrey J</au><au>Constable, Ian J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>AIMS/BACKGROUND An ideal keratoprosthesis (KPro) would closely resemble a donor corneal button in terms of its surgical handling, optics, and capacity to heal with host tissue in order to avoid many of the complications associated with the KPros which are currently in clinical use. This study was carried out to assess the long term clinical outcomes on implantation of the core and skirt poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) KPro in animals. METHODS 20 KPros were made and implanted as full thickness corneal replacements into rabbits and followed for up to 21 months to date. RESULTS 80% of the prostheses have been retained, with a low incidence of complications such as cataract, glaucoma, and retroprosthetic membrane formation which are frequently associated with KPro surgery. CONCLUSIONS KPros of this type may offer promise in the treatment of patients for whom penetrating keratoplasty with donor material carries a poor prognosis. Refinement of the KPro and further animal trials, including implantation into abnormal corneas, are however mandatory before human implantation could be planned.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ</pub><pmid>9536874</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.82.1.18</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1161
ispartof British journal of ophthalmology, 1998-01, Vol.82 (1), p.18-25
issn 0007-1161
1468-2079
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1722337
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bioprosthesis
Cell adhesion & migration
Cornea - surgery
Intraoperative Complications
Medical sciences
Optics
Original articles - Clinical science
Polyhydroxyethyl Methacrylate
Postoperative period
Prosthesis Failure
Prosthesis Fitting - methods
Rabbits
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the eye and orbit
Surgical Wound Dehiscence
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
title Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A48%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20results%20of%20implantation%20of%20the%20Chirila%20keratoprosthesis%20in%20rabbits&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hicks,%20Celia%20R&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.82.1.18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79779582%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778934917&rft_id=info:pmid/9536874&rfr_iscdi=true