Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery
OBJECTIVE--Assessment of facilities for minor surgery in general practitioners' premises. DESIGN--Independent inspection of premises and equipment. SETTING--Large urban district. SUBJECTS--Premises of all general practitioners who applied to be reimbursed for minor surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 1991-04, Vol.302 (6782), p.941-942 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 942 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6782 |
| container_start_page | 941 |
| container_title | BMJ |
| container_volume | 302 |
| creator | Zoltie, N Hoult, G |
| description | OBJECTIVE--Assessment of facilities for minor surgery in general practitioners' premises. DESIGN--Independent inspection of premises and equipment. SETTING--Large urban district. SUBJECTS--Premises of all general practitioners who applied to be reimbursed for minor surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Fullfilment of 14 pre-selected criteria. RESULTS--69 of 111 premises met all criteria and were approved; 23 failed on only one criterion. The commonest reasons for failure were inadequate record keeping and lack of resuscitation equipment. Twelve practices had out of date adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS--Most premises are suitable for minor surgery, some with attention needed to record keeping. Practices must pay careful attention to the expiry date of adrenaline. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.302.6782.941 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1669486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29711187</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29711187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-9bc56409936faece90f2c8417530eaded2784d5f8f50bad719e94e7ac0232e293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBCorErvXJAiIcEBZfGz468DlcqKtqgVXICr5TgvS5ZNvLUTxP57vEq1BS5cbD3NvHkzGkKeA10CcPm27jdLTtlSKs2WpoJHZAGV1KXQnD8mC2qEKTVw_ZScpbShlDKutJHihJyA1ppLWJB3Fw3eTc7vi9AWaxwwum2xi86P3diFPKbXecS-S5iKNsSi74b8pimuMe6fkSet2yY8u_9PydfLD19W1-Xt56uPq4vbshYgxtLUXsiKGsNl69CjoS3zugIlOEXXYMOUrhrR6lbQ2jUKDJoKlfPZMUNm-Ck5n3V3U91j43EYs0-7i13v4t4G19m_kaH7btfhpwUpTaVlFnh1LxDD3YRptDmRx-3WDRimZDUVEpThmfjyH-ImTHHI4SwoJSteKXVg0ZnlY0gpYnu0AtQeurG5G5u7sYdubO4mr7z4M8LDwtzEA75JY4hHmBkFAFplvJzxLo3464i7-CPf4ErYT99W9oYa9v7GGHud-W9m_sHJf939BrH5sMc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776434773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zoltie, N ; Hoult, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Zoltie, N ; Hoult, G</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE--Assessment of facilities for minor surgery in general practitioners' premises. DESIGN--Independent inspection of premises and equipment. SETTING--Large urban district. SUBJECTS--Premises of all general practitioners who applied to be reimbursed for minor surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Fullfilment of 14 pre-selected criteria. RESULTS--69 of 111 premises met all criteria and were approved; 23 failed on only one criterion. The commonest reasons for failure were inadequate record keeping and lack of resuscitation equipment. Twelve practices had out of date adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS--Most premises are suitable for minor surgery, some with attention needed to record keeping. Practices must pay careful attention to the expiry date of adrenaline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.302.6782.941</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1888361</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards ; England ; Equipment failures ; Family health ; General practice ; Humans ; Medical equipment ; Medical Records - standards ; Minor surgical procedures ; Minor Surgical Procedures - standards ; Physicians' Offices - standards ; Physicians, Family ; Practice Observed ; Resuscitation ; Sterilization - standards ; Surgical Equipment - standards ; Surgical practice</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1991-04, Vol.302 (6782), p.941-942</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 British Medical Journal</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Apr 20, 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-9bc56409936faece90f2c8417530eaded2784d5f8f50bad719e94e7ac0232e293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29711187$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29711187$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1888361$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zoltie, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoult, G</creatorcontrib><title>Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE--Assessment of facilities for minor surgery in general practitioners' premises. DESIGN--Independent inspection of premises and equipment. SETTING--Large urban district. SUBJECTS--Premises of all general practitioners who applied to be reimbursed for minor surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Fullfilment of 14 pre-selected criteria. RESULTS--69 of 111 premises met all criteria and were approved; 23 failed on only one criterion. The commonest reasons for failure were inadequate record keeping and lack of resuscitation equipment. Twelve practices had out of date adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS--Most premises are suitable for minor surgery, some with attention needed to record keeping. Practices must pay careful attention to the expiry date of adrenaline.</description><subject>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Equipment failures</subject><subject>Family health</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical Records - standards</subject><subject>Minor surgical procedures</subject><subject>Minor Surgical Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Physicians' Offices - standards</subject><subject>Physicians, Family</subject><subject>Practice Observed</subject><subject>Resuscitation</subject><subject>Sterilization - standards</subject><subject>Surgical Equipment - standards</subject><subject>Surgical practice</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAUtBCorErvXJAiIcEBZfGz468DlcqKtqgVXICr5TgvS5ZNvLUTxP57vEq1BS5cbD3NvHkzGkKeA10CcPm27jdLTtlSKs2WpoJHZAGV1KXQnD8mC2qEKTVw_ZScpbShlDKutJHihJyA1ppLWJB3Fw3eTc7vi9AWaxwwum2xi86P3diFPKbXecS-S5iKNsSi74b8pimuMe6fkSet2yY8u_9PydfLD19W1-Xt56uPq4vbshYgxtLUXsiKGsNl69CjoS3zugIlOEXXYMOUrhrR6lbQ2jUKDJoKlfPZMUNm-Ck5n3V3U91j43EYs0-7i13v4t4G19m_kaH7btfhpwUpTaVlFnh1LxDD3YRptDmRx-3WDRimZDUVEpThmfjyH-ImTHHI4SwoJSteKXVg0ZnlY0gpYnu0AtQeurG5G5u7sYdubO4mr7z4M8LDwtzEA75JY4hHmBkFAFplvJzxLo3464i7-CPf4ErYT99W9oYa9v7GGHud-W9m_sHJf939BrH5sMc</recordid><startdate>19910420</startdate><enddate>19910420</enddate><creator>Zoltie, N</creator><creator>Hoult, G</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910420</creationdate><title>Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery</title><author>Zoltie, N ; Hoult, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b515t-9bc56409936faece90f2c8417530eaded2784d5f8f50bad719e94e7ac0232e293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Equipment failures</topic><topic>Family health</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical Records - standards</topic><topic>Minor surgical procedures</topic><topic>Minor Surgical Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Physicians' Offices - standards</topic><topic>Physicians, Family</topic><topic>Practice Observed</topic><topic>Resuscitation</topic><topic>Sterilization - standards</topic><topic>Surgical Equipment - standards</topic><topic>Surgical practice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zoltie, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoult, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zoltie, N</au><au>Hoult, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1991-04-20</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>302</volume><issue>6782</issue><spage>941</spage><epage>942</epage><pages>941-942</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE--Assessment of facilities for minor surgery in general practitioners' premises. DESIGN--Independent inspection of premises and equipment. SETTING--Large urban district. SUBJECTS--Premises of all general practitioners who applied to be reimbursed for minor surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Fullfilment of 14 pre-selected criteria. RESULTS--69 of 111 premises met all criteria and were approved; 23 failed on only one criterion. The commonest reasons for failure were inadequate record keeping and lack of resuscitation equipment. Twelve practices had out of date adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS--Most premises are suitable for minor surgery, some with attention needed to record keeping. Practices must pay careful attention to the expiry date of adrenaline.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>1888361</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.302.6782.941</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
| ispartof | BMJ, 1991-04, Vol.302 (6782), p.941-942 |
| issn | 0959-8138 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1669486 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - standards England Equipment failures Family health General practice Humans Medical equipment Medical Records - standards Minor surgical procedures Minor Surgical Procedures - standards Physicians' Offices - standards Physicians, Family Practice Observed Resuscitation Sterilization - standards Surgical Equipment - standards Surgical practice |
| title | Adequacy of general practitioners' premises for minor surgery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adequacy%20of%20general%20practitioners'%20premises%20for%20minor%20surgery&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Zoltie,%20N&rft.date=1991-04-20&rft.volume=302&rft.issue=6782&rft.spage=941&rft.epage=942&rft.pages=941-942&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.302.6782.941&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E29711187%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776434773&rft_id=info:pmid/1888361&rft_jstor_id=29711187&rfr_iscdi=true |