Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study

OBJECTIVE--To compare the abnormalities shown by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in three clinically distinct groups of patients with multiple sclerosis, and to correlate the extent of abnormality with the degree of clinical disability in the three groups. DESIGN--All patients underwent magn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ 1990-03, Vol.300 (6725), p.631-634
Hauptverfasser: Thompson, A J, Kermode, A G, MacManus, D G, Kendall, B E, Kingsley, D P, Moseley, I F, McDonald, W I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 634
container_issue 6725
container_start_page 631
container_title BMJ
container_volume 300
creator Thompson, A J
Kermode, A G
MacManus, D G
Kendall, B E
Kingsley, D P
Moseley, I F
McDonald, W I
description OBJECTIVE--To compare the abnormalities shown by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in three clinically distinct groups of patients with multiple sclerosis, and to correlate the extent of abnormality with the degree of clinical disability in the three groups. DESIGN--All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and full neurological examination, and their disability was scored according to the expanded Kurtzke disability state scale. SETTING--National Hospital for Nervous Diseases (Multiple Sclerosis NMR Research Group). PATIENTS--Three groups of patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis were studied: 12 patients with minimal disability despite a long (greater than 10 years) duration of illness (benign multiple sclerosis), 16 who had developed progressive disability after a relapsing and remitting course (secondary progressive multiple sclerosis), and 13 who had had progressive disability from the onset of the disease (primary progressive multiple sclerosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number and size of lesions in 17 anatomically defined sites; total lesion load, estimated with an arbitrary scoring system weighted for the size of lesions; and disability score. RESULTS--Magnetic resonance imaging showed that all 41 patients had abnormalities. These were extensive in the groups with secondary progressive and benign disease compared with the group with primary progressive disease. The lesions in the patients with secondary progressive disease were larger and more confluent than those in the two other groups (p = 0.007). Most lesions (85%) in the patients with primary progressive disease were under 5 mm in diameter; this percentage was higher than that in the two other groups (p = 0.032). Consequently the patients with primary progressive disease had the lowest mean lesion load (36.7); that in the patients with benign disease was 52.7 and that in the patients with secondary progressive disease 64.6 (p = 0.05). No correlation existed between disability and total lesion load. The distribution of brain lesions and of detectable lesions of the spinal cord, and the frequency of cortical atrophy, were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS--No relation was found between the degree of clinical disability and the extent of abnormality shown by magnetic resonance imaging: patients with clinically benign disease often had extensive abnormalities and those with primary progressive disease had surprisingly few lesions. Though magnetic resonance imaging increases knowl
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmj.300.6725.631
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1662448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>29707176</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>29707176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-239ed2bcc18e9479654cecd3113cdce0285afb2704cccf72765a65160e2138e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEUXCFQiUrvXJAsgbigDf5ae5cDEkRtQSqlB-DAxfJ63waHjTfY3qr597woUQpcOD3pzbzRzJuieMronDGhXrfr1VxQOleaV3Ml2INixqSqy6oW4mExo03VlDUT9ePiLKUVpZQLXTeqOilOOK4bLmaFvbE5QwyJjD3pfAKbgFiX_a3PW-IDWU9D9psBSHIDxDH59Ia4wQfv7EBs6MjaLgNk70iENAYbHBCPOx-WJOWp2z4pHvV2SHB2mKfF14vzL4sP5dXny4-Ld1dlW0mZSy4a6HjrHKuhkRptSgeuE5jUdQ4oryvbt1xT6ZzrNdeqsqpiisIuCwhxWrzd626mdg14EnK0g9lEdBO3ZrTe_I0E_8Msx1vDlOJS1ijw8iAQx18TpGzWPjkYBhtgnJLRjWZUyQqJz_8hrsYpBgxnmNZKcq1riSy6Zzn8WorQH60wanb9GezPYH9m15_B_vDk2Z8RjgeHthB_ccBtwvf3Eb_t05GG3SNP38usUh7jvUqjqWZaIV7ucZ8y3B1xG3-iFaErc_1tYW7k-wv16fuluUb-qz1_Z_i_IX4DOF3K2w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776427784</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Thompson, A J ; Kermode, A G ; MacManus, D G ; Kendall, B E ; Kingsley, D P ; Moseley, I F ; McDonald, W I</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, A J ; Kermode, A G ; MacManus, D G ; Kendall, B E ; Kingsley, D P ; Moseley, I F ; McDonald, W I</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE--To compare the abnormalities shown by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in three clinically distinct groups of patients with multiple sclerosis, and to correlate the extent of abnormality with the degree of clinical disability in the three groups. DESIGN--All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and full neurological examination, and their disability was scored according to the expanded Kurtzke disability state scale. SETTING--National Hospital for Nervous Diseases (Multiple Sclerosis NMR Research Group). PATIENTS--Three groups of patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis were studied: 12 patients with minimal disability despite a long (greater than 10 years) duration of illness (benign multiple sclerosis), 16 who had developed progressive disability after a relapsing and remitting course (secondary progressive multiple sclerosis), and 13 who had had progressive disability from the onset of the disease (primary progressive multiple sclerosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number and size of lesions in 17 anatomically defined sites; total lesion load, estimated with an arbitrary scoring system weighted for the size of lesions; and disability score. RESULTS--Magnetic resonance imaging showed that all 41 patients had abnormalities. These were extensive in the groups with secondary progressive and benign disease compared with the group with primary progressive disease. The lesions in the patients with secondary progressive disease were larger and more confluent than those in the two other groups (p = 0.007). Most lesions (85%) in the patients with primary progressive disease were under 5 mm in diameter; this percentage was higher than that in the two other groups (p = 0.032). Consequently the patients with primary progressive disease had the lowest mean lesion load (36.7); that in the patients with benign disease was 52.7 and that in the patients with secondary progressive disease 64.6 (p = 0.05). No correlation existed between disability and total lesion load. The distribution of brain lesions and of detectable lesions of the spinal cord, and the frequency of cortical atrophy, were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS--No relation was found between the degree of clinical disability and the extent of abnormality shown by magnetic resonance imaging: patients with clinically benign disease often had extensive abnormalities and those with primary progressive disease had surprisingly few lesions. Though magnetic resonance imaging increases knowledge of the disease process in multiple sclerosis and is invaluable in diagnosis, it is not helpful in predicting disability in individual patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6725.631</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2138923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - pathology ; Disabilities ; Disability Evaluation ; Disabled Persons ; Disease progression ; Humans ; Lesions ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Medical sciences ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - pathology ; Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology ; Nervous system diseases ; Neurology ; Prognosis ; Recurrence ; Relapse ; Spinal cord ; Spinal cord diseases</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1990-03, Vol.300 (6725), p.631-634</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 British Medical Journal</rights><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Mar 10, 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-239ed2bcc18e9479654cecd3113cdce0285afb2704cccf72765a65160e2138e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-239ed2bcc18e9479654cecd3113cdce0285afb2704cccf72765a65160e2138e33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/29707176$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/29707176$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4683897$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2138923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kermode, A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacManus, D G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, D P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, I F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, W I</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE--To compare the abnormalities shown by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in three clinically distinct groups of patients with multiple sclerosis, and to correlate the extent of abnormality with the degree of clinical disability in the three groups. DESIGN--All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and full neurological examination, and their disability was scored according to the expanded Kurtzke disability state scale. SETTING--National Hospital for Nervous Diseases (Multiple Sclerosis NMR Research Group). PATIENTS--Three groups of patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis were studied: 12 patients with minimal disability despite a long (greater than 10 years) duration of illness (benign multiple sclerosis), 16 who had developed progressive disability after a relapsing and remitting course (secondary progressive multiple sclerosis), and 13 who had had progressive disability from the onset of the disease (primary progressive multiple sclerosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number and size of lesions in 17 anatomically defined sites; total lesion load, estimated with an arbitrary scoring system weighted for the size of lesions; and disability score. RESULTS--Magnetic resonance imaging showed that all 41 patients had abnormalities. These were extensive in the groups with secondary progressive and benign disease compared with the group with primary progressive disease. The lesions in the patients with secondary progressive disease were larger and more confluent than those in the two other groups (p = 0.007). Most lesions (85%) in the patients with primary progressive disease were under 5 mm in diameter; this percentage was higher than that in the two other groups (p = 0.032). Consequently the patients with primary progressive disease had the lowest mean lesion load (36.7); that in the patients with benign disease was 52.7 and that in the patients with secondary progressive disease 64.6 (p = 0.05). No correlation existed between disability and total lesion load. The distribution of brain lesions and of detectable lesions of the spinal cord, and the frequency of cortical atrophy, were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS--No relation was found between the degree of clinical disability and the extent of abnormality shown by magnetic resonance imaging: patients with clinically benign disease often had extensive abnormalities and those with primary progressive disease had surprisingly few lesions. Though magnetic resonance imaging increases knowledge of the disease process in multiple sclerosis and is invaluable in diagnosis, it is not helpful in predicting disability in individual patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - pathology</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Disabled Persons</subject><subject>Disease progression</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Nervous system diseases</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal cord diseases</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEUXCFQiUrvXJAsgbigDf5ae5cDEkRtQSqlB-DAxfJ63waHjTfY3qr597woUQpcOD3pzbzRzJuieMronDGhXrfr1VxQOleaV3Ml2INixqSqy6oW4mExo03VlDUT9ePiLKUVpZQLXTeqOilOOK4bLmaFvbE5QwyJjD3pfAKbgFiX_a3PW-IDWU9D9psBSHIDxDH59Ia4wQfv7EBs6MjaLgNk70iENAYbHBCPOx-WJOWp2z4pHvV2SHB2mKfF14vzL4sP5dXny4-Ld1dlW0mZSy4a6HjrHKuhkRptSgeuE5jUdQ4oryvbt1xT6ZzrNdeqsqpiisIuCwhxWrzd626mdg14EnK0g9lEdBO3ZrTe_I0E_8Msx1vDlOJS1ijw8iAQx18TpGzWPjkYBhtgnJLRjWZUyQqJz_8hrsYpBgxnmNZKcq1riSy6Zzn8WorQH60wanb9GezPYH9m15_B_vDk2Z8RjgeHthB_ccBtwvf3Eb_t05GG3SNP38usUh7jvUqjqWZaIV7ucZ8y3B1xG3-iFaErc_1tYW7k-wv16fuluUb-qz1_Z_i_IX4DOF3K2w</recordid><startdate>19900310</startdate><enddate>19900310</enddate><creator>Thompson, A J</creator><creator>Kermode, A G</creator><creator>MacManus, D G</creator><creator>Kendall, B E</creator><creator>Kingsley, D P</creator><creator>Moseley, I F</creator><creator>McDonald, W I</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900310</creationdate><title>Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study</title><author>Thompson, A J ; Kermode, A G ; MacManus, D G ; Kendall, B E ; Kingsley, D P ; Moseley, I F ; McDonald, W I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b544t-239ed2bcc18e9479654cecd3113cdce0285afb2704cccf72765a65160e2138e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - pathology</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Disabled Persons</topic><topic>Disease progression</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Nervous system diseases</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal cord diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kermode, A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacManus, D G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kendall, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, D P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moseley, I F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, W I</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, A J</au><au>Kermode, A G</au><au>MacManus, D G</au><au>Kendall, B E</au><au>Kingsley, D P</au><au>Moseley, I F</au><au>McDonald, W I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>1990-03-10</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>300</volume><issue>6725</issue><spage>631</spage><epage>634</epage><pages>631-634</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE--To compare the abnormalities shown by magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in three clinically distinct groups of patients with multiple sclerosis, and to correlate the extent of abnormality with the degree of clinical disability in the three groups. DESIGN--All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging and full neurological examination, and their disability was scored according to the expanded Kurtzke disability state scale. SETTING--National Hospital for Nervous Diseases (Multiple Sclerosis NMR Research Group). PATIENTS--Three groups of patients with confirmed multiple sclerosis were studied: 12 patients with minimal disability despite a long (greater than 10 years) duration of illness (benign multiple sclerosis), 16 who had developed progressive disability after a relapsing and remitting course (secondary progressive multiple sclerosis), and 13 who had had progressive disability from the onset of the disease (primary progressive multiple sclerosis). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Number and size of lesions in 17 anatomically defined sites; total lesion load, estimated with an arbitrary scoring system weighted for the size of lesions; and disability score. RESULTS--Magnetic resonance imaging showed that all 41 patients had abnormalities. These were extensive in the groups with secondary progressive and benign disease compared with the group with primary progressive disease. The lesions in the patients with secondary progressive disease were larger and more confluent than those in the two other groups (p = 0.007). Most lesions (85%) in the patients with primary progressive disease were under 5 mm in diameter; this percentage was higher than that in the two other groups (p = 0.032). Consequently the patients with primary progressive disease had the lowest mean lesion load (36.7); that in the patients with benign disease was 52.7 and that in the patients with secondary progressive disease 64.6 (p = 0.05). No correlation existed between disability and total lesion load. The distribution of brain lesions and of detectable lesions of the spinal cord, and the frequency of cortical atrophy, were similar in all groups. CONCLUSIONS--No relation was found between the degree of clinical disability and the extent of abnormality shown by magnetic resonance imaging: patients with clinically benign disease often had extensive abnormalities and those with primary progressive disease had surprisingly few lesions. Though magnetic resonance imaging increases knowledge of the disease process in multiple sclerosis and is invaluable in diagnosis, it is not helpful in predicting disability in individual patients.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>2138923</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.300.6725.631</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8138
ispartof BMJ, 1990-03, Vol.300 (6725), p.631-634
issn 0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1662448
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - pathology
Disabilities
Disability Evaluation
Disabled Persons
Disease progression
Humans
Lesions
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Medical sciences
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis - pathology
Multiple Sclerosis - physiopathology
Nervous system diseases
Neurology
Prognosis
Recurrence
Relapse
Spinal cord
Spinal cord diseases
title Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A17%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20disease%20activity%20in%20multiple%20sclerosis:%20clinical%20and%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20study&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Thompson,%20A%20J&rft.date=1990-03-10&rft.volume=300&rft.issue=6725&rft.spage=631&rft.epage=634&rft.pages=631-634&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.300.6725.631&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E29707176%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776427784&rft_id=info:pmid/2138923&rft_jstor_id=29707176&rfr_iscdi=true