Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach
ABSTRACT Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Skull Base 2002-08, Vol.12 (3), p.119-124 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 124 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 119 |
container_title | Skull Base |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Batay, Funda Vural, Emre Karasu, Aykut Al-Mefty, Ossama |
description | ABSTRACT
Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-2002-33457 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1656946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734178717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ee51623c0b3d400375415d84b2f4ec42813a9014fe69829ffd82ce498979d4aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1v1DAQxS1ERUvhxhn5xgEC_nZyQapWC1Rq1QPlbDn2hLhK7GAniP73ZLsRUInTeOSf3zzPQ-gVJe8pkfJDqRghrOJcSP0EnVHJWUWIkk8fzrSShJJT9LyUO0KoqBv2DJ1STZVWip-hsEvjZHMoKeLU4bkHvP81pbJkwDftbEMEj9t7vI8-FZcmwDZ6fB1c3toQt0czRL-yt9nGUn2deogpeDvgi2nKybr-BTrp7FDg5VbP0bdP-9vdl-rq5vPl7uKqcoLquQKQVDHuSMu9IIRrKaj0tWhZJ8AJVlNum_UjHaimZk3X-Zo5EE3d6MYLa_k5-njUnZZ2BO8gztkOZsphtPneJBvM45sYevM9_TRUSdUItQq82QRy-rFAmc0YioNhsBHSUozmq9FaU72S747kYRslQ_dnCiXmEI4p5hCOeQhnxV__6-wvvKWxAm-PwNwHGMHcpSXHdVf_l_sNnyOZCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734178717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</title><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Batay, Funda ; Vural, Emre ; Karasu, Aykut ; Al-Mefty, Ossama</creator><creatorcontrib>Batay, Funda ; Vural, Emre ; Karasu, Aykut ; Al-Mefty, Ossama</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-5010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-9072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33457</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17167663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Original ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><ispartof>Skull Base, 2002-08, Vol.12 (3), p.119-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662</rights><rights>2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ee51623c0b3d400375415d84b2f4ec42813a9014fe69829ffd82ce498979d4aa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1656946/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1656946/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3004,3005,27901,27902,53766,53768,54534,54535</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17167663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batay, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vural, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasu, Aykut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mefty, Ossama</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</title><title>Skull Base</title><addtitle>Skull Base</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><issn>1531-5010</issn><issn>1532-0065</issn><issn>1098-9072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1v1DAQxS1ERUvhxhn5xgEC_nZyQapWC1Rq1QPlbDn2hLhK7GAniP73ZLsRUInTeOSf3zzPQ-gVJe8pkfJDqRghrOJcSP0EnVHJWUWIkk8fzrSShJJT9LyUO0KoqBv2DJ1STZVWip-hsEvjZHMoKeLU4bkHvP81pbJkwDftbEMEj9t7vI8-FZcmwDZ6fB1c3toQt0czRL-yt9nGUn2deogpeDvgi2nKybr-BTrp7FDg5VbP0bdP-9vdl-rq5vPl7uKqcoLquQKQVDHuSMu9IIRrKaj0tWhZJ8AJVlNum_UjHaimZk3X-Zo5EE3d6MYLa_k5-njUnZZ2BO8gztkOZsphtPneJBvM45sYevM9_TRUSdUItQq82QRy-rFAmc0YioNhsBHSUozmq9FaU72S747kYRslQ_dnCiXmEI4p5hCOeQhnxV__6-wvvKWxAm-PwNwHGMHcpSXHdVf_l_sNnyOZCA</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Batay, Funda</creator><creator>Vural, Emre</creator><creator>Karasu, Aykut</creator><creator>Al-Mefty, Ossama</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</title><author>Batay, Funda ; Vural, Emre ; Karasu, Aykut ; Al-Mefty, Ossama</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ee51623c0b3d400375415d84b2f4ec42813a9014fe69829ffd82ce498979d4aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batay, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vural, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasu, Aykut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mefty, Ossama</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Skull Base</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batay, Funda</au><au>Vural, Emre</au><au>Karasu, Aykut</au><au>Al-Mefty, Ossama</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</atitle><jtitle>Skull Base</jtitle><addtitle>Skull Base</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>119-124</pages><issn>1531-5010</issn><eissn>1532-0065</eissn><eissn>1098-9072</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17167663</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2002-33457</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1531-5010 |
ispartof | Skull Base, 2002-08, Vol.12 (3), p.119-124 |
issn | 1531-5010 1532-0065 1098-9072 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1656946 |
source | Thieme Connect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
title | Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Exposure%20Obtained%20by%20Endoscope%20and%20Microscope%20in%20the%20Extended%20Trans-Sphenoidal%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Skull%20Base&rft.au=Batay,%20Funda&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=119-124&rft.issn=1531-5010&rft.eissn=1532-0065&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2002-33457&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734178717%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734178717&rft_id=info:pmid/17167663&rfr_iscdi=true |