Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach

ABSTRACT Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Skull Base 2002-08, Vol.12 (3), p.119-124
Hauptverfasser: Batay, Funda, Vural, Emre, Karasu, Aykut, Al-Mefty, Ossama
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 3
container_start_page 119
container_title Skull Base
container_volume 12
creator Batay, Funda
Vural, Emre
Karasu, Aykut
Al-Mefty, Ossama
description ABSTRACT Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2002-33457
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1656946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>734178717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ee51623c0b3d400375415d84b2f4ec42813a9014fe69829ffd82ce498979d4aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1v1DAQxS1ERUvhxhn5xgEC_nZyQapWC1Rq1QPlbDn2hLhK7GAniP73ZLsRUInTeOSf3zzPQ-gVJe8pkfJDqRghrOJcSP0EnVHJWUWIkk8fzrSShJJT9LyUO0KoqBv2DJ1STZVWip-hsEvjZHMoKeLU4bkHvP81pbJkwDftbEMEj9t7vI8-FZcmwDZ6fB1c3toQt0czRL-yt9nGUn2deogpeDvgi2nKybr-BTrp7FDg5VbP0bdP-9vdl-rq5vPl7uKqcoLquQKQVDHuSMu9IIRrKaj0tWhZJ8AJVlNum_UjHaimZk3X-Zo5EE3d6MYLa_k5-njUnZZ2BO8gztkOZsphtPneJBvM45sYevM9_TRUSdUItQq82QRy-rFAmc0YioNhsBHSUozmq9FaU72S747kYRslQ_dnCiXmEI4p5hCOeQhnxV__6-wvvKWxAm-PwNwHGMHcpSXHdVf_l_sNnyOZCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>734178717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</title><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Batay, Funda ; Vural, Emre ; Karasu, Aykut ; Al-Mefty, Ossama</creator><creatorcontrib>Batay, Funda ; Vural, Emre ; Karasu, Aykut ; Al-Mefty, Ossama</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-5010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-9072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33457</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17167663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Original ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><ispartof>Skull Base, 2002-08, Vol.12 (3), p.119-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662</rights><rights>2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ee51623c0b3d400375415d84b2f4ec42813a9014fe69829ffd82ce498979d4aa3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1656946/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1656946/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3004,3005,27901,27902,53766,53768,54534,54535</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17167663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batay, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vural, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasu, Aykut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mefty, Ossama</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</title><title>Skull Base</title><addtitle>Skull Base</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><issn>1531-5010</issn><issn>1532-0065</issn><issn>1098-9072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1v1DAQxS1ERUvhxhn5xgEC_nZyQapWC1Rq1QPlbDn2hLhK7GAniP73ZLsRUInTeOSf3zzPQ-gVJe8pkfJDqRghrOJcSP0EnVHJWUWIkk8fzrSShJJT9LyUO0KoqBv2DJ1STZVWip-hsEvjZHMoKeLU4bkHvP81pbJkwDftbEMEj9t7vI8-FZcmwDZ6fB1c3toQt0czRL-yt9nGUn2deogpeDvgi2nKybr-BTrp7FDg5VbP0bdP-9vdl-rq5vPl7uKqcoLquQKQVDHuSMu9IIRrKaj0tWhZJ8AJVlNum_UjHaimZk3X-Zo5EE3d6MYLa_k5-njUnZZ2BO8gztkOZsphtPneJBvM45sYevM9_TRUSdUItQq82QRy-rFAmc0YioNhsBHSUozmq9FaU72S747kYRslQ_dnCiXmEI4p5hCOeQhnxV__6-wvvKWxAm-PwNwHGMHcpSXHdVf_l_sNnyOZCA</recordid><startdate>20020801</startdate><enddate>20020801</enddate><creator>Batay, Funda</creator><creator>Vural, Emre</creator><creator>Karasu, Aykut</creator><creator>Al-Mefty, Ossama</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020801</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</title><author>Batay, Funda ; Vural, Emre ; Karasu, Aykut ; Al-Mefty, Ossama</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-ee51623c0b3d400375415d84b2f4ec42813a9014fe69829ffd82ce498979d4aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batay, Funda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vural, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasu, Aykut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mefty, Ossama</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Skull Base</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batay, Funda</au><au>Vural, Emre</au><au>Karasu, Aykut</au><au>Al-Mefty, Ossama</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach</atitle><jtitle>Skull Base</jtitle><addtitle>Skull Base</addtitle><date>2002-08-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>119-124</pages><issn>1531-5010</issn><eissn>1532-0065</eissn><eissn>1098-9072</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective: Trans-sphenoidal surgery is often combined with other approaches for the treatment of middle cranial base tumors. By combining a maxillotomy with trans-sphenoidal approach, significantly wider exposure to these regions is gained. However, endoscope-assisted techniques have also been used for sellar and parasellar and upper clival regions. Methods: An extended trans-sphenoidal approach was performed on 10 cadaver heads using the operating microscope and was repeated with a 0-degree endoscope. The mean horizontal and vertical distances were measured and pictured for each technique, and both distances were compared using a parametric paired Student's T-test. Results: The mean horizontal distances in the 10 specimens were 19.5 ± 1.8 mm by microscope and 27.5 ± 2.2 mm by endoscope, and the mean vertical distances were 25.8 ± 1.9 mm by the microscope and 34.5 ± 3.5 mm by the endoscope. Conclusion: The aim of this study was to quantify the amount of exposure obtained with an extended trans-sphenoidal approach and to compare both endoscopic and microscopic techniques. Using the endoscope in conjunction with the operating microscope may provide additional exposure and better access in skull base surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>17167663</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2002-33457</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-5010
ispartof Skull Base, 2002-08, Vol.12 (3), p.119-124
issn 1531-5010
1532-0065
1098-9072
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1656946
source Thieme Connect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
title Comparison of the Exposure Obtained by Endoscope and Microscope in the Extended Trans-Sphenoidal Approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T04%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Exposure%20Obtained%20by%20Endoscope%20and%20Microscope%20in%20the%20Extended%20Trans-Sphenoidal%20Approach&rft.jtitle=Skull%20Base&rft.au=Batay,%20Funda&rft.date=2002-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=119-124&rft.issn=1531-5010&rft.eissn=1532-0065&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2002-33457&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E734178717%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=734178717&rft_id=info:pmid/17167663&rfr_iscdi=true