Prescription for a better British diet
A new approach to establishing an upper or prescriptive level of recommended intakes of nutrients was devised for use in Britain. It was based on present food supplies in the UK, and the following measures were proposed to improve the national diet: moderate reductions in intakes of fat, sugar, meat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 1979-02, Vol.1 (6162), p.527-531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6162 |
container_start_page | 527 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Passmore, R Hollingsworth, D F Robertson, J |
description | A new approach to establishing an upper or prescriptive level of recommended intakes of nutrients was devised for use in Britain. It was based on present food supplies in the UK, and the following measures were proposed to improve the national diet: moderate reductions in intakes of fat, sugar, meat, and alcohol; increased intakes of cereals, potatoes, and other vegetables and fruit; while intakes of milk and eggs and fish, pulses, and nuts were to remain unchanged. The proportions of food energy derived from protein would be increased, despite reduced meat consumption. Nutrient content of the diet may be expressed in terms of food groups or as nutrient concentrations per energy unit, which is particularly applicable to planning or prescribing diets for individuals or small groups. The suggested changes in the national diet are large enough to be meaningful, yet would not disrupt agricultural or trade policies if implemented over the next decade. Furthermore, the methods used to assess the recommended intakes of nutrients are flexible enough to be used both for planning and prescribing diets and for evaluating results of dietary surveys or histories. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.1.6162.527 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1598101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25431275</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25431275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-156fd389cee8451521a9fe22a59e5201c3e7399d8542ac51a177c52a7e4c3723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhkNR61J761ULA4WCFzPm5HPmplCXVqX1o1DqZchmz7RZdydrkhX7780yZVFvvArheXJ4T15CXgNtALh6O1stGmgUKNZIpvfIBIRqa9ly_oxMKKW6BiH0S3KY0qJcGddtp8Q-eSGEaDWdkNOvEZOLfp19GKo-xMpWM8wZY_Uu-uzTQzX3mF-R571dJjx8Og_I7eXF7fRDff3l_cfp-XU9k1TlGqTq57ztHGIrJEgGtuuRMSs7lIyC46h5181bKZh1Eixo7SSzGoXjmvEDcjaOXW9mK5w7HHK0S7OOfmXjownWm7_J4B_MffhpQHYtUCgDTp8GxPBjgymblU8Ol0s7YNgko4VUimpaxJN_xEXYxKHsZkomxcu3CV2sZrRcDClF7HdRgJptAaYUYMBsCzClgPLg6M8Fdvr43QUfj3iRcog7yqTgwLQsvB65Txl_7biN343SXEvz-W5qvl3dqJtP7MpcFv_N6G9j_Cfab7U-pOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776314447</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prescription for a better British diet</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Passmore, R ; Hollingsworth, D F ; Robertson, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Passmore, R ; Hollingsworth, D F ; Robertson, J</creatorcontrib><description>A new approach to establishing an upper or prescriptive level of recommended intakes of nutrients was devised for use in Britain. It was based on present food supplies in the UK, and the following measures were proposed to improve the national diet: moderate reductions in intakes of fat, sugar, meat, and alcohol; increased intakes of cereals, potatoes, and other vegetables and fruit; while intakes of milk and eggs and fish, pulses, and nuts were to remain unchanged. The proportions of food energy derived from protein would be increased, despite reduced meat consumption. Nutrient content of the diet may be expressed in terms of food groups or as nutrient concentrations per energy unit, which is particularly applicable to planning or prescribing diets for individuals or small groups. The suggested changes in the national diet are large enough to be meaningful, yet would not disrupt agricultural or trade policies if implemented over the next decade. Furthermore, the methods used to assess the recommended intakes of nutrients are flexible enough to be used both for planning and prescribing diets and for evaluating results of dietary surveys or histories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1447</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6162.527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 444870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Alcohol drinking ; Diet ; Diet - standards ; Diet Surveys ; Dietary Carbohydrates - standards ; Dietary Fats - standards ; Dietary Proteins - standards ; Feeding Behavior ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food supply ; Humans ; Meats ; Medical Practice ; Nutrient intake ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Nutritional Requirements ; Recommendations ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 1979-02, Vol.1 (6162), p.527-531</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 British Medical Journal</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Feb 24, 1979</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-156fd389cee8451521a9fe22a59e5201c3e7399d8542ac51a177c52a7e4c3723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25431275$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25431275$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/444870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Passmore, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, D F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, J</creatorcontrib><title>Prescription for a better British diet</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>Br Med J</addtitle><description>A new approach to establishing an upper or prescriptive level of recommended intakes of nutrients was devised for use in Britain. It was based on present food supplies in the UK, and the following measures were proposed to improve the national diet: moderate reductions in intakes of fat, sugar, meat, and alcohol; increased intakes of cereals, potatoes, and other vegetables and fruit; while intakes of milk and eggs and fish, pulses, and nuts were to remain unchanged. The proportions of food energy derived from protein would be increased, despite reduced meat consumption. Nutrient content of the diet may be expressed in terms of food groups or as nutrient concentrations per energy unit, which is particularly applicable to planning or prescribing diets for individuals or small groups. The suggested changes in the national diet are large enough to be meaningful, yet would not disrupt agricultural or trade policies if implemented over the next decade. Furthermore, the methods used to assess the recommended intakes of nutrients are flexible enough to be used both for planning and prescribing diets and for evaluating results of dietary surveys or histories.</description><subject>Alcohol drinking</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - standards</subject><subject>Diet Surveys</subject><subject>Dietary Carbohydrates - standards</subject><subject>Dietary Fats - standards</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - standards</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meats</subject><subject>Medical Practice</subject><subject>Nutrient intake</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0007-1447</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhkNR61J761ULA4WCFzPm5HPmplCXVqX1o1DqZchmz7RZdydrkhX7780yZVFvvArheXJ4T15CXgNtALh6O1stGmgUKNZIpvfIBIRqa9ly_oxMKKW6BiH0S3KY0qJcGddtp8Q-eSGEaDWdkNOvEZOLfp19GKo-xMpWM8wZY_Uu-uzTQzX3mF-R571dJjx8Og_I7eXF7fRDff3l_cfp-XU9k1TlGqTq57ztHGIrJEgGtuuRMSs7lIyC46h5181bKZh1Eixo7SSzGoXjmvEDcjaOXW9mK5w7HHK0S7OOfmXjownWm7_J4B_MffhpQHYtUCgDTp8GxPBjgymblU8Ol0s7YNgko4VUimpaxJN_xEXYxKHsZkomxcu3CV2sZrRcDClF7HdRgJptAaYUYMBsCzClgPLg6M8Fdvr43QUfj3iRcog7yqTgwLQsvB65Txl_7biN343SXEvz-W5qvl3dqJtP7MpcFv_N6G9j_Cfab7U-pOU</recordid><startdate>19790224</startdate><enddate>19790224</enddate><creator>Passmore, R</creator><creator>Hollingsworth, D F</creator><creator>Robertson, J</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790224</creationdate><title>Prescription for a better British diet</title><author>Passmore, R ; Hollingsworth, D F ; Robertson, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b506t-156fd389cee8451521a9fe22a59e5201c3e7399d8542ac51a177c52a7e4c3723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Alcohol drinking</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - standards</topic><topic>Diet Surveys</topic><topic>Dietary Carbohydrates - standards</topic><topic>Dietary Fats - standards</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - standards</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meats</topic><topic>Medical Practice</topic><topic>Nutrient intake</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Passmore, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollingsworth, D F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Passmore, R</au><au>Hollingsworth, D F</au><au>Robertson, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prescription for a better British diet</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>Br Med J</addtitle><date>1979-02-24</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>6162</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>527-531</pages><issn>0007-1447</issn><issn>0959-8138</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><abstract>A new approach to establishing an upper or prescriptive level of recommended intakes of nutrients was devised for use in Britain. It was based on present food supplies in the UK, and the following measures were proposed to improve the national diet: moderate reductions in intakes of fat, sugar, meat, and alcohol; increased intakes of cereals, potatoes, and other vegetables and fruit; while intakes of milk and eggs and fish, pulses, and nuts were to remain unchanged. The proportions of food energy derived from protein would be increased, despite reduced meat consumption. Nutrient content of the diet may be expressed in terms of food groups or as nutrient concentrations per energy unit, which is particularly applicable to planning or prescribing diets for individuals or small groups. The suggested changes in the national diet are large enough to be meaningful, yet would not disrupt agricultural or trade policies if implemented over the next decade. Furthermore, the methods used to assess the recommended intakes of nutrients are flexible enough to be used both for planning and prescribing diets and for evaluating results of dietary surveys or histories.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>444870</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.1.6162.527</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1447 |
ispartof | BMJ, 1979-02, Vol.1 (6162), p.527-531 |
issn | 0007-1447 0959-8138 1468-5833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1598101 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR |
subjects | Alcohol drinking Diet Diet - standards Diet Surveys Dietary Carbohydrates - standards Dietary Fats - standards Dietary Proteins - standards Feeding Behavior Food Food consumption Food supply Humans Meats Medical Practice Nutrient intake Nutrients Nutrition Nutritional Requirements Recommendations United Kingdom |
title | Prescription for a better British diet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prescription%20for%20a%20better%20British%20diet&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Passmore,%20R&rft.date=1979-02-24&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=6162&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=527-531&rft.issn=0007-1447&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.1.6162.527&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25431275%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776314447&rft_id=info:pmid/444870&rft_jstor_id=25431275&rfr_iscdi=true |