Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study
Important efforts have been invested in the past few years in the development of quality clinical guidelines. However, the means for the effective dissemination of guidelines to practicing physicians have not been determined. Several studies have examined the possibilities offered by the World Wide...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of medical Internet research 2003-01, Vol.5 (2), p.e12-e12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e12 |
container_title | Journal of medical Internet research |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel Scherer, Frédy Pittet, Valérie Burnand, Bernard Vader, John-Paul |
description | Important efforts have been invested in the past few years in the development of quality clinical guidelines. However, the means for the effective dissemination of guidelines to practicing physicians have not been determined. Several studies have examined the possibilities offered by the World Wide Web (the Web), but studies examining the implementation of clinical guidelines in actual practice are clearly lacking.
This study assessed the potential of the Web to implement clinical practice guidelines in actual clinical settings. It also documents the obstacles perceived by the physicians in their use of guidelines on the Internet to determine the role that the Web can play in the implementation of guidelines in practice.
Two guidelines were developed using a standardized panel method and made available via the Web. One concerned indications for low-back surgery and the other dealt with indications for upper and lower digestive endoscopies. To identify obstacles to their use in clinical practice, 20 physicians were asked to consult the guidelines during consultations with patients. Answers were collected using 3 different questionnaires.
Questionnaires were completed for consultations involving 213 patients. Less than 50% of the physicians have direct access to the Internet in their examination room. For 75%, the use of the guidelines was easy and the time required to consult them acceptable (3.4 minutes on average, or 12% of the time spent with the patient). The fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship was mentioned as a reason for not consulting the guidelines for 27 consultations. Taking into account their experience with the Web, 75% of the physicians considered that the Web has a great or very-great potential for the dissemination of guidelines and 78% indicated that they would use such guidelines if they became generally available for clinical questions that concerned them. Only 3 physicians had consulted guidelines on the Web prior to this study.
The acceptance of use of clinical practice guidelines via the Web is high. The main limits to further use of such Web-based guidelines seem to be the lack of a computer connection in the physician's office or examining room and the fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship. Though most participants appreciate the considerable potential of the Web for disseminating guidelines, only a small handful regularly use guid |
doi_str_mv | 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e12 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1550559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17430308</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cc4d0a31323f105a205309adb782e0328a2609d41b5535759315abf5f569d3353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMoPlZvniUgeHLXPDpt6kEQ8QWCFxe9hTRNNUvarEkr7H9vdBdfF08zzPz4-GY-hPYpmTBa5iez1oYJTNjEULaGtmnGxViIgq7_6LfQTowzQhjJSrqJtigTUOS52EZP02iwb3D_YvCjD67Gj7ZOralw77Ft5860puuxdrazWjk8D0r3Vhv8PCQwTU08xQo3RkVbWWf7BY79UC920UajXDR7qzpC06vLh4ub8d399e3F-d1YZ7zsx1pnNVGccsYbSkAxApyUqq4KwQzhTCiWk7LOaAXAoYCSU1BVAw3kZc058BE6W-rOh6o1tU5mg3JyHmyrwkJ6ZeXvTWdf5LN_kxSAQNIboaOVQPCvg4m9bG3UxjnVGT9EWfAMRAH0X5AWGSeciAQe_gFnfghd-oJkQLM8nfZp_HhJ6eBjDKb58kyJ_EhWfiQrQTKZkk34wc87v-FVlPwdzAKfHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2514678235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel ; Scherer, Frédy ; Pittet, Valérie ; Burnand, Bernard ; Vader, John-Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel ; Scherer, Frédy ; Pittet, Valérie ; Burnand, Bernard ; Vader, John-Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Important efforts have been invested in the past few years in the development of quality clinical guidelines. However, the means for the effective dissemination of guidelines to practicing physicians have not been determined. Several studies have examined the possibilities offered by the World Wide Web (the Web), but studies examining the implementation of clinical guidelines in actual practice are clearly lacking.
This study assessed the potential of the Web to implement clinical practice guidelines in actual clinical settings. It also documents the obstacles perceived by the physicians in their use of guidelines on the Internet to determine the role that the Web can play in the implementation of guidelines in practice.
Two guidelines were developed using a standardized panel method and made available via the Web. One concerned indications for low-back surgery and the other dealt with indications for upper and lower digestive endoscopies. To identify obstacles to their use in clinical practice, 20 physicians were asked to consult the guidelines during consultations with patients. Answers were collected using 3 different questionnaires.
Questionnaires were completed for consultations involving 213 patients. Less than 50% of the physicians have direct access to the Internet in their examination room. For 75%, the use of the guidelines was easy and the time required to consult them acceptable (3.4 minutes on average, or 12% of the time spent with the patient). The fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship was mentioned as a reason for not consulting the guidelines for 27 consultations. Taking into account their experience with the Web, 75% of the physicians considered that the Web has a great or very-great potential for the dissemination of guidelines and 78% indicated that they would use such guidelines if they became generally available for clinical questions that concerned them. Only 3 physicians had consulted guidelines on the Web prior to this study.
The acceptance of use of clinical practice guidelines via the Web is high. The main limits to further use of such Web-based guidelines seem to be the lack of a computer connection in the physician's office or examining room and the fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship. Though most participants appreciate the considerable potential of the Web for disseminating guidelines, only a small handful regularly use guidelines available on the Web. There are still numerous obstacles to the regular use of guidelines in clinical practice, some related to the physicians, others to the guidelines themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12857668</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor</publisher><subject>Back surgery ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Dissemination ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - standards ; Evidence-based medicine ; Family physicians ; Fear & phobias ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Humans ; Internet ; Internet access ; Laminectomy - standards ; Low Back Pain - surgery ; Lumbosacral Region - surgery ; Original Paper ; Patients ; Physician patient relationships ; Physicians ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Quality of Health Care - trends ; Questionnaires ; Response rates ; Surgery ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; World Wide Web</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical Internet research, 2003-01, Vol.5 (2), p.e12-e12</ispartof><rights>Copyright Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor 2003</rights><rights>Jean-Gabriel Jeannot, Frédy Scherer, Valérie Pittet, Bernard Burnand, John-Paul Vader. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 13.6.2003. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included. 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cc4d0a31323f105a205309adb782e0328a2609d41b5535759315abf5f569d3353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cc4d0a31323f105a205309adb782e0328a2609d41b5535759315abf5f569d3353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550559/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550559/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,12825,27901,27902,30976,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12857668$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Frédy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittet, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnand, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, John-Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study</title><title>Journal of medical Internet research</title><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><description>Important efforts have been invested in the past few years in the development of quality clinical guidelines. However, the means for the effective dissemination of guidelines to practicing physicians have not been determined. Several studies have examined the possibilities offered by the World Wide Web (the Web), but studies examining the implementation of clinical guidelines in actual practice are clearly lacking.
This study assessed the potential of the Web to implement clinical practice guidelines in actual clinical settings. It also documents the obstacles perceived by the physicians in their use of guidelines on the Internet to determine the role that the Web can play in the implementation of guidelines in practice.
Two guidelines were developed using a standardized panel method and made available via the Web. One concerned indications for low-back surgery and the other dealt with indications for upper and lower digestive endoscopies. To identify obstacles to their use in clinical practice, 20 physicians were asked to consult the guidelines during consultations with patients. Answers were collected using 3 different questionnaires.
Questionnaires were completed for consultations involving 213 patients. Less than 50% of the physicians have direct access to the Internet in their examination room. For 75%, the use of the guidelines was easy and the time required to consult them acceptable (3.4 minutes on average, or 12% of the time spent with the patient). The fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship was mentioned as a reason for not consulting the guidelines for 27 consultations. Taking into account their experience with the Web, 75% of the physicians considered that the Web has a great or very-great potential for the dissemination of guidelines and 78% indicated that they would use such guidelines if they became generally available for clinical questions that concerned them. Only 3 physicians had consulted guidelines on the Web prior to this study.
The acceptance of use of clinical practice guidelines via the Web is high. The main limits to further use of such Web-based guidelines seem to be the lack of a computer connection in the physician's office or examining room and the fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship. Though most participants appreciate the considerable potential of the Web for disseminating guidelines, only a small handful regularly use guidelines available on the Web. There are still numerous obstacles to the regular use of guidelines in clinical practice, some related to the physicians, others to the guidelines themselves.</description><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Dissemination</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - standards</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Fear & phobias</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet access</subject><subject>Laminectomy - standards</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - surgery</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - surgery</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physician patient relationships</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - trends</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>World Wide Web</subject><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1438-8871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctLxDAQxoMoPlZvniUgeHLXPDpt6kEQ8QWCFxe9hTRNNUvarEkr7H9vdBdfF08zzPz4-GY-hPYpmTBa5iez1oYJTNjEULaGtmnGxViIgq7_6LfQTowzQhjJSrqJtigTUOS52EZP02iwb3D_YvCjD67Gj7ZOralw77Ft5860puuxdrazWjk8D0r3Vhv8PCQwTU08xQo3RkVbWWf7BY79UC920UajXDR7qzpC06vLh4ub8d399e3F-d1YZ7zsx1pnNVGccsYbSkAxApyUqq4KwQzhTCiWk7LOaAXAoYCSU1BVAw3kZc058BE6W-rOh6o1tU5mg3JyHmyrwkJ6ZeXvTWdf5LN_kxSAQNIboaOVQPCvg4m9bG3UxjnVGT9EWfAMRAH0X5AWGSeciAQe_gFnfghd-oJkQLM8nfZp_HhJ6eBjDKb58kyJ_EhWfiQrQTKZkk34wc87v-FVlPwdzAKfHA</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel</creator><creator>Scherer, Frédy</creator><creator>Pittet, Valérie</creator><creator>Burnand, Bernard</creator><creator>Vader, John-Paul</creator><general>Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor</general><general>Gunther Eysenbach</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study</title><author>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel ; Scherer, Frédy ; Pittet, Valérie ; Burnand, Bernard ; Vader, John-Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-cc4d0a31323f105a205309adb782e0328a2609d41b5535759315abf5f569d3353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Dissemination</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - standards</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Fear & phobias</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet access</topic><topic>Laminectomy - standards</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - surgery</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - surgery</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physician patient relationships</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - trends</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>World Wide Web</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherer, Frédy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pittet, Valérie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burnand, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vader, John-Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeannot, Jean-Gabriel</au><au>Scherer, Frédy</au><au>Pittet, Valérie</au><au>Burnand, Bernard</au><au>Vader, John-Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e12</spage><epage>e12</epage><pages>e12-e12</pages><issn>1438-8871</issn><eissn>1438-8871</eissn><abstract>Important efforts have been invested in the past few years in the development of quality clinical guidelines. However, the means for the effective dissemination of guidelines to practicing physicians have not been determined. Several studies have examined the possibilities offered by the World Wide Web (the Web), but studies examining the implementation of clinical guidelines in actual practice are clearly lacking.
This study assessed the potential of the Web to implement clinical practice guidelines in actual clinical settings. It also documents the obstacles perceived by the physicians in their use of guidelines on the Internet to determine the role that the Web can play in the implementation of guidelines in practice.
Two guidelines were developed using a standardized panel method and made available via the Web. One concerned indications for low-back surgery and the other dealt with indications for upper and lower digestive endoscopies. To identify obstacles to their use in clinical practice, 20 physicians were asked to consult the guidelines during consultations with patients. Answers were collected using 3 different questionnaires.
Questionnaires were completed for consultations involving 213 patients. Less than 50% of the physicians have direct access to the Internet in their examination room. For 75%, the use of the guidelines was easy and the time required to consult them acceptable (3.4 minutes on average, or 12% of the time spent with the patient). The fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship was mentioned as a reason for not consulting the guidelines for 27 consultations. Taking into account their experience with the Web, 75% of the physicians considered that the Web has a great or very-great potential for the dissemination of guidelines and 78% indicated that they would use such guidelines if they became generally available for clinical questions that concerned them. Only 3 physicians had consulted guidelines on the Web prior to this study.
The acceptance of use of clinical practice guidelines via the Web is high. The main limits to further use of such Web-based guidelines seem to be the lack of a computer connection in the physician's office or examining room and the fear that use of such guidelines might interfere with the physician-patient relationship. Though most participants appreciate the considerable potential of the Web for disseminating guidelines, only a small handful regularly use guidelines available on the Web. There are still numerous obstacles to the regular use of guidelines in clinical practice, some related to the physicians, others to the guidelines themselves.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor</pub><pmid>12857668</pmid><doi>10.2196/jmir.5.2.e12</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1438-8871 |
ispartof | Journal of medical Internet research, 2003-01, Vol.5 (2), p.e12-e12 |
issn | 1438-8871 1438-8871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1550559 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Back surgery Clinical medicine Clinical practice guidelines Decision Support Systems, Clinical Dissemination Endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - standards Evidence-based medicine Family physicians Fear & phobias Feasibility Feasibility Studies Humans Internet Internet access Laminectomy - standards Low Back Pain - surgery Lumbosacral Region - surgery Original Paper Patients Physician patient relationships Physicians Practice Guidelines as Topic Quality of Health Care - trends Questionnaires Response rates Surgery Surveys and Questionnaires World Wide Web |
title | Use of the World Wide Web to implement clinical practice guidelines: a feasibility study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A07%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20the%20World%20Wide%20Web%20to%20implement%20clinical%20practice%20guidelines:%20a%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20Internet%20research&rft.au=Jeannot,%20Jean-Gabriel&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e12&rft.epage=e12&rft.pages=e12-e12&rft.issn=1438-8871&rft.eissn=1438-8871&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/jmir.5.2.e12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E17430308%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2514678235&rft_id=info:pmid/12857668&rfr_iscdi=true |