Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of standard treatment with and without the addition of ward based non-invasive ventilation in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ 2003-05, Vol.326 (7396), p.956-959 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 959 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7396 |
container_start_page | 956 |
container_title | BMJ |
container_volume | 326 |
creator | Plant, P K Owen, J L Parrott, S Elliott, M W |
description | Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of standard treatment with and without the addition of ward based non-invasive ventilation in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Setting: Medical wards in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: The trial comprised 236 patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis (pH 7.25-7.35) secondary to respiratory failure. The economic analysis compared the costs of treatment that these patients received after randomisation. Main outcome measure: Incremental cost per in-hospital death. Results: 24/118 died in the group receiving standard treatment and 12/118 in the group receiving non-invasive ventilation (P=0.05). Allocation to the group receiving non-invasive ventilation was associated with a reduction in costs of £49 362 ($78 741; €73 109), mainly through reduced use of intensive care units. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was −£645 per death avoided (95% confidence interval −£2310 to £386), indicating a dominant (more effective and less costly) strategy. Modelling of these data indicates that a typical UK hospital providing a non-invasive ventilation service will avoid six deaths and three to nine admissions to intensive care units per year, with an associated cost reduction of £12 000–53 000 per year. Conclusions: Non-invasive ventilation is a highly cost effective treatment that both reduced total costs and improved mortality in hospital. What is already known on this topic Non-invasive ventilation reduces the need for intubation and mortality in hospital in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure The procedure is feasible in the ward or intensive care environment What this study adds Non-invasive ventilation given on wards reduces the need for intubation by 44% and halves mortality in hospital in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis The early use of non-invasive ventilation on the ward reduces costs and improves outcomes compared with traditional medical treatment The main cost saving is in preventing the use of intensive care facilities |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.956 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_153850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25454353</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25454353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b635t-7f896cb15933d672f730d9eecfd2081c9c11ae7fe2e8e5cf24e684303ce02f713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEolXpng3IAgELlMGP2E6QWKART1WAREHsLMe5oR4y8WAnQ_uf-JHczIymgARdxfL5zn04J8tuMzpjTKgn9XIxE1zNtKjUrJLqWnbIClXmshTienZIK1nlJRPlQXac0oJSyoUuKyVvZgeMa6610ofZz3lIA4G2BTf4NfSQEgkt-WFjQ2qboCF96HPfr21CmSAx-M4OPvSkDZFYNw5A4Nw6iPXmemN3ZzH03pFQpyGOm8pkNXbL0Nt4QRqfAEs_JeBCH5bI2d52F8lvvNH2DV5OrVEeYug6PA7R2-5WdqO1XYLj3fco-_Tyxen8dX7y_tWb-fOTvFZCDrlucU1XM1kJ0SjNWy1oUwG4tuG0ZK5yjFnQLXAoQbqWF6DKQlDhgCLMxFH2bFt3NdZLaBwuHW1nVtEvcX4TrDd_Kr0_M1_D2jApSknR_2jnj-H7CGkwuI-DrrM9hDEZrQpWUkmnTg__TwrOlWbqSlBqTmlZFAje-wtchDHi-ybDqag0k3wa8P6_IKYxGIxqPpWiW8rFkFKEdv8CjJopggYjaDCCZoqgwQii5e7vL3dp2AUOgQc7wCZnuxb_tvPpkitw2YJx5O5suUUaQtzrXBayEFKgnm91nwY43-s2fjPYRUvz7vPcfDiV5Rf5UZq3yD_e8tPIV67xC9KiDys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777610724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Plant, P K ; Owen, J L ; Parrott, S ; Elliott, M W</creator><creatorcontrib>Plant, P K ; Owen, J L ; Parrott, S ; Elliott, M W</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of standard treatment with and without the addition of ward based non-invasive ventilation in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Setting: Medical wards in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: The trial comprised 236 patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis (pH 7.25-7.35) secondary to respiratory failure. The economic analysis compared the costs of treatment that these patients received after randomisation. Main outcome measure: Incremental cost per in-hospital death. Results: 24/118 died in the group receiving standard treatment and 12/118 in the group receiving non-invasive ventilation (P=0.05). Allocation to the group receiving non-invasive ventilation was associated with a reduction in costs of £49 362 ($78 741; €73 109), mainly through reduced use of intensive care units. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was −£645 per death avoided (95% confidence interval −£2310 to £386), indicating a dominant (more effective and less costly) strategy. Modelling of these data indicates that a typical UK hospital providing a non-invasive ventilation service will avoid six deaths and three to nine admissions to intensive care units per year, with an associated cost reduction of £12 000–53 000 per year. Conclusions: Non-invasive ventilation is a highly cost effective treatment that both reduced total costs and improved mortality in hospital. What is already known on this topic Non-invasive ventilation reduces the need for intubation and mortality in hospital in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure The procedure is feasible in the ward or intensive care environment What this study adds Non-invasive ventilation given on wards reduces the need for intubation by 44% and halves mortality in hospital in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis The early use of non-invasive ventilation on the ward reduces costs and improves outcomes compared with traditional medical treatment The main cost saving is in preventing the use of intensive care facilities</description><edition>International edition</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8146</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0959-535X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7396.956</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12727767</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BMJOAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiovascular disease ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma ; Clinical trials ; Cost control ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost effectiveness analysis ; Cost efficiency ; Cost savings ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Critical Care - economics ; Hospital Costs ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospital units ; Hospitalization - economics ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Intensive care units ; Intubation ; Medical sciences ; Mortality ; Nursing ; Patients ; Pharmacy ; Pneumology ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy ; Randomized controlled trials ; Respiration, Artificial - economics ; Statistical analysis ; Treatment ; Treatment Outcome ; Unit costs ; United Kingdom ; Ventilation ; Ventilation systems</subject><ispartof>BMJ, 2003-05, Vol.326 (7396), p.956-959</ispartof><rights>2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright: 2003 (c) 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group May 3, 2003</rights><rights>Copyright © 2003, BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b635t-7f896cb15933d672f730d9eecfd2081c9c11ae7fe2e8e5cf24e684303ce02f713</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25454353$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25454353$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,799,881,27901,27902,30976,30977,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14716412$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12727767$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plant, P K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, M W</creatorcontrib><title>Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial</title><title>BMJ</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of standard treatment with and without the addition of ward based non-invasive ventilation in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Setting: Medical wards in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: The trial comprised 236 patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis (pH 7.25-7.35) secondary to respiratory failure. The economic analysis compared the costs of treatment that these patients received after randomisation. Main outcome measure: Incremental cost per in-hospital death. Results: 24/118 died in the group receiving standard treatment and 12/118 in the group receiving non-invasive ventilation (P=0.05). Allocation to the group receiving non-invasive ventilation was associated with a reduction in costs of £49 362 ($78 741; €73 109), mainly through reduced use of intensive care units. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was −£645 per death avoided (95% confidence interval −£2310 to £386), indicating a dominant (more effective and less costly) strategy. Modelling of these data indicates that a typical UK hospital providing a non-invasive ventilation service will avoid six deaths and three to nine admissions to intensive care units per year, with an associated cost reduction of £12 000–53 000 per year. Conclusions: Non-invasive ventilation is a highly cost effective treatment that both reduced total costs and improved mortality in hospital. What is already known on this topic Non-invasive ventilation reduces the need for intubation and mortality in hospital in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure The procedure is feasible in the ward or intensive care environment What this study adds Non-invasive ventilation given on wards reduces the need for intubation by 44% and halves mortality in hospital in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis The early use of non-invasive ventilation on the ward reduces costs and improves outcomes compared with traditional medical treatment The main cost saving is in preventing the use of intensive care facilities</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Cost savings</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care - economics</subject><subject>Hospital Costs</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospital units</subject><subject>Hospitalization - economics</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive care units</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - economics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Unit costs</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation systems</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>0959-535X</issn><issn>1468-5833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkktv1DAUhSMEolXpng3IAgELlMGP2E6QWKART1WAREHsLMe5oR4y8WAnQ_uf-JHczIymgARdxfL5zn04J8tuMzpjTKgn9XIxE1zNtKjUrJLqWnbIClXmshTienZIK1nlJRPlQXac0oJSyoUuKyVvZgeMa6610ofZz3lIA4G2BTf4NfSQEgkt-WFjQ2qboCF96HPfr21CmSAx-M4OPvSkDZFYNw5A4Nw6iPXmemN3ZzH03pFQpyGOm8pkNXbL0Nt4QRqfAEs_JeBCH5bI2d52F8lvvNH2DV5OrVEeYug6PA7R2-5WdqO1XYLj3fco-_Tyxen8dX7y_tWb-fOTvFZCDrlucU1XM1kJ0SjNWy1oUwG4tuG0ZK5yjFnQLXAoQbqWF6DKQlDhgCLMxFH2bFt3NdZLaBwuHW1nVtEvcX4TrDd_Kr0_M1_D2jApSknR_2jnj-H7CGkwuI-DrrM9hDEZrQpWUkmnTg__TwrOlWbqSlBqTmlZFAje-wtchDHi-ybDqag0k3wa8P6_IKYxGIxqPpWiW8rFkFKEdv8CjJopggYjaDCCZoqgwQii5e7vL3dp2AUOgQc7wCZnuxb_tvPpkitw2YJx5O5suUUaQtzrXBayEFKgnm91nwY43-s2fjPYRUvz7vPcfDiV5Rf5UZq3yD_e8tPIV67xC9KiDys</recordid><startdate>20030503</startdate><enddate>20030503</enddate><creator>Plant, P K</creator><creator>Owen, J L</creator><creator>Parrott, S</creator><creator>Elliott, M W</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030503</creationdate><title>Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial</title><author>Plant, P K ; Owen, J L ; Parrott, S ; Elliott, M W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b635t-7f896cb15933d672f730d9eecfd2081c9c11ae7fe2e8e5cf24e684303ce02f713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Cost savings</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care - economics</topic><topic>Hospital Costs</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospital units</topic><topic>Hospitalization - economics</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive care units</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - economics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Unit costs</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plant, P K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, M W</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plant, P K</au><au>Owen, J L</au><au>Parrott, S</au><au>Elliott, M W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMJ</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2003-05-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>326</volume><issue>7396</issue><spage>956</spage><epage>959</epage><pages>956-959</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>0959-8146</issn><issn>0959-535X</issn><eissn>1468-5833</eissn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><coden>BMJOAE</coden><abstract>Abstract Objective: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of standard treatment with and without the addition of ward based non-invasive ventilation in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: Incremental cost effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Setting: Medical wards in 14 hospitals in the United Kingdom. Participants: The trial comprised 236 patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis (pH 7.25-7.35) secondary to respiratory failure. The economic analysis compared the costs of treatment that these patients received after randomisation. Main outcome measure: Incremental cost per in-hospital death. Results: 24/118 died in the group receiving standard treatment and 12/118 in the group receiving non-invasive ventilation (P=0.05). Allocation to the group receiving non-invasive ventilation was associated with a reduction in costs of £49 362 ($78 741; €73 109), mainly through reduced use of intensive care units. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was −£645 per death avoided (95% confidence interval −£2310 to £386), indicating a dominant (more effective and less costly) strategy. Modelling of these data indicates that a typical UK hospital providing a non-invasive ventilation service will avoid six deaths and three to nine admissions to intensive care units per year, with an associated cost reduction of £12 000–53 000 per year. Conclusions: Non-invasive ventilation is a highly cost effective treatment that both reduced total costs and improved mortality in hospital. What is already known on this topic Non-invasive ventilation reduces the need for intubation and mortality in hospital in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure The procedure is feasible in the ward or intensive care environment What this study adds Non-invasive ventilation given on wards reduces the need for intubation by 44% and halves mortality in hospital in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild to moderate acidosis The early use of non-invasive ventilation on the ward reduces costs and improves outcomes compared with traditional medical treatment The main cost saving is in preventing the use of intensive care facilities</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><pmid>12727767</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmj.326.7396.956</doi><tpages>4</tpages><edition>International edition</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ, 2003-05, Vol.326 (7396), p.956-959 |
issn | 0959-8138 0959-8146 0959-535X 1468-5833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_153850 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acute Disease Biological and medical sciences Cardiovascular disease Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma Clinical trials Cost control Cost effectiveness Cost effectiveness analysis Cost efficiency Cost savings Cost-Benefit Analysis Critical Care - economics Hospital Costs Hospital Mortality Hospital units Hospitalization - economics Hospitals Humans Intensive care Intensive care units Intubation Medical sciences Mortality Nursing Patients Pharmacy Pneumology Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - economics Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - therapy Randomized controlled trials Respiration, Artificial - economics Statistical analysis Treatment Treatment Outcome Unit costs United Kingdom Ventilation Ventilation systems |
title | Cost effectiveness of ward based non-invasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: economic analysis of randomised controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A59%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20effectiveness%20of%20ward%20based%20non-invasive%20ventilation%20for%20acute%20exacerbations%20of%20chronic%20obstructive%20pulmonary%20disease:%20economic%20analysis%20of%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMJ&rft.au=Plant,%20P%20K&rft.date=2003-05-03&rft.volume=326&rft.issue=7396&rft.spage=956&rft.epage=959&rft.pages=956-959&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1468-5833&rft.coden=BMJOAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.326.7396.956&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25454353%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777610724&rft_id=info:pmid/12727767&rft_jstor_id=25454353&rfr_iscdi=true |