In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes
SUMMARY Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental immunology 1990-10, Vol.82 (1), p.151-156 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 156 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | Clinical and experimental immunology |
container_volume | 82 |
creator | FLEXMAN, J.P. MANNING, L.S. ROBINSON, B.W.S. |
description | SUMMARY
Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P < 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1535147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15906491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVks1uEzEQx1cIVNLCIyBZSHBqgu31frgHJBQViFSJC5wtxzvbOPXawfaG7o1H4Cl4MJ4Em4YUTghfxvb8Zv5jzxTFc4IXJK1X2wUp62pOKeMLwjlexDWuGOGL2wfF7Oh6WMwwxnzOCWaPi9MQtulY1zU9KU4oxW3T8lnxfWXRXu8dWjsXorbXyPXIjMlaGUcvDbrRxoBH0nbITMNu4260hR9fv0kV9V5G6H4TCoxBv251nNB6QtpG8AbGFJB4eoGUG3bS6-BsVglTiDBodZ5BL3eJzHpZSNuNNDLqBHo3RghPike9NAGeHuxZ8ent5cfl-_nVh3er5ZuruWIYk3nDoe45Tdse9xgY7-W6qqnCHa9qwEBkLZtayaajvG84bTFwCrgjXSWBSV6eFa_v8u7G9QCdglyZETuvB-kn4aQWf3us3ohrtxekKivCmpTg5SGBd59HCFEMOuSfkRbcGESLMS1ZS_4JkorjmvEMXtyByrsQPPTHaggWeRzEVuSei9xzkcdBHMZB3KbgZ3--5xh66H_yvzj4ZVDS9F5apcO9AmesLSt2_y9ftIHpPyoQy8sVqUj5E-QD2cI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15906491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>FLEXMAN, J.P. ; MANNING, L.S. ; ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>FLEXMAN, J.P. ; MANNING, L.S. ; ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY
Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P < 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P<0.05 versus controls for both). Surprisingly, inhaled IL‐2 suppressed both splenic and lung NK cell activity (84.8% and 78 ± 10% suppression, respectively, P<0.05). LAK cell activity was also enhanced in the lung by 1.8‐8‐fold in response to i.v., i.p. and intrapleural IL‐2, whereas inhaled IL‐2 was ineffective in generating LAK cell activity. These results suggest that the systemic and intrapleural administration of IL‐2 effectively boost pulmonary NK and LAK activity whereas inhalation of IL‐2 does not. Thus, in clinical situations where boosting of local lung NK or LAK cell activity is desired, these routes of IL‐2 administration may be effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2208789</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEXIAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects ; Drug Administration Routes ; Female ; Immunomodulators ; inhalation ; Interleukin-2 - administration & dosage ; Interleukin-2 - pharmacology ; intrapleural ; Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects ; Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology ; Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects ; Killer Cells, Natural - immunology ; Lung - drug effects ; Lung - immunology ; Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects ; lymphokine‐activated killer cells ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred CBA ; natural killer cells ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Spleen - cytology ; Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental immunology, 1990-10, Vol.82 (1), p.151-156</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1535147/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1535147/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19448354$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2208789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FLEXMAN, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNING, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</title><title>Clinical and experimental immunology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Immunol</addtitle><description>SUMMARY
Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P < 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P<0.05 versus controls for both). Surprisingly, inhaled IL‐2 suppressed both splenic and lung NK cell activity (84.8% and 78 ± 10% suppression, respectively, P<0.05). LAK cell activity was also enhanced in the lung by 1.8‐8‐fold in response to i.v., i.p. and intrapleural IL‐2, whereas inhaled IL‐2 was ineffective in generating LAK cell activity. These results suggest that the systemic and intrapleural administration of IL‐2 effectively boost pulmonary NK and LAK activity whereas inhalation of IL‐2 does not. Thus, in clinical situations where boosting of local lung NK or LAK cell activity is desired, these routes of IL‐2 administration may be effective.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Immunomodulators</subject><subject>inhalation</subject><subject>Interleukin-2 - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Interleukin-2 - pharmacology</subject><subject>intrapleural</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Natural - immunology</subject><subject>Lung - drug effects</subject><subject>Lung - immunology</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects</subject><subject>lymphokine‐activated killer cells</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred CBA</subject><subject>natural killer cells</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Spleen - cytology</subject><subject>Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology</subject><issn>0009-9104</issn><issn>1365-2249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVks1uEzEQx1cIVNLCIyBZSHBqgu31frgHJBQViFSJC5wtxzvbOPXawfaG7o1H4Cl4MJ4Em4YUTghfxvb8Zv5jzxTFc4IXJK1X2wUp62pOKeMLwjlexDWuGOGL2wfF7Oh6WMwwxnzOCWaPi9MQtulY1zU9KU4oxW3T8lnxfWXRXu8dWjsXorbXyPXIjMlaGUcvDbrRxoBH0nbITMNu4260hR9fv0kV9V5G6H4TCoxBv251nNB6QtpG8AbGFJB4eoGUG3bS6-BsVglTiDBodZ5BL3eJzHpZSNuNNDLqBHo3RghPike9NAGeHuxZ8ent5cfl-_nVh3er5ZuruWIYk3nDoe45Tdse9xgY7-W6qqnCHa9qwEBkLZtayaajvG84bTFwCrgjXSWBSV6eFa_v8u7G9QCdglyZETuvB-kn4aQWf3us3ohrtxekKivCmpTg5SGBd59HCFEMOuSfkRbcGESLMS1ZS_4JkorjmvEMXtyByrsQPPTHaggWeRzEVuSei9xzkcdBHMZB3KbgZ3--5xh66H_yvzj4ZVDS9F5apcO9AmesLSt2_y9ftIHpPyoQy8sVqUj5E-QD2cI</recordid><startdate>199010</startdate><enddate>199010</enddate><creator>FLEXMAN, J.P.</creator><creator>MANNING, L.S.</creator><creator>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199010</creationdate><title>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</title><author>FLEXMAN, J.P. ; MANNING, L.S. ; ROBINSON, B.W.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Immunomodulators</topic><topic>inhalation</topic><topic>Interleukin-2 - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Interleukin-2 - pharmacology</topic><topic>intrapleural</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Natural - immunology</topic><topic>Lung - drug effects</topic><topic>Lung - immunology</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects</topic><topic>lymphokine‐activated killer cells</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred CBA</topic><topic>natural killer cells</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Spleen - cytology</topic><topic>Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FLEXMAN, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNING, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FLEXMAN, J.P.</au><au>MANNING, L.S.</au><au>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Immunol</addtitle><date>1990-10</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>151-156</pages><issn>0009-9104</issn><eissn>1365-2249</eissn><coden>CEXIAL</coden><abstract>SUMMARY
Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P < 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P<0.05 versus controls for both). Surprisingly, inhaled IL‐2 suppressed both splenic and lung NK cell activity (84.8% and 78 ± 10% suppression, respectively, P<0.05). LAK cell activity was also enhanced in the lung by 1.8‐8‐fold in response to i.v., i.p. and intrapleural IL‐2, whereas inhaled IL‐2 was ineffective in generating LAK cell activity. These results suggest that the systemic and intrapleural administration of IL‐2 effectively boost pulmonary NK and LAK activity whereas inhalation of IL‐2 does not. Thus, in clinical situations where boosting of local lung NK or LAK cell activity is desired, these routes of IL‐2 administration may be effective.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2208789</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9104 |
ispartof | Clinical and experimental immunology, 1990-10, Vol.82 (1), p.151-156 |
issn | 0009-9104 1365-2249 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1535147 |
source | PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects Drug Administration Routes Female Immunomodulators inhalation Interleukin-2 - administration & dosage Interleukin-2 - pharmacology intrapleural Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects Killer Cells, Natural - immunology Lung - drug effects Lung - immunology Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects lymphokine‐activated killer cells Medical sciences Mice Mice, Inbred CBA natural killer cells Pharmacology. Drug treatments Spleen - cytology Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology |
title | In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20boosting%20of%20lung%20natural%20killer%20and%20lymphokine%E2%80%90activated%20killer%20cell%20activity%20by%20interleukin%E2%80%902:%20comparison%20of%20systemic,%20intrapleural%20and%20inhalation%20routes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20immunology&rft.au=FLEXMAN,%20J.P.&rft.date=1990-10&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=151-156&rft.issn=0009-9104&rft.eissn=1365-2249&rft.coden=CEXIAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15906491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15906491&rft_id=info:pmid/2208789&rfr_iscdi=true |