In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes

SUMMARY Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental immunology 1990-10, Vol.82 (1), p.151-156
Hauptverfasser: FLEXMAN, J.P., MANNING, L.S., ROBINSON, B.W.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue 1
container_start_page 151
container_title Clinical and experimental immunology
container_volume 82
creator FLEXMAN, J.P.
MANNING, L.S.
ROBINSON, B.W.S.
description SUMMARY Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P < 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1535147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15906491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVks1uEzEQx1cIVNLCIyBZSHBqgu31frgHJBQViFSJC5wtxzvbOPXawfaG7o1H4Cl4MJ4Em4YUTghfxvb8Zv5jzxTFc4IXJK1X2wUp62pOKeMLwjlexDWuGOGL2wfF7Oh6WMwwxnzOCWaPi9MQtulY1zU9KU4oxW3T8lnxfWXRXu8dWjsXorbXyPXIjMlaGUcvDbrRxoBH0nbITMNu4260hR9fv0kV9V5G6H4TCoxBv251nNB6QtpG8AbGFJB4eoGUG3bS6-BsVglTiDBodZ5BL3eJzHpZSNuNNDLqBHo3RghPike9NAGeHuxZ8ent5cfl-_nVh3er5ZuruWIYk3nDoe45Tdse9xgY7-W6qqnCHa9qwEBkLZtayaajvG84bTFwCrgjXSWBSV6eFa_v8u7G9QCdglyZETuvB-kn4aQWf3us3ohrtxekKivCmpTg5SGBd59HCFEMOuSfkRbcGESLMS1ZS_4JkorjmvEMXtyByrsQPPTHaggWeRzEVuSei9xzkcdBHMZB3KbgZ3--5xh66H_yvzj4ZVDS9F5apcO9AmesLSt2_y9ftIHpPyoQy8sVqUj5E-QD2cI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15906491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>FLEXMAN, J.P. ; MANNING, L.S. ; ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>FLEXMAN, J.P. ; MANNING, L.S. ; ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P &lt; 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P&lt;0.05 versus controls for both). Surprisingly, inhaled IL‐2 suppressed both splenic and lung NK cell activity (84.8% and 78 ± 10% suppression, respectively, P&lt;0.05). LAK cell activity was also enhanced in the lung by 1.8‐8‐fold in response to i.v., i.p. and intrapleural IL‐2, whereas inhaled IL‐2 was ineffective in generating LAK cell activity. These results suggest that the systemic and intrapleural administration of IL‐2 effectively boost pulmonary NK and LAK activity whereas inhalation of IL‐2 does not. Thus, in clinical situations where boosting of local lung NK or LAK cell activity is desired, these routes of IL‐2 administration may be effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9104</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2208789</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEXIAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects ; Drug Administration Routes ; Female ; Immunomodulators ; inhalation ; Interleukin-2 - administration &amp; dosage ; Interleukin-2 - pharmacology ; intrapleural ; Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects ; Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology ; Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects ; Killer Cells, Natural - immunology ; Lung - drug effects ; Lung - immunology ; Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects ; lymphokine‐activated killer cells ; Medical sciences ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred CBA ; natural killer cells ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Spleen - cytology ; Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental immunology, 1990-10, Vol.82 (1), p.151-156</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1535147/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1535147/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19448354$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2208789$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FLEXMAN, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNING, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</title><title>Clinical and experimental immunology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Immunol</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P &lt; 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P&lt;0.05 versus controls for both). Surprisingly, inhaled IL‐2 suppressed both splenic and lung NK cell activity (84.8% and 78 ± 10% suppression, respectively, P&lt;0.05). LAK cell activity was also enhanced in the lung by 1.8‐8‐fold in response to i.v., i.p. and intrapleural IL‐2, whereas inhaled IL‐2 was ineffective in generating LAK cell activity. These results suggest that the systemic and intrapleural administration of IL‐2 effectively boost pulmonary NK and LAK activity whereas inhalation of IL‐2 does not. Thus, in clinical situations where boosting of local lung NK or LAK cell activity is desired, these routes of IL‐2 administration may be effective.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug Administration Routes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Immunomodulators</subject><subject>inhalation</subject><subject>Interleukin-2 - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Interleukin-2 - pharmacology</subject><subject>intrapleural</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects</subject><subject>Killer Cells, Natural - immunology</subject><subject>Lung - drug effects</subject><subject>Lung - immunology</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects</subject><subject>lymphokine‐activated killer cells</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred CBA</subject><subject>natural killer cells</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Spleen - cytology</subject><subject>Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology</subject><issn>0009-9104</issn><issn>1365-2249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVks1uEzEQx1cIVNLCIyBZSHBqgu31frgHJBQViFSJC5wtxzvbOPXawfaG7o1H4Cl4MJ4Em4YUTghfxvb8Zv5jzxTFc4IXJK1X2wUp62pOKeMLwjlexDWuGOGL2wfF7Oh6WMwwxnzOCWaPi9MQtulY1zU9KU4oxW3T8lnxfWXRXu8dWjsXorbXyPXIjMlaGUcvDbrRxoBH0nbITMNu4260hR9fv0kV9V5G6H4TCoxBv251nNB6QtpG8AbGFJB4eoGUG3bS6-BsVglTiDBodZ5BL3eJzHpZSNuNNDLqBHo3RghPike9NAGeHuxZ8ent5cfl-_nVh3er5ZuruWIYk3nDoe45Tdse9xgY7-W6qqnCHa9qwEBkLZtayaajvG84bTFwCrgjXSWBSV6eFa_v8u7G9QCdglyZETuvB-kn4aQWf3us3ohrtxekKivCmpTg5SGBd59HCFEMOuSfkRbcGESLMS1ZS_4JkorjmvEMXtyByrsQPPTHaggWeRzEVuSei9xzkcdBHMZB3KbgZ3--5xh66H_yvzj4ZVDS9F5apcO9AmesLSt2_y9ftIHpPyoQy8sVqUj5E-QD2cI</recordid><startdate>199010</startdate><enddate>199010</enddate><creator>FLEXMAN, J.P.</creator><creator>MANNING, L.S.</creator><creator>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199010</creationdate><title>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</title><author>FLEXMAN, J.P. ; MANNING, L.S. ; ROBINSON, B.W.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-79e6f92001f0f0e49fab562c0d956e0e1a6a76ca7d29f79280e92e0d1d5ae4a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug Administration Routes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Immunomodulators</topic><topic>inhalation</topic><topic>Interleukin-2 - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Interleukin-2 - pharmacology</topic><topic>intrapleural</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects</topic><topic>Killer Cells, Natural - immunology</topic><topic>Lung - drug effects</topic><topic>Lung - immunology</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects</topic><topic>lymphokine‐activated killer cells</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred CBA</topic><topic>natural killer cells</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Spleen - cytology</topic><topic>Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FLEXMAN, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MANNING, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FLEXMAN, J.P.</au><au>MANNING, L.S.</au><au>ROBINSON, B.W.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Immunol</addtitle><date>1990-10</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>151-156</pages><issn>0009-9104</issn><eissn>1365-2249</eissn><coden>CEXIAL</coden><abstract>SUMMARY Natural killer (NK) cells are thought to play a role in host defence against malignancy and infection, in immunoregulation and as precursor cells in a generation of lymphokine‐activated killer (LAK) cells which can lyse NK‐resistant tumour cells. As the lung is a major site for malignancy and infection and as there are large numbers of lymphoid cells including NK cells in the interstitial compartment of the lung, we evaluated the capacity of interleukin‐2 (1L‐2), a lymphokine capable of augmenting NK activity in vitro, to augment lung NK cell activity in vivo, usingdifferent routes ofIL‐2 administration. We compared both systemic (i.v. and i.p.) and local (intrapleural and inhalation) routes of IL‐2 administration (50000 UJdaily for 5 days) using CBA mice, assessing NK and LAK cell activity in the spleen (systemic) and in the lung. The target cells used for these studies were the YAC‐1 (NK‐sensitive) and P815, NO36 and HA56 (NK‐resistant, LAK‐sensitive) cell lines. Splenic NK activity was increased by 1.4‐1 1.9‐fold for i.v./i.p., respectively, compared with controls with both systemic routes of administration, and lung NK activity was increased 3‐2‐fold and 3‐8‐fold (i.v./i.p, respectively, P &lt; 0.05), to levels which were comparable to systemic (splenic) NK activity following the same therapy. Intrapleural IL‐2 administration similarly enhanced lung NK activity (3‐3‐fold) and splenic NK activity (1.3‐fold; P&lt;0.05 versus controls for both). Surprisingly, inhaled IL‐2 suppressed both splenic and lung NK cell activity (84.8% and 78 ± 10% suppression, respectively, P&lt;0.05). LAK cell activity was also enhanced in the lung by 1.8‐8‐fold in response to i.v., i.p. and intrapleural IL‐2, whereas inhaled IL‐2 was ineffective in generating LAK cell activity. These results suggest that the systemic and intrapleural administration of IL‐2 effectively boost pulmonary NK and LAK activity whereas inhalation of IL‐2 does not. Thus, in clinical situations where boosting of local lung NK or LAK cell activity is desired, these routes of IL‐2 administration may be effective.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2208789</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9104
ispartof Clinical and experimental immunology, 1990-10, Vol.82 (1), p.151-156
issn 0009-9104
1365-2249
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1535147
source PubMed (Medline); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cytotoxicity, Immunologic - drug effects
Drug Administration Routes
Female
Immunomodulators
inhalation
Interleukin-2 - administration & dosage
Interleukin-2 - pharmacology
intrapleural
Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - drug effects
Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated - immunology
Killer Cells, Natural - drug effects
Killer Cells, Natural - immunology
Lung - drug effects
Lung - immunology
Lymphocyte Activation - drug effects
lymphokine‐activated killer cells
Medical sciences
Mice
Mice, Inbred CBA
natural killer cells
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Spleen - cytology
Tumor Cells, Cultured - immunology
title In vivo boosting of lung natural killer and lymphokine‐activated killer cell activity by interleukin‐2: comparison of systemic, intrapleural and inhalation routes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20boosting%20of%20lung%20natural%20killer%20and%20lymphokine%E2%80%90activated%20killer%20cell%20activity%20by%20interleukin%E2%80%902:%20comparison%20of%20systemic,%20intrapleural%20and%20inhalation%20routes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20immunology&rft.au=FLEXMAN,%20J.P.&rft.date=1990-10&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=151-156&rft.issn=0009-9104&rft.eissn=1365-2249&rft.coden=CEXIAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2249.1990.tb05419.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15906491%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15906491&rft_id=info:pmid/2208789&rfr_iscdi=true