Sex Ratio Variation in Iberian Pigs

Within the area of sex allocation, one of the topics that has attracted a lot of attention is the sex ratio problem. Fisher (1930) proposed that equal numbers of males and females have been promoted by natural selection and it has an adaptive significance. But the empirical success of Fisher's...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics (Austin) 2006-06, Vol.173 (2), p.911-917
Hauptverfasser: Toro, M. A, Fernandez, A, Garcia-Cortes, L. A, Rodriganez, J, Silio, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 917
container_issue 2
container_start_page 911
container_title Genetics (Austin)
container_volume 173
creator Toro, M. A
Fernandez, A
Garcia-Cortes, L. A
Rodriganez, J
Silio, L
description Within the area of sex allocation, one of the topics that has attracted a lot of attention is the sex ratio problem. Fisher (1930) proposed that equal numbers of males and females have been promoted by natural selection and it has an adaptive significance. But the empirical success of Fisher's theory remains doubtful because a sex ratio of 0.50 is also expected from the chromosomal mechanism of sex determination. Another way of approaching the subject is to consider that Fisher's argument relies on the underlying assumption that offspring inherit their parent's tendency in biased sex ratio and therefore that genetic variance for this trait exists. Here, we analyzed sex ratio data of 56,807 piglets coming from 550 boars and 1893 dams. In addition to classical analysis of heterogeneity we performed analyses fitting linear and threshold animal models in a Bayesian framework using Gibbs sampling techniques. The marginal posterior mean of heritability was 2.63 x 10(-4) under the sire linear model and 9.17 x 10(-4) under the sire threshold model. The probability of the hypothesis p(h(2) = 0) fitting the last model was 0.996. Also, we did not detect any trend in sex ratio related to maternal age. From an evolutionary point of view, the chromosomal sex determination acts as a constraint that precludes control of offspring sex ratio in vertebrates and it should be included in the general theory of sex allocation. From a practical view that means that the sex ratio in domestic species is hardly susceptible to modification by artificial selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1534/genetics.106.055939
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1526491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19334263</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1295f47234ade2d38cd8b08454c4db219fd2b212d9d2393be4bbc251d4f8fef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1r2zAUhsVYWdNuv2AwzAa9c6ajI8nWTWGUfkGhZQu7FbIlJyqOnUrOsv77KiRt2t7k6ujjOa903peQr0DHIJD_nLrODb6OY6ByTIVQqD6QESiOOZMIH8mIUpC5LBAOyVGM95RSqUT5iRyCFCXjCCPy44_7n_02g--zvyb49aLLfJddVy7tuuzOT-NnctCYNrov23pMJhfnk7Or_Ob28vrs101eC4ZDDkyJhhcMubGOWSxrW1a05ILX3FYMVGNZKswqy1Bh5XhV1UyA5U3ZuAaPyelGdrGs5s7WrhuCafUi-LkJj7o3Xr-96fxMT_t_GgSTXEESONkKhP5h6eKg5z7Wrm1N5_pl1LIUBWUo94KMIhYAxV4QFCJPZifw-zvwvl-GLrmlGXDAQhbrZ3ED1aGPMbjmZTageh2pfo40HUi9iTR1fXtty65nm-HukzM_na18cDrOTdsmHPRqtUpjaKYVAD4Bx-Kqnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214137676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex Ratio Variation in Iberian Pigs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Toro, M. A ; Fernandez, A ; Garcia-Cortes, L. A ; Rodriganez, J ; Silio, L</creator><creatorcontrib>Toro, M. A ; Fernandez, A ; Garcia-Cortes, L. A ; Rodriganez, J ; Silio, L</creatorcontrib><description>Within the area of sex allocation, one of the topics that has attracted a lot of attention is the sex ratio problem. Fisher (1930) proposed that equal numbers of males and females have been promoted by natural selection and it has an adaptive significance. But the empirical success of Fisher's theory remains doubtful because a sex ratio of 0.50 is also expected from the chromosomal mechanism of sex determination. Another way of approaching the subject is to consider that Fisher's argument relies on the underlying assumption that offspring inherit their parent's tendency in biased sex ratio and therefore that genetic variance for this trait exists. Here, we analyzed sex ratio data of 56,807 piglets coming from 550 boars and 1893 dams. In addition to classical analysis of heterogeneity we performed analyses fitting linear and threshold animal models in a Bayesian framework using Gibbs sampling techniques. The marginal posterior mean of heritability was 2.63 x 10(-4) under the sire linear model and 9.17 x 10(-4) under the sire threshold model. The probability of the hypothesis p(h(2) = 0) fitting the last model was 0.996. Also, we did not detect any trend in sex ratio related to maternal age. From an evolutionary point of view, the chromosomal sex determination acts as a constraint that precludes control of offspring sex ratio in vertebrates and it should be included in the general theory of sex allocation. From a practical view that means that the sex ratio in domestic species is hardly susceptible to modification by artificial selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-6731</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-2631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2631</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.055939</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16582431</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GENTAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Genetics Soc America</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; Biological Evolution ; Female ; Genetic Variation ; Hogs ; Investigations ; Linear Models ; Male ; Models, Genetic ; Sex Ratio ; Sexes ; Spain ; Studies ; Sus scrofa - genetics</subject><ispartof>Genetics (Austin), 2006-06, Vol.173 (2), p.911-917</ispartof><rights>Copyright Genetics Society of America Jun 2006</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 by the Genetics Society of America 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1295f47234ade2d38cd8b08454c4db219fd2b212d9d2393be4bbc251d4f8fef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1295f47234ade2d38cd8b08454c4db219fd2b212d9d2393be4bbc251d4f8fef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16582431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toro, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Cortes, L. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriganez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silio, L</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Ratio Variation in Iberian Pigs</title><title>Genetics (Austin)</title><addtitle>Genetics</addtitle><description>Within the area of sex allocation, one of the topics that has attracted a lot of attention is the sex ratio problem. Fisher (1930) proposed that equal numbers of males and females have been promoted by natural selection and it has an adaptive significance. But the empirical success of Fisher's theory remains doubtful because a sex ratio of 0.50 is also expected from the chromosomal mechanism of sex determination. Another way of approaching the subject is to consider that Fisher's argument relies on the underlying assumption that offspring inherit their parent's tendency in biased sex ratio and therefore that genetic variance for this trait exists. Here, we analyzed sex ratio data of 56,807 piglets coming from 550 boars and 1893 dams. In addition to classical analysis of heterogeneity we performed analyses fitting linear and threshold animal models in a Bayesian framework using Gibbs sampling techniques. The marginal posterior mean of heritability was 2.63 x 10(-4) under the sire linear model and 9.17 x 10(-4) under the sire threshold model. The probability of the hypothesis p(h(2) = 0) fitting the last model was 0.996. Also, we did not detect any trend in sex ratio related to maternal age. From an evolutionary point of view, the chromosomal sex determination acts as a constraint that precludes control of offspring sex ratio in vertebrates and it should be included in the general theory of sex allocation. From a practical view that means that the sex ratio in domestic species is hardly susceptible to modification by artificial selection.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Hogs</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Sex Ratio</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sus scrofa - genetics</subject><issn>0016-6731</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1r2zAUhsVYWdNuv2AwzAa9c6ajI8nWTWGUfkGhZQu7FbIlJyqOnUrOsv77KiRt2t7k6ujjOa903peQr0DHIJD_nLrODb6OY6ByTIVQqD6QESiOOZMIH8mIUpC5LBAOyVGM95RSqUT5iRyCFCXjCCPy44_7n_02g--zvyb49aLLfJddVy7tuuzOT-NnctCYNrov23pMJhfnk7Or_Ob28vrs101eC4ZDDkyJhhcMubGOWSxrW1a05ILX3FYMVGNZKswqy1Bh5XhV1UyA5U3ZuAaPyelGdrGs5s7WrhuCafUi-LkJj7o3Xr-96fxMT_t_GgSTXEESONkKhP5h6eKg5z7Wrm1N5_pl1LIUBWUo94KMIhYAxV4QFCJPZifw-zvwvl-GLrmlGXDAQhbrZ3ED1aGPMbjmZTageh2pfo40HUi9iTR1fXtty65nm-HukzM_na18cDrOTdsmHPRqtUpjaKYVAD4Bx-Kqnw</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Toro, M. A</creator><creator>Fernandez, A</creator><creator>Garcia-Cortes, L. A</creator><creator>Rodriganez, J</creator><creator>Silio, L</creator><general>Genetics Soc America</general><general>Genetics Society of America</general><general>Copyright © 2006 by the Genetics Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Sex Ratio Variation in Iberian Pigs</title><author>Toro, M. A ; Fernandez, A ; Garcia-Cortes, L. A ; Rodriganez, J ; Silio, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-1295f47234ade2d38cd8b08454c4db219fd2b212d9d2393be4bbc251d4f8fef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Hogs</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Sex Ratio</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sus scrofa - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toro, M. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Cortes, L. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriganez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silio, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genetics (Austin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toro, M. A</au><au>Fernandez, A</au><au>Garcia-Cortes, L. A</au><au>Rodriganez, J</au><au>Silio, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex Ratio Variation in Iberian Pigs</atitle><jtitle>Genetics (Austin)</jtitle><addtitle>Genetics</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>917</epage><pages>911-917</pages><issn>0016-6731</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><eissn>1943-2631</eissn><coden>GENTAE</coden><abstract>Within the area of sex allocation, one of the topics that has attracted a lot of attention is the sex ratio problem. Fisher (1930) proposed that equal numbers of males and females have been promoted by natural selection and it has an adaptive significance. But the empirical success of Fisher's theory remains doubtful because a sex ratio of 0.50 is also expected from the chromosomal mechanism of sex determination. Another way of approaching the subject is to consider that Fisher's argument relies on the underlying assumption that offspring inherit their parent's tendency in biased sex ratio and therefore that genetic variance for this trait exists. Here, we analyzed sex ratio data of 56,807 piglets coming from 550 boars and 1893 dams. In addition to classical analysis of heterogeneity we performed analyses fitting linear and threshold animal models in a Bayesian framework using Gibbs sampling techniques. The marginal posterior mean of heritability was 2.63 x 10(-4) under the sire linear model and 9.17 x 10(-4) under the sire threshold model. The probability of the hypothesis p(h(2) = 0) fitting the last model was 0.996. Also, we did not detect any trend in sex ratio related to maternal age. From an evolutionary point of view, the chromosomal sex determination acts as a constraint that precludes control of offspring sex ratio in vertebrates and it should be included in the general theory of sex allocation. From a practical view that means that the sex ratio in domestic species is hardly susceptible to modification by artificial selection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Genetics Soc America</pub><pmid>16582431</pmid><doi>10.1534/genetics.106.055939</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-6731
ispartof Genetics (Austin), 2006-06, Vol.173 (2), p.911-917
issn 0016-6731
1943-2631
1943-2631
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1526491
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animal reproduction
Animals
Bayes Theorem
Biological Evolution
Female
Genetic Variation
Hogs
Investigations
Linear Models
Male
Models, Genetic
Sex Ratio
Sexes
Spain
Studies
Sus scrofa - genetics
title Sex Ratio Variation in Iberian Pigs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-11-30T01%3A30%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20Ratio%20Variation%20in%20Iberian%20Pigs&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20(Austin)&rft.au=Toro,%20M.%20A&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=917&rft.pages=911-917&rft.issn=0016-6731&rft.eissn=1943-2631&rft.coden=GENTAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1534/genetics.106.055939&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E19334263%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214137676&rft_id=info:pmid/16582431&rfr_iscdi=true