POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature
Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of par...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | California Medicine 1952-07, Vol.77 (1), p.22-28 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 28 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | California Medicine |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | DRAKE, R M |
description | Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.” |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1521636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75093719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-bd6e87978239a57fdf113c18b8bce9c90d4e07653d03de3328799d3c730cbe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkN1Kw0AQhYMotlZfQQKCd4H9SbK7N0KIaY3EpKRB8GrJz0ZT06Zukqp3PoRP6JO4pbWoVzNwvjlzZg60IcIUGIyZ7FAbAgCoAZFtDrSTtp0DYBKL0mNtABEjlFI81CbTKPCjuwcv8BN_pjvhtT51Yi9MvNgJdD-89dzEj8LZ18eno8diXYlXvSlVl4tlpwdVJ2Ta9VKcakdlWrfibFdHWjL2EvfGCKKJ7zqBUSHT6oyssAUlajnCLLVIWZQQ4hzSjGa5YDkDhSkAsS1cAFwIjJGCWYFzgkGeCRuPtKut7arPFqLYhJBpzVeyWqTynTdpxf8qy-qJPzZrDi0EbbwxuNwZyOalF23HF1Wbi7pOl6LpW04swDCBTIEX_8B508uluo1DoiiAgE0Udf47zz7Iz4MVYGyBqu3E215P5TNX48Ti4b3LbRRYYBwTjvE3YeWEbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1775002067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>DRAKE, R M</creator><creatorcontrib>DRAKE, R M</creatorcontrib><description>Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1264</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2380-9949</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12978883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Humans ; Infusions, Parenteral ; Injections ; Old Medline ; Paralysis ; Poliomyelitis - etiology ; Symposium on Poliomyelitis</subject><ispartof>California Medicine, 1952-07, Vol.77 (1), p.22-28</ispartof><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Jul 1952</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,310,314,776,780,785,786,881,23910,23911,25119</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12978883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DRAKE, R M</creatorcontrib><title>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</title><title>California Medicine</title><addtitle>Calif Med</addtitle><description>Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Parenteral</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Old Medline</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Poliomyelitis - etiology</subject><subject>Symposium on Poliomyelitis</subject><issn>0008-1264</issn><issn>2380-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1952</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkN1Kw0AQhYMotlZfQQKCd4H9SbK7N0KIaY3EpKRB8GrJz0ZT06Zukqp3PoRP6JO4pbWoVzNwvjlzZg60IcIUGIyZ7FAbAgCoAZFtDrSTtp0DYBKL0mNtABEjlFI81CbTKPCjuwcv8BN_pjvhtT51Yi9MvNgJdD-89dzEj8LZ18eno8diXYlXvSlVl4tlpwdVJ2Ta9VKcakdlWrfibFdHWjL2EvfGCKKJ7zqBUSHT6oyssAUlajnCLLVIWZQQ4hzSjGa5YDkDhSkAsS1cAFwIjJGCWYFzgkGeCRuPtKut7arPFqLYhJBpzVeyWqTynTdpxf8qy-qJPzZrDi0EbbwxuNwZyOalF23HF1Wbi7pOl6LpW04swDCBTIEX_8B508uluo1DoiiAgE0Udf47zz7Iz4MVYGyBqu3E215P5TNX48Ti4b3LbRRYYBwTjvE3YeWEbQ</recordid><startdate>195207</startdate><enddate>195207</enddate><creator>DRAKE, R M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>195207</creationdate><title>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</title><author>DRAKE, R M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i245t-bd6e87978239a57fdf113c18b8bce9c90d4e07653d03de3328799d3c730cbe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1952</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Parenteral</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Old Medline</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Poliomyelitis - etiology</topic><topic>Symposium on Poliomyelitis</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DRAKE, R M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>California Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DRAKE, R M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature</atitle><jtitle>California Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Calif Med</addtitle><date>1952-07</date><risdate>1952</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>22-28</pages><issn>0008-1264</issn><eissn>2380-9949</eissn><abstract>Data presented in the literature as to the relationship of poliomyelitis and recent prior injections include several aspects. the coincidence of paralysis in the same site as a recent injection has been considered the most definitive evidence. The fact of an inordinately large number of cases of paralysis of an arm where a recent previous antigen injection was recorded offered less specific corroboration. The larger number of cases among persons who had had an injection in the month preceding onset than among persons with injections in more distant months was noted. This observation was supported when similar information was obtained in a comparison of injection histories for persons who had the disease with the histories of persons who did not have it. The interval between injection and onset among persons who had the disease within a month of injection suggested something other than chance relationship. There is limited information indicating increased severity of paralysis in the injected limb. Evidence is divided on whether or not there is more paralytic disease among patients with recent injections. Similarly, the evidence is no more than suggestive with regard to increased severity of spinal paralytic disease. The mechanism or nature of such a phenomenon is unexplained. However, as Anderson and Skaar said, “considerable attention must be attached to the fact of uniformity of results in a series of independent observations even though each may be small.”</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>12978883</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-1264 |
ispartof | California Medicine, 1952-07, Vol.77 (1), p.22-28 |
issn | 0008-1264 2380-9949 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1521636 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Humans Infusions, Parenteral Injections Old Medline Paralysis Poliomyelitis - etiology Symposium on Poliomyelitis |
title | POLIOMYELITIS AND PARENTERAL INJECTIONS—A Review of Recent Literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A57%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=POLIOMYELITIS%20AND%20PARENTERAL%20INJECTIONS%E2%80%94A%20Review%20of%20Recent%20Literature&rft.jtitle=California%20Medicine&rft.au=DRAKE,%20R%20M&rft.date=1952-07&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=22-28&rft.issn=0008-1264&rft.eissn=2380-9949&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E75093719%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1775002067&rft_id=info:pmid/12978883&rfr_iscdi=true |