The Potential of Exposure Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Studies of Reproductive Health

To further the development and application of exposure markers in field investigations in reproductive epidemiology, we have synthesized recent examinations of the issues surrounding exposure measurements in reproductive epidemiology. The specific goals of this paper are to define exposure biomarker...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental health perspectives 1991-01, Vol.90, p.261-269
Hauptverfasser: Carol J. Rowland Hogue, Brewster, Marge A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue
container_start_page 261
container_title Environmental health perspectives
container_volume 90
creator Carol J. Rowland Hogue
Brewster, Marge A.
description To further the development and application of exposure markers in field investigations in reproductive epidemiology, we have synthesized recent examinations of the issues surrounding exposure measurements in reproductive epidemiology. The specific goals of this paper are to define exposure biomarkers and explore their potential uses, particularly as screening tools. The tests for glucaric acid, thioethers, mutagenicity, and porphyrin patterns meet the general criteria for useful exposure screens. For certain xenobiotic agents, these tests accurately differentiate exposure levels, as demonstrated in occupational and environmental epidemiologic studies. As urinary screens, they are noninvasive and applicable on a large scale with current laboratory techniques. For short-term exposure, glucaric acid, thioethers, and mutagenicity tests are useful. Porphyrin patterns may measure cumulative effects as well as current exposure levels. The usefulness of these tests in epidemiologic studies of environmental effects on reproductive health has yet to be studied. To do so, the battery must be standardized for pregnant women, and test results must be correlated with measured adverse reproductive outcomes, such as gestational length and birthweight. This correlation is particularly important because maternal exposure rather than fetal exposure is being measured. The extent to which xenobiotic chemicals cross the placental barrier may vary greatly depending on the type of exposures, timing in pregnancy, and maternal detoxification capability. Without better exposure measures, epidemiologic studies of reproductive health probably will not successfully identify xenobiotic fetotoxic agents in the environment. However, with an adequate battery of nonspecific exposure biomarkers, prospective studies of environmental effects on pregnancy outcomes might be possible. To narrow the list of potential exposures, these prospective studies could be followed by case-control studies of more specific biomarkers directed at suspect exposures.
doi_str_mv 10.1289/ehp.90-1519493
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1519493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3430877</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3430877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2923-e324a02b6088fa22982e2290480049413d89585b4ab64a920554f564c3e7e23c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1Lw0AQxRdRaq1evQk5iLfU2a9k9yKo1A8oKFrPyzaZ2NW0G3cT0f_eSIvUy8zhPX7zZoaQYwpjypQ-x0Uz1pBSSbXQfIcMqZQs1ZqJXTIE0DTN8kzuk4MY3wCAqiwbkAEDCZDDkMxmC0wefYur1tk68VUy-Wp87AImV84vbXjHEBO3SiaNK3HpfO1fXZE8t13pMP76n7AJvuyK1n1icoe2bheHZK-ydcSjTR-Rl5vJ7PounT7c3l9fTtOCacZT5ExYYPMMlKosY1ox7CsIBSC0oLxUWio5F3aeCav7zFJUMhMFxxwZL_iIXKy5TTdfYln0SwRbmya4Pvi38daZ_8rKLcyr_zSba_WAsw0g-I8OY2uWLhZY13aFvouGZpwK2jtHZLw2FsHHGLD6G0LB_P7B9H8wGrbIJ9vR_uybw_f66Vp_i60P2zTGITdccFB5zn8AHNOPIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16314149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Potential of Exposure Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Studies of Reproductive Health</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Carol J. Rowland Hogue ; Brewster, Marge A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Carol J. Rowland Hogue ; Brewster, Marge A.</creatorcontrib><description>To further the development and application of exposure markers in field investigations in reproductive epidemiology, we have synthesized recent examinations of the issues surrounding exposure measurements in reproductive epidemiology. The specific goals of this paper are to define exposure biomarkers and explore their potential uses, particularly as screening tools. The tests for glucaric acid, thioethers, mutagenicity, and porphyrin patterns meet the general criteria for useful exposure screens. For certain xenobiotic agents, these tests accurately differentiate exposure levels, as demonstrated in occupational and environmental epidemiologic studies. As urinary screens, they are noninvasive and applicable on a large scale with current laboratory techniques. For short-term exposure, glucaric acid, thioethers, and mutagenicity tests are useful. Porphyrin patterns may measure cumulative effects as well as current exposure levels. The usefulness of these tests in epidemiologic studies of environmental effects on reproductive health has yet to be studied. To do so, the battery must be standardized for pregnant women, and test results must be correlated with measured adverse reproductive outcomes, such as gestational length and birthweight. This correlation is particularly important because maternal exposure rather than fetal exposure is being measured. The extent to which xenobiotic chemicals cross the placental barrier may vary greatly depending on the type of exposures, timing in pregnancy, and maternal detoxification capability. Without better exposure measures, epidemiologic studies of reproductive health probably will not successfully identify xenobiotic fetotoxic agents in the environment. However, with an adequate battery of nonspecific exposure biomarkers, prospective studies of environmental effects on pregnancy outcomes might be possible. To narrow the list of potential exposures, these prospective studies could be followed by case-control studies of more specific biomarkers directed at suspect exposures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.90-1519493</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2050070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</publisher><subject>Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Chemical hazards ; Cigarette smoking ; Environmental Exposure ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Excretion ; Humans ; Mass Screening - methods ; Mutagenicity ; Porphyrins ; Pregnancy ; Reproduction - drug effects ; Sulfides ; Urine ; Use of Biological Markers and Pharmacokinetics in Human Health Risk Assessment ; Xenobiotics</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 1991-01, Vol.90, p.261-269</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2923-e324a02b6088fa22982e2290480049413d89585b4ab64a920554f564c3e7e23c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3430877$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3430877$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2050070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carol J. Rowland Hogue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Marge A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Potential of Exposure Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Studies of Reproductive Health</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>To further the development and application of exposure markers in field investigations in reproductive epidemiology, we have synthesized recent examinations of the issues surrounding exposure measurements in reproductive epidemiology. The specific goals of this paper are to define exposure biomarkers and explore their potential uses, particularly as screening tools. The tests for glucaric acid, thioethers, mutagenicity, and porphyrin patterns meet the general criteria for useful exposure screens. For certain xenobiotic agents, these tests accurately differentiate exposure levels, as demonstrated in occupational and environmental epidemiologic studies. As urinary screens, they are noninvasive and applicable on a large scale with current laboratory techniques. For short-term exposure, glucaric acid, thioethers, and mutagenicity tests are useful. Porphyrin patterns may measure cumulative effects as well as current exposure levels. The usefulness of these tests in epidemiologic studies of environmental effects on reproductive health has yet to be studied. To do so, the battery must be standardized for pregnant women, and test results must be correlated with measured adverse reproductive outcomes, such as gestational length and birthweight. This correlation is particularly important because maternal exposure rather than fetal exposure is being measured. The extent to which xenobiotic chemicals cross the placental barrier may vary greatly depending on the type of exposures, timing in pregnancy, and maternal detoxification capability. Without better exposure measures, epidemiologic studies of reproductive health probably will not successfully identify xenobiotic fetotoxic agents in the environment. However, with an adequate battery of nonspecific exposure biomarkers, prospective studies of environmental effects on pregnancy outcomes might be possible. To narrow the list of potential exposures, these prospective studies could be followed by case-control studies of more specific biomarkers directed at suspect exposures.</description><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Excretion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Mutagenicity</subject><subject>Porphyrins</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Reproduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Use of Biological Markers and Pharmacokinetics in Human Health Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Xenobiotics</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1Lw0AQxRdRaq1evQk5iLfU2a9k9yKo1A8oKFrPyzaZ2NW0G3cT0f_eSIvUy8zhPX7zZoaQYwpjypQ-x0Uz1pBSSbXQfIcMqZQs1ZqJXTIE0DTN8kzuk4MY3wCAqiwbkAEDCZDDkMxmC0wefYur1tk68VUy-Wp87AImV84vbXjHEBO3SiaNK3HpfO1fXZE8t13pMP76n7AJvuyK1n1icoe2bheHZK-ydcSjTR-Rl5vJ7PounT7c3l9fTtOCacZT5ExYYPMMlKosY1ox7CsIBSC0oLxUWio5F3aeCav7zFJUMhMFxxwZL_iIXKy5TTdfYln0SwRbmya4Pvi38daZ_8rKLcyr_zSba_WAsw0g-I8OY2uWLhZY13aFvouGZpwK2jtHZLw2FsHHGLD6G0LB_P7B9H8wGrbIJ9vR_uybw_f66Vp_i60P2zTGITdccFB5zn8AHNOPIQ</recordid><startdate>19910101</startdate><enddate>19910101</enddate><creator>Carol J. Rowland Hogue</creator><creator>Brewster, Marge A.</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910101</creationdate><title>The Potential of Exposure Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Studies of Reproductive Health</title><author>Carol J. Rowland Hogue ; Brewster, Marge A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2923-e324a02b6088fa22982e2290480049413d89585b4ab64a920554f564c3e7e23c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Excretion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Mutagenicity</topic><topic>Porphyrins</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Reproduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Use of Biological Markers and Pharmacokinetics in Human Health Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Xenobiotics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carol J. Rowland Hogue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Marge A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carol J. Rowland Hogue</au><au>Brewster, Marge A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Potential of Exposure Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Studies of Reproductive Health</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>1991-01-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>261</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>261-269</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>To further the development and application of exposure markers in field investigations in reproductive epidemiology, we have synthesized recent examinations of the issues surrounding exposure measurements in reproductive epidemiology. The specific goals of this paper are to define exposure biomarkers and explore their potential uses, particularly as screening tools. The tests for glucaric acid, thioethers, mutagenicity, and porphyrin patterns meet the general criteria for useful exposure screens. For certain xenobiotic agents, these tests accurately differentiate exposure levels, as demonstrated in occupational and environmental epidemiologic studies. As urinary screens, they are noninvasive and applicable on a large scale with current laboratory techniques. For short-term exposure, glucaric acid, thioethers, and mutagenicity tests are useful. Porphyrin patterns may measure cumulative effects as well as current exposure levels. The usefulness of these tests in epidemiologic studies of environmental effects on reproductive health has yet to be studied. To do so, the battery must be standardized for pregnant women, and test results must be correlated with measured adverse reproductive outcomes, such as gestational length and birthweight. This correlation is particularly important because maternal exposure rather than fetal exposure is being measured. The extent to which xenobiotic chemicals cross the placental barrier may vary greatly depending on the type of exposures, timing in pregnancy, and maternal detoxification capability. Without better exposure measures, epidemiologic studies of reproductive health probably will not successfully identify xenobiotic fetotoxic agents in the environment. However, with an adequate battery of nonspecific exposure biomarkers, prospective studies of environmental effects on pregnancy outcomes might be possible. To narrow the list of potential exposures, these prospective studies could be followed by case-control studies of more specific biomarkers directed at suspect exposures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</pub><pmid>2050070</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.90-1519493</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6765
ispartof Environmental health perspectives, 1991-01, Vol.90, p.261-269
issn 0091-6765
1552-9924
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1519493
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; PubMed Central
subjects Biological markers
Biomarkers
Chemical hazards
Cigarette smoking
Environmental Exposure
Epidemiologic Methods
Excretion
Humans
Mass Screening - methods
Mutagenicity
Porphyrins
Pregnancy
Reproduction - drug effects
Sulfides
Urine
Use of Biological Markers and Pharmacokinetics in Human Health Risk Assessment
Xenobiotics
title The Potential of Exposure Biomarkers in Epidemiologic Studies of Reproductive Health
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Potential%20of%20Exposure%20Biomarkers%20in%20Epidemiologic%20Studies%20of%20Reproductive%20Health&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Carol%20J.%20Rowland%20Hogue&rft.date=1991-01-01&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=261-269&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.90-1519493&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E3430877%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16314149&rft_id=info:pmid/2050070&rft_jstor_id=3430877&rfr_iscdi=true