Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results
This study determined the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms in a low-income area experiencing a high rate of residential fire-related injuries. An on-site survey of households was conducted to confirm the results of a telephone survey. In the telephone survey, 71% of households repor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 1999-07, Vol.89 (7), p.1112-1114 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1114 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1112 |
| container_title | American journal of public health (1971) |
| container_volume | 89 |
| creator | Douglas, M R Mallonee, S Istre, G R |
| description | This study determined the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms in a low-income area experiencing a high rate of residential fire-related injuries.
An on-site survey of households was conducted to confirm the results of a telephone survey.
In the telephone survey, 71% of households reported having functioning smoke alarms. In the household survey, 66% of households reported having functioning alarms; however, when the alarms were tested, the percentage dropped to 49%.
Telephone surveys may overestimate the presence of functioning smoke alarms in some populations. Thus, the use of telephone surveys to establish baseline measures could significantly affect the evaluation of smoke-alarm giveaway programs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1112 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1508830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>42831093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-2a5a53ebdca703baa9c9953e273392a03b312cf45eee363d4fd52cc826b45ad63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5YgshOC0iz_ixOaAVFWFgirBAc7WrDPZeHHiYCeteuJfx9EutHDpydbzb95oxq8onjO65ozKt6efv16slV7Xa8YYf1AcM1myFaWlelgcU6ppvovqqHiS0o5SxrRkj4sjRoUuBdfHxa_zNLkeJjdsydQhGWMYQ5xcGEhoSRd6TOTaTR1p58Eu8gKmPvxAAh5in94RIDb0I0SX9kUTehy7MCBJc7zCGwJDk53mhF3wzR8xYpr9lJ4Wj1rwCZ8dzpPi-4fzb2cXq8svHz-dnV6urBTVtOIgQQrcNBZqKjYA2mqdBV4LoTlkSTBu21IioqhEU7aN5NYqXm1KCU0lTor3e99x3vTYWBymCN6MMQ8fb0wAZ_59GVxntuHKMEmVEjQbvD4YxPBzxjSZ3iWL3sOAeTZTaVUpWep7QVmXsio1vxdkKjtWFcvgy__AXZjjkNdlOJP533VZZ2i9h2wMKUVs_87GqFmiYpaoGKVNbZao5IIXdzdyB99nIwOvDgAkC76NMFiXbjmlcsyWzb7ZY53bdtcuokk9eJ9dmYHd2N12_A2HMddz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215111947</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Douglas, M R ; Mallonee, S ; Istre, G R</creator><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M R ; Mallonee, S ; Istre, G R</creatorcontrib><description>This study determined the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms in a low-income area experiencing a high rate of residential fire-related injuries.
An on-site survey of households was conducted to confirm the results of a telephone survey.
In the telephone survey, 71% of households reported having functioning smoke alarms. In the household survey, 66% of households reported having functioning alarms; however, when the alarms were tested, the percentage dropped to 49%.
Telephone surveys may overestimate the presence of functioning smoke alarms in some populations. Thus, the use of telephone surveys to establish baseline measures could significantly affect the evaluation of smoke-alarm giveaway programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10394329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc</publisher><subject>Accidents, Home - prevention & control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Burns ; Comparison ; Data collection ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Estimates ; Firefighters ; Fires ; Fires - prevention & control ; General aspects ; Health surveillance ; Households ; Humans ; Injuries ; Injury prevention ; Interviews ; Low income groups ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Oklahoma ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Polls & surveys ; Population ; Protective Devices - statistics & numerical data ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Questionnaires ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; Smoke alarms ; Smoke detectors ; Statistical analysis ; Surveillance ; Surveys ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Telephone ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 1999-07, Vol.89 (7), p.1112-1114</ispartof><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Jul 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-2a5a53ebdca703baa9c9953e273392a03b312cf45eee363d4fd52cc826b45ad63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-2a5a53ebdca703baa9c9953e273392a03b312cf45eee363d4fd52cc826b45ad63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508830/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1508830/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27843,27901,27902,30977,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1880046$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10394329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallonee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Istre, G R</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>This study determined the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms in a low-income area experiencing a high rate of residential fire-related injuries.
An on-site survey of households was conducted to confirm the results of a telephone survey.
In the telephone survey, 71% of households reported having functioning smoke alarms. In the household survey, 66% of households reported having functioning alarms; however, when the alarms were tested, the percentage dropped to 49%.
Telephone surveys may overestimate the presence of functioning smoke alarms in some populations. Thus, the use of telephone surveys to establish baseline measures could significantly affect the evaluation of smoke-alarm giveaway programs.</description><subject>Accidents, Home - prevention & control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Burns</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Firefighters</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Fires - prevention & control</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health surveillance</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Oklahoma</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Protective Devices - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Smoke alarms</subject><subject>Smoke detectors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Telephone</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1v1DAQxSMEoqVw5YgshOC0iz_ixOaAVFWFgirBAc7WrDPZeHHiYCeteuJfx9EutHDpydbzb95oxq8onjO65ozKt6efv16slV7Xa8YYf1AcM1myFaWlelgcU6ppvovqqHiS0o5SxrRkj4sjRoUuBdfHxa_zNLkeJjdsydQhGWMYQ5xcGEhoSRd6TOTaTR1p58Eu8gKmPvxAAh5in94RIDb0I0SX9kUTehy7MCBJc7zCGwJDk53mhF3wzR8xYpr9lJ4Wj1rwCZ8dzpPi-4fzb2cXq8svHz-dnV6urBTVtOIgQQrcNBZqKjYA2mqdBV4LoTlkSTBu21IioqhEU7aN5NYqXm1KCU0lTor3e99x3vTYWBymCN6MMQ8fb0wAZ_59GVxntuHKMEmVEjQbvD4YxPBzxjSZ3iWL3sOAeTZTaVUpWep7QVmXsio1vxdkKjtWFcvgy__AXZjjkNdlOJP533VZZ2i9h2wMKUVs_87GqFmiYpaoGKVNbZao5IIXdzdyB99nIwOvDgAkC76NMFiXbjmlcsyWzb7ZY53bdtcuokk9eJ9dmYHd2N12_A2HMddz</recordid><startdate>19990701</startdate><enddate>19990701</enddate><creator>Douglas, M R</creator><creator>Mallonee, S</creator><creator>Istre, G R</creator><general>Am Public Health Assoc</general><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990701</creationdate><title>Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results</title><author>Douglas, M R ; Mallonee, S ; Istre, G R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-2a5a53ebdca703baa9c9953e273392a03b312cf45eee363d4fd52cc826b45ad63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Accidents, Home - prevention & control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Burns</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Firefighters</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Fires - prevention & control</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health surveillance</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Oklahoma</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Protective Devices - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Smoke alarms</topic><topic>Smoke detectors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Telephone</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douglas, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallonee, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Istre, G R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douglas, M R</au><au>Mallonee, S</au><au>Istre, G R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>1999-07-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1112</spage><epage>1114</epage><pages>1112-1114</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>This study determined the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms in a low-income area experiencing a high rate of residential fire-related injuries.
An on-site survey of households was conducted to confirm the results of a telephone survey.
In the telephone survey, 71% of households reported having functioning smoke alarms. In the household survey, 66% of households reported having functioning alarms; however, when the alarms were tested, the percentage dropped to 49%.
Telephone surveys may overestimate the presence of functioning smoke alarms in some populations. Thus, the use of telephone surveys to establish baseline measures could significantly affect the evaluation of smoke-alarm giveaway programs.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Public Health Assoc</pub><pmid>10394329</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1112</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-0036 |
| ispartof | American journal of public health (1971), 1999-07, Vol.89 (7), p.1112-1114 |
| issn | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1508830 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Accidents, Home - prevention & control Biological and medical sciences Burns Comparison Data collection Disease control Disease prevention Estimates Firefighters Fires Fires - prevention & control General aspects Health surveillance Households Humans Injuries Injury prevention Interviews Low income groups Medical research Medical sciences Oklahoma Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation Polls & surveys Population Protective Devices - statistics & numerical data Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Questionnaires Retrospective Studies Risk factors Smoke alarms Smoke detectors Statistical analysis Surveillance Surveys Surveys and Questionnaires Telephone Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
| title | Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20the%20proportion%20of%20homes%20with%20functioning%20smoke%20alarms:%20a%20comparison%20of%20telephone%20survey%20and%20household%20survey%20results&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Douglas,%20M%20R&rft.date=1999-07-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1112&rft.epage=1114&rft.pages=1112-1114&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E42831093%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215111947&rft_id=info:pmid/10394329&rfr_iscdi=true |