Regulation of Tattooing in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota: Tattooists' Attitudes and Relationship between Regulation and Practice
Objective: This study investigated tattooists' attitudes regarding government regulation and the relationship between existing tattooing regulation and tattooists' knowledge and practice of infection control. Methods: Self-reported and observational data were collected in a cross-sectional...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public health reports (1974) 2003-03, Vol.118 (2), p.154-161 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 161 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 154 |
| container_title | Public health reports (1974) |
| container_volume | 118 |
| creator | RAYMOND, Monica J HALCON, Linda L PIRIE, Phyllis L |
| description | Objective: This study investigated tattooists' attitudes regarding government regulation and the relationship between existing tattooing regulation and tattooists' knowledge and practice of infection control. Methods: Self-reported and observational data were collected in a cross-sectional study of professional tattooists. A written survey was used to investigate knowledge and practice of infection control and attitudes toward government regulation. Infection control practice was also examined through direct observation of tattooing. Rating scales were used to compare tattoo artists subject to local tattooing ordinances with those in areas without ordinances. Results: Sixty-one tattooists (45 regulated, 16 unregulated) completed surveys and 25 (17 regulated, 8 unregulated) were observed. Attitudes toward regulation were generally positive. Most participants supported health department inspections and training requirements. The presence of local tattooing ordinances was not associated with tattooists' knowledge (p=0.53), but was associated with self-reported practices (p=0.05). A more positive attitude toward regulation was associated with the use of more self-reported infection control procedures (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50230-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1497524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4598828</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4598828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-7be17d44baf1f3f819e6cc52caf2ed2bae7128e91492bf3de68e81e794923ca73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt9qFDEUxgex2LX6BiqhoFZwav5NkvFCKKVVoWJp63XIZM5ss8wm6ySj-AI-t9nOuq3eNDchfL_zhXPOVxTPCT4kmIh3lxgzVrKK1weYv6kwZbhkD4oZ4UKVVEn5sJhtkd3icYwLnA8l7FGxS6ioMRb1rPh9AfOxN8kFj0KHrkxKITg_R86jL857MKvQu4iMb9FlOkTnZuzfTkoMybz_WxFTfI2OUnJpbGHCL2DyjdduhRpIPwE8uvPdmjkfjE3OwpNipzN9hKebe6_4dnpydfypPPv68fPx0VlpKy5TKRsgsuW8MR3pWKdIDcLailrTUWhpY0ASqqAmvKZNx1oQChQBWec3s0ayveLD5LsamyW0FnwaTK9Xg1ua4ZcOxul_Fe-u9Tz80NlRVpRng1cbgyF8HyEmvXTRQt8bD2GMWjKSJ0vkvWBVK5GXUN8LkrzLShCSwf3_wEUYB5_HpSkmleBMigxVE2SHEOMA3bY3gvU6OPomOHqdCo25vgmOZrnuxd3B3FZtkpKBlxvARGv6bjDeunjLcSkFVWvu2cQtYgrDVue5X0UV-wMzZtdJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>201564376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulation of Tattooing in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota: Tattooists' Attitudes and Relationship between Regulation and Practice</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>RAYMOND, Monica J ; HALCON, Linda L ; PIRIE, Phyllis L</creator><creatorcontrib>RAYMOND, Monica J ; HALCON, Linda L ; PIRIE, Phyllis L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study investigated tattooists' attitudes regarding government regulation and the relationship between existing tattooing regulation and tattooists' knowledge and practice of infection control. Methods: Self-reported and observational data were collected in a cross-sectional study of professional tattooists. A written survey was used to investigate knowledge and practice of infection control and attitudes toward government regulation. Infection control practice was also examined through direct observation of tattooing. Rating scales were used to compare tattoo artists subject to local tattooing ordinances with those in areas without ordinances. Results: Sixty-one tattooists (45 regulated, 16 unregulated) completed surveys and 25 (17 regulated, 8 unregulated) were observed. Attitudes toward regulation were generally positive. Most participants supported health department inspections and training requirements. The presence of local tattooing ordinances was not associated with tattooists' knowledge (p=0.53), but was associated with self-reported practices (p=0.05). A more positive attitude toward regulation was associated with the use of more self-reported infection control procedures (p<0.01). Conclusions: Tattoo artists in areas with local tattooing ordinances may implement more bloodborne pathogen precautions than those in areas without ordinances, despite working from a similar knowledge base. Tattooists most in need of improvement may be difficult to reach due to opposition to government intrusion. Federal guidelines, clarification of OSHA rules applying to tattooists, and statewide regulation are needed. Tattooists should be involved in the development of regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50230-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12690069</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHRPA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitude to Health ; Attitudes ; Biological and medical sciences ; Commercial regulation ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Drug regulation ; Federal regulation ; Female ; Government Regulation ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health policy ; Humans ; Infection control ; Infection Control - legislation & jurisprudence ; Infections ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Minneapolis, Minnesota ; Minnesota ; Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control ; Observation ; Observational research ; Physiological regulation ; Prevention and actions ; Professional Competence ; Professional Practice - legislation & jurisprudence ; Professional Practice - standards ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Regulation ; Saint Paul, Minnesota ; Self Disclosure ; Self reports ; Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) ; State Government ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tattooing ; Tattooing - standards ; Tattoos</subject><ispartof>Public health reports (1974), 2003-03, Vol.118 (2), p.154-161</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Association of Schools of Public Health</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Mar/Apr 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-7be17d44baf1f3f819e6cc52caf2ed2bae7128e91492bf3de68e81e794923ca73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-7be17d44baf1f3f819e6cc52caf2ed2bae7128e91492bf3de68e81e794923ca73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4598828$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4598828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,799,881,27842,27843,27901,27902,53766,53768,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14776289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12690069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAYMOND, Monica J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALCON, Linda L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIRIE, Phyllis L</creatorcontrib><title>Regulation of Tattooing in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota: Tattooists' Attitudes and Relationship between Regulation and Practice</title><title>Public health reports (1974)</title><addtitle>Public Health Rep</addtitle><description>Objective: This study investigated tattooists' attitudes regarding government regulation and the relationship between existing tattooing regulation and tattooists' knowledge and practice of infection control. Methods: Self-reported and observational data were collected in a cross-sectional study of professional tattooists. A written survey was used to investigate knowledge and practice of infection control and attitudes toward government regulation. Infection control practice was also examined through direct observation of tattooing. Rating scales were used to compare tattoo artists subject to local tattooing ordinances with those in areas without ordinances. Results: Sixty-one tattooists (45 regulated, 16 unregulated) completed surveys and 25 (17 regulated, 8 unregulated) were observed. Attitudes toward regulation were generally positive. Most participants supported health department inspections and training requirements. The presence of local tattooing ordinances was not associated with tattooists' knowledge (p=0.53), but was associated with self-reported practices (p=0.05). A more positive attitude toward regulation was associated with the use of more self-reported infection control procedures (p<0.01). Conclusions: Tattoo artists in areas with local tattooing ordinances may implement more bloodborne pathogen precautions than those in areas without ordinances, despite working from a similar knowledge base. Tattooists most in need of improvement may be difficult to reach due to opposition to government intrusion. Federal guidelines, clarification of OSHA rules applying to tattooists, and statewide regulation are needed. Tattooists should be involved in the development of regulations.</description><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Commercial regulation</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Drug regulation</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health policy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Infection Control - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Minneapolis, Minnesota</subject><subject>Minnesota</subject><subject>Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Observational research</subject><subject>Physiological regulation</subject><subject>Prevention and actions</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Professional Practice - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Professional Practice - standards</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Saint Paul, Minnesota</subject><subject>Self Disclosure</subject><subject>Self reports</subject><subject>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</subject><subject>State Government</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tattooing</subject><subject>Tattooing - standards</subject><subject>Tattoos</subject><issn>0033-3549</issn><issn>1468-2877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt9qFDEUxgex2LX6BiqhoFZwav5NkvFCKKVVoWJp63XIZM5ss8wm6ySj-AI-t9nOuq3eNDchfL_zhXPOVxTPCT4kmIh3lxgzVrKK1weYv6kwZbhkD4oZ4UKVVEn5sJhtkd3icYwLnA8l7FGxS6ioMRb1rPh9AfOxN8kFj0KHrkxKITg_R86jL857MKvQu4iMb9FlOkTnZuzfTkoMybz_WxFTfI2OUnJpbGHCL2DyjdduhRpIPwE8uvPdmjkfjE3OwpNipzN9hKebe6_4dnpydfypPPv68fPx0VlpKy5TKRsgsuW8MR3pWKdIDcLailrTUWhpY0ASqqAmvKZNx1oQChQBWec3s0ayveLD5LsamyW0FnwaTK9Xg1ua4ZcOxul_Fe-u9Tz80NlRVpRng1cbgyF8HyEmvXTRQt8bD2GMWjKSJ0vkvWBVK5GXUN8LkrzLShCSwf3_wEUYB5_HpSkmleBMigxVE2SHEOMA3bY3gvU6OPomOHqdCo25vgmOZrnuxd3B3FZtkpKBlxvARGv6bjDeunjLcSkFVWvu2cQtYgrDVue5X0UV-wMzZtdJ</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>RAYMOND, Monica J</creator><creator>HALCON, Linda L</creator><creator>PIRIE, Phyllis L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Association of Schools of Public Health</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Regulation of Tattooing in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota: Tattooists' Attitudes and Relationship between Regulation and Practice</title><author>RAYMOND, Monica J ; HALCON, Linda L ; PIRIE, Phyllis L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c547t-7be17d44baf1f3f819e6cc52caf2ed2bae7128e91492bf3de68e81e794923ca73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Commercial regulation</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Drug regulation</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health policy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Infection Control - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Minneapolis, Minnesota</topic><topic>Minnesota</topic><topic>Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Observational research</topic><topic>Physiological regulation</topic><topic>Prevention and actions</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Professional Practice - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Professional Practice - standards</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Saint Paul, Minnesota</topic><topic>Self Disclosure</topic><topic>Self reports</topic><topic>Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...)</topic><topic>State Government</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tattooing</topic><topic>Tattooing - standards</topic><topic>Tattoos</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAYMOND, Monica J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HALCON, Linda L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIRIE, Phyllis L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Public health reports (1974)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAYMOND, Monica J</au><au>HALCON, Linda L</au><au>PIRIE, Phyllis L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulation of Tattooing in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota: Tattooists' Attitudes and Relationship between Regulation and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Public health reports (1974)</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Rep</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>154-161</pages><issn>0033-3549</issn><eissn>1468-2877</eissn><coden>PHRPA6</coden><abstract>Objective: This study investigated tattooists' attitudes regarding government regulation and the relationship between existing tattooing regulation and tattooists' knowledge and practice of infection control. Methods: Self-reported and observational data were collected in a cross-sectional study of professional tattooists. A written survey was used to investigate knowledge and practice of infection control and attitudes toward government regulation. Infection control practice was also examined through direct observation of tattooing. Rating scales were used to compare tattoo artists subject to local tattooing ordinances with those in areas without ordinances. Results: Sixty-one tattooists (45 regulated, 16 unregulated) completed surveys and 25 (17 regulated, 8 unregulated) were observed. Attitudes toward regulation were generally positive. Most participants supported health department inspections and training requirements. The presence of local tattooing ordinances was not associated with tattooists' knowledge (p=0.53), but was associated with self-reported practices (p=0.05). A more positive attitude toward regulation was associated with the use of more self-reported infection control procedures (p<0.01). Conclusions: Tattoo artists in areas with local tattooing ordinances may implement more bloodborne pathogen precautions than those in areas without ordinances, despite working from a similar knowledge base. Tattooists most in need of improvement may be difficult to reach due to opposition to government intrusion. Federal guidelines, clarification of OSHA rules applying to tattooists, and statewide regulation are needed. Tattooists should be involved in the development of regulations.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12690069</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50230-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3549 |
| ispartof | Public health reports (1974), 2003-03, Vol.118 (2), p.154-161 |
| issn | 0033-3549 1468-2877 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1497524 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; PAIS Index; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SAGE Complete; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Attitude to Health Attitudes Biological and medical sciences Commercial regulation Cross-Sectional Studies Drug regulation Federal regulation Female Government Regulation Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health policy Humans Infection control Infection Control - legislation & jurisprudence Infections Male Medical sciences Minneapolis, Minnesota Minnesota Needlestick Injuries - prevention & control Observation Observational research Physiological regulation Prevention and actions Professional Competence Professional Practice - legislation & jurisprudence Professional Practice - standards Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Regulation Saint Paul, Minnesota Self Disclosure Self reports Specific populations (family, woman, child, elderly...) State Government Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Tattooing Tattooing - standards Tattoos |
| title | Regulation of Tattooing in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota: Tattooists' Attitudes and Relationship between Regulation and Practice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A21%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulation%20of%20Tattooing%20in%20Minneapolis%20and%20St.%20Paul,%20Minnesota:%20Tattooists'%20Attitudes%20and%20Relationship%20between%20Regulation%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20reports%20(1974)&rft.au=RAYMOND,%20Monica%20J&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=154-161&rft.issn=0033-3549&rft.eissn=1468-2877&rft.coden=PHRPA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50230-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E4598828%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=201564376&rft_id=info:pmid/12690069&rft_jstor_id=4598828&rfr_iscdi=true |