Comparing the Satisfaction of Low Back Pain Patients Randomized to Receive Medical or Chiropractic Care: Results From the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study
This study examined the difference in satisfaction between patients assigned to chiropractic vs medical care for treatment of low back pain in a managed care organization. Satisfaction scores (on a 10-50 scale) after 4 weeks of follow-up were compared among 672 patients randomized to receive medical...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 2002-10, Vol.92 (10), p.1628-1633 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1633 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1628 |
| container_title | American journal of public health (1971) |
| container_volume | 92 |
| creator | Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P Morgenstern, Hal Hurwitz, Eric L Yu, Fei Adams, Alan H Harber, Philip Kominski, Gerald F |
| description | This study examined the difference in satisfaction between patients assigned to chiropractic vs medical care for treatment of low back pain in a managed care organization.
Satisfaction scores (on a 10-50 scale) after 4 weeks of follow-up were compared among 672 patients randomized to receive medical or chiropractic care.
The mean satisfaction score for chiropractic patients was greater than the score for medical patients (crude difference = 5.5; 95% confidence interval = 4.5, 6.5). Self-care advice and explanation of treatment predicted satisfaction and reduced the estimated difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.
Communication of advice and information to patients with low back pain increases their satisfaction with providers and accounts for much of the difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1628 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1447298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72138583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c653t-feee4f33ebdab211de1cfe9d7769d9de9998c04dd59c33a119b37391682f35a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFv0zAUxiMEYmVw5oYsJBCXdH52nMQckErEGKiIaWNny7WdxiWJi51sGn8GfzEOrejgsovtJ__8fXrPX5I8BzwngNnJ4vP52ZyTeawhJ-WDZAYsgxTjrHyYzDDmOJ5pfpQ8CWGDMQBn8Dg5AkJZngOZJb8q122lt_0aDY1Bl3KwoZZqsK5HrkZLd4PeS_UdnUvbx2Wwph8CupC9dp39aTQaHLowythrg74YbZVskfOoaqx3Wz8JKVRJb95GKoxtfHvqXffH66paLiaD9GBwOYz69mnyqJZtMM_2-3FydfrhW3WWLr9-_FQtlqnKGR3S2hiT1ZSalZYrAqANqNpwXRQ511wbznmpcKY144pSGVtf0YJyyEtSUyYJPU7e7XS346ozWsXOvGzF1ttO-lvhpBX_3vS2EWt3LSDLCsLLKPB6L-Ddj9GEQXQ2KNO2sjduDKIgQEtW0ntBVgDnrLhfEcqCYIyLCL78D9y40fdxXIIAw7wExiJ0soOUdyF4U__tDbCY4iOm-AhOpnqKT3zx4u5IDvw-LxF4tQdkiF9de9krGw4c5RnkPI_cmx3X2HVzY70RoZNtG2VByM22ueP5G2Jy27A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215098155</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the Satisfaction of Low Back Pain Patients Randomized to Receive Medical or Chiropractic Care: Results From the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCO Business Source Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P ; Morgenstern, Hal ; Hurwitz, Eric L ; Yu, Fei ; Adams, Alan H ; Harber, Philip ; Kominski, Gerald F</creator><creatorcontrib>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P ; Morgenstern, Hal ; Hurwitz, Eric L ; Yu, Fei ; Adams, Alan H ; Harber, Philip ; Kominski, Gerald F</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the difference in satisfaction between patients assigned to chiropractic vs medical care for treatment of low back pain in a managed care organization.
Satisfaction scores (on a 10-50 scale) after 4 weeks of follow-up were compared among 672 patients randomized to receive medical or chiropractic care.
The mean satisfaction score for chiropractic patients was greater than the score for medical patients (crude difference = 5.5; 95% confidence interval = 4.5, 6.5). Self-care advice and explanation of treatment predicted satisfaction and reduced the estimated difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.
Communication of advice and information to patients with low back pain increases their satisfaction with providers and accounts for much of the difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1628</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12356612</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Back ; Back pain ; Biological and medical sciences ; California ; Chiropractic ; Chiropractic medicine ; Colleges & universities ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Communication ; Comparative studies ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Family Practice ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Managed Care Programs ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Mental health ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient satisfaction ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Patients ; Physical therapists ; Physical therapy ; Physical Therapy Modalities ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Randomized controlled trials ; Research and Practice ; Satisfaction ; Self Efficacy ; Southern California ; Spinal manipulation ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Treatment ; USA</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 2002-10, Vol.92 (10), p.1628-1633</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Oct 2002</rights><rights>American Journal of Public Health 2002 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c653t-feee4f33ebdab211de1cfe9d7769d9de9998c04dd59c33a119b37391682f35a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c653t-feee4f33ebdab211de1cfe9d7769d9de9998c04dd59c33a119b37391682f35a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447298/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1447298/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27843,27901,27902,30977,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13941696$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12356612$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgenstern, Hal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, Eric L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Alan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harber, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kominski, Gerald F</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the Satisfaction of Low Back Pain Patients Randomized to Receive Medical or Chiropractic Care: Results From the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>This study examined the difference in satisfaction between patients assigned to chiropractic vs medical care for treatment of low back pain in a managed care organization.
Satisfaction scores (on a 10-50 scale) after 4 weeks of follow-up were compared among 672 patients randomized to receive medical or chiropractic care.
The mean satisfaction score for chiropractic patients was greater than the score for medical patients (crude difference = 5.5; 95% confidence interval = 4.5, 6.5). Self-care advice and explanation of treatment predicted satisfaction and reduced the estimated difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.
Communication of advice and information to patients with low back pain increases their satisfaction with providers and accounts for much of the difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Back</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Chiropractic</subject><subject>Chiropractic medicine</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical therapists</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Research and Practice</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Southern California</subject><subject>Spinal manipulation</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFv0zAUxiMEYmVw5oYsJBCXdH52nMQckErEGKiIaWNny7WdxiWJi51sGn8GfzEOrejgsovtJ__8fXrPX5I8BzwngNnJ4vP52ZyTeawhJ-WDZAYsgxTjrHyYzDDmOJ5pfpQ8CWGDMQBn8Dg5AkJZngOZJb8q122lt_0aDY1Bl3KwoZZqsK5HrkZLd4PeS_UdnUvbx2Wwph8CupC9dp39aTQaHLowythrg74YbZVskfOoaqx3Wz8JKVRJb95GKoxtfHvqXffH66paLiaD9GBwOYz69mnyqJZtMM_2-3FydfrhW3WWLr9-_FQtlqnKGR3S2hiT1ZSalZYrAqANqNpwXRQ511wbznmpcKY144pSGVtf0YJyyEtSUyYJPU7e7XS346ozWsXOvGzF1ttO-lvhpBX_3vS2EWt3LSDLCsLLKPB6L-Ddj9GEQXQ2KNO2sjduDKIgQEtW0ntBVgDnrLhfEcqCYIyLCL78D9y40fdxXIIAw7wExiJ0soOUdyF4U__tDbCY4iOm-AhOpnqKT3zx4u5IDvw-LxF4tQdkiF9de9krGw4c5RnkPI_cmx3X2HVzY70RoZNtG2VByM22ueP5G2Jy27A</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P</creator><creator>Morgenstern, Hal</creator><creator>Hurwitz, Eric L</creator><creator>Yu, Fei</creator><creator>Adams, Alan H</creator><creator>Harber, Philip</creator><creator>Kominski, Gerald F</creator><general>Am Public Health Assoc</general><general>American Public Health Association</general><general>American Journal of Public Health 2002</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Comparing the Satisfaction of Low Back Pain Patients Randomized to Receive Medical or Chiropractic Care: Results From the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study</title><author>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P ; Morgenstern, Hal ; Hurwitz, Eric L ; Yu, Fei ; Adams, Alan H ; Harber, Philip ; Kominski, Gerald F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c653t-feee4f33ebdab211de1cfe9d7769d9de9998c04dd59c33a119b37391682f35a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Back</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Chiropractic</topic><topic>Chiropractic medicine</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical therapists</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Research and Practice</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Southern California</topic><topic>Spinal manipulation</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgenstern, Hal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, Eric L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Alan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harber, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kominski, Gerald F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hertzman-Miller, Ruth P</au><au>Morgenstern, Hal</au><au>Hurwitz, Eric L</au><au>Yu, Fei</au><au>Adams, Alan H</au><au>Harber, Philip</au><au>Kominski, Gerald F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the Satisfaction of Low Back Pain Patients Randomized to Receive Medical or Chiropractic Care: Results From the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1628</spage><epage>1633</epage><pages>1628-1633</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>This study examined the difference in satisfaction between patients assigned to chiropractic vs medical care for treatment of low back pain in a managed care organization.
Satisfaction scores (on a 10-50 scale) after 4 weeks of follow-up were compared among 672 patients randomized to receive medical or chiropractic care.
The mean satisfaction score for chiropractic patients was greater than the score for medical patients (crude difference = 5.5; 95% confidence interval = 4.5, 6.5). Self-care advice and explanation of treatment predicted satisfaction and reduced the estimated difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.
Communication of advice and information to patients with low back pain increases their satisfaction with providers and accounts for much of the difference between chiropractic and medical patients' satisfaction.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Public Health Assoc</pub><pmid>12356612</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1628</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-0036 |
| ispartof | American journal of public health (1971), 2002-10, Vol.92 (10), p.1628-1633 |
| issn | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1447298 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCO Business Source Complete; PAIS Index; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Activities of daily living Adolescent Adult Aged Back Back pain Biological and medical sciences California Chiropractic Chiropractic medicine Colleges & universities Combined Modality Therapy Communication Comparative studies Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment Family Practice Humans Linear Models Low back pain Low Back Pain - therapy Managed Care Programs Medical sciences Medical treatment Mental health Middle Aged Pain Patient Education as Topic Patient satisfaction Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Patients Physical therapists Physical therapy Physical Therapy Modalities Public health Questionnaires Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Randomized controlled trials Research and Practice Satisfaction Self Efficacy Southern California Spinal manipulation Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment USA |
| title | Comparing the Satisfaction of Low Back Pain Patients Randomized to Receive Medical or Chiropractic Care: Results From the UCLA Low-Back Pain Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A56%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20Satisfaction%20of%20Low%20Back%20Pain%20Patients%20Randomized%20to%20Receive%20Medical%20or%20Chiropractic%20Care:%20Results%20From%20the%20UCLA%20Low-Back%20Pain%20Study&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Hertzman-Miller,%20Ruth%20P&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1628&rft.epage=1633&rft.pages=1628-1633&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.92.10.1628&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72138583%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215098155&rft_id=info:pmid/12356612&rfr_iscdi=true |