Management of pain after abdominal surgery: dipyrone compared with pethidine
1 Dipyrone 2.5 g was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a double‐blind parallel group study. 2 Patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain following abdominal surgery received one of the two drugs intramuscularly. 3 The two treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, weight, heigh...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of clinical pharmacology 1980-01, Vol.10 (S2), p.351S-354S |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 354S |
|---|---|
| container_issue | S2 |
| container_start_page | 351S |
| container_title | British journal of clinical pharmacology |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Patel, CV Koppikar, MG Patel, MS Parulkar, GB Pereira, Pinto LM |
| description | 1 Dipyrone 2.5 g was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a double‐blind parallel group study. 2 Patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain following abdominal surgery received one of the two drugs intramuscularly. 3 The two treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, weight, height, sex, and initial severity of pain. 4 The onset degree and duration of pain relief afforded by both drugs was similar when the groups were compared as a whole or according to initial pain level. 5 No side‐effects were attributed to either drug in this study. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01822.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1430171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>BCP1822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4772-341368fac96025f81a5c6cf77aac2407dfbc431d2965a0b6b40469f862772a9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRan38BGFwnziPZCbpQtHiCyq60PVwM5lppzQPJqlt_r0JLUWX3s29cDjnHj6ErikJaT83y5ByEQeMsjikaULCNiM0YSzcHqHxQTpGY8KJCGIW01N01jRLQiinIh6hkYy4ZFKM0ewNSpibwpQtriyuwZUYbGs8hiyvClfCCjdrPze-m-Dc1Z2vSoN1VdTgTY43rl3g2rQLl7vSXKATC6vGXO73Ofp6evycvgSz9-fX6f0s0JGULOBR3zGxoFNBWGwTCrEW2koJoFlEZG4zHXGas1TEQDKRRSQSqU0E692Qan6Obne59TorTK778h5WqvauAN-pCpz6q5RuoebVt6IRJ1TSPmCyC9C-ahpv7MFLiRoQq6UaOKqBoxoQqz1ite3NV7-_H6x7pr1-t9M3bmW6fySrh-nHcPEffDGNng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of pain after abdominal surgery: dipyrone compared with pethidine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Patel, CV ; Koppikar, MG ; Patel, MS ; Parulkar, GB ; Pereira, Pinto LM</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, CV ; Koppikar, MG ; Patel, MS ; Parulkar, GB ; Pereira, Pinto LM</creatorcontrib><description>1 Dipyrone 2.5 g was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a double‐blind parallel group study. 2 Patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain following abdominal surgery received one of the two drugs intramuscularly. 3 The two treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, weight, height, sex, and initial severity of pain. 4 The onset degree and duration of pain relief afforded by both drugs was similar when the groups were compared as a whole or according to initial pain level. 5 No side‐effects were attributed to either drug in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-5251</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01822.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7437276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Adult ; Aminopyrine - analogs & derivatives ; Dipyrone - adverse effects ; Dipyrone - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Meperidine - adverse effects ; Meperidine - therapeutic use ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1980-01, Vol.10 (S2), p.351S-354S</ispartof><rights>1980 The British Pharmacological Society</rights><rights>Macmillan Publishers Ltd 1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4772-341368fac96025f81a5c6cf77aac2407dfbc431d2965a0b6b40469f862772a9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4772-341368fac96025f81a5c6cf77aac2407dfbc431d2965a0b6b40469f862772a9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7437276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, CV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppikar, MG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parulkar, GB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Pinto LM</creatorcontrib><title>Management of pain after abdominal surgery: dipyrone compared with pethidine</title><title>British journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>1 Dipyrone 2.5 g was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a double‐blind parallel group study. 2 Patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain following abdominal surgery received one of the two drugs intramuscularly. 3 The two treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, weight, height, sex, and initial severity of pain. 4 The onset degree and duration of pain relief afforded by both drugs was similar when the groups were compared as a whole or according to initial pain level. 5 No side‐effects were attributed to either drug in this study.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aminopyrine - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Dipyrone - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dipyrone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meperidine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Meperidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0306-5251</issn><issn>1365-2125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkEtLw0AUhQdRan38BGFwnziPZCbpQtHiCyq60PVwM5lppzQPJqlt_r0JLUWX3s29cDjnHj6ErikJaT83y5ByEQeMsjikaULCNiM0YSzcHqHxQTpGY8KJCGIW01N01jRLQiinIh6hkYy4ZFKM0ewNSpibwpQtriyuwZUYbGs8hiyvClfCCjdrPze-m-Dc1Z2vSoN1VdTgTY43rl3g2rQLl7vSXKATC6vGXO73Ofp6evycvgSz9-fX6f0s0JGULOBR3zGxoFNBWGwTCrEW2koJoFlEZG4zHXGas1TEQDKRRSQSqU0E692Qan6Obne59TorTK778h5WqvauAN-pCpz6q5RuoebVt6IRJ1TSPmCyC9C-ahpv7MFLiRoQq6UaOKqBoxoQqz1ite3NV7-_H6x7pr1-t9M3bmW6fySrh-nHcPEffDGNng</recordid><startdate>19800101</startdate><enddate>19800101</enddate><creator>Patel, CV</creator><creator>Koppikar, MG</creator><creator>Patel, MS</creator><creator>Parulkar, GB</creator><creator>Pereira, Pinto LM</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800101</creationdate><title>Management of pain after abdominal surgery: dipyrone compared with pethidine</title><author>Patel, CV ; Koppikar, MG ; Patel, MS ; Parulkar, GB ; Pereira, Pinto LM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4772-341368fac96025f81a5c6cf77aac2407dfbc431d2965a0b6b40469f862772a9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aminopyrine - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Dipyrone - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dipyrone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meperidine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Meperidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, CV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppikar, MG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parulkar, GB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Pinto LM</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, CV</au><au>Koppikar, MG</au><au>Patel, MS</au><au>Parulkar, GB</au><au>Pereira, Pinto LM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of pain after abdominal surgery: dipyrone compared with pethidine</atitle><jtitle>British journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1980-01-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>351S</spage><epage>354S</epage><pages>351S-354S</pages><issn>0306-5251</issn><eissn>1365-2125</eissn><abstract>1 Dipyrone 2.5 g was compared with pethidine 100 mg in a double‐blind parallel group study. 2 Patients with moderate or severe postoperative pain following abdominal surgery received one of the two drugs intramuscularly. 3 The two treatment groups were homogeneous when analyzed by age, weight, height, sex, and initial severity of pain. 4 The onset degree and duration of pain relief afforded by both drugs was similar when the groups were compared as a whole or according to initial pain level. 5 No side‐effects were attributed to either drug in this study.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>7437276</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01822.x</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0306-5251 |
| ispartof | British journal of clinical pharmacology, 1980-01, Vol.10 (S2), p.351S-354S |
| issn | 0306-5251 1365-2125 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1430171 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Abdomen - surgery Adult Aminopyrine - analogs & derivatives Dipyrone - adverse effects Dipyrone - therapeutic use Female Humans Male Meperidine - adverse effects Meperidine - therapeutic use Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Time Factors |
| title | Management of pain after abdominal surgery: dipyrone compared with pethidine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T08%3A53%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20pain%20after%20abdominal%20surgery:%20dipyrone%20compared%20with%20pethidine&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Patel,%20CV&rft.date=1980-01-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=351S&rft.epage=354S&rft.pages=351S-354S&rft.issn=0306-5251&rft.eissn=1365-2125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01822.x&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pubme%3EBCP1822%3C/wiley_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/7437276&rfr_iscdi=true |