Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia

To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus. Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last mor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2002-10, Vol.236 (4), p.531-541
Hauptverfasser: Hirschl, Ronald B, Yardeni, Dani, Oldham, Keith, Sherman, Neil, Siplovich, Leo, Gross, Eitan, Udassin, Raphael, Cohen, Zehavi, Nagar, Hagith, Geiger, James D, Coran, Arnold G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 541
container_issue 4
container_start_page 531
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 236
creator Hirschl, Ronald B
Yardeni, Dani
Oldham, Keith
Sherman, Neil
Siplovich, Leo
Gross, Eitan
Udassin, Raphael
Cohen, Zehavi
Nagar, Hagith
Geiger, James D
Coran, Arnold G
description To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus. Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement. Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required. Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1422608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72158536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-cf3aa6460a69210babb2e546a47f9fce5321fc64e8bb1a0f4a11aa73ecfe492e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1u1DAQhS0EokvbV0C-4i7gvzgJF0iogoJUiRt6bU3cSdcosYPHW-AleGa83aUUS5Zlz5lzPPoY41K8lmLo3oj9sm3fKCGU3F-auqV9wjayVX0jpRFP2aa-6cYMWp2wF0TfqsL0onvOTqTStre92rDfl0AlB89LhkhrolBCinxKmSOldQu3CDPPuM7gccFYeIjcb8N8kzG-5fhzxRwweuQ_QtlyI7lPkdDvSrhD7oGQDhVa0YdqhUs1pUC8pjxKgJKRApyxZxPMhOfH85Rdf_zw9eJTc_Xl8vPF-6vGaylL4ycNYI0VYIc6_wjjqLA1Fkw3DZPHVis5eWuwH0cJYjIgJUCn0U9oBoX6lL07-K67ccEbXwfLMLs1hwXyL5cguP8rMWzdbbpz0ihlRV8NXh0Ncvq-QypuCeRxniFi2pHrlGz7Vtsq7A9CnxNRxukhRAq3h-n-wnQPMN09zNr68vEn_zUe6ek_bOyf4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72158536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hirschl, Ronald B ; Yardeni, Dani ; Oldham, Keith ; Sherman, Neil ; Siplovich, Leo ; Gross, Eitan ; Udassin, Raphael ; Cohen, Zehavi ; Nagar, Hagith ; Geiger, James D ; Coran, Arnold G</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirschl, Ronald B ; Yardeni, Dani ; Oldham, Keith ; Sherman, Neil ; Siplovich, Leo ; Gross, Eitan ; Udassin, Raphael ; Cohen, Zehavi ; Nagar, Hagith ; Geiger, James D ; Coran, Arnold G</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus. Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement. Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required. Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12368682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Esophageal Atresia - surgery ; Esophageal Diseases - congenital ; Esophageal Diseases - surgery ; Esophagus - abnormalities ; Esophagus - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association ; Stomach - transplantation</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2002-10, Vol.236 (4), p.531-541</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-cf3aa6460a69210babb2e546a47f9fce5321fc64e8bb1a0f4a11aa73ecfe492e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1422608/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1422608/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12368682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirschl, Ronald B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yardeni, Dani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siplovich, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udassin, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Zehavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagar, Hagith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coran, Arnold G</creatorcontrib><title>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus. Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement. Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required. Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal Atresia - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - congenital</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagus - abnormalities</subject><subject>Esophagus - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association</subject><subject>Stomach - transplantation</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1u1DAQhS0EokvbV0C-4i7gvzgJF0iogoJUiRt6bU3cSdcosYPHW-AleGa83aUUS5Zlz5lzPPoY41K8lmLo3oj9sm3fKCGU3F-auqV9wjayVX0jpRFP2aa-6cYMWp2wF0TfqsL0onvOTqTStre92rDfl0AlB89LhkhrolBCinxKmSOldQu3CDPPuM7gccFYeIjcb8N8kzG-5fhzxRwweuQ_QtlyI7lPkdDvSrhD7oGQDhVa0YdqhUs1pUC8pjxKgJKRApyxZxPMhOfH85Rdf_zw9eJTc_Xl8vPF-6vGaylL4ycNYI0VYIc6_wjjqLA1Fkw3DZPHVis5eWuwH0cJYjIgJUCn0U9oBoX6lL07-K67ccEbXwfLMLs1hwXyL5cguP8rMWzdbbpz0ihlRV8NXh0Ncvq-QypuCeRxniFi2pHrlGz7Vtsq7A9CnxNRxukhRAq3h-n-wnQPMN09zNr68vEn_zUe6ek_bOyf4g</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Hirschl, Ronald B</creator><creator>Yardeni, Dani</creator><creator>Oldham, Keith</creator><creator>Sherman, Neil</creator><creator>Siplovich, Leo</creator><creator>Gross, Eitan</creator><creator>Udassin, Raphael</creator><creator>Cohen, Zehavi</creator><creator>Nagar, Hagith</creator><creator>Geiger, James D</creator><creator>Coran, Arnold G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</title><author>Hirschl, Ronald B ; Yardeni, Dani ; Oldham, Keith ; Sherman, Neil ; Siplovich, Leo ; Gross, Eitan ; Udassin, Raphael ; Cohen, Zehavi ; Nagar, Hagith ; Geiger, James D ; Coran, Arnold G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-cf3aa6460a69210babb2e546a47f9fce5321fc64e8bb1a0f4a11aa73ecfe492e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal Atresia - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - congenital</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagus - abnormalities</topic><topic>Esophagus - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association</topic><topic>Stomach - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirschl, Ronald B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yardeni, Dani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siplovich, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udassin, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Zehavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagar, Hagith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coran, Arnold G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirschl, Ronald B</au><au>Yardeni, Dani</au><au>Oldham, Keith</au><au>Sherman, Neil</au><au>Siplovich, Leo</au><au>Gross, Eitan</au><au>Udassin, Raphael</au><au>Cohen, Zehavi</au><au>Nagar, Hagith</au><au>Geiger, James D</au><au>Coran, Arnold G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>541</epage><pages>531-541</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus. Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children. The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement. Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required. Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12368682</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2002-10, Vol.236 (4), p.531-541
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1422608
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Esophageal Atresia - surgery
Esophageal Diseases - congenital
Esophageal Diseases - surgery
Esophagus - abnormalities
Esophagus - surgery
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association
Stomach - transplantation
title Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T00%3A41%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gastric%20transposition%20for%20esophageal%20replacement%20in%20children:%20experience%20with%2041%20consecutive%20cases%20with%20special%20emphasis%20on%20esophageal%20atresia&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Hirschl,%20Ronald%20B&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=541&rft.pages=531-541&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72158536%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72158536&rft_id=info:pmid/12368682&rfr_iscdi=true