Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia
To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus. Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last mor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgery 2002-10, Vol.236 (4), p.531-541 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 541 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 236 |
creator | Hirschl, Ronald B Yardeni, Dani Oldham, Keith Sherman, Neil Siplovich, Leo Gross, Eitan Udassin, Raphael Cohen, Zehavi Nagar, Hagith Geiger, James D Coran, Arnold G |
description | To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.
Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.
Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.
Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1422608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72158536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-cf3aa6460a69210babb2e546a47f9fce5321fc64e8bb1a0f4a11aa73ecfe492e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1u1DAQhS0EokvbV0C-4i7gvzgJF0iogoJUiRt6bU3cSdcosYPHW-AleGa83aUUS5Zlz5lzPPoY41K8lmLo3oj9sm3fKCGU3F-auqV9wjayVX0jpRFP2aa-6cYMWp2wF0TfqsL0onvOTqTStre92rDfl0AlB89LhkhrolBCinxKmSOldQu3CDPPuM7gccFYeIjcb8N8kzG-5fhzxRwweuQ_QtlyI7lPkdDvSrhD7oGQDhVa0YdqhUs1pUC8pjxKgJKRApyxZxPMhOfH85Rdf_zw9eJTc_Xl8vPF-6vGaylL4ycNYI0VYIc6_wjjqLA1Fkw3DZPHVis5eWuwH0cJYjIgJUCn0U9oBoX6lL07-K67ccEbXwfLMLs1hwXyL5cguP8rMWzdbbpz0ihlRV8NXh0Ncvq-QypuCeRxniFi2pHrlGz7Vtsq7A9CnxNRxukhRAq3h-n-wnQPMN09zNr68vEn_zUe6ek_bOyf4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72158536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hirschl, Ronald B ; Yardeni, Dani ; Oldham, Keith ; Sherman, Neil ; Siplovich, Leo ; Gross, Eitan ; Udassin, Raphael ; Cohen, Zehavi ; Nagar, Hagith ; Geiger, James D ; Coran, Arnold G</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirschl, Ronald B ; Yardeni, Dani ; Oldham, Keith ; Sherman, Neil ; Siplovich, Leo ; Gross, Eitan ; Udassin, Raphael ; Cohen, Zehavi ; Nagar, Hagith ; Geiger, James D ; Coran, Arnold G</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.
Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.
Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.
Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12368682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Esophageal Atresia - surgery ; Esophageal Diseases - congenital ; Esophageal Diseases - surgery ; Esophagus - abnormalities ; Esophagus - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Postoperative Complications ; Retrospective Studies ; Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association ; Stomach - transplantation</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2002-10, Vol.236 (4), p.531-541</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-cf3aa6460a69210babb2e546a47f9fce5321fc64e8bb1a0f4a11aa73ecfe492e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1422608/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1422608/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12368682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirschl, Ronald B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yardeni, Dani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siplovich, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udassin, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Zehavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagar, Hagith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coran, Arnold G</creatorcontrib><title>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.
Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.
Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.
Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal Atresia - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - congenital</subject><subject>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagus - abnormalities</subject><subject>Esophagus - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association</subject><subject>Stomach - transplantation</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1u1DAQhS0EokvbV0C-4i7gvzgJF0iogoJUiRt6bU3cSdcosYPHW-AleGa83aUUS5Zlz5lzPPoY41K8lmLo3oj9sm3fKCGU3F-auqV9wjayVX0jpRFP2aa-6cYMWp2wF0TfqsL0onvOTqTStre92rDfl0AlB89LhkhrolBCinxKmSOldQu3CDPPuM7gccFYeIjcb8N8kzG-5fhzxRwweuQ_QtlyI7lPkdDvSrhD7oGQDhVa0YdqhUs1pUC8pjxKgJKRApyxZxPMhOfH85Rdf_zw9eJTc_Xl8vPF-6vGaylL4ycNYI0VYIc6_wjjqLA1Fkw3DZPHVis5eWuwH0cJYjIgJUCn0U9oBoX6lL07-K67ccEbXwfLMLs1hwXyL5cguP8rMWzdbbpz0ihlRV8NXh0Ncvq-QypuCeRxniFi2pHrlGz7Vtsq7A9CnxNRxukhRAq3h-n-wnQPMN09zNr68vEn_zUe6ek_bOyf4g</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Hirschl, Ronald B</creator><creator>Yardeni, Dani</creator><creator>Oldham, Keith</creator><creator>Sherman, Neil</creator><creator>Siplovich, Leo</creator><creator>Gross, Eitan</creator><creator>Udassin, Raphael</creator><creator>Cohen, Zehavi</creator><creator>Nagar, Hagith</creator><creator>Geiger, James D</creator><creator>Coran, Arnold G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</title><author>Hirschl, Ronald B ; Yardeni, Dani ; Oldham, Keith ; Sherman, Neil ; Siplovich, Leo ; Gross, Eitan ; Udassin, Raphael ; Cohen, Zehavi ; Nagar, Hagith ; Geiger, James D ; Coran, Arnold G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-cf3aa6460a69210babb2e546a47f9fce5321fc64e8bb1a0f4a11aa73ecfe492e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal Atresia - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - congenital</topic><topic>Esophageal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagus - abnormalities</topic><topic>Esophagus - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association</topic><topic>Stomach - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirschl, Ronald B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yardeni, Dani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siplovich, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, Eitan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Udassin, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Zehavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagar, Hagith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, James D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coran, Arnold G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirschl, Ronald B</au><au>Yardeni, Dani</au><au>Oldham, Keith</au><au>Sherman, Neil</au><au>Siplovich, Leo</au><au>Gross, Eitan</au><au>Udassin, Raphael</au><au>Cohen, Zehavi</au><au>Nagar, Hagith</au><au>Geiger, James D</au><au>Coran, Arnold G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>541</epage><pages>531-541</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the authors' experience with gastric transposition as a method of esophageal replacement in children with congenital or acquired abnormalities of the esophagus.
Esophageal replacement in children is almost always done for benign disease and thus requires a conduit that will last more than 70 years. The organ most commonly used in the past has been colon; however, most series have been fraught with major complications and conduit loss. For these reasons, in 1985 the authors switched from using colon interpositions to gastric transpositions for esophageal replacement in infants and children.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of 41 patients with the diagnoses of esophageal atresia (n = 26), corrosive injury (n = 8), leiomyomatosis (n = 5), and refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 2) who underwent gastric transposition for esophageal replacement.
Mean +/- SE age at the time of gastric transposition was 3.3 +/- 0.6 years. All but two transpositions were performed through the posterior mediastinum without mortality or loss of the gastric conduit despite previous surgery on the gastric fundus in 8 (20%), previous esophageal operations in 15 (37%), and previous esophageal perforations in 6 (15%) patients. Complications included esophagogastric anastomotic leak (n = 15, 36%), which uniformly resolved without intervention; stricture formation (n = 20, 49%), all of which no longer require dilation; and feeding intolerance necessitating jejunal feeding (n = 8, 20%) due to delayed gastric emptying (n = 3), feeding aversion related to the underlying anomaly (n = 1), or severe neurological impairment (n = 4). No redo anastomoses were required.
Gastric transposition reestablishes effective gastrointestinal continuity with few complications. Oral feeding and appropriate weight gain are achieved in most children. Therefore, gastric transposition is an appropriate alternative for esophageal replacement in infants and children.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12368682</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 2002-10, Vol.236 (4), p.531-541 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1422608 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adolescent Child Child, Preschool Digestive System Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Esophageal Atresia - surgery Esophageal Diseases - congenital Esophageal Diseases - surgery Esophagus - abnormalities Esophagus - surgery Female Humans Infant Male Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Postoperative Complications Retrospective Studies Scientific Papers of the American Surgical Association Stomach - transplantation |
title | Gastric transposition for esophageal replacement in children: experience with 41 consecutive cases with special emphasis on esophageal atresia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T00%3A41%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gastric%20transposition%20for%20esophageal%20replacement%20in%20children:%20experience%20with%2041%20consecutive%20cases%20with%20special%20emphasis%20on%20esophageal%20atresia&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Hirschl,%20Ronald%20B&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=541&rft.pages=531-541&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72158536%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72158536&rft_id=info:pmid/12368682&rfr_iscdi=true |