Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient education on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potential live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in less postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2000-09, Vol.232 (3), p.392-400
Hauptverfasser: Schweitzer, E J, Wilson, J, Jacobs, S, Machan, C H, Philosophe, B, Farney, A, Colonna, J, Jarrell, B E, Bartlett, S T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 3
container_start_page 392
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 232
creator Schweitzer, E J
Wilson, J
Jacobs, S
Machan, C H
Philosophe, B
Farney, A
Colonna, J
Jarrell, B E
Bartlett, S T
description To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient education on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potential live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in less postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhance the willingness of family and friends to donate. The study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease patients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and February 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group had both formal LD education and LDN available. Records were examined to determine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-typed, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant. Before LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of referrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant within 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunteer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became available, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indicated that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relative risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kaplan-Meier death-censored 1- and 3-year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus 97.5% and 94. 8% for LDN. The availability of LDN and an LD family education program has doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1421152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72230604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-47eb840f9c5dee48927d11ae21af9d83b1b76f1a4aac417ebf9542544b93f36c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCygrdgG_ktgbEKp4VKrEBtaW44xpUBIHOwX173FoqYqlkUczd649B6GE4GuCZXGDx5NnIqVjImOkMQg5QlOSUZESwvExmsYaS7lkdILOQviICi5wcYomowljQk7R3aIzHnSAKvF6gJA4m1Su00PtuuS7HlZJo3vtXTCur83Ycj7poF95MINrN-foxOomwMXunqG3x4fX-XO6fHlazO-XqeE8G1JeQCk4ttJkFQAXkhYVIRoo0VZWgpWkLHJLNNfacBLFVmacZpyXklmWGzZDt1vffl22UBnoBq8b1fu61X6jnK7V_05Xr9S7-1KEUxKZRIOrnYF3n2sIg2rrYKBpdAduHVRBKcM55lEotkITtw4e7P4RgtUITv3RV3v66pd-HL08_OTB4BY3-wEkYoGV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72230604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Schweitzer, E J ; Wilson, J ; Jacobs, S ; Machan, C H ; Philosophe, B ; Farney, A ; Colonna, J ; Jarrell, B E ; Bartlett, S T</creator><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, E J ; Wilson, J ; Jacobs, S ; Machan, C H ; Philosophe, B ; Farney, A ; Colonna, J ; Jarrell, B E ; Bartlett, S T</creatorcontrib><description>To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient education on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potential live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in less postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhance the willingness of family and friends to donate. The study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease patients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and February 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group had both formal LD education and LDN available. Records were examined to determine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-typed, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant. Before LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of referrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant within 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunteer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became available, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indicated that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relative risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kaplan-Meier death-censored 1- and 3-year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus 97.5% and 94. 8% for LDN. The availability of LDN and an LD family education program has doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10973389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Living Donors - supply &amp; distribution ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Education as Topic ; Scientific Papers ; Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2000-09, Vol.232 (3), p.392-400</ispartof><rights>2000 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-47eb840f9c5dee48927d11ae21af9d83b1b76f1a4aac417ebf9542544b93f36c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-47eb840f9c5dee48927d11ae21af9d83b1b76f1a4aac417ebf9542544b93f36c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421152/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1421152/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10973389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machan, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophe, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farney, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colonna, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrell, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, S T</creatorcontrib><title>Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient education on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potential live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in less postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhance the willingness of family and friends to donate. The study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease patients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and February 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group had both formal LD education and LDN available. Records were examined to determine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-typed, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant. Before LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of referrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant within 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunteer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became available, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indicated that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relative risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kaplan-Meier death-censored 1- and 3-year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus 97.5% and 94. 8% for LDN. The availability of LDN and an LD family education program has doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Living Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Scientific Papers</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwCygrdgG_ktgbEKp4VKrEBtaW44xpUBIHOwX173FoqYqlkUczd649B6GE4GuCZXGDx5NnIqVjImOkMQg5QlOSUZESwvExmsYaS7lkdILOQviICi5wcYomowljQk7R3aIzHnSAKvF6gJA4m1Su00PtuuS7HlZJo3vtXTCur83Ycj7poF95MINrN-foxOomwMXunqG3x4fX-XO6fHlazO-XqeE8G1JeQCk4ttJkFQAXkhYVIRoo0VZWgpWkLHJLNNfacBLFVmacZpyXklmWGzZDt1vffl22UBnoBq8b1fu61X6jnK7V_05Xr9S7-1KEUxKZRIOrnYF3n2sIg2rrYKBpdAduHVRBKcM55lEotkITtw4e7P4RgtUITv3RV3v66pd-HL08_OTB4BY3-wEkYoGV</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Schweitzer, E J</creator><creator>Wilson, J</creator><creator>Jacobs, S</creator><creator>Machan, C H</creator><creator>Philosophe, B</creator><creator>Farney, A</creator><creator>Colonna, J</creator><creator>Jarrell, B E</creator><creator>Bartlett, S T</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy</title><author>Schweitzer, E J ; Wilson, J ; Jacobs, S ; Machan, C H ; Philosophe, B ; Farney, A ; Colonna, J ; Jarrell, B E ; Bartlett, S T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-47eb840f9c5dee48927d11ae21af9d83b1b76f1a4aac417ebf9542544b93f36c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Living Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrectomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Scientific Papers</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schweitzer, E J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machan, C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philosophe, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farney, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colonna, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrell, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, S T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schweitzer, E J</au><au>Wilson, J</au><au>Jacobs, S</au><au>Machan, C H</au><au>Philosophe, B</au><au>Farney, A</au><au>Colonna, J</au><au>Jarrell, B E</au><au>Bartlett, S T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>232</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>392-400</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>To examine the impact of laparoscopic nephrectomy and recipient education on the proportion of kidney recipients who could identify a potential live donor, and on the live donor (LD) transplantation rate. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) results in less postoperative surgical pain, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery than the standard open donor nephrectomy (ODN). The authors hypothesized that the availability of this less invasive surgical technique would enhance the willingness of family and friends to donate. The study population consisted of 3,298 end-stage renal disease patients referred for kidney transplant evaluation between November 1991 and February 2000, divided into three groups. The first group received no formal LD education and had only ODN available. The second group received formal education about the LD process and had only ODN available. The third group had both formal LD education and LDN available. Records were examined to determine what proportion of each group had any potential donors tissue-typed, and the rate at which they received an LD transplant. Before LDN availability and formal LD education, only 35.1% of referrals found a potential donor, and only 12.2% received an LD transplant within 3 years. Institution of a formal education program increased the volunteer rate to 39.0%, and 16.5% received an LD transplant. When LDN became available, 50% of patients were able to find at least one potential donor, and within 3 years 24.7% received an LD transplant. Regression analysis indicated that availability of LDN was independently associated with a 1.9 relative risk of receiving an LD transplant. Kaplan-Meier death-censored 1- and 3-year graft survival rates for ODN transplants were 95.8% and 90.6%, versus 97.5% and 94. 8% for LDN. The availability of LDN and an LD family education program has doubled the live donor transplantation rate, and outcomes remain excellent.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10973389</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000658-200009000-00011</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2000-09, Vol.232 (3), p.392-400
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1421152
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Living Donors - supply & distribution
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrectomy - statistics & numerical data
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Education as Topic
Scientific Papers
Tissue Donors - supply & distribution
title Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T22%3A12%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increased%20rates%20of%20donation%20with%20laparoscopic%20donor%20nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Schweitzer,%20E%20J&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=232&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=392-400&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000658-200009000-00011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72230604%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72230604&rft_id=info:pmid/10973389&rfr_iscdi=true