Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index scientific reports

Rationale and Objectives. To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy. Materials and Methods. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2004-02, Vol.11 (2), p.178-189
Hauptverfasser: Zou, Kelly H, Warfield, Simon K, Bharatha, Aditya, Tempany, Clare M C, Kaus, Michael R, Haker, Steven J, Wells, William M, Jolesz, Ferenc A, Kikinis, Ron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 189
container_issue 2
container_start_page 178
container_title Academic radiology
container_volume 11
creator Zou, Kelly H
Warfield, Simon K
Bharatha, Aditya
Tempany, Clare M C
Kaus, Michael R
Haker, Steven J
Wells, William M
Jolesz, Ferenc A
Kikinis, Ron
description Rationale and Objectives. To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy. Materials and Methods. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the reproducibility of manual segmentations and the spatial overlap accuracy of automated probabilistic fractional segmentation of MR images, illustrated on two clinical examples. Example 1: 10 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy patients underwent both preoperative 1.5T and intraoperative 0.5T MR imaging. For each case, 5 repeated manual segmentations of the prostate peripheral zone were performed separately on preoperative and on intraoperative images. Example 2: A semi-automated probabilistic fractional segmentation algorithm was applied to MR imaging of 9 cases with 3 types of brain tumors. DSC values were computed and logit-transformed values were compared in the mean with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. Example 1: The mean DSCs of 0.883 (range, 0.876-0.893) with 1.5T preoperative MRI and 0.838 (range, 0.819-0.852) with 0.5T intraoperative MRI (P < .001) were within and at the margin of the range of good reproducibility, respectively. Example 2: Wide ranges of DSC were observed in brain tumor segmentations: Meningiomas (0.519-0.893), astrocytomas (0.487-0.972), and other mixed gliomas (0.490-0.899). Conclusion. The DSC value is a simple and useful summary measure of spatial overlap, which can be applied to studies of reproducibility and accuracy in image segmentation. We observed generally satisfactory but variable validation results in two clinical applications. This metric may be adapted for similar validation tasks.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00671-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1415224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>32228915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p171t-efb5bad2f4e0981b859fbf6a9b703bb4cd50831484a2125fc7b27413c48b39193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj0tLAzEUhbNQbK3-BCEr0cVobpJ5ZCNI8QUFF9X1kGSSNjIzmU4yxf57AxXB1eV-557DuQhdAbkDAsX9GkhZZAVj9IawW0KKErLqBM3_8Aydh_BFCORFxc7QDLgoeS7YHG3XUUYXotOyxXvZuiatvsfeYtfJjcHBbDrTxyPdTekiHrCSwTQ4AYnDkKTk9XsztnLArm_MNw7aJZOzTuPRDH6M4QKdWtkGc_k7F-jz-elj-Zqt3l_elo-rbIASYmasypVsqOWGiApUlQurbCGFKglTiusmJxUDXnFJgeZWl4qWHJjmlWICBFugh2PuMKnONDrVGGVbD2N6ZzzUXrr6v9K7bb3x-xo45JTyFHD9GzD63WRCrDsXtGlb2Rs_hZpRSisBOfsB6Q50lw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32228915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index scientific reports</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zou, Kelly H ; Warfield, Simon K ; Bharatha, Aditya ; Tempany, Clare M C ; Kaus, Michael R ; Haker, Steven J ; Wells, William M ; Jolesz, Ferenc A ; Kikinis, Ron</creator><creatorcontrib>Zou, Kelly H ; Warfield, Simon K ; Bharatha, Aditya ; Tempany, Clare M C ; Kaus, Michael R ; Haker, Steven J ; Wells, William M ; Jolesz, Ferenc A ; Kikinis, Ron</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale and Objectives. To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy. Materials and Methods. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the reproducibility of manual segmentations and the spatial overlap accuracy of automated probabilistic fractional segmentation of MR images, illustrated on two clinical examples. Example 1: 10 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy patients underwent both preoperative 1.5T and intraoperative 0.5T MR imaging. For each case, 5 repeated manual segmentations of the prostate peripheral zone were performed separately on preoperative and on intraoperative images. Example 2: A semi-automated probabilistic fractional segmentation algorithm was applied to MR imaging of 9 cases with 3 types of brain tumors. DSC values were computed and logit-transformed values were compared in the mean with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. Example 1: The mean DSCs of 0.883 (range, 0.876-0.893) with 1.5T preoperative MRI and 0.838 (range, 0.819-0.852) with 0.5T intraoperative MRI (P &lt; .001) were within and at the margin of the range of good reproducibility, respectively. Example 2: Wide ranges of DSC were observed in brain tumor segmentations: Meningiomas (0.519-0.893), astrocytomas (0.487-0.972), and other mixed gliomas (0.490-0.899). Conclusion. The DSC value is a simple and useful summary measure of spatial overlap, which can be applied to studies of reproducibility and accuracy in image segmentation. We observed generally satisfactory but variable validation results in two clinical applications. This metric may be adapted for similar validation tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00671-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14974593</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2004-02, Vol.11 (2), p.178-189</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zou, Kelly H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warfield, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharatha, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tempany, Clare M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaus, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haker, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolesz, Ferenc A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikinis, Ron</creatorcontrib><title>Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index scientific reports</title><title>Academic radiology</title><description>Rationale and Objectives. To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy. Materials and Methods. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the reproducibility of manual segmentations and the spatial overlap accuracy of automated probabilistic fractional segmentation of MR images, illustrated on two clinical examples. Example 1: 10 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy patients underwent both preoperative 1.5T and intraoperative 0.5T MR imaging. For each case, 5 repeated manual segmentations of the prostate peripheral zone were performed separately on preoperative and on intraoperative images. Example 2: A semi-automated probabilistic fractional segmentation algorithm was applied to MR imaging of 9 cases with 3 types of brain tumors. DSC values were computed and logit-transformed values were compared in the mean with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. Example 1: The mean DSCs of 0.883 (range, 0.876-0.893) with 1.5T preoperative MRI and 0.838 (range, 0.819-0.852) with 0.5T intraoperative MRI (P &lt; .001) were within and at the margin of the range of good reproducibility, respectively. Example 2: Wide ranges of DSC were observed in brain tumor segmentations: Meningiomas (0.519-0.893), astrocytomas (0.487-0.972), and other mixed gliomas (0.490-0.899). Conclusion. The DSC value is a simple and useful summary measure of spatial overlap, which can be applied to studies of reproducibility and accuracy in image segmentation. We observed generally satisfactory but variable validation results in two clinical applications. This metric may be adapted for similar validation tasks.</description><issn>1076-6332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVj0tLAzEUhbNQbK3-BCEr0cVobpJ5ZCNI8QUFF9X1kGSSNjIzmU4yxf57AxXB1eV-557DuQhdAbkDAsX9GkhZZAVj9IawW0KKErLqBM3_8Aydh_BFCORFxc7QDLgoeS7YHG3XUUYXotOyxXvZuiatvsfeYtfJjcHBbDrTxyPdTekiHrCSwTQ4AYnDkKTk9XsztnLArm_MNw7aJZOzTuPRDH6M4QKdWtkGc_k7F-jz-elj-Zqt3l_elo-rbIASYmasypVsqOWGiApUlQurbCGFKglTiusmJxUDXnFJgeZWl4qWHJjmlWICBFugh2PuMKnONDrVGGVbD2N6ZzzUXrr6v9K7bb3x-xo45JTyFHD9GzD63WRCrDsXtGlb2Rs_hZpRSisBOfsB6Q50lw</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Zou, Kelly H</creator><creator>Warfield, Simon K</creator><creator>Bharatha, Aditya</creator><creator>Tempany, Clare M C</creator><creator>Kaus, Michael R</creator><creator>Haker, Steven J</creator><creator>Wells, William M</creator><creator>Jolesz, Ferenc A</creator><creator>Kikinis, Ron</creator><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index scientific reports</title><author>Zou, Kelly H ; Warfield, Simon K ; Bharatha, Aditya ; Tempany, Clare M C ; Kaus, Michael R ; Haker, Steven J ; Wells, William M ; Jolesz, Ferenc A ; Kikinis, Ron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p171t-efb5bad2f4e0981b859fbf6a9b703bb4cd50831484a2125fc7b27413c48b39193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zou, Kelly H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warfield, Simon K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharatha, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tempany, Clare M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaus, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haker, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, William M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jolesz, Ferenc A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kikinis, Ron</creatorcontrib><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zou, Kelly H</au><au>Warfield, Simon K</au><au>Bharatha, Aditya</au><au>Tempany, Clare M C</au><au>Kaus, Michael R</au><au>Haker, Steven J</au><au>Wells, William M</au><au>Jolesz, Ferenc A</au><au>Kikinis, Ron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index scientific reports</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>178</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>178-189</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><abstract>Rationale and Objectives. To examine a statistical validation method based on the spatial overlap between two sets of segmentations of the same anatomy. Materials and Methods. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used as a statistical validation metric to evaluate the performance of both the reproducibility of manual segmentations and the spatial overlap accuracy of automated probabilistic fractional segmentation of MR images, illustrated on two clinical examples. Example 1: 10 consecutive cases of prostate brachytherapy patients underwent both preoperative 1.5T and intraoperative 0.5T MR imaging. For each case, 5 repeated manual segmentations of the prostate peripheral zone were performed separately on preoperative and on intraoperative images. Example 2: A semi-automated probabilistic fractional segmentation algorithm was applied to MR imaging of 9 cases with 3 types of brain tumors. DSC values were computed and logit-transformed values were compared in the mean with the analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results. Example 1: The mean DSCs of 0.883 (range, 0.876-0.893) with 1.5T preoperative MRI and 0.838 (range, 0.819-0.852) with 0.5T intraoperative MRI (P &lt; .001) were within and at the margin of the range of good reproducibility, respectively. Example 2: Wide ranges of DSC were observed in brain tumor segmentations: Meningiomas (0.519-0.893), astrocytomas (0.487-0.972), and other mixed gliomas (0.490-0.899). Conclusion. The DSC value is a simple and useful summary measure of spatial overlap, which can be applied to studies of reproducibility and accuracy in image segmentation. We observed generally satisfactory but variable validation results in two clinical applications. This metric may be adapted for similar validation tasks.</abstract><pmid>14974593</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00671-8</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-6332
ispartof Academic radiology, 2004-02, Vol.11 (2), p.178-189
issn 1076-6332
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1415224
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index scientific reports
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A44%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Statistical%20validation%20of%20image%20segmentation%20quality%20based%20on%20a%20spatial%20overlap%20index%20scientific%20reports&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Zou,%20Kelly%20H&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=178&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=178-189&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00671-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E32228915%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32228915&rft_id=info:pmid/14974593&rfr_iscdi=true