Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint
We evaluated traditional and modified practices for abating lead-based paint in homes of children with blood-lead concentrations (PbB) greater than 1.4 mumol/L (greater than 29 micrograms/dl). Traditional abatement resulted in acute increases in: 1) lead contaminated house dust (generally 3 to 6-fol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 1990-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1240-1245 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1245 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1240 |
container_title | American journal of public health (1971) |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Farfel, M R Chisolm, J J, Jr |
description | We evaluated traditional and modified practices for abating lead-based paint in homes of children with blood-lead concentrations (PbB) greater than 1.4 mumol/L (greater than 29 micrograms/dl). Traditional abatement resulted in acute increases in: 1) lead contaminated house dust (generally 3 to 6-fold over pre-abatement levels, but at abated sites typically 10 to 100-fold); and 2) the PbBs of nearly half of the occupant children. Modified practices represented modest short-term improvement compared to traditional practices but were also inadequate. By six months, it was clear that neither form of abatement resulted in long-term reductions of PbB or house dust lead levels, leaving children at continued risk of excessive exposure to lead and permanent adverse neurobehavioral effects. Windows were found to be high sources of lead contaminated house dust. Recommendations are made for improved abatement practices including more complete abatement of window units and more effective clean-up to remove lead-bearing dust. Thirteen million US children live in lead-painted dwellings. Research is needed to identify abatement strategies that will be practical and well suited to the current understanding of low-level lead toxicity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2105/AJPH.80.10.1240 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1404837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2737286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2639710348287670ea45a45272680d4fd9932966202503bcfa73f1a6f6b873243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk2LFDEQhoMo6zh69iQ0KuKlZ_Pd3ZeFZVFHWdCDnkNNOtnO0J2MSXrFf2-aGcb1IASSSj3vm1RRCL0keEMJFpfXX75tNy3elJhQjh-hFRGc1Bjz9jFaYdzhcmbyKXqW0h5jQjpBLtAFJUwy2q3QvDUw5qEC31fG37sY_GR8hrEKc9ZhMqkKtsoRepdd8OV-IafQO-tMXx0i6Ox0oWyIFewgm0W-aKJJri9nVzSjgb7eQVoU4Hx-jp5YGJN5cdrX6MfHD99vtvXt10-fb65vay0kyzWVrGsIZrylbSMbbICLsmhDZYt7bvuuK0VISTEVmO20hYZZAtLKXdswytkaXR19D_NuMr0u34kwqkN0E8TfKoBT_2a8G9RduFeElwayphi8PhqElJ1K2mWjBx28NzorySRvG1Ggd6dXYvg5m5TV5JI24wjehDkpUj4jiKR_3c7gPsyxNDUpSgTuJC8FrdGb_0GEdi2jS62FujxSOoaUorHnoghWy2SoZTJUi5d4mYyiePWwF2f-NAol__aUh6RhtBG8dumMCcFx6XrB3h-xwd0Nv1w0Kk0wjsWUKNgfhgcv_gFDGs08</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298322503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Farfel, M R ; Chisolm, J J, Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>Farfel, M R ; Chisolm, J J, Jr</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated traditional and modified practices for abating lead-based paint in homes of children with blood-lead concentrations (PbB) greater than 1.4 mumol/L (greater than 29 micrograms/dl). Traditional abatement resulted in acute increases in: 1) lead contaminated house dust (generally 3 to 6-fold over pre-abatement levels, but at abated sites typically 10 to 100-fold); and 2) the PbBs of nearly half of the occupant children. Modified practices represented modest short-term improvement compared to traditional practices but were also inadequate. By six months, it was clear that neither form of abatement resulted in long-term reductions of PbB or house dust lead levels, leaving children at continued risk of excessive exposure to lead and permanent adverse neurobehavioral effects. Windows were found to be high sources of lead contaminated house dust. Recommendations are made for improved abatement practices including more complete abatement of window units and more effective clean-up to remove lead-bearing dust. Thirteen million US children live in lead-painted dwellings. Research is needed to identify abatement strategies that will be practical and well suited to the current understanding of low-level lead toxicity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.80.10.1240</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2136329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc</publisher><subject>560300 - Chemicals Metabolism & Toxicology ; AGE GROUPS ; Biological and medical sciences ; BUILDINGS ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; CHILDREN ; COATINGS ; Dust - analysis ; ELEMENTS ; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE ; Female ; Hazardous materials ; HOUSES ; Housing ; Humans ; Infant ; LEAD ; Lead - analysis ; Lead - blood ; Lead content ; Lead poisoning ; Male ; Medical sciences ; METABOLISM ; METALS ; Paint - analysis ; Paint - standards ; PAINTS ; Paints & painting industry ; Poisoning ; POLLUTION ABATEMENT ; Prospective Studies ; Public health ; RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGS. AND BIOL. MAT ; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS ; TOXICITY ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 1990-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1240-1245</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Oct 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2639710348287670ea45a45272680d4fd9932966202503bcfa73f1a6f6b873243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2639710348287670ea45a45272680d4fd9932966202503bcfa73f1a6f6b873243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1404837/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1404837/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27866,27869,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5540680$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2136329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/6364875$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farfel, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisolm, J J, Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>We evaluated traditional and modified practices for abating lead-based paint in homes of children with blood-lead concentrations (PbB) greater than 1.4 mumol/L (greater than 29 micrograms/dl). Traditional abatement resulted in acute increases in: 1) lead contaminated house dust (generally 3 to 6-fold over pre-abatement levels, but at abated sites typically 10 to 100-fold); and 2) the PbBs of nearly half of the occupant children. Modified practices represented modest short-term improvement compared to traditional practices but were also inadequate. By six months, it was clear that neither form of abatement resulted in long-term reductions of PbB or house dust lead levels, leaving children at continued risk of excessive exposure to lead and permanent adverse neurobehavioral effects. Windows were found to be high sources of lead contaminated house dust. Recommendations are made for improved abatement practices including more complete abatement of window units and more effective clean-up to remove lead-bearing dust. Thirteen million US children live in lead-painted dwellings. Research is needed to identify abatement strategies that will be practical and well suited to the current understanding of low-level lead toxicity.</description><subject>560300 - Chemicals Metabolism & Toxicology</subject><subject>AGE GROUPS</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BUILDINGS</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>CHILDREN</subject><subject>COATINGS</subject><subject>Dust - analysis</subject><subject>ELEMENTS</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hazardous materials</subject><subject>HOUSES</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>LEAD</subject><subject>Lead - analysis</subject><subject>Lead - blood</subject><subject>Lead content</subject><subject>Lead poisoning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>METABOLISM</subject><subject>METALS</subject><subject>Paint - analysis</subject><subject>Paint - standards</subject><subject>PAINTS</subject><subject>Paints & painting industry</subject><subject>Poisoning</subject><subject>POLLUTION ABATEMENT</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGS. AND BIOL. MAT</subject><subject>RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS</subject><subject>TOXICITY</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk2LFDEQhoMo6zh69iQ0KuKlZ_Pd3ZeFZVFHWdCDnkNNOtnO0J2MSXrFf2-aGcb1IASSSj3vm1RRCL0keEMJFpfXX75tNy3elJhQjh-hFRGc1Bjz9jFaYdzhcmbyKXqW0h5jQjpBLtAFJUwy2q3QvDUw5qEC31fG37sY_GR8hrEKc9ZhMqkKtsoRepdd8OV-IafQO-tMXx0i6Ox0oWyIFewgm0W-aKJJri9nVzSjgb7eQVoU4Hx-jp5YGJN5cdrX6MfHD99vtvXt10-fb65vay0kyzWVrGsIZrylbSMbbICLsmhDZYt7bvuuK0VISTEVmO20hYZZAtLKXdswytkaXR19D_NuMr0u34kwqkN0E8TfKoBT_2a8G9RduFeElwayphi8PhqElJ1K2mWjBx28NzorySRvG1Ggd6dXYvg5m5TV5JI24wjehDkpUj4jiKR_3c7gPsyxNDUpSgTuJC8FrdGb_0GEdi2jS62FujxSOoaUorHnoghWy2SoZTJUi5d4mYyiePWwF2f-NAol__aUh6RhtBG8dumMCcFx6XrB3h-xwd0Nv1w0Kk0wjsWUKNgfhgcv_gFDGs08</recordid><startdate>19901001</startdate><enddate>19901001</enddate><creator>Farfel, M R</creator><creator>Chisolm, J J, Jr</creator><general>Am Public Health Assoc</general><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901001</creationdate><title>Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint</title><author>Farfel, M R ; Chisolm, J J, Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2639710348287670ea45a45272680d4fd9932966202503bcfa73f1a6f6b873243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>560300 - Chemicals Metabolism & Toxicology</topic><topic>AGE GROUPS</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BUILDINGS</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>CHILDREN</topic><topic>COATINGS</topic><topic>Dust - analysis</topic><topic>ELEMENTS</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hazardous materials</topic><topic>HOUSES</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>LEAD</topic><topic>Lead - analysis</topic><topic>Lead - blood</topic><topic>Lead content</topic><topic>Lead poisoning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>METABOLISM</topic><topic>METALS</topic><topic>Paint - analysis</topic><topic>Paint - standards</topic><topic>PAINTS</topic><topic>Paints & painting industry</topic><topic>Poisoning</topic><topic>POLLUTION ABATEMENT</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGS. AND BIOL. MAT</topic><topic>RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS</topic><topic>TOXICITY</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farfel, M R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chisolm, J J, Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farfel, M R</au><au>Chisolm, J J, Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>1990-10-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1240</spage><epage>1245</epage><pages>1240-1245</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>We evaluated traditional and modified practices for abating lead-based paint in homes of children with blood-lead concentrations (PbB) greater than 1.4 mumol/L (greater than 29 micrograms/dl). Traditional abatement resulted in acute increases in: 1) lead contaminated house dust (generally 3 to 6-fold over pre-abatement levels, but at abated sites typically 10 to 100-fold); and 2) the PbBs of nearly half of the occupant children. Modified practices represented modest short-term improvement compared to traditional practices but were also inadequate. By six months, it was clear that neither form of abatement resulted in long-term reductions of PbB or house dust lead levels, leaving children at continued risk of excessive exposure to lead and permanent adverse neurobehavioral effects. Windows were found to be high sources of lead contaminated house dust. Recommendations are made for improved abatement practices including more complete abatement of window units and more effective clean-up to remove lead-bearing dust. Thirteen million US children live in lead-painted dwellings. Research is needed to identify abatement strategies that will be practical and well suited to the current understanding of low-level lead toxicity.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Public Health Assoc</pub><pmid>2136329</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.80.10.1240</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-0036 |
ispartof | American journal of public health (1971), 1990-10, Vol.80 (10), p.1240-1245 |
issn | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1404837 |
source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Education Source; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 560300 - Chemicals Metabolism & Toxicology AGE GROUPS Biological and medical sciences BUILDINGS Child Child, Preschool CHILDREN COATINGS Dust - analysis ELEMENTS ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE Female Hazardous materials HOUSES Housing Humans Infant LEAD Lead - analysis Lead - blood Lead content Lead poisoning Male Medical sciences METABOLISM METALS Paint - analysis Paint - standards PAINTS Paints & painting industry Poisoning POLLUTION ABATEMENT Prospective Studies Public health RADIATION, THERMAL, AND OTHER ENVIRON. POLLUTANT EFFECTS ON LIVING ORGS. AND BIOL. MAT RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TOXICITY Toxicology |
title | Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T23%3A24%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20and%20environmental%20outcomes%20of%20traditional%20and%20modified%20practices%20for%20abatement%20of%20residential%20lead-based%20paint&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Farfel,%20M%20R&rft.date=1990-10-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1240&rft.epage=1245&rft.pages=1240-1245&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.80.10.1240&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2737286%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298322503&rft_id=info:pmid/2136329&rfr_iscdi=true |