Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients

A cross sectional study was undertaken to examine the relationship between coeliac disease and bone mineral density. The 135 female coeliac patients registered on the database of the Department of Gastroenterology at Hull Royal Infirmary were approached by letter, advising them of a potential risk o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 1995-11, Vol.37 (5), p.639-642
Hauptverfasser: Pistorius, L R, Sweidan, W H, Purdie, D W, Steel, S A, Howey, S, Bennett, J R, Sutton, D R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 642
container_issue 5
container_start_page 639
container_title Gut
container_volume 37
creator Pistorius, L R
Sweidan, W H
Purdie, D W
Steel, S A
Howey, S
Bennett, J R
Sutton, D R
description A cross sectional study was undertaken to examine the relationship between coeliac disease and bone mineral density. The 135 female coeliac patients registered on the database of the Department of Gastroenterology at Hull Royal Infirmary were approached by letter, advising them of a potential risk of osteoporosis and inviting them to undergo bone densitometry. A total of 81 registered women (60%) attended the Osteoporosis Laboratory, Princess Royal Hospital and underwent dual energy x ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. Historical data relating to the time of diagnosis and adherence to a gluten free diet were obtained. A control group was selected from the local normal population and was first matched for height, weight, and menopausal status. Postmenopausal patients were then further matched to controls of equivalent menopausal age. In coeliac patients, bone mineral density expressed in g/cm2 as mean (SD) was significantly lower at the lumbar spine (1.076 (0.186)) than in the control group (1.155 (0.143), p < 0.001). This was also the case at the femoral neck (0.887 (0.142) versus 0.965 (0.127), p < 0.001). When the coeliac patients were stratified by menopausal status, it was found that femoral neck bone mineral density was significantly below control values in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Spinal bone mineral density exhibited a significant decrement only in the postmenopausal group. The age at diagnosis of coeliac disease and adherence to a gluten free diet did not influence bone mineral density at either hip or spine. These results confirm coeliac patients' higher risk of osteopenia. Coeliac disease should be added to the list of medical conditions which constitute an indication for bone densitometry in order that the individual risk of osteoporosis related fracture may be determined.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/gut.37.5.639
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1382867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>77813110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4219-46dd21f4f7cfbf21f3a8c4ce4efa2ff801b8db73d7c88749723eacb430d0101c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo67h68yoEFL3YY766k74Iy6CusuhFRfYSqpPKmrE7PdvpFve_N8sMg3rwVAXvx6tXPEIec7bmXDavrpZ5LfW6XjeyvUNWXDWmksKYu2TFGNdVrVV7nzzIecsYM6blJ-TE1KptpVmRs82IfQRHfcwIGSkkT7sxIR1iwgl66jHlON_QmCj4pZ9pwAF6pDuYI6Y5PyT3AvQZHx3mKfny9s3nzXl18end-83ZRdUpwdtKNd4LHlTQLnShbBKMUw4VBhAhGMY74zstvXbGlMRaSATXKck844w7eUpe7313Szegd-V2iWd3UxxgurEjRPu3kuJ3ezX-tFwaYRpdDJ4fDKbxesE82yFmh30PCcclW60Nl5yzAj79B9yOy5TKc5ZrzVhTi9oU6uWectOY84ThGIUze1uMLcVYqW1tSzEFf_Jn_CN8aKLozw46ZAd9mCC5mI-YMK2om1us2mMxz_jrKMP0w5YXdW0_ft3YSy6ay2_q3H4o_Is93w3b_wf8DUmEsoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770065258</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pistorius, L R ; Sweidan, W H ; Purdie, D W ; Steel, S A ; Howey, S ; Bennett, J R ; Sutton, D R</creator><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, L R ; Sweidan, W H ; Purdie, D W ; Steel, S A ; Howey, S ; Bennett, J R ; Sutton, D R</creatorcontrib><description>A cross sectional study was undertaken to examine the relationship between coeliac disease and bone mineral density. The 135 female coeliac patients registered on the database of the Department of Gastroenterology at Hull Royal Infirmary were approached by letter, advising them of a potential risk of osteoporosis and inviting them to undergo bone densitometry. A total of 81 registered women (60%) attended the Osteoporosis Laboratory, Princess Royal Hospital and underwent dual energy x ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. Historical data relating to the time of diagnosis and adherence to a gluten free diet were obtained. A control group was selected from the local normal population and was first matched for height, weight, and menopausal status. Postmenopausal patients were then further matched to controls of equivalent menopausal age. In coeliac patients, bone mineral density expressed in g/cm2 as mean (SD) was significantly lower at the lumbar spine (1.076 (0.186)) than in the control group (1.155 (0.143), p &lt; 0.001). This was also the case at the femoral neck (0.887 (0.142) versus 0.965 (0.127), p &lt; 0.001). When the coeliac patients were stratified by menopausal status, it was found that femoral neck bone mineral density was significantly below control values in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Spinal bone mineral density exhibited a significant decrement only in the postmenopausal group. The age at diagnosis of coeliac disease and adherence to a gluten free diet did not influence bone mineral density at either hip or spine. These results confirm coeliac patients' higher risk of osteopenia. Coeliac disease should be added to the list of medical conditions which constitute an indication for bone densitometry in order that the individual risk of osteoporosis related fracture may be determined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-5749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1458-3288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/gut.37.5.639</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8549938</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GUTTAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology ; Bone Diseases, Metabolic - physiopathology ; Case-Control Studies ; Celiac Disease - complications ; Celiac Disease - physiopathology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Postmenopause - physiology ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><ispartof>Gut, 1995-11, Vol.37 (5), p.639-642</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Nov 1995</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4219-46dd21f4f7cfbf21f3a8c4ce4efa2ff801b8db73d7c88749723eacb430d0101c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b4219-46dd21f4f7cfbf21f3a8c4ce4efa2ff801b8db73d7c88749723eacb430d0101c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1382867/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1382867/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2892568$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8549938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweidan, W H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdie, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steel, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, D R</creatorcontrib><title>Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients</title><title>Gut</title><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><description>A cross sectional study was undertaken to examine the relationship between coeliac disease and bone mineral density. The 135 female coeliac patients registered on the database of the Department of Gastroenterology at Hull Royal Infirmary were approached by letter, advising them of a potential risk of osteoporosis and inviting them to undergo bone densitometry. A total of 81 registered women (60%) attended the Osteoporosis Laboratory, Princess Royal Hospital and underwent dual energy x ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. Historical data relating to the time of diagnosis and adherence to a gluten free diet were obtained. A control group was selected from the local normal population and was first matched for height, weight, and menopausal status. Postmenopausal patients were then further matched to controls of equivalent menopausal age. In coeliac patients, bone mineral density expressed in g/cm2 as mean (SD) was significantly lower at the lumbar spine (1.076 (0.186)) than in the control group (1.155 (0.143), p &lt; 0.001). This was also the case at the femoral neck (0.887 (0.142) versus 0.965 (0.127), p &lt; 0.001). When the coeliac patients were stratified by menopausal status, it was found that femoral neck bone mineral density was significantly below control values in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Spinal bone mineral density exhibited a significant decrement only in the postmenopausal group. The age at diagnosis of coeliac disease and adherence to a gluten free diet did not influence bone mineral density at either hip or spine. These results confirm coeliac patients' higher risk of osteopenia. Coeliac disease should be added to the list of medical conditions which constitute an indication for bone densitometry in order that the individual risk of osteoporosis related fracture may be determined.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology</subject><subject>Bone Diseases, Metabolic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - complications</subject><subject>Celiac Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Postmenopause - physiology</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><issn>0017-5749</issn><issn>1468-3288</issn><issn>1458-3288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2LFDEQxYMo67h68yoEFL3YY766k74Iy6CusuhFRfYSqpPKmrE7PdvpFve_N8sMg3rwVAXvx6tXPEIec7bmXDavrpZ5LfW6XjeyvUNWXDWmksKYu2TFGNdVrVV7nzzIecsYM6blJ-TE1KptpVmRs82IfQRHfcwIGSkkT7sxIR1iwgl66jHlON_QmCj4pZ9pwAF6pDuYI6Y5PyT3AvQZHx3mKfny9s3nzXl18end-83ZRdUpwdtKNd4LHlTQLnShbBKMUw4VBhAhGMY74zstvXbGlMRaSATXKck844w7eUpe7313Szegd-V2iWd3UxxgurEjRPu3kuJ3ezX-tFwaYRpdDJ4fDKbxesE82yFmh30PCcclW60Nl5yzAj79B9yOy5TKc5ZrzVhTi9oU6uWectOY84ThGIUze1uMLcVYqW1tSzEFf_Jn_CN8aKLozw46ZAd9mCC5mI-YMK2om1us2mMxz_jrKMP0w5YXdW0_ft3YSy6ay2_q3H4o_Is93w3b_wf8DUmEsoE</recordid><startdate>19951101</startdate><enddate>19951101</enddate><creator>Pistorius, L R</creator><creator>Sweidan, W H</creator><creator>Purdie, D W</creator><creator>Steel, S A</creator><creator>Howey, S</creator><creator>Bennett, J R</creator><creator>Sutton, D R</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951101</creationdate><title>Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients</title><author>Pistorius, L R ; Sweidan, W H ; Purdie, D W ; Steel, S A ; Howey, S ; Bennett, J R ; Sutton, D R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b4219-46dd21f4f7cfbf21f3a8c4ce4efa2ff801b8db73d7c88749723eacb430d0101c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology</topic><topic>Bone Diseases, Metabolic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - complications</topic><topic>Celiac Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Postmenopause - physiology</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pistorius, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweidan, W H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdie, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steel, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howey, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, J R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, D R</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gut</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pistorius, L R</au><au>Sweidan, W H</au><au>Purdie, D W</au><au>Steel, S A</au><au>Howey, S</au><au>Bennett, J R</au><au>Sutton, D R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients</atitle><jtitle>Gut</jtitle><addtitle>Gut</addtitle><date>1995-11-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>639-642</pages><issn>0017-5749</issn><eissn>1468-3288</eissn><eissn>1458-3288</eissn><coden>GUTTAK</coden><abstract>A cross sectional study was undertaken to examine the relationship between coeliac disease and bone mineral density. The 135 female coeliac patients registered on the database of the Department of Gastroenterology at Hull Royal Infirmary were approached by letter, advising them of a potential risk of osteoporosis and inviting them to undergo bone densitometry. A total of 81 registered women (60%) attended the Osteoporosis Laboratory, Princess Royal Hospital and underwent dual energy x ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck. Historical data relating to the time of diagnosis and adherence to a gluten free diet were obtained. A control group was selected from the local normal population and was first matched for height, weight, and menopausal status. Postmenopausal patients were then further matched to controls of equivalent menopausal age. In coeliac patients, bone mineral density expressed in g/cm2 as mean (SD) was significantly lower at the lumbar spine (1.076 (0.186)) than in the control group (1.155 (0.143), p &lt; 0.001). This was also the case at the femoral neck (0.887 (0.142) versus 0.965 (0.127), p &lt; 0.001). When the coeliac patients were stratified by menopausal status, it was found that femoral neck bone mineral density was significantly below control values in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Spinal bone mineral density exhibited a significant decrement only in the postmenopausal group. The age at diagnosis of coeliac disease and adherence to a gluten free diet did not influence bone mineral density at either hip or spine. These results confirm coeliac patients' higher risk of osteopenia. Coeliac disease should be added to the list of medical conditions which constitute an indication for bone densitometry in order that the individual risk of osteoporosis related fracture may be determined.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology</pub><pmid>8549938</pmid><doi>10.1136/gut.37.5.639</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-5749
ispartof Gut, 1995-11, Vol.37 (5), p.639-642
issn 0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1382867
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology
Bone Diseases, Metabolic - physiopathology
Case-Control Studies
Celiac Disease - complications
Celiac Disease - physiopathology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Postmenopause - physiology
Regression Analysis
Risk Factors
Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus
title Coeliac disease and bone mineral density in adult female patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coeliac%20disease%20and%20bone%20mineral%20density%20in%20adult%20female%20patients&rft.jtitle=Gut&rft.au=Pistorius,%20L%20R&rft.date=1995-11-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=639-642&rft.issn=0017-5749&rft.eissn=1468-3288&rft.coden=GUTTAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/gut.37.5.639&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E77813110%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770065258&rft_id=info:pmid/8549938&rfr_iscdi=true