The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs
This paper describes the magnitude of effects for family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs. Studies that used true experimental designs to evaluate family planning programs were identified and their results subjected to meta-analysis. For the 14 studies with the information...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of public health (1971) 1997-04, Vol.87 (4), p.666-669 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 669 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 666 |
| container_title | American journal of public health (1971) |
| container_volume | 87 |
| creator | Bauman, K E |
| description | This paper describes the magnitude of effects for family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs.
Studies that used true experimental designs to evaluate family planning programs were identified and their results subjected to meta-analysis.
For the 14 studies with the information needed to calculate effect size, the Pearson r between program and effect variables ranged from -.08 to .09 and averaged .08.
The programs evaluated in the studies considered have had, on average, smaller effects than many would assume and desire. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2105/AJPH.87.4.666 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1380852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18847086</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-8984159805631f31885c9075b5c8aed5e1ec1b3b3a6430cbdeb9ad8c594d5173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEKtPCkiVShKruMvjGj9gbpKoCCqoEixFby3FuJh45D-xkSv89HnU0Kmy6sqXz-fjce7LsHZB1CYR_vP7-83YtqzVbCyFeZCvgDApCmHyZrQhRJN2peJ2dx7gjBEBxOMvOFDDBOKyyX5sOc2xbtLPb44Ax5mObt6Z3_iGfvBkGN2zzKYzbYPqY4974xczY5Pdu7vI5LOn1nwmD63GYjc8bjG47xDfZq9b4iG-P50W2-fJ5c3Nb3P34-u3m-q6wnMJcSCUZcCUJFxRaClJyq0jFa26lwYYjoIWa1tQIRomtG6yVaaTlijUcKnqRfXq0nZa6x8amDMF4PaU4Jjzo0Tj9rzK4Tm_HvQYqieRlMrg6GoTx94Jx1r2LFn0aHMcl6uqQkCt4FuQVTXaMPAumGVlFpEjgh__A3biEIW1Ll8CJkhVTCSoeIRvGGAO2p9mA6EP9-lC_lpVmOtWf-PdPF3Kij30n_fKom2iNb4MZrIsnrBSCl-WTtXRu2927gDr2xvtkCtrspu70319u48XW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215098749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bauman, K E</creator><creatorcontrib>Bauman, K E</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes the magnitude of effects for family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs.
Studies that used true experimental designs to evaluate family planning programs were identified and their results subjected to meta-analysis.
For the 14 studies with the information needed to calculate effect size, the Pearson r between program and effect variables ranged from -.08 to .09 and averaged .08.
The programs evaluated in the studies considered have had, on average, smaller effects than many would assume and desire.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.87.4.666</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9146451</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPEAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Am Public Health Assoc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Births ; Design ; Developing countries ; Effectiveness ; Experiments ; Family planning ; Family Planning Services ; Fertility ; General aspects ; Humans ; LDCs ; Medical sciences ; Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation ; Programmes ; Public health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Systematic review ; Variables</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 1997-04, Vol.87 (4), p.666-669</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Apr 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-8984159805631f31885c9075b5c8aed5e1ec1b3b3a6430cbdeb9ad8c594d5173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-8984159805631f31885c9075b5c8aed5e1ec1b3b3a6430cbdeb9ad8c594d5173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380852/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380852/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27865,27923,27924,30999,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2665222$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9146451$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bauman, K E</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><description>This paper describes the magnitude of effects for family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs.
Studies that used true experimental designs to evaluate family planning programs were identified and their results subjected to meta-analysis.
For the 14 studies with the information needed to calculate effect size, the Pearson r between program and effect variables ranged from -.08 to .09 and averaged .08.
The programs evaluated in the studies considered have had, on average, smaller effects than many would assume and desire.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Family Planning Services</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</subject><subject>Programmes</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEKtPCkiVShKruMvjGj9gbpKoCCqoEixFby3FuJh45D-xkSv89HnU0Kmy6sqXz-fjce7LsHZB1CYR_vP7-83YtqzVbCyFeZCvgDApCmHyZrQhRJN2peJ2dx7gjBEBxOMvOFDDBOKyyX5sOc2xbtLPb44Ax5mObt6Z3_iGfvBkGN2zzKYzbYPqY4974xczY5Pdu7vI5LOn1nwmD63GYjc8bjG47xDfZq9b4iG-P50W2-fJ5c3Nb3P34-u3m-q6wnMJcSCUZcCUJFxRaClJyq0jFa26lwYYjoIWa1tQIRomtG6yVaaTlijUcKnqRfXq0nZa6x8amDMF4PaU4Jjzo0Tj9rzK4Tm_HvQYqieRlMrg6GoTx94Jx1r2LFn0aHMcl6uqQkCt4FuQVTXaMPAumGVlFpEjgh__A3biEIW1Ll8CJkhVTCSoeIRvGGAO2p9mA6EP9-lC_lpVmOtWf-PdPF3Kij30n_fKom2iNb4MZrIsnrBSCl-WTtXRu2927gDr2xvtkCtrspu70319u48XW</recordid><startdate>19970401</startdate><enddate>19970401</enddate><creator>Bauman, K E</creator><general>Am Public Health Assoc</general><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970401</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs</title><author>Bauman, K E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-8984159805631f31885c9075b5c8aed5e1ec1b3b3a6430cbdeb9ad8c594d5173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Family Planning Services</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation</topic><topic>Programmes</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bauman, K E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bauman, K E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health</addtitle><date>1997-04-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>666-669</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><coden>AJPEAG</coden><abstract>This paper describes the magnitude of effects for family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs.
Studies that used true experimental designs to evaluate family planning programs were identified and their results subjected to meta-analysis.
For the 14 studies with the information needed to calculate effect size, the Pearson r between program and effect variables ranged from -.08 to .09 and averaged .08.
The programs evaluated in the studies considered have had, on average, smaller effects than many would assume and desire.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Am Public Health Assoc</pub><pmid>9146451</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.87.4.666</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-0036 |
| ispartof | American journal of public health (1971), 1997-04, Vol.87 (4), p.666-669 |
| issn | 0090-0036 1541-0048 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1380852 |
| source | MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Births Design Developing countries Effectiveness Experiments Family planning Family Planning Services Fertility General aspects Humans LDCs Medical sciences Planification. Prevention (methods). Intervention. Evaluation Programmes Public health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Systematic review Variables |
| title | The effectiveness of family planning programs evaluated with true experimental designs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A16%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20family%20planning%20programs%20evaluated%20with%20true%20experimental%20designs&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Bauman,%20K%20E&rft.date=1997-04-01&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=666-669&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft.coden=AJPEAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.87.4.666&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E18847086%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215098749&rft_id=info:pmid/9146451&rfr_iscdi=true |