Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience

Although the patient Internet portal is a potentially transformative technology, there is little scientific information about the demographic and clinical characteristics of portal enrollees and the features that they access. We describe two pilot studies of a comprehensive Internet portal called Pa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2006-01, Vol.13 (1), p.91-95
Hauptverfasser: Weingart, Saul N., Rind, David, Tofias, Zachary, Sands, Daniel Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 95
container_issue 1
container_start_page 91
container_title Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
container_volume 13
creator Weingart, Saul N.
Rind, David
Tofias, Zachary
Sands, Daniel Z.
description Although the patient Internet portal is a potentially transformative technology, there is little scientific information about the demographic and clinical characteristics of portal enrollees and the features that they access. We describe two pilot studies of a comprehensive Internet portal called PatientSite. These pilots include a prospective one-year cohort study of all patients who enrolled in April 2003 and a case-control study in 2004 of enrollees and nonenrollees at two hospital-based primary care practices. The cohort study tracked patient enrollment and features in PatientSite that enrollees accessed, such as laboratory and radiology results, prescription renewals, appointment requests, managed care referrals, and clinical messaging. The case-control study used medical record review to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of 100 randomly selected PatientSite enrollees and 100 nonenrollees. PatientSite use grew steadily after its introduction. New enrollees logged in most frequently in the first month, but 26% to 77% of the cohort continued to access the portal at least monthly. They most often examined laboratory and radiology results and sent clinical messages to their providers. PatientSite enrollees were younger and more affluent and had fewer medical problems than nonenrollees. Expanding the use of patient portals will require an understanding of obstacles that prevent access for those who might benefit most from this technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1197/jamia.M1833
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1380201</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1067502705001982</els_id><sourcerecordid>17429032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-a7bbea48eec9b07202e31ae0a550d6e2155c68e2cc44c38664cea193878ff0953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUlLBDEQhYMo7ifv0njwIq1ZOktfXBA3UBRU9BYymRonQ09nTDKi_944M7gheKoq6uNR9R5CGwTvElLLvYEZOrN7RRRjc2iZcCrLWlaP87nHQpYcU7mEVmIcYEwEZXwRLeVKSV2xZXT40PfFfYRYpD4UNyY5aFNx0SYILaTixodkmoPi7mt56xIUJ68jCHmysIYWeqaJsD6rq-j-9OTu-Ly8vD67OD66LG2lWCqN7HTAVArA1h0sKabAiAFsOMddAZRwboUCam1VWaaEqCwYUjMlVa-Ha85W0f5UdzTuDKFr8yXBNHoU3NCEN-2N0z83revrJ_-iCVOYYpIFtmcCwT-PISY9dNFC05gW_DhqIQVmlNB_QSIrWmc0g1u_wIEfhza7oCnFKjssRIZ2ppANPsYAvc-TCdYf-elJfnqSX6Y3v3_5xc4CywCfApC9fnEQdLSTHLougE26692fwu81LakM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220821966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Weingart, Saul N. ; Rind, David ; Tofias, Zachary ; Sands, Daniel Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Saul N. ; Rind, David ; Tofias, Zachary ; Sands, Daniel Z.</creatorcontrib><description>Although the patient Internet portal is a potentially transformative technology, there is little scientific information about the demographic and clinical characteristics of portal enrollees and the features that they access. We describe two pilot studies of a comprehensive Internet portal called PatientSite. These pilots include a prospective one-year cohort study of all patients who enrolled in April 2003 and a case-control study in 2004 of enrollees and nonenrollees at two hospital-based primary care practices. The cohort study tracked patient enrollment and features in PatientSite that enrollees accessed, such as laboratory and radiology results, prescription renewals, appointment requests, managed care referrals, and clinical messaging. The case-control study used medical record review to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of 100 randomly selected PatientSite enrollees and 100 nonenrollees. PatientSite use grew steadily after its introduction. New enrollees logged in most frequently in the first month, but 26% to 77% of the cohort continued to access the portal at least monthly. They most often examined laboratory and radiology results and sent clinical messages to their providers. PatientSite enrollees were younger and more affluent and had fewer medical problems than nonenrollees. Expanding the use of patient portals will require an understanding of obstacles that prevent access for those who might benefit most from this technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-974X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1833</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16221943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Internet - utilization ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization ; Middle Aged ; Original Investigation ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Primary Health Care</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2006-01, Vol.13 (1), p.91-95</ispartof><rights>2006 American Medical Informatics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Hanley &amp; Belfus, Inc. Jan/Feb 2006</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006, American Medical Informatics Association 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-a7bbea48eec9b07202e31ae0a550d6e2155c68e2cc44c38664cea193878ff0953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-a7bbea48eec9b07202e31ae0a550d6e2155c68e2cc44c38664cea193878ff0953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380201/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1380201/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16221943$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Saul N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rind, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tofias, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, Daniel Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</title><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><description>Although the patient Internet portal is a potentially transformative technology, there is little scientific information about the demographic and clinical characteristics of portal enrollees and the features that they access. We describe two pilot studies of a comprehensive Internet portal called PatientSite. These pilots include a prospective one-year cohort study of all patients who enrolled in April 2003 and a case-control study in 2004 of enrollees and nonenrollees at two hospital-based primary care practices. The cohort study tracked patient enrollment and features in PatientSite that enrollees accessed, such as laboratory and radiology results, prescription renewals, appointment requests, managed care referrals, and clinical messaging. The case-control study used medical record review to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of 100 randomly selected PatientSite enrollees and 100 nonenrollees. PatientSite use grew steadily after its introduction. New enrollees logged in most frequently in the first month, but 26% to 77% of the cohort continued to access the portal at least monthly. They most often examined laboratory and radiology results and sent clinical messages to their providers. PatientSite enrollees were younger and more affluent and had fewer medical problems than nonenrollees. Expanding the use of patient portals will require an understanding of obstacles that prevent access for those who might benefit most from this technology.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet - utilization</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Primary Health Care</subject><issn>1067-5027</issn><issn>1527-974X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUlLBDEQhYMo7ifv0njwIq1ZOktfXBA3UBRU9BYymRonQ09nTDKi_944M7gheKoq6uNR9R5CGwTvElLLvYEZOrN7RRRjc2iZcCrLWlaP87nHQpYcU7mEVmIcYEwEZXwRLeVKSV2xZXT40PfFfYRYpD4UNyY5aFNx0SYILaTixodkmoPi7mt56xIUJ68jCHmysIYWeqaJsD6rq-j-9OTu-Ly8vD67OD66LG2lWCqN7HTAVArA1h0sKabAiAFsOMddAZRwboUCam1VWaaEqCwYUjMlVa-Ha85W0f5UdzTuDKFr8yXBNHoU3NCEN-2N0z83revrJ_-iCVOYYpIFtmcCwT-PISY9dNFC05gW_DhqIQVmlNB_QSIrWmc0g1u_wIEfhza7oCnFKjssRIZ2ppANPsYAvc-TCdYf-elJfnqSX6Y3v3_5xc4CywCfApC9fnEQdLSTHLougE26692fwu81LakM</recordid><startdate>200601</startdate><enddate>200601</enddate><creator>Weingart, Saul N.</creator><creator>Rind, David</creator><creator>Tofias, Zachary</creator><creator>Sands, Daniel Z.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Medical Informatics Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200601</creationdate><title>Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience</title><author>Weingart, Saul N. ; Rind, David ; Tofias, Zachary ; Sands, Daniel Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-a7bbea48eec9b07202e31ae0a550d6e2155c68e2cc44c38664cea193878ff0953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet - utilization</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Primary Health Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Saul N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rind, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tofias, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sands, Daniel Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weingart, Saul N.</au><au>Rind, David</au><au>Tofias, Zachary</au><au>Sands, Daniel Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Inform Assoc</addtitle><date>2006-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>91-95</pages><issn>1067-5027</issn><eissn>1527-974X</eissn><abstract>Although the patient Internet portal is a potentially transformative technology, there is little scientific information about the demographic and clinical characteristics of portal enrollees and the features that they access. We describe two pilot studies of a comprehensive Internet portal called PatientSite. These pilots include a prospective one-year cohort study of all patients who enrolled in April 2003 and a case-control study in 2004 of enrollees and nonenrollees at two hospital-based primary care practices. The cohort study tracked patient enrollment and features in PatientSite that enrollees accessed, such as laboratory and radiology results, prescription renewals, appointment requests, managed care referrals, and clinical messaging. The case-control study used medical record review to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of 100 randomly selected PatientSite enrollees and 100 nonenrollees. PatientSite use grew steadily after its introduction. New enrollees logged in most frequently in the first month, but 26% to 77% of the cohort continued to access the portal at least monthly. They most often examined laboratory and radiology results and sent clinical messages to their providers. PatientSite enrollees were younger and more affluent and had fewer medical problems than nonenrollees. Expanding the use of patient portals will require an understanding of obstacles that prevent access for those who might benefit most from this technology.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16221943</pmid><doi>10.1197/jamia.M1833</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-5027
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2006-01, Vol.13 (1), p.91-95
issn 1067-5027
1527-974X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1380201
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Internet - utilization
Male
Medical Audit
Medical Records Systems, Computerized - utilization
Middle Aged
Original Investigation
Patients
Pilot Projects
Primary Health Care
title Who Uses the Patient Internet Portal? The PatientSite Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A01%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20Uses%20the%20Patient%20Internet%20Portal?%20The%20PatientSite%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Informatics%20Association%20:%20JAMIA&rft.au=Weingart,%20Saul%20N.&rft.date=2006-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=91-95&rft.issn=1067-5027&rft.eissn=1527-974X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1197/jamia.M1833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E17429032%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220821966&rft_id=info:pmid/16221943&rft_els_id=S1067502705001982&rfr_iscdi=true