Heller myotomy for failed pneumatic dilation in achalasia: How effective is it?

This long-term prospective study describes the effect of myotomy in patients who fail to respond to repeated pneumatic dilations and compares their clinical course with that of patients responding to dilation therapy. Nineteen consecutive patients who had never reached a clinical remission after rep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2004-03, Vol.239 (3), p.371-377
Hauptverfasser: GOCKEL, Ines, JUNGINGER, Th, BERNHARD, Gudrun, ECKARDT, Volker F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 377
container_issue 3
container_start_page 371
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 239
creator GOCKEL, Ines
JUNGINGER, Th
BERNHARD, Gudrun
ECKARDT, Volker F
description This long-term prospective study describes the effect of myotomy in patients who fail to respond to repeated pneumatic dilations and compares their clinical course with that of patients responding to dilation therapy. Nineteen consecutive patients who had never reached a clinical remission after repeated pneumatic dilation underwent myotomy. Their clinical course was compared with that of patients who had reached a clinical remission after a single (n = 34) or multiple (n = 14) pneumatic dilation(s). Symptoms were graded with a previously described symptom score ranging from 0 to 12. Remission was defined as a score of 3 or less persisting for at least 6 months. Duration of remission was summarized using Kaplan Meier survival curves. Association between baseline factors and the need for surgery was evaluated using logistic regression. Complete follow-up was obtained for 98.5% of the patients. The median duration of follow-up was similar in patients treated by myotomy (10.0 years), in patients reaching a clinical remission after a single dilation (10.6 years), but differed in patients undergoing repeated dilations (6.9 years). The 10-year remission rate was 77% (95% CI 53-100%) in patients undergoing myotomy, 72% (95% CI: 56-87%) in patients "successfully" treated with a single pneumatic dilation and 45% (95% CI: 16-73%) in patients undergoing several dilations. Among all baseline factors investigated, young age was associated with an increased need of surgery. Myotomy is an effective treatment modality in patients with achalasia who have failed to respond to pneumatic dilation. Young patients may benefit from primary surgical therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.sla.0000114228.34809.01
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1356235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71818434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-745e94bc0eb22c873487bc1812ec46a41ac8245000abf824c0cd048a4d6759503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCX0AWEtyS-nPt9ABCVWErVeqlPVsTx6FGTrzY2aL99wztihZfxho_886MX0I-cNZy1plTxtuaoGV4OFdC2FYqy7qW8RdkxbWwDabZS7JCQDaqk-KEvKn1J-LImdfkhGtm9EarFbnehpRCodMhL3k60DEXOkJMYaC7OewnWKKnQ0wY80zjTMHfQYIa4Yxu828axjH4Jd4HGiuNy5e35NUIqYZ3x7gmt98ubs63zdX198vzr1eNl0oujVE6dKr3LPRCeGtwAdN7brkIXm1AcfBWKI0LQD_izTM_MGVBDRujO83kmnx-1N3t-ykMPsxLgeR2JU5QDi5DdP-_zPHO_cj3jku9EVKjwKejQMm_9qEuborV42fAHPK-OoPDWIXDrsnZI-hLrrWE8V8TztxfPxzjDv1wT364Bz8wj8Xvn4_5VHo0AIGPRwCqhzQWmH2szzhtheFM_gELk5S9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>71818434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heller myotomy for failed pneumatic dilation in achalasia: How effective is it?</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>GOCKEL, Ines ; JUNGINGER, Th ; BERNHARD, Gudrun ; ECKARDT, Volker F</creator><creatorcontrib>GOCKEL, Ines ; JUNGINGER, Th ; BERNHARD, Gudrun ; ECKARDT, Volker F</creatorcontrib><description>This long-term prospective study describes the effect of myotomy in patients who fail to respond to repeated pneumatic dilations and compares their clinical course with that of patients responding to dilation therapy. Nineteen consecutive patients who had never reached a clinical remission after repeated pneumatic dilation underwent myotomy. Their clinical course was compared with that of patients who had reached a clinical remission after a single (n = 34) or multiple (n = 14) pneumatic dilation(s). Symptoms were graded with a previously described symptom score ranging from 0 to 12. Remission was defined as a score of 3 or less persisting for at least 6 months. Duration of remission was summarized using Kaplan Meier survival curves. Association between baseline factors and the need for surgery was evaluated using logistic regression. Complete follow-up was obtained for 98.5% of the patients. The median duration of follow-up was similar in patients treated by myotomy (10.0 years), in patients reaching a clinical remission after a single dilation (10.6 years), but differed in patients undergoing repeated dilations (6.9 years). The 10-year remission rate was 77% (95% CI 53-100%) in patients undergoing myotomy, 72% (95% CI: 56-87%) in patients "successfully" treated with a single pneumatic dilation and 45% (95% CI: 16-73%) in patients undergoing several dilations. Among all baseline factors investigated, young age was associated with an increased need of surgery. Myotomy is an effective treatment modality in patients with achalasia who have failed to respond to pneumatic dilation. Young patients may benefit from primary surgical therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000114228.34809.01</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15075654</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Catheterization ; Digestive System Surgical Procedures ; Esophageal Achalasia - surgery ; Esophageal Achalasia - therapy ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Prospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2004-03, Vol.239 (3), p.371-377</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2004 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-745e94bc0eb22c873487bc1812ec46a41ac8245000abf824c0cd048a4d6759503</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1356235/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1356235/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15582710$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15075654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GOCKEL, Ines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUNGINGER, Th</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNHARD, Gudrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ECKARDT, Volker F</creatorcontrib><title>Heller myotomy for failed pneumatic dilation in achalasia: How effective is it?</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>This long-term prospective study describes the effect of myotomy in patients who fail to respond to repeated pneumatic dilations and compares their clinical course with that of patients responding to dilation therapy. Nineteen consecutive patients who had never reached a clinical remission after repeated pneumatic dilation underwent myotomy. Their clinical course was compared with that of patients who had reached a clinical remission after a single (n = 34) or multiple (n = 14) pneumatic dilation(s). Symptoms were graded with a previously described symptom score ranging from 0 to 12. Remission was defined as a score of 3 or less persisting for at least 6 months. Duration of remission was summarized using Kaplan Meier survival curves. Association between baseline factors and the need for surgery was evaluated using logistic regression. Complete follow-up was obtained for 98.5% of the patients. The median duration of follow-up was similar in patients treated by myotomy (10.0 years), in patients reaching a clinical remission after a single dilation (10.6 years), but differed in patients undergoing repeated dilations (6.9 years). The 10-year remission rate was 77% (95% CI 53-100%) in patients undergoing myotomy, 72% (95% CI: 56-87%) in patients "successfully" treated with a single pneumatic dilation and 45% (95% CI: 16-73%) in patients undergoing several dilations. Among all baseline factors investigated, young age was associated with an increased need of surgery. Myotomy is an effective treatment modality in patients with achalasia who have failed to respond to pneumatic dilation. Young patients may benefit from primary surgical therapy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Catheterization</subject><subject>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Esophageal Achalasia - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Achalasia - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EosvCX0AWEtyS-nPt9ABCVWErVeqlPVsTx6FGTrzY2aL99wztihZfxho_886MX0I-cNZy1plTxtuaoGV4OFdC2FYqy7qW8RdkxbWwDabZS7JCQDaqk-KEvKn1J-LImdfkhGtm9EarFbnehpRCodMhL3k60DEXOkJMYaC7OewnWKKnQ0wY80zjTMHfQYIa4Yxu828axjH4Jd4HGiuNy5e35NUIqYZ3x7gmt98ubs63zdX198vzr1eNl0oujVE6dKr3LPRCeGtwAdN7brkIXm1AcfBWKI0LQD_izTM_MGVBDRujO83kmnx-1N3t-ykMPsxLgeR2JU5QDi5DdP-_zPHO_cj3jku9EVKjwKejQMm_9qEuborV42fAHPK-OoPDWIXDrsnZI-hLrrWE8V8TztxfPxzjDv1wT364Bz8wj8Xvn4_5VHo0AIGPRwCqhzQWmH2szzhtheFM_gELk5S9</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>GOCKEL, Ines</creator><creator>JUNGINGER, Th</creator><creator>BERNHARD, Gudrun</creator><creator>ECKARDT, Volker F</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Heller myotomy for failed pneumatic dilation in achalasia: How effective is it?</title><author>GOCKEL, Ines ; JUNGINGER, Th ; BERNHARD, Gudrun ; ECKARDT, Volker F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-745e94bc0eb22c873487bc1812ec46a41ac8245000abf824c0cd048a4d6759503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Catheterization</topic><topic>Digestive System Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Esophageal Achalasia - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Achalasia - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GOCKEL, Ines</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUNGINGER, Th</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNHARD, Gudrun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ECKARDT, Volker F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GOCKEL, Ines</au><au>JUNGINGER, Th</au><au>BERNHARD, Gudrun</au><au>ECKARDT, Volker F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heller myotomy for failed pneumatic dilation in achalasia: How effective is it?</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>239</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>371-377</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>This long-term prospective study describes the effect of myotomy in patients who fail to respond to repeated pneumatic dilations and compares their clinical course with that of patients responding to dilation therapy. Nineteen consecutive patients who had never reached a clinical remission after repeated pneumatic dilation underwent myotomy. Their clinical course was compared with that of patients who had reached a clinical remission after a single (n = 34) or multiple (n = 14) pneumatic dilation(s). Symptoms were graded with a previously described symptom score ranging from 0 to 12. Remission was defined as a score of 3 or less persisting for at least 6 months. Duration of remission was summarized using Kaplan Meier survival curves. Association between baseline factors and the need for surgery was evaluated using logistic regression. Complete follow-up was obtained for 98.5% of the patients. The median duration of follow-up was similar in patients treated by myotomy (10.0 years), in patients reaching a clinical remission after a single dilation (10.6 years), but differed in patients undergoing repeated dilations (6.9 years). The 10-year remission rate was 77% (95% CI 53-100%) in patients undergoing myotomy, 72% (95% CI: 56-87%) in patients "successfully" treated with a single pneumatic dilation and 45% (95% CI: 16-73%) in patients undergoing several dilations. Among all baseline factors investigated, young age was associated with an increased need of surgery. Myotomy is an effective treatment modality in patients with achalasia who have failed to respond to pneumatic dilation. Young patients may benefit from primary surgical therapy.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>15075654</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.sla.0000114228.34809.01</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2004-03, Vol.239 (3), p.371-377
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1356235
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Catheterization
Digestive System Surgical Procedures
Esophageal Achalasia - surgery
Esophageal Achalasia - therapy
Female
General aspects
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Original
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Failure
title Heller myotomy for failed pneumatic dilation in achalasia: How effective is it?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A45%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heller%20myotomy%20for%20failed%20pneumatic%20dilation%20in%20achalasia:%20How%20effective%20is%20it?&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=GOCKEL,%20Ines&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=239&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=371-377&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.sla.0000114228.34809.01&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E71818434%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=71818434&rft_id=info:pmid/15075654&rfr_iscdi=true