A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions

A prospective study of the ability of laboratory tests and liver imaging tests to detect hepatic metastases was performed. Eighty patients at risk for hepatic metastases but without clinical evidence of disease were tested with 13 laboratory tests and three liver imaging tests. No single laboratory...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ann. Surg.; (United States) 1982-02, Vol.195 (2), p.163-167
Hauptverfasser: Kemeny, M M, Sugarbaker, P H, Smith, T J, Edwards, B K, Shawker, T, Vermess, M, Jones, A E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 2
container_start_page 163
container_title Ann. Surg.; (United States)
container_volume 195
creator Kemeny, M M
Sugarbaker, P H
Smith, T J
Edwards, B K
Shawker, T
Vermess, M
Jones, A E
description A prospective study of the ability of laboratory tests and liver imaging tests to detect hepatic metastases was performed. Eighty patients at risk for hepatic metastases but without clinical evidence of disease were tested with 13 laboratory tests and three liver imaging tests. No single laboratory test had greater than 65% accuracy in the detection of hepatic lesions. No combination of the laboratory tests increased this accuracy. If the laboratory tests were used with one of the liver imaging tests, the accuracy was improved in some combinations to 76%. The CEA assay when analyzed in patients with colorectal primaries had an accuracy of 79%. The results show that the laboratory tests alone are not sufficiently accurate to detect liver metastases. Additional accuracy can be obtained by the combined use of a single liver imaging test and selected laboratory tests. Use of all the liver imaging tests and laboratory tests lowers the accuracy and increases the expense and thus is unnecessary.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000658-198202000-00007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1352436</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73917902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e3215110b3e6df9dcff81ad03455ab7cc646388b688e1a0ca3c3203c19d0945c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1r3DAQFaUh3aT9CQXRQ29ORl-2dAmEkC8I9JJAbkKW5V0Vr-V4tIH999V2t0uji9CbN0_z5hFCGVwwMM0l7E6tdMWM5sDLo9ohzSeyYIoXmEn4TBYFEpU0gn8hZ4i_AZjU0JyS0waUEoYvyOs1neaEU_A5vgfqRjdsMSJNPR1cm2aX07ylOWDGUuxoXLtlHJcU86aLAWlOtAu5dNNVmFyOng4BYxrxKznp3YDh2-E-Jy93t883D9XTr_vHm-unykvJcxUEZ4oxaEWou950vu81cx0IqZRrG-9rWQut21rrwBx4J7zgIDwzHRipvDgnV3vdadOuQ-fDmGc32Gkuk85bm1y0HytjXNllerdMKC5FXQR-7AUS5mjRx-Jm5dM4FlO2ZgYk6EL6efhlTm-bsg27jujDMLgxpA3aRhjWGOCFqPdEX7aKc-iPkzCwu-jsv-jsMbq_UFNav__v5Nh4yEr8ATsnlbw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73917902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kemeny, M M ; Sugarbaker, P H ; Smith, T J ; Edwards, B K ; Shawker, T ; Vermess, M ; Jones, A E</creator><creatorcontrib>Kemeny, M M ; Sugarbaker, P H ; Smith, T J ; Edwards, B K ; Shawker, T ; Vermess, M ; Jones, A E</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective study of the ability of laboratory tests and liver imaging tests to detect hepatic metastases was performed. Eighty patients at risk for hepatic metastases but without clinical evidence of disease were tested with 13 laboratory tests and three liver imaging tests. No single laboratory test had greater than 65% accuracy in the detection of hepatic lesions. No combination of the laboratory tests increased this accuracy. If the laboratory tests were used with one of the liver imaging tests, the accuracy was improved in some combinations to 76%. The CEA assay when analyzed in patients with colorectal primaries had an accuracy of 79%. The results show that the laboratory tests alone are not sufficiently accurate to detect liver metastases. Additional accuracy can be obtained by the combined use of a single liver imaging test and selected laboratory tests. Use of all the liver imaging tests and laboratory tests lowers the accuracy and increases the expense and thus is unnecessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198202000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7055392</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>550601 - Medicine- Unsealed Radionuclides in Diagnostics ; 550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-) ; BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES ; BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES ; BIOASSAY ; BODY ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis ; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; COUNTING TECHNIQUES ; DIAGNOSIS ; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES ; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM ; DISEASES ; GLANDS ; HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES ; Humans ; INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI ; ISOMERIC NUCLEI ; ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES ; ISOTOPES ; LIVER ; Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Liver - enzymology ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Neoplasms - secondary ; METASTASES ; NEOPLASMS ; NUCLEI ; ODD-EVEN NUCLEI ; ORGANS ; PATIENTS ; Prospective Studies ; RADIOISOTOPE SCANNING ; RADIOISOTOPES ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; SCINTISCANNING ; TECHNETIUM 99 ; TECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS ; TECHNETIUM ISOTOPES ; TOMOGRAPHY ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS ; ULTRASONOGRAPHY ; YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES</subject><ispartof>Ann. Surg.; (United States), 1982-02, Vol.195 (2), p.163-167</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e3215110b3e6df9dcff81ad03455ab7cc646388b688e1a0ca3c3203c19d0945c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1352436/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1352436/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7055392$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/6190408$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kemeny, M M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarbaker, P H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, B K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shawker, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermess, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, A E</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions</title><title>Ann. Surg.; (United States)</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>A prospective study of the ability of laboratory tests and liver imaging tests to detect hepatic metastases was performed. Eighty patients at risk for hepatic metastases but without clinical evidence of disease were tested with 13 laboratory tests and three liver imaging tests. No single laboratory test had greater than 65% accuracy in the detection of hepatic lesions. No combination of the laboratory tests increased this accuracy. If the laboratory tests were used with one of the liver imaging tests, the accuracy was improved in some combinations to 76%. The CEA assay when analyzed in patients with colorectal primaries had an accuracy of 79%. The results show that the laboratory tests alone are not sufficiently accurate to detect liver metastases. Additional accuracy can be obtained by the combined use of a single liver imaging test and selected laboratory tests. Use of all the liver imaging tests and laboratory tests lowers the accuracy and increases the expense and thus is unnecessary.</description><subject>550601 - Medicine- Unsealed Radionuclides in Diagnostics</subject><subject>550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-)</subject><subject>BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES</subject><subject>BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES</subject><subject>BIOASSAY</subject><subject>BODY</subject><subject>Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>COUNTING TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>DIAGNOSIS</subject><subject>DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES</subject><subject>DIGESTIVE SYSTEM</subject><subject>DISEASES</subject><subject>GLANDS</subject><subject>HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI</subject><subject>ISOMERIC NUCLEI</subject><subject>ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES</subject><subject>ISOTOPES</subject><subject>LIVER</subject><subject>Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver - enzymology</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>METASTASES</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>NUCLEI</subject><subject>ODD-EVEN NUCLEI</subject><subject>ORGANS</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>RADIOISOTOPE SCANNING</subject><subject>RADIOISOTOPES</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>SCINTISCANNING</subject><subject>TECHNETIUM 99</subject><subject>TECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>TECHNETIUM ISOTOPES</subject><subject>TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</subject><subject>YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1r3DAQFaUh3aT9CQXRQ29ORl-2dAmEkC8I9JJAbkKW5V0Vr-V4tIH999V2t0uji9CbN0_z5hFCGVwwMM0l7E6tdMWM5sDLo9ohzSeyYIoXmEn4TBYFEpU0gn8hZ4i_AZjU0JyS0waUEoYvyOs1neaEU_A5vgfqRjdsMSJNPR1cm2aX07ylOWDGUuxoXLtlHJcU86aLAWlOtAu5dNNVmFyOng4BYxrxKznp3YDh2-E-Jy93t883D9XTr_vHm-unykvJcxUEZ4oxaEWou950vu81cx0IqZRrG-9rWQut21rrwBx4J7zgIDwzHRipvDgnV3vdadOuQ-fDmGc32Gkuk85bm1y0HytjXNllerdMKC5FXQR-7AUS5mjRx-Jm5dM4FlO2ZgYk6EL6efhlTm-bsg27jujDMLgxpA3aRhjWGOCFqPdEX7aKc-iPkzCwu-jsv-jsMbq_UFNav__v5Nh4yEr8ATsnlbw</recordid><startdate>19820201</startdate><enddate>19820201</enddate><creator>Kemeny, M M</creator><creator>Sugarbaker, P H</creator><creator>Smith, T J</creator><creator>Edwards, B K</creator><creator>Shawker, T</creator><creator>Vermess, M</creator><creator>Jones, A E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820201</creationdate><title>A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions</title><author>Kemeny, M M ; Sugarbaker, P H ; Smith, T J ; Edwards, B K ; Shawker, T ; Vermess, M ; Jones, A E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-e3215110b3e6df9dcff81ad03455ab7cc646388b688e1a0ca3c3203c19d0945c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>550601 - Medicine- Unsealed Radionuclides in Diagnostics</topic><topic>550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-)</topic><topic>BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES</topic><topic>BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES</topic><topic>BIOASSAY</topic><topic>BODY</topic><topic>Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>COUNTING TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>DIAGNOSIS</topic><topic>DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES</topic><topic>DIGESTIVE SYSTEM</topic><topic>DISEASES</topic><topic>GLANDS</topic><topic>HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI</topic><topic>ISOMERIC NUCLEI</topic><topic>ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES</topic><topic>ISOTOPES</topic><topic>LIVER</topic><topic>Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver - enzymology</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>METASTASES</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>NUCLEI</topic><topic>ODD-EVEN NUCLEI</topic><topic>ORGANS</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>RADIOISOTOPE SCANNING</topic><topic>RADIOISOTOPES</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>SCINTISCANNING</topic><topic>TECHNETIUM 99</topic><topic>TECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>TECHNETIUM ISOTOPES</topic><topic>TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>ULTRASONOGRAPHY</topic><topic>YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kemeny, M M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugarbaker, P H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, B K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shawker, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermess, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, A E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ann. Surg.; (United States)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kemeny, M M</au><au>Sugarbaker, P H</au><au>Smith, T J</au><au>Edwards, B K</au><au>Shawker, T</au><au>Vermess, M</au><au>Jones, A E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions</atitle><jtitle>Ann. Surg.; (United States)</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>1982-02-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>163-167</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>A prospective study of the ability of laboratory tests and liver imaging tests to detect hepatic metastases was performed. Eighty patients at risk for hepatic metastases but without clinical evidence of disease were tested with 13 laboratory tests and three liver imaging tests. No single laboratory test had greater than 65% accuracy in the detection of hepatic lesions. No combination of the laboratory tests increased this accuracy. If the laboratory tests were used with one of the liver imaging tests, the accuracy was improved in some combinations to 76%. The CEA assay when analyzed in patients with colorectal primaries had an accuracy of 79%. The results show that the laboratory tests alone are not sufficiently accurate to detect liver metastases. Additional accuracy can be obtained by the combined use of a single liver imaging test and selected laboratory tests. Use of all the liver imaging tests and laboratory tests lowers the accuracy and increases the expense and thus is unnecessary.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>7055392</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000658-198202000-00007</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Ann. Surg.; (United States), 1982-02, Vol.195 (2), p.163-167
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1352436
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects 550601 - Medicine- Unsealed Radionuclides in Diagnostics
550602 - Medicine- External Radiation in Diagnostics- (1980-)
BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BETA-MINUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BIOASSAY
BODY
Carcinoembryonic Antigen - analysis
Colonic Neoplasms - pathology
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
COUNTING TECHNIQUES
DIAGNOSIS
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
DISEASES
GLANDS
HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
Humans
INTERMEDIATE MASS NUCLEI
ISOMERIC NUCLEI
ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES
ISOTOPES
LIVER
Liver - diagnostic imaging
Liver - enzymology
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms - secondary
METASTASES
NEOPLASMS
NUCLEI
ODD-EVEN NUCLEI
ORGANS
PATIENTS
Prospective Studies
RADIOISOTOPE SCANNING
RADIOISOTOPES
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Radionuclide Imaging
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
SCINTISCANNING
TECHNETIUM 99
TECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS
TECHNETIUM ISOTOPES
TOMOGRAPHY
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
TRANSITION ELEMENT COMPOUNDS
ULTRASONOGRAPHY
YEARS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
title A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T11%3A41%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20analysis%20of%20laboratory%20tests%20and%20imaging%20studies%20to%20detect%20hepatic%20lesions&rft.jtitle=Ann.%20Surg.;%20(United%20States)&rft.au=Kemeny,%20M%20M&rft.date=1982-02-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=163-167&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000658-198202000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73917902%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73917902&rft_id=info:pmid/7055392&rfr_iscdi=true