RELATIVE DURATIONS OF CONDITIONED STIMULUS AND INTERTRIAL INTERVAL IN CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION

The effects of the relative durations of the conditional stimulus and the intertrial interval on bar pressing during a conditioned‐suppression procedure were examined as a function of two additional variables—type of operant baseline schedule and rate of shock presentation. In Experiment 1, response suppression was compared across components of a multiple fixed‐ratio, random‐ratio, fixed‐interval, random‐interval schedule, at relative conditioned‐stimulus/intertrial‐interval durations of 1/1, 1/4, and 1/9. In Experiment 2, relative conditioned‐stimulus/intertrial‐interval duration (1/5, 3/3, or 5/1) was manipulated across groups, while shock frequency (2, 6, or 10 shocks/hr) was manipulated within groups. In both experiments, suppression during the signal was virtually complete at all relative durations. Responding was also suppressed during the intertrial interval, but that suppression varied as a function of experimental manipulations. In Experiment 1, intertrial‐interval response rates were higher when relative signal duration was 1/9 than when it was 1/1, although both relative signal duration and shock frequency, which covaried, could have contributed to the difference. In Experiment 2, the patterning of response rates between successive shocks was affected by relative duration, absolute rates during the intertrial interval varied as a function of shock frequency, and differences between suppression during the signal and suppression during the intertrial interval were affected by both relative duration and shock frequency. The data support an analysis based upon relationships between shock‐correlated and intertrial‐interval stimuli and, as assessed by the relative‐delay‐to‐reinforcement metric, are comparable to results that have been reported from experiments using similar manipulations under the autoshaping paradigm.