ON THE LIMITS OF THE MATCHING CONCEPT IN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA)
Two cebus monkeys, with many years of experience matching a variety of static visual stimuli (forms and colors) within a standard matching‐to‐sample paradigm, were trained to press a left lever when a pair of displayed static stimuli were the same and to press a right lever when they were different....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1989-11, Vol.52 (3), p.225-236 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 236 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 225 |
| container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
| container_volume | 52 |
| creator | D'Amato, M. R. Colombo, Michael |
| description | Two cebus monkeys, with many years of experience matching a variety of static visual stimuli (forms and colors) within a standard matching‐to‐sample paradigm, were trained to press a left lever when a pair of displayed static stimuli were the same and to press a right lever when they were different. After learning the same/different task, the monkeys were tested for transfer to dynamic visual stimuli (flashing versus steady green disks), with which they had no previous experience. Both failed to transfer to the dynamic stimuli. A third monkey, also with massive past experience matching static visual stimuli, was tested for transfer to the dynamic stimuli within our standard matching paradigm, and it, too, failed. All 3 subjects were unable to reach a moderate acquisition criterion despite as many as 52 sessions of training with the dynamic stimuli. These results provide further evidence that, in monkeys, the matching (or identity) concept has a very limited reach; they consequently do not support the view held by some theorists that an matching concept based on physical similarity is a general endowment of animals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-225 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1339177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1311433367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5900-bb5eb7b4e701b3ee09baae8028fc05720101c8c4ea92f62a856c5cd76e6be2d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdtv0zAUxi0EGt3gnRekCCYEDxm-xLcXUBayLtAmldpxebIc14GUNBlxC-y_x6FVBUhoL_axzu_7jnw-AB4heIYkRC9XVpe-EvKM4hBjegeMkCQiJByhu2AEIcYh9ed9cOzcyheScXwEjjAVkUTRCLwu8mBxmQaTbJot5kFx8fs1jRfJZZaPg6TIk3S2CLI8mBb5u_TTPHiepOdX8yCepZNJ_OIBuFfpxtmH-_sEXF2kXhxOinGWxJPQUAlhWJbUlryMLIeoJNZCWWptBcSiMpByDBFERpjIaokrhrWgzFCz5Myy0uIlISfg1c73eluu7dLYdtPrRl339Vr3N6rTtfq709Zf1Ofuu0KESMS5N3i2N-i7b1vrNmpdO2ObRre22zrFJYmwiG4HEWUEISY8-OQfcNVt-9ZvQWEUeStMmIee_g9C3iYihLBhJtxRpu-c6211-BiCaghaDUGrIWhFsfJBe8njPxdyEOyT9f3TfV87o5uq162p3QFjnFEuBozusB91Y29uHavepvG5kNDrwp2udhv786DT_VdvTThVH_KxejOf8al8_1FB8gsch8kC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311433367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ON THE LIMITS OF THE MATCHING CONCEPT IN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>D'Amato, M. R. ; Colombo, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Amato, M. R. ; Colombo, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Two cebus monkeys, with many years of experience matching a variety of static visual stimuli (forms and colors) within a standard matching‐to‐sample paradigm, were trained to press a left lever when a pair of displayed static stimuli were the same and to press a right lever when they were different. After learning the same/different task, the monkeys were tested for transfer to dynamic visual stimuli (flashing versus steady green disks), with which they had no previous experience. Both failed to transfer to the dynamic stimuli. A third monkey, also with massive past experience matching static visual stimuli, was tested for transfer to the dynamic stimuli within our standard matching paradigm, and it, too, failed. All 3 subjects were unable to reach a moderate acquisition criterion despite as many as 52 sessions of training with the dynamic stimuli. These results provide further evidence that, in monkeys, the matching (or identity) concept has a very limited reach; they consequently do not support the view held by some theorists that an matching concept based on physical similarity is a general endowment of animals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2584914</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cebidae ; Cebus - psychology ; cognitive processes ; Color Perception ; Concept Formation ; Conditioning ; Discrimination Learning ; Female ; Form Perception ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; matching concept ; matching to sample ; monkeys ; Monkeys & apes ; Motion Perception ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance ; same/different procedure ; Stimuli ; Transfer (Psychology) ; Visual Stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1989-11, Vol.52 (3), p.225-236</ispartof><rights>1989 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incorporated Nov 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5900-bb5eb7b4e701b3ee09baae8028fc05720101c8c4ea92f62a856c5cd76e6be2d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5900-bb5eb7b4e701b3ee09baae8028fc05720101c8c4ea92f62a856c5cd76e6be2d33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1339177/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1339177/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27846,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6765784$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2584914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Amato, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>ON THE LIMITS OF THE MATCHING CONCEPT IN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA)</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Two cebus monkeys, with many years of experience matching a variety of static visual stimuli (forms and colors) within a standard matching‐to‐sample paradigm, were trained to press a left lever when a pair of displayed static stimuli were the same and to press a right lever when they were different. After learning the same/different task, the monkeys were tested for transfer to dynamic visual stimuli (flashing versus steady green disks), with which they had no previous experience. Both failed to transfer to the dynamic stimuli. A third monkey, also with massive past experience matching static visual stimuli, was tested for transfer to the dynamic stimuli within our standard matching paradigm, and it, too, failed. All 3 subjects were unable to reach a moderate acquisition criterion despite as many as 52 sessions of training with the dynamic stimuli. These results provide further evidence that, in monkeys, the matching (or identity) concept has a very limited reach; they consequently do not support the view held by some theorists that an matching concept based on physical similarity is a general endowment of animals.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cebidae</subject><subject>Cebus - psychology</subject><subject>cognitive processes</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>matching concept</subject><subject>matching to sample</subject><subject>monkeys</subject><subject>Monkeys & apes</subject><subject>Motion Perception</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>same/different procedure</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Transfer (Psychology)</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdtv0zAUxi0EGt3gnRekCCYEDxm-xLcXUBayLtAmldpxebIc14GUNBlxC-y_x6FVBUhoL_axzu_7jnw-AB4heIYkRC9XVpe-EvKM4hBjegeMkCQiJByhu2AEIcYh9ed9cOzcyheScXwEjjAVkUTRCLwu8mBxmQaTbJot5kFx8fs1jRfJZZaPg6TIk3S2CLI8mBb5u_TTPHiepOdX8yCepZNJ_OIBuFfpxtmH-_sEXF2kXhxOinGWxJPQUAlhWJbUlryMLIeoJNZCWWptBcSiMpByDBFERpjIaokrhrWgzFCz5Myy0uIlISfg1c73eluu7dLYdtPrRl339Vr3N6rTtfq709Zf1Ofuu0KESMS5N3i2N-i7b1vrNmpdO2ObRre22zrFJYmwiG4HEWUEISY8-OQfcNVt-9ZvQWEUeStMmIee_g9C3iYihLBhJtxRpu-c6211-BiCaghaDUGrIWhFsfJBe8njPxdyEOyT9f3TfV87o5uq162p3QFjnFEuBozusB91Y29uHavepvG5kNDrwp2udhv786DT_VdvTThVH_KxejOf8al8_1FB8gsch8kC</recordid><startdate>198911</startdate><enddate>198911</enddate><creator>D'Amato, M. R.</creator><creator>Colombo, Michael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JTYFY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198911</creationdate><title>ON THE LIMITS OF THE MATCHING CONCEPT IN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA)</title><author>D'Amato, M. R. ; Colombo, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5900-bb5eb7b4e701b3ee09baae8028fc05720101c8c4ea92f62a856c5cd76e6be2d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cebidae</topic><topic>Cebus - psychology</topic><topic>cognitive processes</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>matching concept</topic><topic>matching to sample</topic><topic>monkeys</topic><topic>Monkeys & apes</topic><topic>Motion Perception</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>same/different procedure</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Transfer (Psychology)</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Amato, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 37</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Amato, M. R.</au><au>Colombo, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ON THE LIMITS OF THE MATCHING CONCEPT IN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>1989-11</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>225-236</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>Two cebus monkeys, with many years of experience matching a variety of static visual stimuli (forms and colors) within a standard matching‐to‐sample paradigm, were trained to press a left lever when a pair of displayed static stimuli were the same and to press a right lever when they were different. After learning the same/different task, the monkeys were tested for transfer to dynamic visual stimuli (flashing versus steady green disks), with which they had no previous experience. Both failed to transfer to the dynamic stimuli. A third monkey, also with massive past experience matching static visual stimuli, was tested for transfer to the dynamic stimuli within our standard matching paradigm, and it, too, failed. All 3 subjects were unable to reach a moderate acquisition criterion despite as many as 52 sessions of training with the dynamic stimuli. These results provide further evidence that, in monkeys, the matching (or identity) concept has a very limited reach; they consequently do not support the view held by some theorists that an matching concept based on physical similarity is a general endowment of animals.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2584914</pmid><doi>10.1901/jeab.1989.52-225</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
| ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1989-11, Vol.52 (3), p.225-236 |
| issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1339177 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Animal Animal behavior Animal cognition Animals Attention Biological and medical sciences Cebidae Cebus - psychology cognitive processes Color Perception Concept Formation Conditioning Discrimination Learning Female Form Perception Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Learning. Memory Male matching concept matching to sample monkeys Monkeys & apes Motion Perception Pattern Recognition, Visual Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance same/different procedure Stimuli Transfer (Psychology) Visual Stimuli |
| title | ON THE LIMITS OF THE MATCHING CONCEPT IN MONKEYS (CEBUS APELLA) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T03%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ON%20THE%20LIMITS%20OF%20THE%20MATCHING%20CONCEPT%20IN%20MONKEYS%20(CEBUS%20APELLA)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=D'Amato,%20M.%20R.&rft.date=1989-11&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=225-236&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jeab.1989.52-225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1311433367%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311433367&rft_id=info:pmid/2584914&rfr_iscdi=true |