CONTRAST AS SEEN IN VISUAL SEARCH REACTION TIMES
Three pigeons searched arrays of alphabetic letters displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, either an A or an E appeared, and the reaction time and accuracy with which the bird pecked at this target were measured. In each block of trials, each target (A or E) was displayed alone, or together...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1989-11, Vol.52 (3), p.199-211 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Blough, Donald S. |
description | Three pigeons searched arrays of alphabetic letters displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, either an A or an E appeared, and the reaction time and accuracy with which the bird pecked at this target were measured. In each block of trials, each target (A or E) was displayed alone, or together with a number of distractor letters (2 or 18) that varied in their similarity to the target. During a baseline series of sessions, responses to the A and to the E each yielded food reinforcement on 10% of the trials. In the next series of sessions, reinforcement continued at 10% for A, but rose to 30% for E. In a final series, these reinforcement conditions were reversed. As expected, reaction times increased with target‐distractor similarity and (for similar distractors) with the number of distractors. Increased reinforcement of E had no effect on reaction times to E, but produced a very consistent increase in reaction times to A; the average increase was constant across the various display conditions. Reversal of the differential reinforcement conditions reversed this contrast effect. Analysis of the reaction time distributions indicated that increased reinforcement to E decreased the momentary probability of response to A by a constant amount, regardless of display conditions. These results are discussed in relation to theories of contrast, memory, and of the search image. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1339175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15765108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6568-2c79b46de7c7fb8e0327e3fafc3c7e0cd94dc3e70df8a083611dc25d5bc79ce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU2P0zAQtRBoKYU7F6QIELcs_oztC1Iahd2wJZWaLCAuluM4kJImS9wC--9x1KoCJLQXz4zmvTeeeQA8RfAcSYheb6yufCbkOcMhkvIemCFJREg4QvfBDEKMQ-bfh-CRcxufyIjjM3CGmaASkRmAySov13FRBnERFGmaB1kefMiK63jpy3idXAbrNE7KbJUHZfY-LR6DB43unH1yjHNw_TYtk8twubrIkngZmohFIsSGy4pGteWGN5WwkGBuSaMbQwy30NSS1oZYDutGaChIhFBtMKtZ5YnGEjIHbw66N_tqa2tj-92oO3Uztls93qpBt-rvTt9-VV-GHwoRIhFnXuDVUWAcvu-t26lt64ztOt3bYe8Ul4RiGvE7gYjxiCH_xzl4_g9wM-zH3l9BYUQFlpROai_-B0IEIUoIwdij4AFlxsG50TanxRBUk7NqclZNziqGfZSe8uzPg5wIRyt9_-Wxr53RXTPq3rTuBIv8ElxMk9kB9rPt7O2dY9W7NF4IMS0fHnit29lfJ54ev3lpwpn6mF-oq8XV4hP-vFQJ-Q3MlMYX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311433322</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONTRAST AS SEEN IN VISUAL SEARCH REACTION TIMES</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Blough, Donald S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blough, Donald S.</creatorcontrib><description>Three pigeons searched arrays of alphabetic letters displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, either an A or an E appeared, and the reaction time and accuracy with which the bird pecked at this target were measured. In each block of trials, each target (A or E) was displayed alone, or together with a number of distractor letters (2 or 18) that varied in their similarity to the target. During a baseline series of sessions, responses to the A and to the E each yielded food reinforcement on 10% of the trials. In the next series of sessions, reinforcement continued at 10% for A, but rose to 30% for E. In a final series, these reinforcement conditions were reversed. As expected, reaction times increased with target‐distractor similarity and (for similar distractors) with the number of distractors. Increased reinforcement of E had no effect on reaction times to E, but produced a very consistent increase in reaction times to A; the average increase was constant across the various display conditions. Reversal of the differential reinforcement conditions reversed this contrast effect. Analysis of the reaction time distributions indicated that increased reinforcement to E decreased the momentary probability of response to A by a constant amount, regardless of display conditions. These results are discussed in relation to theories of contrast, memory, and of the search image.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1989.52-199</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2584913</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEABAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal cognition ; Animals ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Computers ; Conditioning, Operant ; contrast ; Discrimination Learning ; Eyes & eyesight ; Form Perception ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; key peck ; Male ; Pattern Recognition, Visual ; Perception ; pigeon ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; reinforcement ; Reinforcement Schedule ; similarity ; Vision ; visual search</subject><ispartof>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1989-11, Vol.52 (3), p.199-211</ispartof><rights>1989 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Incorporated Nov 1989</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6568-2c79b46de7c7fb8e0327e3fafc3c7e0cd94dc3e70df8a083611dc25d5bc79ce33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6568-2c79b46de7c7fb8e0327e3fafc3c7e0cd94dc3e70df8a083611dc25d5bc79ce33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1339175/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1339175/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27868,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6765782$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2584913$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blough, Donald S.</creatorcontrib><title>CONTRAST AS SEEN IN VISUAL SEARCH REACTION TIMES</title><title>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</title><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><description>Three pigeons searched arrays of alphabetic letters displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, either an A or an E appeared, and the reaction time and accuracy with which the bird pecked at this target were measured. In each block of trials, each target (A or E) was displayed alone, or together with a number of distractor letters (2 or 18) that varied in their similarity to the target. During a baseline series of sessions, responses to the A and to the E each yielded food reinforcement on 10% of the trials. In the next series of sessions, reinforcement continued at 10% for A, but rose to 30% for E. In a final series, these reinforcement conditions were reversed. As expected, reaction times increased with target‐distractor similarity and (for similar distractors) with the number of distractors. Increased reinforcement of E had no effect on reaction times to E, but produced a very consistent increase in reaction times to A; the average increase was constant across the various display conditions. Reversal of the differential reinforcement conditions reversed this contrast effect. Analysis of the reaction time distributions indicated that increased reinforcement to E decreased the momentary probability of response to A by a constant amount, regardless of display conditions. These results are discussed in relation to theories of contrast, memory, and of the search image.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant</subject><subject>contrast</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Eyes & eyesight</subject><subject>Form Perception</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>key peck</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>pigeon</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>reinforcement</subject><subject>Reinforcement Schedule</subject><subject>similarity</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>visual search</subject><issn>0022-5002</issn><issn>1938-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU2P0zAQtRBoKYU7F6QIELcs_oztC1Iahd2wJZWaLCAuluM4kJImS9wC--9x1KoCJLQXz4zmvTeeeQA8RfAcSYheb6yufCbkOcMhkvIemCFJREg4QvfBDEKMQ-bfh-CRcxufyIjjM3CGmaASkRmAySov13FRBnERFGmaB1kefMiK63jpy3idXAbrNE7KbJUHZfY-LR6DB43unH1yjHNw_TYtk8twubrIkngZmohFIsSGy4pGteWGN5WwkGBuSaMbQwy30NSS1oZYDutGaChIhFBtMKtZ5YnGEjIHbw66N_tqa2tj-92oO3Uztls93qpBt-rvTt9-VV-GHwoRIhFnXuDVUWAcvu-t26lt64ztOt3bYe8Ul4RiGvE7gYjxiCH_xzl4_g9wM-zH3l9BYUQFlpROai_-B0IEIUoIwdij4AFlxsG50TanxRBUk7NqclZNziqGfZSe8uzPg5wIRyt9_-Wxr53RXTPq3rTuBIv8ElxMk9kB9rPt7O2dY9W7NF4IMS0fHnit29lfJ54ev3lpwpn6mF-oq8XV4hP-vFQJ-Q3MlMYX</recordid><startdate>198911</startdate><enddate>198911</enddate><creator>Blough, Donald S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JTYFY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198911</creationdate><title>CONTRAST AS SEEN IN VISUAL SEARCH REACTION TIMES</title><author>Blough, Donald S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6568-2c79b46de7c7fb8e0327e3fafc3c7e0cd94dc3e70df8a083611dc25d5bc79ce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant</topic><topic>contrast</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Eyes & eyesight</topic><topic>Form Perception</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>key peck</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>pigeon</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>reinforcement</topic><topic>Reinforcement Schedule</topic><topic>similarity</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>visual search</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blough, Donald S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 37</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blough, Donald S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONTRAST AS SEEN IN VISUAL SEARCH REACTION TIMES</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Anal Behav</addtitle><date>1989-11</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>199-211</pages><issn>0022-5002</issn><eissn>1938-3711</eissn><coden>JEABAU</coden><abstract>Three pigeons searched arrays of alphabetic letters displayed on computer monitors. On each trial, either an A or an E appeared, and the reaction time and accuracy with which the bird pecked at this target were measured. In each block of trials, each target (A or E) was displayed alone, or together with a number of distractor letters (2 or 18) that varied in their similarity to the target. During a baseline series of sessions, responses to the A and to the E each yielded food reinforcement on 10% of the trials. In the next series of sessions, reinforcement continued at 10% for A, but rose to 30% for E. In a final series, these reinforcement conditions were reversed. As expected, reaction times increased with target‐distractor similarity and (for similar distractors) with the number of distractors. Increased reinforcement of E had no effect on reaction times to E, but produced a very consistent increase in reaction times to A; the average increase was constant across the various display conditions. Reversal of the differential reinforcement conditions reversed this contrast effect. Analysis of the reaction time distributions indicated that increased reinforcement to E decreased the momentary probability of response to A by a constant amount, regardless of display conditions. These results are discussed in relation to theories of contrast, memory, and of the search image.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>2584913</pmid><doi>10.1901/jeab.1989.52-199</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5002 |
ispartof | Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1989-11, Vol.52 (3), p.199-211 |
issn | 0022-5002 1938-3711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1339175 |
source | MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal cognition Animals Attention Biological and medical sciences Birds Computers Conditioning, Operant contrast Discrimination Learning Eyes & eyesight Form Perception Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology key peck Male Pattern Recognition, Visual Perception pigeon Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time reinforcement Reinforcement Schedule similarity Vision visual search |
title | CONTRAST AS SEEN IN VISUAL SEARCH REACTION TIMES |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONTRAST%20AS%20SEEN%20IN%20VISUAL%20SEARCH%20REACTION%20TIMES&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20experimental%20analysis%20of%20behavior&rft.au=Blough,%20Donald%20S.&rft.date=1989-11&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=199-211&rft.issn=0022-5002&rft.eissn=1938-3711&rft.coden=JEABAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1901/jeab.1989.52-199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15765108%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311433322&rft_id=info:pmid/2584913&rfr_iscdi=true |