Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed

OBJECTIVE: Wheelchair athletes often select a percentage of their top speed (%TS) to determine training intensity. The aim of the study was to determine whether choosing a %TS corresponds to the physiological concept of relative exercise intensity (% peak oxygen uptake: %VO2 peak) and to examine sel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of sports medicine 1997-03, Vol.31 (1), p.36-40
Hauptverfasser: Campbell, I G, Williams, C, Lakomy, H K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 1
container_start_page 36
container_title British journal of sports medicine
container_volume 31
creator Campbell, I G
Williams, C
Lakomy, H K
description OBJECTIVE: Wheelchair athletes often select a percentage of their top speed (%TS) to determine training intensity. The aim of the study was to determine whether choosing a %TS corresponds to the physiological concept of relative exercise intensity (% peak oxygen uptake: %VO2 peak) and to examine selected physiological and metabolic responses of a group of wheelchair athletes to 60 minutes' exercise at 80% TS. METHODS: 12 male wheelchair athletes (10 paraplegics and two tetraplegics) performed a series of tests on a motorised treadmill adapted for wheelchairs. The tests, which were undertaken on separate occasions, included the determination of VO2 peak, the determination of oxygen cost at a range of submaximal wheelchair propulsion speeds, and a 60 min exercise test at 80% TS. RESULTS: Wheelchair propulsion speeds equivalent to 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of each subject's TS were found to equate to 48.3 (SD13.8)%, 60.0(11.1)%, 70.6(9.8)%, and 82.7(9.6)% of VO2 peak, with a wide variation in the relative exercise intensities evident at each %TS. During the 1 h exercise test at 80% TS the physiological and metabolic responses measured were indicative of steady state exercise, with no signs of fatigue evident. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that selecting a %TS is not an appropriate way of selecting a common relative exercise intensity. There may also be a need for the current training practises of some wheelchair road racers to be modified.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bjsm.31.1.36
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1332473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3980623791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b508t-2141bc075c2bdaef20ef94a15850260cf32c43a4f10934ab5ac06e91345cd29e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxS0EWsrCjStSJCS4bIrHY-fjgoQq9ksL7AG4Wo47aVKSONgpsP_9ukpVAQc4WfL76b2ZeYw9B74EwOxNtQ39EmEJS8wesAXIHFMuC_6QLTjyLMUsl4_ZkxC2nINQvDhhJyWgELxcsOvb5i60rnOb1pou8RRGNwQKiauTnw1RZxvT-sRMTUdT_DZTMpK3NExmM1OTG5MwEq2fske16QI9O7yn7Mv5-8-ry_Tm08XV6t1NWsXsKRUgobI8V1ZUa0O14FSX0oAqFBcZtzUKK9HIGniJ0lTKWJ5RHFgquxYl4Sl7O_uOu6qn9X4Wbzo9-rY3_k470-o_laFt9Mb90IAo4nGiwauDgXffdxQm3bfBUteZgdwu6LwoSgRV_heEosBMcRnBl3-BW7fzQ7yChjwXQhVc7XPPZsp6F4Kn-jgzcL2vUu-r1AgaNGYRf_H7nkf40F3U01lvw0S_jrLx33SWY670x68rfX17Xir1AfVl5F_PfNVv_518D6PStog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772258053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Campbell, I G ; Williams, C ; Lakomy, H K</creator><creatorcontrib>Campbell, I G ; Williams, C ; Lakomy, H K</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Wheelchair athletes often select a percentage of their top speed (%TS) to determine training intensity. The aim of the study was to determine whether choosing a %TS corresponds to the physiological concept of relative exercise intensity (% peak oxygen uptake: %VO2 peak) and to examine selected physiological and metabolic responses of a group of wheelchair athletes to 60 minutes' exercise at 80% TS. METHODS: 12 male wheelchair athletes (10 paraplegics and two tetraplegics) performed a series of tests on a motorised treadmill adapted for wheelchairs. The tests, which were undertaken on separate occasions, included the determination of VO2 peak, the determination of oxygen cost at a range of submaximal wheelchair propulsion speeds, and a 60 min exercise test at 80% TS. RESULTS: Wheelchair propulsion speeds equivalent to 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of each subject's TS were found to equate to 48.3 (SD13.8)%, 60.0(11.1)%, 70.6(9.8)%, and 82.7(9.6)% of VO2 peak, with a wide variation in the relative exercise intensities evident at each %TS. During the 1 h exercise test at 80% TS the physiological and metabolic responses measured were indicative of steady state exercise, with no signs of fatigue evident. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that selecting a %TS is not an appropriate way of selecting a common relative exercise intensity. There may also be a need for the current training practises of some wheelchair road racers to be modified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-3674</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-0480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.31.1.36</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9132209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</publisher><subject>Exercise Test ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; Lactic Acid - blood ; Male ; Oxygen Consumption ; Physical Endurance ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Spinal Dysraphism - physiopathology ; Sports - physiology ; Wheelchairs</subject><ispartof>British journal of sports medicine, 1997-03, Vol.31 (1), p.36-40</ispartof><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Mar 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b508t-2141bc075c2bdaef20ef94a15850260cf32c43a4f10934ab5ac06e91345cd29e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b508t-2141bc075c2bdaef20ef94a15850260cf32c43a4f10934ab5ac06e91345cd29e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1332473/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1332473/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9132209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Campbell, I G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakomy, H K</creatorcontrib><title>Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed</title><title>British journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: Wheelchair athletes often select a percentage of their top speed (%TS) to determine training intensity. The aim of the study was to determine whether choosing a %TS corresponds to the physiological concept of relative exercise intensity (% peak oxygen uptake: %VO2 peak) and to examine selected physiological and metabolic responses of a group of wheelchair athletes to 60 minutes' exercise at 80% TS. METHODS: 12 male wheelchair athletes (10 paraplegics and two tetraplegics) performed a series of tests on a motorised treadmill adapted for wheelchairs. The tests, which were undertaken on separate occasions, included the determination of VO2 peak, the determination of oxygen cost at a range of submaximal wheelchair propulsion speeds, and a 60 min exercise test at 80% TS. RESULTS: Wheelchair propulsion speeds equivalent to 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of each subject's TS were found to equate to 48.3 (SD13.8)%, 60.0(11.1)%, 70.6(9.8)%, and 82.7(9.6)% of VO2 peak, with a wide variation in the relative exercise intensities evident at each %TS. During the 1 h exercise test at 80% TS the physiological and metabolic responses measured were indicative of steady state exercise, with no signs of fatigue evident. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that selecting a %TS is not an appropriate way of selecting a common relative exercise intensity. There may also be a need for the current training practises of some wheelchair road racers to be modified.</description><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lactic Acid - blood</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Physical Endurance</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Spinal Dysraphism - physiopathology</subject><subject>Sports - physiology</subject><subject>Wheelchairs</subject><issn>0306-3674</issn><issn>1473-0480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxS0EWsrCjStSJCS4bIrHY-fjgoQq9ksL7AG4Wo47aVKSONgpsP_9ukpVAQc4WfL76b2ZeYw9B74EwOxNtQ39EmEJS8wesAXIHFMuC_6QLTjyLMUsl4_ZkxC2nINQvDhhJyWgELxcsOvb5i60rnOb1pou8RRGNwQKiauTnw1RZxvT-sRMTUdT_DZTMpK3NExmM1OTG5MwEq2fske16QI9O7yn7Mv5-8-ry_Tm08XV6t1NWsXsKRUgobI8V1ZUa0O14FSX0oAqFBcZtzUKK9HIGniJ0lTKWJ5RHFgquxYl4Sl7O_uOu6qn9X4Wbzo9-rY3_k470-o_laFt9Mb90IAo4nGiwauDgXffdxQm3bfBUteZgdwu6LwoSgRV_heEosBMcRnBl3-BW7fzQ7yChjwXQhVc7XPPZsp6F4Kn-jgzcL2vUu-r1AgaNGYRf_H7nkf40F3U01lvw0S_jrLx33SWY670x68rfX17Xir1AfVl5F_PfNVv_518D6PStog</recordid><startdate>19970301</startdate><enddate>19970301</enddate><creator>Campbell, I G</creator><creator>Williams, C</creator><creator>Lakomy, H K</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970301</creationdate><title>Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed</title><author>Campbell, I G ; Williams, C ; Lakomy, H K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b508t-2141bc075c2bdaef20ef94a15850260cf32c43a4f10934ab5ac06e91345cd29e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lactic Acid - blood</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Physical Endurance</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Spinal Dysraphism - physiopathology</topic><topic>Sports - physiology</topic><topic>Wheelchairs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Campbell, I G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakomy, H K</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Campbell, I G</au><au>Williams, C</au><au>Lakomy, H K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Sports Med</addtitle><date>1997-03-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>36-40</pages><issn>0306-3674</issn><eissn>1473-0480</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Wheelchair athletes often select a percentage of their top speed (%TS) to determine training intensity. The aim of the study was to determine whether choosing a %TS corresponds to the physiological concept of relative exercise intensity (% peak oxygen uptake: %VO2 peak) and to examine selected physiological and metabolic responses of a group of wheelchair athletes to 60 minutes' exercise at 80% TS. METHODS: 12 male wheelchair athletes (10 paraplegics and two tetraplegics) performed a series of tests on a motorised treadmill adapted for wheelchairs. The tests, which were undertaken on separate occasions, included the determination of VO2 peak, the determination of oxygen cost at a range of submaximal wheelchair propulsion speeds, and a 60 min exercise test at 80% TS. RESULTS: Wheelchair propulsion speeds equivalent to 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% of each subject's TS were found to equate to 48.3 (SD13.8)%, 60.0(11.1)%, 70.6(9.8)%, and 82.7(9.6)% of VO2 peak, with a wide variation in the relative exercise intensities evident at each %TS. During the 1 h exercise test at 80% TS the physiological and metabolic responses measured were indicative of steady state exercise, with no signs of fatigue evident. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that selecting a %TS is not an appropriate way of selecting a common relative exercise intensity. There may also be a need for the current training practises of some wheelchair road racers to be modified.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine</pub><pmid>9132209</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjsm.31.1.36</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-3674
ispartof British journal of sports medicine, 1997-03, Vol.31 (1), p.36-40
issn 0306-3674
1473-0480
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1332473
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Exercise Test
Heart Rate
Humans
Lactic Acid - blood
Male
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Endurance
Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology
Spinal Dysraphism - physiopathology
Sports - physiology
Wheelchairs
title Physiological responses of wheelchair athletes at percentages of top speed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T02%3A28%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physiological%20responses%20of%20wheelchair%20athletes%20at%20percentages%20of%20top%20speed&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Campbell,%20I%20G&rft.date=1997-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=36-40&rft.issn=0306-3674&rft.eissn=1473-0480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjsm.31.1.36&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3980623791%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772258053&rft_id=info:pmid/9132209&rfr_iscdi=true