PERFORMANCE OF CHILDREN UNDER A MULTIPLE RANDOM-RATIO RANDOM-INTERVAL SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT

Three children, aged 1.5, 2.5, and 4.5 years, pressed telegraph keys under a two‐component multiple random‐ratio random‐interval schedule of reinforcement. In the first condition, responses on the left key were reinforced under a random‐interval schedule and responses on the right key were reinforced under a random‐ratio schedule. In the second condition, the schedule components were reversed. In the third condition, the original arrangement was reinstated. For all subjects, rates of responding were higher in the random‐ratio component despite higher rates of reinforcement in the random‐interval component. The average interreinforcement interval of the random‐interval component was increased in the fourth condition, resulting in more similar rates of reinforcement for both schedule components, and then returned to its original value in the fifth condition. In both conditions, all subjects continued to exhibit higher rates of responding in the ratio component than in the interval component. Although these observations are consistent with results from studies with pigeons, it is argued that the response‐rate differences between the interval and ratio schedule components are sufficient to demonstrate schedule sensitivity.