Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?

Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of general practice 1997-08, Vol.47 (421), p.487-492
Hauptverfasser: den Otter, J J, Reijnen, G M, van den Bosch, W J, van Schayck, C P, Molema, J, van Weel, C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 492
container_issue 421
container_start_page 487
container_title British journal of general practice
container_volume 47
creator den Otter, J J
Reijnen, G M
van den Bosch, W J
van Schayck, C P
Molema, J
van Weel, C
description Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of < or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of > or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of < or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P < 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1313077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79293941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p261t-4317807a49bde11868297888bc57fd7a5f52bd5cce0dc9753c67994bfa89b75d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9LwzAAxXNQ5px-BCEnb4WkaZvEgyLDfzDwMsFbSNJ0i2ZJTLpqv70Fh-jpHd7j9x7vCMwRb1CBm4qcgNOc3xAqywajGZhxgkrK6By8rk3urd9AlYLXWysd3I7RpCKZHIPPdjDe5HwFYwpD0LK3wcOQYDTyHZqvaJPsQxph58InHGSyUlln-_HmDBx30mVzftAFeLm_Wy8fi9Xzw9PydlXEaUpfVARThqisuGoNxqxhJaeMMaVr2rVU1l1dqrbW2qBWc1oT3VDOK9VJxhWtW7IA1z_cuFc702rj-ySdiMnuZBpFkFb8d7zdik0YBCaYIEonwOUBkMLHfnpD7GzWxjnpTdhnQXnJCa_wFLz42_RbcfiSfAOoH3LE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79293941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>den Otter, J J ; Reijnen, G M ; van den Bosch, W J ; van Schayck, C P ; Molema, J ; van Weel, C</creator><creatorcontrib>den Otter, J J ; Reijnen, G M ; van den Bosch, W J ; van Schayck, C P ; Molema, J ; van Weel, C</creatorcontrib><description>Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of &lt; or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of &gt; or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of &gt; or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of &lt; or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of &gt; or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P &lt; 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1643</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9302787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Asthma - diagnosis ; Asthma - physiopathology ; Bronchial Hyperreactivity - diagnosis ; Bronchial Provocation Tests ; Histamine ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Peak Expiratory Flow Rate</subject><ispartof>British journal of general practice, 1997-08, Vol.47 (421), p.487-492</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1313077/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1313077/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9302787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>den Otter, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reijnen, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Bosch, W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schayck, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molema, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Weel, C</creatorcontrib><title>Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?</title><title>British journal of general practice</title><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><description>Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of &lt; or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of &gt; or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of &gt; or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of &lt; or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of &gt; or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P &lt; 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Asthma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Asthma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Bronchial Hyperreactivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Bronchial Provocation Tests</subject><subject>Histamine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peak Expiratory Flow Rate</subject><issn>0960-1643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE9LwzAAxXNQ5px-BCEnb4WkaZvEgyLDfzDwMsFbSNJ0i2ZJTLpqv70Fh-jpHd7j9x7vCMwRb1CBm4qcgNOc3xAqywajGZhxgkrK6By8rk3urd9AlYLXWysd3I7RpCKZHIPPdjDe5HwFYwpD0LK3wcOQYDTyHZqvaJPsQxph58InHGSyUlln-_HmDBx30mVzftAFeLm_Wy8fi9Xzw9PydlXEaUpfVARThqisuGoNxqxhJaeMMaVr2rVU1l1dqrbW2qBWc1oT3VDOK9VJxhWtW7IA1z_cuFc702rj-ySdiMnuZBpFkFb8d7zdik0YBCaYIEonwOUBkMLHfnpD7GzWxjnpTdhnQXnJCa_wFLz42_RbcfiSfAOoH3LE</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>den Otter, J J</creator><creator>Reijnen, G M</creator><creator>van den Bosch, W J</creator><creator>van Schayck, C P</creator><creator>Molema, J</creator><creator>van Weel, C</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?</title><author>den Otter, J J ; Reijnen, G M ; van den Bosch, W J ; van Schayck, C P ; Molema, J ; van Weel, C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p261t-4317807a49bde11868297888bc57fd7a5f52bd5cce0dc9753c67994bfa89b75d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Asthma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Asthma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Bronchial Hyperreactivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Bronchial Provocation Tests</topic><topic>Histamine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peak Expiratory Flow Rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>den Otter, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reijnen, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Bosch, W J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Schayck, C P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molema, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Weel, C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>den Otter, J J</au><au>Reijnen, G M</au><au>van den Bosch, W J</au><au>van Schayck, C P</au><au>Molema, J</au><au>van Weel, C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?</atitle><jtitle>British journal of general practice</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Gen Pract</addtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>421</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>492</epage><pages>487-492</pages><issn>0960-1643</issn><abstract>Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of &lt; or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of &gt; or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of &gt; or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of &lt; or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of &gt; or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P &lt; 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>9302787</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-1643
ispartof British journal of general practice, 1997-08, Vol.47 (421), p.487-492
issn 0960-1643
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1313077
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Asthma - diagnosis
Asthma - physiopathology
Bronchial Hyperreactivity - diagnosis
Bronchial Provocation Tests
Histamine
Humans
Middle Aged
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate
title Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T07%3A30%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Testing%20bronchial%20hyper-responsiveness:%20provocation%20or%20peak%20expiratory%20flow%20variability?&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20general%20practice&rft.au=den%20Otter,%20J%20J&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=421&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=492&rft.pages=487-492&rft.issn=0960-1643&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79293941%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79293941&rft_id=info:pmid/9302787&rfr_iscdi=true