Verification of Self-Report of Zygosity Determined via DNA Testing in a Subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 Years Later

The National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC) twin panel, created nearly 50 years ago, had twin zygosity determined primarily via a similarity questionnaire that has been estimated to correctly classify at least 95% of twins. In the course of a study on the genetics of healt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Twin research and human genetics 2005-08, Vol.8 (4), p.362-367
Hauptverfasser: Reed, T., Plassman, B.L., Tanner, C.M., Dick, D. M., Rinehart, S.A., Nichols, W.C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 362
container_title Twin research and human genetics
container_volume 8
creator Reed, T.
Plassman, B.L.
Tanner, C.M.
Dick, D. M.
Rinehart, S.A.
Nichols, W.C.
description The National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC) twin panel, created nearly 50 years ago, had twin zygosity determined primarily via a similarity questionnaire that has been estimated to correctly classify at least 95% of twins. In the course of a study on the genetics of healthy aging in the NAS-NRC twins DNA was collected for genome-wide scanning and zygosity confirmation was examined in 343 participating pairs. The sample was supplemented from two other studies using NAS-NRC twins where one or both co-twins were suspected to have Alzheimer disease or another dementia, or Parkinson’s disease. Overall there were 578 twin-pairs with DNA analyzed. 96.8% (519/536) had confirmation of zygosity assignment via questionnaire. Among 42 pairs whose questionnaire responses were inconclusive for assigning zygosity, 50% were found to be monozygous and 50% were dizygous. There was some evidence for greater misclassification of presumed DZ pairs in the healthy aging study where participation favored pairs who were similar in having a favorable health history and willingness to volunteer without any element of perceived risk for a specific disease influencing participation.
doi_str_mv 10.1375/1832427054936763
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1262657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1262657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1673-971ca2b1cf039e2e4ed9370e3c0b3dfccf413f62841b6c2a603c3730c3a9bb613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVjE1PAjEURbvQCKJ7l_0Do23f0DIbEwJ-JQQTQBPdTDqd16EGZiZtwYy_XlA3rm7uPbmHkCvOrjmo4Q0fgUiFYsM0A6kknJD-cUoOW9oj5yF8MAaKZ-yM9LjkSirB--TrFb2zzujompo2li5xY5MFto2Px_reVU1wsaNTjOi3rsaS7p2m0_mYrjBEV1fU1VTT5a4I-HOJa6Tz8TKZLyZ09XmAC6xciL6jKaNvqH2gM32QXZBTqzcBL_9yQF7u71aTx2T2_PA0Gc-SlksFSaa40aLgxjLIUGCKZQaKIRhWQGmNsSkHK8Uo5YU0QksGBhQwAzorCslhQG5_ve2u2GJpsI5eb_LWu632Xd5ol_8ntVvnVbPPuZBCDhV8AxQBaV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verification of Self-Report of Zygosity Determined via DNA Testing in a Subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 Years Later</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Reed, T. ; Plassman, B.L. ; Tanner, C.M. ; Dick, D. M. ; Rinehart, S.A. ; Nichols, W.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reed, T. ; Plassman, B.L. ; Tanner, C.M. ; Dick, D. M. ; Rinehart, S.A. ; Nichols, W.C.</creatorcontrib><description>The National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC) twin panel, created nearly 50 years ago, had twin zygosity determined primarily via a similarity questionnaire that has been estimated to correctly classify at least 95% of twins. In the course of a study on the genetics of healthy aging in the NAS-NRC twins DNA was collected for genome-wide scanning and zygosity confirmation was examined in 343 participating pairs. The sample was supplemented from two other studies using NAS-NRC twins where one or both co-twins were suspected to have Alzheimer disease or another dementia, or Parkinson’s disease. Overall there were 578 twin-pairs with DNA analyzed. 96.8% (519/536) had confirmation of zygosity assignment via questionnaire. Among 42 pairs whose questionnaire responses were inconclusive for assigning zygosity, 50% were found to be monozygous and 50% were dizygous. There was some evidence for greater misclassification of presumed DZ pairs in the healthy aging study where participation favored pairs who were similar in having a favorable health history and willingness to volunteer without any element of perceived risk for a specific disease influencing participation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1832-4274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1375/1832427054936763</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16176721</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Twin research and human genetics, 2005-08, Vol.8 (4), p.362-367</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reed, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plassman, B.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dick, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, W.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Verification of Self-Report of Zygosity Determined via DNA Testing in a Subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 Years Later</title><title>Twin research and human genetics</title><description>The National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC) twin panel, created nearly 50 years ago, had twin zygosity determined primarily via a similarity questionnaire that has been estimated to correctly classify at least 95% of twins. In the course of a study on the genetics of healthy aging in the NAS-NRC twins DNA was collected for genome-wide scanning and zygosity confirmation was examined in 343 participating pairs. The sample was supplemented from two other studies using NAS-NRC twins where one or both co-twins were suspected to have Alzheimer disease or another dementia, or Parkinson’s disease. Overall there were 578 twin-pairs with DNA analyzed. 96.8% (519/536) had confirmation of zygosity assignment via questionnaire. Among 42 pairs whose questionnaire responses were inconclusive for assigning zygosity, 50% were found to be monozygous and 50% were dizygous. There was some evidence for greater misclassification of presumed DZ pairs in the healthy aging study where participation favored pairs who were similar in having a favorable health history and willingness to volunteer without any element of perceived risk for a specific disease influencing participation.</description><issn>1832-4274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVjE1PAjEURbvQCKJ7l_0Do23f0DIbEwJ-JQQTQBPdTDqd16EGZiZtwYy_XlA3rm7uPbmHkCvOrjmo4Q0fgUiFYsM0A6kknJD-cUoOW9oj5yF8MAaKZ-yM9LjkSirB--TrFb2zzujompo2li5xY5MFto2Px_reVU1wsaNTjOi3rsaS7p2m0_mYrjBEV1fU1VTT5a4I-HOJa6Tz8TKZLyZ09XmAC6xciL6jKaNvqH2gM32QXZBTqzcBL_9yQF7u71aTx2T2_PA0Gc-SlksFSaa40aLgxjLIUGCKZQaKIRhWQGmNsSkHK8Uo5YU0QksGBhQwAzorCslhQG5_ve2u2GJpsI5eb_LWu632Xd5ol_8ntVvnVbPPuZBCDhV8AxQBaV8</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Reed, T.</creator><creator>Plassman, B.L.</creator><creator>Tanner, C.M.</creator><creator>Dick, D. M.</creator><creator>Rinehart, S.A.</creator><creator>Nichols, W.C.</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Verification of Self-Report of Zygosity Determined via DNA Testing in a Subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 Years Later</title><author>Reed, T. ; Plassman, B.L. ; Tanner, C.M. ; Dick, D. M. ; Rinehart, S.A. ; Nichols, W.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1673-971ca2b1cf039e2e4ed9370e3c0b3dfccf413f62841b6c2a603c3730c3a9bb613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reed, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plassman, B.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanner, C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dick, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinehart, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, W.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Twin research and human genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reed, T.</au><au>Plassman, B.L.</au><au>Tanner, C.M.</au><au>Dick, D. M.</au><au>Rinehart, S.A.</au><au>Nichols, W.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verification of Self-Report of Zygosity Determined via DNA Testing in a Subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 Years Later</atitle><jtitle>Twin research and human genetics</jtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>362</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>362-367</pages><issn>1832-4274</issn><abstract>The National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC) twin panel, created nearly 50 years ago, had twin zygosity determined primarily via a similarity questionnaire that has been estimated to correctly classify at least 95% of twins. In the course of a study on the genetics of healthy aging in the NAS-NRC twins DNA was collected for genome-wide scanning and zygosity confirmation was examined in 343 participating pairs. The sample was supplemented from two other studies using NAS-NRC twins where one or both co-twins were suspected to have Alzheimer disease or another dementia, or Parkinson’s disease. Overall there were 578 twin-pairs with DNA analyzed. 96.8% (519/536) had confirmation of zygosity assignment via questionnaire. Among 42 pairs whose questionnaire responses were inconclusive for assigning zygosity, 50% were found to be monozygous and 50% were dizygous. There was some evidence for greater misclassification of presumed DZ pairs in the healthy aging study where participation favored pairs who were similar in having a favorable health history and willingness to volunteer without any element of perceived risk for a specific disease influencing participation.</abstract><pmid>16176721</pmid><doi>10.1375/1832427054936763</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1832-4274
ispartof Twin research and human genetics, 2005-08, Vol.8 (4), p.362-367
issn 1832-4274
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1262657
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Verification of Self-Report of Zygosity Determined via DNA Testing in a Subset of the NAS-NRC Twin Registry 40 Years Later
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A13%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verification%20of%20Self-Report%20of%20Zygosity%20Determined%20via%20DNA%20Testing%20in%20a%20Subset%20of%20the%20NAS-NRC%20Twin%20Registry%2040%20Years%20Later&rft.jtitle=Twin%20research%20and%20human%20genetics&rft.au=Reed,%20T.&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=362&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=362-367&rft.issn=1832-4274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1375/1832427054936763&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1262657%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/16176721&rfr_iscdi=true