Radiation Hazards of Primary Concern to Public Health-Present Status and Outlook

The radiation hazards currently of primary concern to public health are fallout of radioiodine from testing nuclear weapons and excessive x-ray exposures performed by careless and sometimes poorly trained physicians. Because of the relatively short half life of I/sup 131/(8 days), it might be expect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970 v18 1928-v60 1970, 1963-06, Vol.53 (6), p.872-877
1. Verfasser: Morgan, R H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 877
container_issue 6
container_start_page 872
container_title American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970
container_volume 53
creator Morgan, R H
description The radiation hazards currently of primary concern to public health are fallout of radioiodine from testing nuclear weapons and excessive x-ray exposures performed by careless and sometimes poorly trained physicians. Because of the relatively short half life of I/sup 131/(8 days), it might be expected to be of little consequence as a public health hazard following nuclear weapons testing. However, the yield of I/sup 131/ from a nuclear weapon is sufficiently high that considerable contamination of the environment takes place, and the hazard to the general population becomes greatest when the weapon is detonated at low altitude. The ground contamination problem increases as the altitude of detonation decreases. After the USSR tests of 1961, levels of I/sup 131/ contamination rose rapidly-in a few communities to a level which, if continued over a period of several months, would cause a dose in excess of the Federal Radiation Council's (FRC) radiation protection guide of 0.5 rem. The meteorologic aspect is of interest to public health authorities because it clearly indicates the manner in which variation in the weather pattern may cause fallout to occur from time to time in quite unexpected places. As a result of later detonations, estimates indicate that in some regions of the United States the radiation dose received by the thyroid glands of children may reach a level of 1.5 rem/yr, which represents the ingestion of 100,000 mu mu C of radioiodine. This amount is 3 times the quantity of radioiodine recommended by the FRC as a maximum limit. The FRC has announced that its radiation standards, applicable to the peacetime uses of radionuclides, do not apply to environmental contamination from fallout. The political implications of this decision, as well as the confusion it has introduced among public health authorities, are discussed. Reduction of the I/ sup 131/ hazard by the use of dried or stored fresh milk by infants and lactating mothers, and addition of stable iodide to the diet, are also discussed. Problems of medical overexposure to radiation are, in general, the result of the use of unsafe x-ray equipment or careless use of x-ray equipment. It is recommended that exposure dose values to such tissues as the reproductive organs be reduced to 15 mr/yr or about 15% of the exposure dose from natural background sources, as an The duties and experiences encountered during the 4-yr operation of a radiation control agency are recounted. The most important part
doi_str_mv 10.2105/AJPH.53.6.872
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1254171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1298331858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f4da5c0f9be908480b0df06463592e9de73799bdab6190d19d2ba76ae67f4373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9PHCEYhjm0Uas99toQm_Q2W34MMFyamE3rakyc2PZMGGC66CxYYEzav142u9HqiRCevN_z8QLwAaMFwYh9ObvsVwtGF3zRCfIGHCGESCOZIIfgXc639cqkpAfgEHcICynxEehvtPW6-BjgSv_TyWYYR9gnv9HpL1zGYFwKsETYz8PkDVw5PZV10yeXXSjwR9FlzlAHC6_nMsV4dwLejnrK7v3-PAa_vn_7uVw1V9fnF8uzq8ZQwkvDx9ZqZtAoBydR13ZoQHZEvOWUSeKkdYJWw8HqgWOJLJaWDFpw7bgYWyroMfi6y72fh42zptokPan7nbmK2quXL8Gv1e_4oDBhLRa4BpzuAmIuXmXjizNrE0NwpqiWk61KhT7vp6T4Z3a5qI3Pxk2TDi7OWXWUIcIEr-CnV-BtnFOoP1AHyo5S3LGuUs2OMinmnNz45IuR2laothUqRhVXtcLKf_x_yWd63x99BJfBmNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1298331858</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiation Hazards of Primary Concern to Public Health-Present Status and Outlook</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Morgan, R H</creator><creatorcontrib>Morgan, R H ; Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore</creatorcontrib><description>The radiation hazards currently of primary concern to public health are fallout of radioiodine from testing nuclear weapons and excessive x-ray exposures performed by careless and sometimes poorly trained physicians. Because of the relatively short half life of I/sup 131/(8 days), it might be expected to be of little consequence as a public health hazard following nuclear weapons testing. However, the yield of I/sup 131/ from a nuclear weapon is sufficiently high that considerable contamination of the environment takes place, and the hazard to the general population becomes greatest when the weapon is detonated at low altitude. The ground contamination problem increases as the altitude of detonation decreases. After the USSR tests of 1961, levels of I/sup 131/ contamination rose rapidly-in a few communities to a level which, if continued over a period of several months, would cause a dose in excess of the Federal Radiation Council's (FRC) radiation protection guide of 0.5 rem. The meteorologic aspect is of interest to public health authorities because it clearly indicates the manner in which variation in the weather pattern may cause fallout to occur from time to time in quite unexpected places. As a result of later detonations, estimates indicate that in some regions of the United States the radiation dose received by the thyroid glands of children may reach a level of 1.5 rem/yr, which represents the ingestion of 100,000 mu mu C of radioiodine. This amount is 3 times the quantity of radioiodine recommended by the FRC as a maximum limit. The FRC has announced that its radiation standards, applicable to the peacetime uses of radionuclides, do not apply to environmental contamination from fallout. The political implications of this decision, as well as the confusion it has introduced among public health authorities, are discussed. Reduction of the I/ sup 131/ hazard by the use of dried or stored fresh milk by infants and lactating mothers, and addition of stable iodide to the diet, are also discussed. Problems of medical overexposure to radiation are, in general, the result of the use of unsafe x-ray equipment or careless use of x-ray equipment. It is recommended that exposure dose values to such tissues as the reproductive organs be reduced to 15 mr/yr or about 15% of the exposure dose from natural background sources, as an The duties and experiences encountered during the 4-yr operation of a radiation control agency are recounted. The most important part of a comprehensive radiation control program, in terms of overall exposure of the population, is the effort to minimize the radiatlon exposure from the medical and dental use of x-rays. The fact that much of the equipment is installed in apartmert houses, other multiple dwelling structures, and office buildings means that a more critical evaluation of the structural shielding is necessary. An inspection of existing x-ray installations showed that much equipment had been installed in multiple dwellings without having the basic structural shielding considered standard practice for many years. Public health considerations relating to siting nuclear reactors in cities are discussed, particularly with respect to nuclear-powered vessels entening the harbors of large cities. The problem of safeguarding the public from hazards associated with the transportation of radioactive materials in a large city is also discussed. Dosimetry tests showed that many watches being sold with luminous dials exceeded permisnible dose rates, and many jewelry and department stores have been restrained from selling such watches. Other tests showed that, under normal use, television equipment does not emit a sufficiently hlgh dose rate of x-rays to constitute a health hazard. (BBB)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9572</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.53.6.872</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18017991</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Public Health Association</publisher><subject>BACKGROUND ; CONTAMINATION ; DIET ; ENVIRONMENT ; FALLOUT ; HALF-LIFE ; HEALTH AND SAFETY ; INGESTION ; IODIDES ; IODINE 131 ; LEVELS ; METEOROLOGY ; MILK ; NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS ; POPULATIONS ; POWDERS ; RADIATION DOSES ; RADIATION EFFECTS ; RADIATION PROTECTION ; SAFETY ; SOILS ; STOMACH ; STORAGE ; THYROID ; TISSUES ; X RADIATION</subject><ispartof>American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970, 1963-06, Vol.53 (6), p.872-877</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1254171/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1254171/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27850,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18017991$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/4626463$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morgan, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore</creatorcontrib><title>Radiation Hazards of Primary Concern to Public Health-Present Status and Outlook</title><title>American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970</title><addtitle>Am J Public Health Nations Health</addtitle><description>The radiation hazards currently of primary concern to public health are fallout of radioiodine from testing nuclear weapons and excessive x-ray exposures performed by careless and sometimes poorly trained physicians. Because of the relatively short half life of I/sup 131/(8 days), it might be expected to be of little consequence as a public health hazard following nuclear weapons testing. However, the yield of I/sup 131/ from a nuclear weapon is sufficiently high that considerable contamination of the environment takes place, and the hazard to the general population becomes greatest when the weapon is detonated at low altitude. The ground contamination problem increases as the altitude of detonation decreases. After the USSR tests of 1961, levels of I/sup 131/ contamination rose rapidly-in a few communities to a level which, if continued over a period of several months, would cause a dose in excess of the Federal Radiation Council's (FRC) radiation protection guide of 0.5 rem. The meteorologic aspect is of interest to public health authorities because it clearly indicates the manner in which variation in the weather pattern may cause fallout to occur from time to time in quite unexpected places. As a result of later detonations, estimates indicate that in some regions of the United States the radiation dose received by the thyroid glands of children may reach a level of 1.5 rem/yr, which represents the ingestion of 100,000 mu mu C of radioiodine. This amount is 3 times the quantity of radioiodine recommended by the FRC as a maximum limit. The FRC has announced that its radiation standards, applicable to the peacetime uses of radionuclides, do not apply to environmental contamination from fallout. The political implications of this decision, as well as the confusion it has introduced among public health authorities, are discussed. Reduction of the I/ sup 131/ hazard by the use of dried or stored fresh milk by infants and lactating mothers, and addition of stable iodide to the diet, are also discussed. Problems of medical overexposure to radiation are, in general, the result of the use of unsafe x-ray equipment or careless use of x-ray equipment. It is recommended that exposure dose values to such tissues as the reproductive organs be reduced to 15 mr/yr or about 15% of the exposure dose from natural background sources, as an The duties and experiences encountered during the 4-yr operation of a radiation control agency are recounted. The most important part of a comprehensive radiation control program, in terms of overall exposure of the population, is the effort to minimize the radiatlon exposure from the medical and dental use of x-rays. The fact that much of the equipment is installed in apartmert houses, other multiple dwelling structures, and office buildings means that a more critical evaluation of the structural shielding is necessary. An inspection of existing x-ray installations showed that much equipment had been installed in multiple dwellings without having the basic structural shielding considered standard practice for many years. Public health considerations relating to siting nuclear reactors in cities are discussed, particularly with respect to nuclear-powered vessels entening the harbors of large cities. The problem of safeguarding the public from hazards associated with the transportation of radioactive materials in a large city is also discussed. Dosimetry tests showed that many watches being sold with luminous dials exceeded permisnible dose rates, and many jewelry and department stores have been restrained from selling such watches. Other tests showed that, under normal use, television equipment does not emit a sufficiently hlgh dose rate of x-rays to constitute a health hazard. (BBB)</description><subject>BACKGROUND</subject><subject>CONTAMINATION</subject><subject>DIET</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENT</subject><subject>FALLOUT</subject><subject>HALF-LIFE</subject><subject>HEALTH AND SAFETY</subject><subject>INGESTION</subject><subject>IODIDES</subject><subject>IODINE 131</subject><subject>LEVELS</subject><subject>METEOROLOGY</subject><subject>MILK</subject><subject>NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS</subject><subject>POPULATIONS</subject><subject>POWDERS</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>RADIATION EFFECTS</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION</subject><subject>SAFETY</subject><subject>SOILS</subject><subject>STOMACH</subject><subject>STORAGE</subject><subject>THYROID</subject><subject>TISSUES</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><issn>0002-9572</issn><issn>0090-0036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1963</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9PHCEYhjm0Uas99toQm_Q2W34MMFyamE3rakyc2PZMGGC66CxYYEzav142u9HqiRCevN_z8QLwAaMFwYh9ObvsVwtGF3zRCfIGHCGESCOZIIfgXc639cqkpAfgEHcICynxEehvtPW6-BjgSv_TyWYYR9gnv9HpL1zGYFwKsETYz8PkDVw5PZV10yeXXSjwR9FlzlAHC6_nMsV4dwLejnrK7v3-PAa_vn_7uVw1V9fnF8uzq8ZQwkvDx9ZqZtAoBydR13ZoQHZEvOWUSeKkdYJWw8HqgWOJLJaWDFpw7bgYWyroMfi6y72fh42zptokPan7nbmK2quXL8Gv1e_4oDBhLRa4BpzuAmIuXmXjizNrE0NwpqiWk61KhT7vp6T4Z3a5qI3Pxk2TDi7OWXWUIcIEr-CnV-BtnFOoP1AHyo5S3LGuUs2OMinmnNz45IuR2laothUqRhVXtcLKf_x_yWd63x99BJfBmNU</recordid><startdate>19630601</startdate><enddate>19630601</enddate><creator>Morgan, R H</creator><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HDMVH</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19630601</creationdate><title>Radiation Hazards of Primary Concern to Public Health-Present Status and Outlook</title><author>Morgan, R H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-6f4da5c0f9be908480b0df06463592e9de73799bdab6190d19d2ba76ae67f4373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1963</creationdate><topic>BACKGROUND</topic><topic>CONTAMINATION</topic><topic>DIET</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENT</topic><topic>FALLOUT</topic><topic>HALF-LIFE</topic><topic>HEALTH AND SAFETY</topic><topic>INGESTION</topic><topic>IODIDES</topic><topic>IODINE 131</topic><topic>LEVELS</topic><topic>METEOROLOGY</topic><topic>MILK</topic><topic>NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS</topic><topic>POPULATIONS</topic><topic>POWDERS</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>RADIATION EFFECTS</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION</topic><topic>SAFETY</topic><topic>SOILS</topic><topic>STOMACH</topic><topic>STORAGE</topic><topic>THYROID</topic><topic>TISSUES</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morgan, R H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 15</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morgan, R H</au><aucorp>Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiation Hazards of Primary Concern to Public Health-Present Status and Outlook</atitle><jtitle>American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Public Health Nations Health</addtitle><date>1963-06-01</date><risdate>1963</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>872</spage><epage>877</epage><pages>872-877</pages><issn>0002-9572</issn><issn>0090-0036</issn><abstract>The radiation hazards currently of primary concern to public health are fallout of radioiodine from testing nuclear weapons and excessive x-ray exposures performed by careless and sometimes poorly trained physicians. Because of the relatively short half life of I/sup 131/(8 days), it might be expected to be of little consequence as a public health hazard following nuclear weapons testing. However, the yield of I/sup 131/ from a nuclear weapon is sufficiently high that considerable contamination of the environment takes place, and the hazard to the general population becomes greatest when the weapon is detonated at low altitude. The ground contamination problem increases as the altitude of detonation decreases. After the USSR tests of 1961, levels of I/sup 131/ contamination rose rapidly-in a few communities to a level which, if continued over a period of several months, would cause a dose in excess of the Federal Radiation Council's (FRC) radiation protection guide of 0.5 rem. The meteorologic aspect is of interest to public health authorities because it clearly indicates the manner in which variation in the weather pattern may cause fallout to occur from time to time in quite unexpected places. As a result of later detonations, estimates indicate that in some regions of the United States the radiation dose received by the thyroid glands of children may reach a level of 1.5 rem/yr, which represents the ingestion of 100,000 mu mu C of radioiodine. This amount is 3 times the quantity of radioiodine recommended by the FRC as a maximum limit. The FRC has announced that its radiation standards, applicable to the peacetime uses of radionuclides, do not apply to environmental contamination from fallout. The political implications of this decision, as well as the confusion it has introduced among public health authorities, are discussed. Reduction of the I/ sup 131/ hazard by the use of dried or stored fresh milk by infants and lactating mothers, and addition of stable iodide to the diet, are also discussed. Problems of medical overexposure to radiation are, in general, the result of the use of unsafe x-ray equipment or careless use of x-ray equipment. It is recommended that exposure dose values to such tissues as the reproductive organs be reduced to 15 mr/yr or about 15% of the exposure dose from natural background sources, as an The duties and experiences encountered during the 4-yr operation of a radiation control agency are recounted. The most important part of a comprehensive radiation control program, in terms of overall exposure of the population, is the effort to minimize the radiatlon exposure from the medical and dental use of x-rays. The fact that much of the equipment is installed in apartmert houses, other multiple dwelling structures, and office buildings means that a more critical evaluation of the structural shielding is necessary. An inspection of existing x-ray installations showed that much equipment had been installed in multiple dwellings without having the basic structural shielding considered standard practice for many years. Public health considerations relating to siting nuclear reactors in cities are discussed, particularly with respect to nuclear-powered vessels entening the harbors of large cities. The problem of safeguarding the public from hazards associated with the transportation of radioactive materials in a large city is also discussed. Dosimetry tests showed that many watches being sold with luminous dials exceeded permisnible dose rates, and many jewelry and department stores have been restrained from selling such watches. Other tests showed that, under normal use, television equipment does not emit a sufficiently hlgh dose rate of x-rays to constitute a health hazard. (BBB)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Public Health Association</pub><pmid>18017991</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.53.6.872</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9572
ispartof American Journal of Public Health (U.S.) Title varies: Am. J. Public Health Nation's Health, v18 1928-v60 1970, 1963-06, Vol.53 (6), p.872-877
issn 0002-9572
0090-0036
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1254171
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Periodicals Index Online; PubMed Central
subjects BACKGROUND
CONTAMINATION
DIET
ENVIRONMENT
FALLOUT
HALF-LIFE
HEALTH AND SAFETY
INGESTION
IODIDES
IODINE 131
LEVELS
METEOROLOGY
MILK
NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS
POPULATIONS
POWDERS
RADIATION DOSES
RADIATION EFFECTS
RADIATION PROTECTION
SAFETY
SOILS
STOMACH
STORAGE
THYROID
TISSUES
X RADIATION
title Radiation Hazards of Primary Concern to Public Health-Present Status and Outlook
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A17%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiation%20Hazards%20of%20Primary%20Concern%20to%20Public%20Health-Present%20Status%20and%20Outlook&rft.jtitle=American%20Journal%20of%20Public%20Health%20(U.S.)%20Title%20varies:%20Am.%20J.%20Public%20Health%20Nation's%20Health,%20v18%201928-v60%201970&rft.au=Morgan,%20R%20H&rft.aucorp=Johns%20Hopkins%20School%20of%20Hygiene%20and%20Public%20Health,%20Baltimore&rft.date=1963-06-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=872&rft.epage=877&rft.pages=872-877&rft.issn=0002-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.53.6.872&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1298331858%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1298331858&rft_id=info:pmid/18017991&rfr_iscdi=true