Overview of an Interlaboratory Collaboration on Evaluating the Effects of Model Hepatotoxicants on Hepatic Gene Expression

DNA microarrays and related tools offer promise for identification of pathways involved in toxic responses to xenobiotics. To be useful for risk assessment, experimental data must be challenged for reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. Toward this goal, the Hepatotoxicity Working Group of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental health perspectives 2004-03, Vol.112 (4), p.423-427
Hauptverfasser: Ulrich, Roger G., Rockett, John C., Gibson, G. Gordon, Pettit, Syril D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 427
container_issue 4
container_start_page 423
container_title Environmental health perspectives
container_volume 112
creator Ulrich, Roger G.
Rockett, John C.
Gibson, G. Gordon
Pettit, Syril D.
description DNA microarrays and related tools offer promise for identification of pathways involved in toxic responses to xenobiotics. To be useful for risk assessment, experimental data must be challenged for reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. Toward this goal, the Hepatotoxicity Working Group of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Technical Committee on Application of Genomics to Mechanism-Based Risk Assessment evaluated and compared biological and gene expression responses in rats exposed to two model hepatotoxins-clofibrate and methapyrilene. This collaborative effort provided an unprecedented opportunity for the working group to evaluate and compare multiple biological, genomic, and toxicological parameters across different laboratories and microarray platforms. Many of the results from this collaboration are presented in accompanying articles in this mini-monograph, whereas others have been published previously. In vivo studies for both compounds were conducted in two laboratories using a standard experimental protocol, and RNA samples were distributed to 16 laboratories for analysis on six microarray platforms. Histopathology, clinical chemistry, and organ weight changes were consistent with reported effects. Gene expression results demonstrated reasonable agreement between laboratories and across platforms. Discrepancies in expression profiles of some individual genes were largely due to platform differences and approaches to data analysis rather than to biological or interlaboratory variability. Despite these discrepancies there was overall agreement in the biological pathways affected by these compounds, demonstrating that transcriptional profiling is reproducible between laboratories and can reliably identify affected pathways necessary to provide mechanistic insight. This effort represents an important first step toward the use of transcriptional profiling in risk assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1289/ehp.6675
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1241895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A115634397</galeid><jstor_id>3837952</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A115634397</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-3d44294617aa307a8f88ba4650364de80087f2a7fc26bbba6de3154388393b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLNusB8whtlF2S6cWR-WpZtBCVkb6AhsZbdCto8dBUdKJTlL9-snk9A1oxdDAqFznveIc_QmyVuUTxHm4jOstlPGyuJZMkFFgTMhMH2eTPJcoIyVrDhLXnm_zvMcccZeJmeoyAkpBJokv5c7cDsNv1LbpsqkCxPA9aqyTgXr7tOZ7Y83bU0a93yn-iHeTJeGFaTztoU6-FH9zTbQp9ewjcpg97pWZkyYQ0jX6RWYKNhvHXgfq71OXrSq9_DmeJ4nt1_nt7Pr7GZ5tZhd3mQ14yJkpKEUC8pQqRTJS8VbzitFWWyB0QZ4nvOyxapsa8yqqlKsAYIKSjgnglQFOU--HMpuh2oDTQ0mONXLrdMb5e6lVVqeZoxeyc7uJMIUcTEWuDgWcPZuAB_kRvsa4lwM2MFLRJlAlPIIfvgHXNvBmdibxBgzWqByhLID1KkepDatjY_WXRxNfNsaaHUMXyJUMEKJKCM_fYKPq4GNrp8UfDoRRCbAPnRq8F4ufnz_f3b585S9eMSuQPVh5W0_jMbwp-DHA1g7672D9mHWKJejXWW0qxztGtH3j__mL3j0ZwTeHYC1j3Z8yBNOSlFg8gcTd-1p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222645178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview of an Interlaboratory Collaboration on Evaluating the Effects of Model Hepatotoxicants on Hepatic Gene Expression</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Ulrich, Roger G. ; Rockett, John C. ; Gibson, G. Gordon ; Pettit, Syril D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Roger G. ; Rockett, John C. ; Gibson, G. Gordon ; Pettit, Syril D.</creatorcontrib><description>DNA microarrays and related tools offer promise for identification of pathways involved in toxic responses to xenobiotics. To be useful for risk assessment, experimental data must be challenged for reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. Toward this goal, the Hepatotoxicity Working Group of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Technical Committee on Application of Genomics to Mechanism-Based Risk Assessment evaluated and compared biological and gene expression responses in rats exposed to two model hepatotoxins-clofibrate and methapyrilene. This collaborative effort provided an unprecedented opportunity for the working group to evaluate and compare multiple biological, genomic, and toxicological parameters across different laboratories and microarray platforms. Many of the results from this collaboration are presented in accompanying articles in this mini-monograph, whereas others have been published previously. In vivo studies for both compounds were conducted in two laboratories using a standard experimental protocol, and RNA samples were distributed to 16 laboratories for analysis on six microarray platforms. Histopathology, clinical chemistry, and organ weight changes were consistent with reported effects. Gene expression results demonstrated reasonable agreement between laboratories and across platforms. Discrepancies in expression profiles of some individual genes were largely due to platform differences and approaches to data analysis rather than to biological or interlaboratory variability. Despite these discrepancies there was overall agreement in the biological pathways affected by these compounds, demonstrating that transcriptional profiling is reproducible between laboratories and can reliably identify affected pathways necessary to provide mechanistic insight. This effort represents an important first step toward the use of transcriptional profiling in risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6675</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15033591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anti-Allergic Agents - toxicity ; Clofibrate - toxicity ; Data Collection ; Dosage ; Environmental health ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling ; Genes ; Genomics ; Hypolipidemic Agents - toxicity ; Liver ; Liver - drug effects ; Liver - pathology ; Male ; Methapyrilene - toxicity ; Mini-Monograph: Genomics and Risk Assessment ; Observer Variation ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis ; Pharmaceutical preparations ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reproducibility of Results ; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Risk analysis ; Risk Assessment ; RNA ; Toxicogenetics</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2004-03, Vol.112 (4), p.423-427</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-3d44294617aa307a8f88ba4650364de80087f2a7fc26bbba6de3154388393b53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3837952$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3837952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15033591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Roger G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockett, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, G. Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Syril D.</creatorcontrib><title>Overview of an Interlaboratory Collaboration on Evaluating the Effects of Model Hepatotoxicants on Hepatic Gene Expression</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>DNA microarrays and related tools offer promise for identification of pathways involved in toxic responses to xenobiotics. To be useful for risk assessment, experimental data must be challenged for reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. Toward this goal, the Hepatotoxicity Working Group of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Technical Committee on Application of Genomics to Mechanism-Based Risk Assessment evaluated and compared biological and gene expression responses in rats exposed to two model hepatotoxins-clofibrate and methapyrilene. This collaborative effort provided an unprecedented opportunity for the working group to evaluate and compare multiple biological, genomic, and toxicological parameters across different laboratories and microarray platforms. Many of the results from this collaboration are presented in accompanying articles in this mini-monograph, whereas others have been published previously. In vivo studies for both compounds were conducted in two laboratories using a standard experimental protocol, and RNA samples were distributed to 16 laboratories for analysis on six microarray platforms. Histopathology, clinical chemistry, and organ weight changes were consistent with reported effects. Gene expression results demonstrated reasonable agreement between laboratories and across platforms. Discrepancies in expression profiles of some individual genes were largely due to platform differences and approaches to data analysis rather than to biological or interlaboratory variability. Despite these discrepancies there was overall agreement in the biological pathways affected by these compounds, demonstrating that transcriptional profiling is reproducible between laboratories and can reliably identify affected pathways necessary to provide mechanistic insight. This effort represents an important first step toward the use of transcriptional profiling in risk assessment.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Allergic Agents - toxicity</subject><subject>Clofibrate - toxicity</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Environmental health</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Hypolipidemic Agents - toxicity</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver - drug effects</subject><subject>Liver - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methapyrilene - toxicity</subject><subject>Mini-Monograph: Genomics and Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical preparations</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Toxicogenetics</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1r2zAUhs3YWLNusB8whtlF2S6cWR-WpZtBCVkb6AhsZbdCto8dBUdKJTlL9-snk9A1oxdDAqFznveIc_QmyVuUTxHm4jOstlPGyuJZMkFFgTMhMH2eTPJcoIyVrDhLXnm_zvMcccZeJmeoyAkpBJokv5c7cDsNv1LbpsqkCxPA9aqyTgXr7tOZ7Y83bU0a93yn-iHeTJeGFaTztoU6-FH9zTbQp9ewjcpg97pWZkyYQ0jX6RWYKNhvHXgfq71OXrSq9_DmeJ4nt1_nt7Pr7GZ5tZhd3mQ14yJkpKEUC8pQqRTJS8VbzitFWWyB0QZ4nvOyxapsa8yqqlKsAYIKSjgnglQFOU--HMpuh2oDTQ0mONXLrdMb5e6lVVqeZoxeyc7uJMIUcTEWuDgWcPZuAB_kRvsa4lwM2MFLRJlAlPIIfvgHXNvBmdibxBgzWqByhLID1KkepDatjY_WXRxNfNsaaHUMXyJUMEKJKCM_fYKPq4GNrp8UfDoRRCbAPnRq8F4ufnz_f3b585S9eMSuQPVh5W0_jMbwp-DHA1g7672D9mHWKJejXWW0qxztGtH3j__mL3j0ZwTeHYC1j3Z8yBNOSlFg8gcTd-1p</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Ulrich, Roger G.</creator><creator>Rockett, John C.</creator><creator>Gibson, G. Gordon</creator><creator>Pettit, Syril D.</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</general><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Overview of an Interlaboratory Collaboration on Evaluating the Effects of Model Hepatotoxicants on Hepatic Gene Expression</title><author>Ulrich, Roger G. ; Rockett, John C. ; Gibson, G. Gordon ; Pettit, Syril D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c689t-3d44294617aa307a8f88ba4650364de80087f2a7fc26bbba6de3154388393b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Allergic Agents - toxicity</topic><topic>Clofibrate - toxicity</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Environmental health</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Hypolipidemic Agents - toxicity</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver - drug effects</topic><topic>Liver - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methapyrilene - toxicity</topic><topic>Mini-Monograph: Genomics and Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical preparations</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Toxicogenetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Roger G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rockett, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, G. Gordon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pettit, Syril D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Source</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Family Health Database (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ulrich, Roger G.</au><au>Rockett, John C.</au><au>Gibson, G. Gordon</au><au>Pettit, Syril D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview of an Interlaboratory Collaboration on Evaluating the Effects of Model Hepatotoxicants on Hepatic Gene Expression</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>423-427</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>DNA microarrays and related tools offer promise for identification of pathways involved in toxic responses to xenobiotics. To be useful for risk assessment, experimental data must be challenged for reliability and interlaboratory reproducibility. Toward this goal, the Hepatotoxicity Working Group of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Technical Committee on Application of Genomics to Mechanism-Based Risk Assessment evaluated and compared biological and gene expression responses in rats exposed to two model hepatotoxins-clofibrate and methapyrilene. This collaborative effort provided an unprecedented opportunity for the working group to evaluate and compare multiple biological, genomic, and toxicological parameters across different laboratories and microarray platforms. Many of the results from this collaboration are presented in accompanying articles in this mini-monograph, whereas others have been published previously. In vivo studies for both compounds were conducted in two laboratories using a standard experimental protocol, and RNA samples were distributed to 16 laboratories for analysis on six microarray platforms. Histopathology, clinical chemistry, and organ weight changes were consistent with reported effects. Gene expression results demonstrated reasonable agreement between laboratories and across platforms. Discrepancies in expression profiles of some individual genes were largely due to platform differences and approaches to data analysis rather than to biological or interlaboratory variability. Despite these discrepancies there was overall agreement in the biological pathways affected by these compounds, demonstrating that transcriptional profiling is reproducible between laboratories and can reliably identify affected pathways necessary to provide mechanistic insight. This effort represents an important first step toward the use of transcriptional profiling in risk assessment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</pub><pmid>15033591</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.6675</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6765
ispartof Environmental health perspectives, 2004-03, Vol.112 (4), p.423-427
issn 0091-6765
1552-9924
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1241895
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed; JSTOR; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Animals
Anti-Allergic Agents - toxicity
Clofibrate - toxicity
Data Collection
Dosage
Environmental health
Gene expression
Gene Expression Profiling
Genes
Genomics
Hypolipidemic Agents - toxicity
Liver
Liver - drug effects
Liver - pathology
Male
Methapyrilene - toxicity
Mini-Monograph: Genomics and Risk Assessment
Observer Variation
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Pharmaceutical preparations
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reproducibility of Results
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Risk analysis
Risk Assessment
RNA
Toxicogenetics
title Overview of an Interlaboratory Collaboration on Evaluating the Effects of Model Hepatotoxicants on Hepatic Gene Expression
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview%20of%20an%20Interlaboratory%20Collaboration%20on%20Evaluating%20the%20Effects%20of%20Model%20Hepatotoxicants%20on%20Hepatic%20Gene%20Expression&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Ulrich,%20Roger%20G.&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=423-427&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.6675&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA115634397%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222645178&rft_id=info:pmid/15033591&rft_galeid=A115634397&rft_jstor_id=3837952&rfr_iscdi=true