Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene Exposure in Polymer Production Workers Using HPRT Mutations in Lymphocytes as a Biomarker

1,3-Butadiene (BD), which is used to make styrene-butadiene rubber, is a potent carcinogen in mice and a probable carcinogen, associated with leukemia, in humans. We have previously used HPRT mutation as a biomarker to evaluate exposures to BD in a monomer production plant. We now report on a study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental health perspectives 2001-12, Vol.109 (12), p.1249-1255
Hauptverfasser: Ammenheuser, Marinel M., Bechtold, William E., Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z., Rosenblatt, Judah I., Hastings-Smith, Darlene A., Ward, Jonathan B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1255
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1249
container_title Environmental health perspectives
container_volume 109
creator Ammenheuser, Marinel M.
Bechtold, William E.
Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z.
Rosenblatt, Judah I.
Hastings-Smith, Darlene A.
Ward, Jonathan B.
description 1,3-Butadiene (BD), which is used to make styrene-butadiene rubber, is a potent carcinogen in mice and a probable carcinogen, associated with leukemia, in humans. We have previously used HPRT mutation as a biomarker to evaluate exposures to BD in a monomer production plant. We now report on a study of 49 workers in a styrene-butadiene rubber plant in which we used the concentration of the BD metabolite 1,2-dihydroxy-4-(N-acetylcysteinyl-S)-butane (M1) in urine as a biomarker of exposure and the frequency of HPRT variant (mutant) lymphocytes (Vf) as a biomarker of effect. Workers were assigned to high- and low-exposure groups based on historical information about work areas and jobs. Personal exposure to BD for one work shift was measured using a passive badge dosimeter. Each participant provided a urine specimen and blood sample at the end of the work shift and completed a questionnaire providing information on lifestyle, health, and work activities. The average BD exposures in the high- and low-exposure groups were significantly different, even after excluding two extreme values, (high 1.48 ppm; low 0.15 ppm, p < 0.002). This study was done in 1994 and 1995 before the establishment, in 1996, of the new permissible exposure limit of 1 ppm. Both the mean M1 and the HPRT Vf were more than three times greater in the high-exposure group than in the low-exposure group (p < 0.0005). The three end points correlated with each other, with sample correlation coefficients between 0.4 and 0.6. The correlations among BD exposure and the biomarkers of internal exposure and genotoxicity suggest that occupational exposure to BD, in the range of 1-3 ppm, may be associated with adverse biological effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1289/ehp.011091249
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1240507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A82551833</galeid><jstor_id>3454747</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A82551833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-21bd7a591c576e9981edf082daceeb604a5b6555b454f3d291c3d27718a1beb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9v0zAQxyMEYmXwyCvyAyAelmE7cX68IHXTYJM6rRoFHi0nubQeSVx8CVr_e6602lqpEsiWLZ0_973z3QXBa8FPhczyj7BYnnIheC5knD8JRkIpGea5jJ8GI07WMEkTdRS8QLzjnIssSZ4HR0KkccYjOQqGMSIgttD1zNVMnETh2dCbykIH7OJ-6XDwwGzHpq5ZteDZ1LtqKHvrOvbD-Z_gkX1D283Z5fR2xq7Jd_2Ga5fJql0uXLnqAZmhzc6sa83a52XwrDYNwqvtfRzMPl_Mzi_Dyc2Xq_PxJCyTWPWhFEWVGpWLUqUJ5HkmoKp5JitTAhQJj40qEqVUEau4jipJIJ1pKjIjCiii4-DTRnY5FC1UJX3Sm0YvvaU0VtoZq_dfOrvQc_dbUy254ikJvN8KePdrAOx1a7GEpjEduAG1yKSKpBL_BuOEy0TEBJ5swLlpQNuudhS4nFO1Kb7roLZkHpOsElkUER4ewGlV0NryEP9hjyekh_t-bgZEffX19r_Rm-976LsddAGm6RfomuFvpw9lW3qH6KF-KLXgej2tmqZVP0wr8W92-_NIb8eTgLcb4A5753fVZMRTHVHf0ziN_gCX2e_c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14602614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene Exposure in Polymer Production Workers Using HPRT Mutations in Lymphocytes as a Biomarker</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ammenheuser, Marinel M. ; Bechtold, William E. ; Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z. ; Rosenblatt, Judah I. ; Hastings-Smith, Darlene A. ; Ward, Jonathan B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ammenheuser, Marinel M. ; Bechtold, William E. ; Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z. ; Rosenblatt, Judah I. ; Hastings-Smith, Darlene A. ; Ward, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><description>1,3-Butadiene (BD), which is used to make styrene-butadiene rubber, is a potent carcinogen in mice and a probable carcinogen, associated with leukemia, in humans. We have previously used HPRT mutation as a biomarker to evaluate exposures to BD in a monomer production plant. We now report on a study of 49 workers in a styrene-butadiene rubber plant in which we used the concentration of the BD metabolite 1,2-dihydroxy-4-(N-acetylcysteinyl-S)-butane (M1) in urine as a biomarker of exposure and the frequency of HPRT variant (mutant) lymphocytes (Vf) as a biomarker of effect. Workers were assigned to high- and low-exposure groups based on historical information about work areas and jobs. Personal exposure to BD for one work shift was measured using a passive badge dosimeter. Each participant provided a urine specimen and blood sample at the end of the work shift and completed a questionnaire providing information on lifestyle, health, and work activities. The average BD exposures in the high- and low-exposure groups were significantly different, even after excluding two extreme values, (high 1.48 ppm; low 0.15 ppm, p &lt; 0.002). This study was done in 1994 and 1995 before the establishment, in 1996, of the new permissible exposure limit of 1 ppm. Both the mean M1 and the HPRT Vf were more than three times greater in the high-exposure group than in the low-exposure group (p &lt; 0.0005). The three end points correlated with each other, with sample correlation coefficients between 0.4 and 0.6. The correlations among BD exposure and the biomarkers of internal exposure and genotoxicity suggest that occupational exposure to BD, in the range of 1-3 ppm, may be associated with adverse biological effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-9924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1289/ehp.011091249</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11748032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</publisher><subject>1,3-Butadiene ; Acetylcysteine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Acetylcysteine - urine ; Adult ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers - analysis ; Blood ; Butadienes ; Butadienes - adverse effects ; Butadienes - analysis ; Carcinogens - adverse effects ; Carcinogens - analysis ; Chemical hazards ; Chemical Industry ; Cigarette smoking ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; Genetic mutation ; Humans ; Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase - genetics ; Lymphocytes ; Male ; Metabolites ; Middle Aged ; Mutagens ; Occupational Exposure ; Rubber ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Environmental health perspectives, 2001-12, Vol.109 (12), p.1249-1255</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2001 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-21bd7a591c576e9981edf082daceeb604a5b6555b454f3d291c3d27718a1beb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3454747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3454747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,864,885,27915,27916,53782,53784,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11748032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ammenheuser, Marinel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtold, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Judah I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings-Smith, Darlene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene Exposure in Polymer Production Workers Using HPRT Mutations in Lymphocytes as a Biomarker</title><title>Environmental health perspectives</title><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><description>1,3-Butadiene (BD), which is used to make styrene-butadiene rubber, is a potent carcinogen in mice and a probable carcinogen, associated with leukemia, in humans. We have previously used HPRT mutation as a biomarker to evaluate exposures to BD in a monomer production plant. We now report on a study of 49 workers in a styrene-butadiene rubber plant in which we used the concentration of the BD metabolite 1,2-dihydroxy-4-(N-acetylcysteinyl-S)-butane (M1) in urine as a biomarker of exposure and the frequency of HPRT variant (mutant) lymphocytes (Vf) as a biomarker of effect. Workers were assigned to high- and low-exposure groups based on historical information about work areas and jobs. Personal exposure to BD for one work shift was measured using a passive badge dosimeter. Each participant provided a urine specimen and blood sample at the end of the work shift and completed a questionnaire providing information on lifestyle, health, and work activities. The average BD exposures in the high- and low-exposure groups were significantly different, even after excluding two extreme values, (high 1.48 ppm; low 0.15 ppm, p &lt; 0.002). This study was done in 1994 and 1995 before the establishment, in 1996, of the new permissible exposure limit of 1 ppm. Both the mean M1 and the HPRT Vf were more than three times greater in the high-exposure group than in the low-exposure group (p &lt; 0.0005). The three end points correlated with each other, with sample correlation coefficients between 0.4 and 0.6. The correlations among BD exposure and the biomarkers of internal exposure and genotoxicity suggest that occupational exposure to BD, in the range of 1-3 ppm, may be associated with adverse biological effects.</description><subject>1,3-Butadiene</subject><subject>Acetylcysteine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Acetylcysteine - urine</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - analysis</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Butadienes</subject><subject>Butadienes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Butadienes - analysis</subject><subject>Carcinogens - adverse effects</subject><subject>Carcinogens - analysis</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Chemical Industry</subject><subject>Cigarette smoking</subject><subject>DNA Mutational Analysis</subject><subject>Genetic mutation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase - genetics</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mutagens</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0091-6765</issn><issn>1552-9924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9v0zAQxyMEYmXwyCvyAyAelmE7cX68IHXTYJM6rRoFHi0nubQeSVx8CVr_e6602lqpEsiWLZ0_973z3QXBa8FPhczyj7BYnnIheC5knD8JRkIpGea5jJ8GI07WMEkTdRS8QLzjnIssSZ4HR0KkccYjOQqGMSIgttD1zNVMnETh2dCbykIH7OJ-6XDwwGzHpq5ZteDZ1LtqKHvrOvbD-Z_gkX1D283Z5fR2xq7Jd_2Ga5fJql0uXLnqAZmhzc6sa83a52XwrDYNwqvtfRzMPl_Mzi_Dyc2Xq_PxJCyTWPWhFEWVGpWLUqUJ5HkmoKp5JitTAhQJj40qEqVUEau4jipJIJ1pKjIjCiii4-DTRnY5FC1UJX3Sm0YvvaU0VtoZq_dfOrvQc_dbUy254ikJvN8KePdrAOx1a7GEpjEduAG1yKSKpBL_BuOEy0TEBJ5swLlpQNuudhS4nFO1Kb7roLZkHpOsElkUER4ewGlV0NryEP9hjyekh_t-bgZEffX19r_Rm-976LsddAGm6RfomuFvpw9lW3qH6KF-KLXgej2tmqZVP0wr8W92-_NIb8eTgLcb4A5753fVZMRTHVHf0ziN_gCX2e_c</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Ammenheuser, Marinel M.</creator><creator>Bechtold, William E.</creator><creator>Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z.</creator><creator>Rosenblatt, Judah I.</creator><creator>Hastings-Smith, Darlene A.</creator><creator>Ward, Jonathan B.</creator><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</general><general>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene Exposure in Polymer Production Workers Using HPRT Mutations in Lymphocytes as a Biomarker</title><author>Ammenheuser, Marinel M. ; Bechtold, William E. ; Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z. ; Rosenblatt, Judah I. ; Hastings-Smith, Darlene A. ; Ward, Jonathan B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c645t-21bd7a591c576e9981edf082daceeb604a5b6555b454f3d291c3d27718a1beb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>1,3-Butadiene</topic><topic>Acetylcysteine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Acetylcysteine - urine</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - analysis</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Butadienes</topic><topic>Butadienes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Butadienes - analysis</topic><topic>Carcinogens - adverse effects</topic><topic>Carcinogens - analysis</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Chemical Industry</topic><topic>Cigarette smoking</topic><topic>DNA Mutational Analysis</topic><topic>Genetic mutation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase - genetics</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mutagens</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ammenheuser, Marinel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechtold, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenblatt, Judah I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hastings-Smith, Darlene A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ammenheuser, Marinel M.</au><au>Bechtold, William E.</au><au>Abdel-Rahman, Sherif Z.</au><au>Rosenblatt, Judah I.</au><au>Hastings-Smith, Darlene A.</au><au>Ward, Jonathan B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene Exposure in Polymer Production Workers Using HPRT Mutations in Lymphocytes as a Biomarker</atitle><jtitle>Environmental health perspectives</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Health Perspect</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1249</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1249-1255</pages><issn>0091-6765</issn><eissn>1552-9924</eissn><abstract>1,3-Butadiene (BD), which is used to make styrene-butadiene rubber, is a potent carcinogen in mice and a probable carcinogen, associated with leukemia, in humans. We have previously used HPRT mutation as a biomarker to evaluate exposures to BD in a monomer production plant. We now report on a study of 49 workers in a styrene-butadiene rubber plant in which we used the concentration of the BD metabolite 1,2-dihydroxy-4-(N-acetylcysteinyl-S)-butane (M1) in urine as a biomarker of exposure and the frequency of HPRT variant (mutant) lymphocytes (Vf) as a biomarker of effect. Workers were assigned to high- and low-exposure groups based on historical information about work areas and jobs. Personal exposure to BD for one work shift was measured using a passive badge dosimeter. Each participant provided a urine specimen and blood sample at the end of the work shift and completed a questionnaire providing information on lifestyle, health, and work activities. The average BD exposures in the high- and low-exposure groups were significantly different, even after excluding two extreme values, (high 1.48 ppm; low 0.15 ppm, p &lt; 0.002). This study was done in 1994 and 1995 before the establishment, in 1996, of the new permissible exposure limit of 1 ppm. Both the mean M1 and the HPRT Vf were more than three times greater in the high-exposure group than in the low-exposure group (p &lt; 0.0005). The three end points correlated with each other, with sample correlation coefficients between 0.4 and 0.6. The correlations among BD exposure and the biomarkers of internal exposure and genotoxicity suggest that occupational exposure to BD, in the range of 1-3 ppm, may be associated with adverse biological effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. National Institutes of Health. Department of Health, Education and Welfare</pub><pmid>11748032</pmid><doi>10.1289/ehp.011091249</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-6765
ispartof Environmental health perspectives, 2001-12, Vol.109 (12), p.1249-1255
issn 0091-6765
1552-9924
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1240507
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central
subjects 1,3-Butadiene
Acetylcysteine - analogs & derivatives
Acetylcysteine - urine
Adult
Biological markers
Biomarkers - analysis
Blood
Butadienes
Butadienes - adverse effects
Butadienes - analysis
Carcinogens - adverse effects
Carcinogens - analysis
Chemical hazards
Chemical Industry
Cigarette smoking
DNA Mutational Analysis
Genetic mutation
Humans
Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase - genetics
Lymphocytes
Male
Metabolites
Middle Aged
Mutagens
Occupational Exposure
Rubber
Urine
title Assessment of 1,3-Butadiene Exposure in Polymer Production Workers Using HPRT Mutations in Lymphocytes as a Biomarker
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A36%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%201,3-Butadiene%20Exposure%20in%20Polymer%20Production%20Workers%20Using%20HPRT%20Mutations%20in%20Lymphocytes%20as%20a%20Biomarker&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20health%20perspectives&rft.au=Ammenheuser,%20Marinel%20M.&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1249&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1249-1255&rft.issn=0091-6765&rft.eissn=1552-9924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.011091249&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA82551833%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14602614&rft_id=info:pmid/11748032&rft_galeid=A82551833&rft_jstor_id=3454747&rfr_iscdi=true