Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems
To describe and compare trends in hospital admission rates for mechanical neck and back problems between 1982 and 1992 in Ontario and the United States. A descriptive analysis of hospital admissions, with data for Ontario extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database and data...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 1998-01, Vol.158 (1), p.29-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) |
container_volume | 158 |
creator | Lavis, J N Malter, A Anderson, G M Taylor, V M Deyo, R A Bombardier, C Axcell, T Kreuter, W |
description | To describe and compare trends in hospital admission rates for mechanical neck and back problems between 1982 and 1992 in Ontario and the United States.
A descriptive analysis of hospital admissions, with data for Ontario extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database and data for the US extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Survey.
All acute care hospitals in Ontario and a probability sample of acute care hospitals in the US.
Adults aged 20 years or more who were admitted to an acute care hospital for mechanical neck or back problems in 1982, 1987 or 1992. Mechanical neck and back problems were defined using an algorithm developed by the study team.
Hospital admission rate per 100,000 adults.
Between 1982 and 1992 the hospital admission rate for medically treated cases decreased by 52% in Ontario and by 75% in the US. Over the same period the admission rate for surgically treated cases increased by 14% and by 35% respectively. By 1992 the admission rate for medically treated cases in the US was 23% higher than that in Ontario, whereas the rate for surgically treated cases was 164% higher.
The hospital-based medical or surgical treatment of mechanical neck and back problems provides an example of discretionary care. The higher admission rates for surgery in the US may reflect a larger supply of surgical specialists and imaging units. Further work is needed to confirm these findings for other types of discretionary care and to compare the appropriateness of care and clinical outcomes for discretionary care in these 2 jurisdictions. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1228738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79689467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p288t-87fca0bb2a82ef2a0d4fd655e2c76cd048ce3164b7d7c92668f76a0d6c8b1e663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1LxDAQLaLouvoThODBWyGbdJPUgyCLX7CwB91zSZOpjbZJTVLBv-EvNu4uouYyYd6bN29m9rLJrBAiJ5SU-9kEC4JzWhbsKDsO4QWnRwk_zA7Lgs9LzCfZ55MHqwMyFrUuDCbKDo0BUOM86kG10hqVUhbUK5JWo1qmz-Bd3UG_qVrZKL1xGzC2gNbWRNDoMcoI4RJpE5SHaJyV_gMp6eG7SJumgdQ4ohZkF9stED5CTKon2UEjuwCnuzjN1rc3T4v7fLm6e1hcL_OBCBFzwRslcV0TKQg0RGJdNJrN50AUZ0rjQiigM1bUXHNVEsZEw1liMSXqGTBGp9nVVncY6x60Sna87KrBmz55rZw01V_EmrZ6du_VjBDBqUgCFzsB795GCLHq07TQddKCG0PFSybS7nkinv8jvrjR2zRcRXBRMkwLmkhnv-38-Nidin4B2pGUpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204960343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lavis, J N ; Malter, A ; Anderson, G M ; Taylor, V M ; Deyo, R A ; Bombardier, C ; Axcell, T ; Kreuter, W</creator><creatorcontrib>Lavis, J N ; Malter, A ; Anderson, G M ; Taylor, V M ; Deyo, R A ; Bombardier, C ; Axcell, T ; Kreuter, W</creatorcontrib><description>To describe and compare trends in hospital admission rates for mechanical neck and back problems between 1982 and 1992 in Ontario and the United States.
A descriptive analysis of hospital admissions, with data for Ontario extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database and data for the US extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Survey.
All acute care hospitals in Ontario and a probability sample of acute care hospitals in the US.
Adults aged 20 years or more who were admitted to an acute care hospital for mechanical neck or back problems in 1982, 1987 or 1992. Mechanical neck and back problems were defined using an algorithm developed by the study team.
Hospital admission rate per 100,000 adults.
Between 1982 and 1992 the hospital admission rate for medically treated cases decreased by 52% in Ontario and by 75% in the US. Over the same period the admission rate for surgically treated cases increased by 14% and by 35% respectively. By 1992 the admission rate for medically treated cases in the US was 23% higher than that in Ontario, whereas the rate for surgically treated cases was 164% higher.
The hospital-based medical or surgical treatment of mechanical neck and back problems provides an example of discretionary care. The higher admission rates for surgery in the US may reflect a larger supply of surgical specialists and imaging units. Further work is needed to confirm these findings for other types of discretionary care and to compare the appropriateness of care and clinical outcomes for discretionary care in these 2 jurisdictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9475907</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMAJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: CMA Impact, Inc</publisher><subject>Admissions ; Adult ; Algorithms ; Back ; Back Pain - therapy ; Hospitals ; Hospitals - utilization ; Humans ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy ; Neck ; Neck Pain - therapy ; Ontario ; Orthopedics - statistics & numerical data ; Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends ; United States</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 1998-01, Vol.158 (1), p.29-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association Jan 13, 1998</rights><rights>1998 Canadian Medical Association 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1228738/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1228738/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9475907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lavis, J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, V M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deyo, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombardier, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axcell, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuter, W</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>To describe and compare trends in hospital admission rates for mechanical neck and back problems between 1982 and 1992 in Ontario and the United States.
A descriptive analysis of hospital admissions, with data for Ontario extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database and data for the US extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Survey.
All acute care hospitals in Ontario and a probability sample of acute care hospitals in the US.
Adults aged 20 years or more who were admitted to an acute care hospital for mechanical neck or back problems in 1982, 1987 or 1992. Mechanical neck and back problems were defined using an algorithm developed by the study team.
Hospital admission rate per 100,000 adults.
Between 1982 and 1992 the hospital admission rate for medically treated cases decreased by 52% in Ontario and by 75% in the US. Over the same period the admission rate for surgically treated cases increased by 14% and by 35% respectively. By 1992 the admission rate for medically treated cases in the US was 23% higher than that in Ontario, whereas the rate for surgically treated cases was 164% higher.
The hospital-based medical or surgical treatment of mechanical neck and back problems provides an example of discretionary care. The higher admission rates for surgery in the US may reflect a larger supply of surgical specialists and imaging units. Further work is needed to confirm these findings for other types of discretionary care and to compare the appropriateness of care and clinical outcomes for discretionary care in these 2 jurisdictions.</description><subject>Admissions</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Back</subject><subject>Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals - utilization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neck Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Orthopedics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1LxDAQLaLouvoThODBWyGbdJPUgyCLX7CwB91zSZOpjbZJTVLBv-EvNu4uouYyYd6bN29m9rLJrBAiJ5SU-9kEC4JzWhbsKDsO4QWnRwk_zA7Lgs9LzCfZ55MHqwMyFrUuDCbKDo0BUOM86kG10hqVUhbUK5JWo1qmz-Bd3UG_qVrZKL1xGzC2gNbWRNDoMcoI4RJpE5SHaJyV_gMp6eG7SJumgdQ4ohZkF9stED5CTKon2UEjuwCnuzjN1rc3T4v7fLm6e1hcL_OBCBFzwRslcV0TKQg0RGJdNJrN50AUZ0rjQiigM1bUXHNVEsZEw1liMSXqGTBGp9nVVncY6x60Sna87KrBmz55rZw01V_EmrZ6du_VjBDBqUgCFzsB795GCLHq07TQddKCG0PFSybS7nkinv8jvrjR2zRcRXBRMkwLmkhnv-38-Nidin4B2pGUpw</recordid><startdate>19980113</startdate><enddate>19980113</enddate><creator>Lavis, J N</creator><creator>Malter, A</creator><creator>Anderson, G M</creator><creator>Taylor, V M</creator><creator>Deyo, R A</creator><creator>Bombardier, C</creator><creator>Axcell, T</creator><creator>Kreuter, W</creator><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980113</creationdate><title>Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems</title><author>Lavis, J N ; Malter, A ; Anderson, G M ; Taylor, V M ; Deyo, R A ; Bombardier, C ; Axcell, T ; Kreuter, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p288t-87fca0bb2a82ef2a0d4fd655e2c76cd048ce3164b7d7c92668f76a0d6c8b1e663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Admissions</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Back</topic><topic>Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals - utilization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neck Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Orthopedics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lavis, J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malter, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, V M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deyo, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombardier, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axcell, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kreuter, W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lavis, J N</au><au>Malter, A</au><au>Anderson, G M</au><au>Taylor, V M</au><au>Deyo, R A</au><au>Bombardier, C</au><au>Axcell, T</au><au>Kreuter, W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>1998-01-13</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>158</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>29-36</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><coden>CMAJAX</coden><abstract>To describe and compare trends in hospital admission rates for mechanical neck and back problems between 1982 and 1992 in Ontario and the United States.
A descriptive analysis of hospital admissions, with data for Ontario extracted from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database and data for the US extracted from the National Hospital Discharge Survey.
All acute care hospitals in Ontario and a probability sample of acute care hospitals in the US.
Adults aged 20 years or more who were admitted to an acute care hospital for mechanical neck or back problems in 1982, 1987 or 1992. Mechanical neck and back problems were defined using an algorithm developed by the study team.
Hospital admission rate per 100,000 adults.
Between 1982 and 1992 the hospital admission rate for medically treated cases decreased by 52% in Ontario and by 75% in the US. Over the same period the admission rate for surgically treated cases increased by 14% and by 35% respectively. By 1992 the admission rate for medically treated cases in the US was 23% higher than that in Ontario, whereas the rate for surgically treated cases was 164% higher.
The hospital-based medical or surgical treatment of mechanical neck and back problems provides an example of discretionary care. The higher admission rates for surgery in the US may reflect a larger supply of surgical specialists and imaging units. Further work is needed to confirm these findings for other types of discretionary care and to compare the appropriateness of care and clinical outcomes for discretionary care in these 2 jurisdictions.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>CMA Impact, Inc</pub><pmid>9475907</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0820-3946 |
ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 1998-01, Vol.158 (1), p.29-36 |
issn | 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1228738 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Admissions Adult Algorithms Back Back Pain - therapy Hospitals Hospitals - utilization Humans Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy Neck Neck Pain - therapy Ontario Orthopedics - statistics & numerical data Patient Admission - statistics & numerical data Practice Patterns, Physicians' - trends United States |
title | Trends in hospital use for mechanical neck and back problems in Ontario and the United States: discretionary care in different health care systems |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A39%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20hospital%20use%20for%20mechanical%20neck%20and%20back%20problems%20in%20Ontario%20and%20the%20United%20States:%20discretionary%20care%20in%20different%20health%20care%20systems&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.au=Lavis,%20J%20N&rft.date=1998-01-13&rft.volume=158&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=29-36&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft.coden=CMAJAX&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79689467%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204960343&rft_id=info:pmid/9475907&rfr_iscdi=true |