Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species

Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were obser...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Genetics (Austin) 1981-02, Vol.97 (2), p.391-414
Hauptverfasser: Dvorcaronak, Jan, McGuire, Patrick E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 414
container_issue 2
container_start_page 391
container_title Genetics (Austin)
container_volume 97
creator Dvorcaronak, Jan
McGuire, Patrick E
description Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were observed in the hybrids, indicating that the cultivars do not differ by translocations. Thirty-one Chinese Spring telosomic lines were then crossed with substitution lines in which single chromosomes of the three cultivars were substituted for their Chinese Spring homologues. The telosomic lines were also crossed with Chinese Spring. Data were collected on the frequencies (% of PMCs) of pairing of the telesomes with their homologues at MI and the regularity of pairing of the remaining 20 pairs of Chinese Spring chromosomes in the monotelodisomics obtained from these crosses. The reduced MI pairing in the intercultivar hybrids was caused primarily by chromosome differentiation, rather than by specific genes. Because the differentiation involved a large part of the chromosome complement in each hybrid, it was concluded that it could not be caused by structural changes such as inversions or translocations. In each case, the differentiation appeared to be unevenly distributed among the three wheat genomes. It is proposed that the same kind of differentiation, although of greater magnitude, differentiates homoeologous chromosomes and is responsible, together with structural differentiation, for poor chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/genetics/97.2.391
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1214400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15472273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-e7ea86d510f88eb666510f38bfd857dbd427efbc6582a97bcbab22ab1dd8fc533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhAdggb4ANmfqS2M6mEqrKRapgAV1bjnOSGCXxYDuNeAZeuh5mgKJKrGzJ3__pHP8IPadkS0nNz3qYITkbz2q5ZVte0wdoQ-uSF0xw-hBtCKGiEJLTE_Qkxm-EEFFX6jE6oZKVNZFyg35-8nNMYbFpCWbEdgh-8tFPgFvXdRBgTs4k52dsJj_3eB3AJGyXMbkbE-IbvLo04LgD63I8wK-IBZz8PYHv7ugjdnPGR5OgPcQhPkWPOjNGeHY8T9H1u8uvFx-Kq8_vP168vSpsSVkqQIJRoq0o6ZSCRgixv3LVdK2qZNu0JZPQNVZUiplaNrYxDWOmoW2rOltxforOD97d0kzQ2jxi3l3vgptM-KG9cfrfl9kNuvc3mjJaloRkweujIPjvC8SkJxctjKOZwS9RS85LSZSgmXz1X5JWpWRM7meiB9AGH2P-xz_jUKL3ZevfZetaaqZz2Tnz4u4efxPHdjPw8gAMrh9WF0DHyYxjxqle1_W-qDNemz64qK-_0FoxIpUiJeG34DPEjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15472273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dvorcaronak, Jan ; McGuire, Patrick E</creator><creatorcontrib>Dvorcaronak, Jan ; McGuire, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><description>Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were observed in the hybrids, indicating that the cultivars do not differ by translocations. Thirty-one Chinese Spring telosomic lines were then crossed with substitution lines in which single chromosomes of the three cultivars were substituted for their Chinese Spring homologues. The telosomic lines were also crossed with Chinese Spring. Data were collected on the frequencies (% of PMCs) of pairing of the telesomes with their homologues at MI and the regularity of pairing of the remaining 20 pairs of Chinese Spring chromosomes in the monotelodisomics obtained from these crosses. The reduced MI pairing in the intercultivar hybrids was caused primarily by chromosome differentiation, rather than by specific genes. Because the differentiation involved a large part of the chromosome complement in each hybrid, it was concluded that it could not be caused by structural changes such as inversions or translocations. In each case, the differentiation appeared to be unevenly distributed among the three wheat genomes. It is proposed that the same kind of differentiation, although of greater magnitude, differentiates homoeologous chromosomes and is responsible, together with structural differentiation, for poor chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-6731</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-2631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2631</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/genetics/97.2.391</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17249077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Genetics Soc America</publisher><subject>Investigations ; Triticum aestivum</subject><ispartof>Genetics (Austin), 1981-02, Vol.97 (2), p.391-414</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-e7ea86d510f88eb666510f38bfd857dbd427efbc6582a97bcbab22ab1dd8fc533</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17249077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dvorcaronak, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><title>Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species</title><title>Genetics (Austin)</title><addtitle>Genetics</addtitle><description>Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were observed in the hybrids, indicating that the cultivars do not differ by translocations. Thirty-one Chinese Spring telosomic lines were then crossed with substitution lines in which single chromosomes of the three cultivars were substituted for their Chinese Spring homologues. The telosomic lines were also crossed with Chinese Spring. Data were collected on the frequencies (% of PMCs) of pairing of the telesomes with their homologues at MI and the regularity of pairing of the remaining 20 pairs of Chinese Spring chromosomes in the monotelodisomics obtained from these crosses. The reduced MI pairing in the intercultivar hybrids was caused primarily by chromosome differentiation, rather than by specific genes. Because the differentiation involved a large part of the chromosome complement in each hybrid, it was concluded that it could not be caused by structural changes such as inversions or translocations. In each case, the differentiation appeared to be unevenly distributed among the three wheat genomes. It is proposed that the same kind of differentiation, although of greater magnitude, differentiates homoeologous chromosomes and is responsible, together with structural differentiation, for poor chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids.</description><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><issn>0016-6731</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhAdggb4ANmfqS2M6mEqrKRapgAV1bjnOSGCXxYDuNeAZeuh5mgKJKrGzJ3__pHP8IPadkS0nNz3qYITkbz2q5ZVte0wdoQ-uSF0xw-hBtCKGiEJLTE_Qkxm-EEFFX6jE6oZKVNZFyg35-8nNMYbFpCWbEdgh-8tFPgFvXdRBgTs4k52dsJj_3eB3AJGyXMbkbE-IbvLo04LgD63I8wK-IBZz8PYHv7ugjdnPGR5OgPcQhPkWPOjNGeHY8T9H1u8uvFx-Kq8_vP168vSpsSVkqQIJRoq0o6ZSCRgixv3LVdK2qZNu0JZPQNVZUiplaNrYxDWOmoW2rOltxforOD97d0kzQ2jxi3l3vgptM-KG9cfrfl9kNuvc3mjJaloRkweujIPjvC8SkJxctjKOZwS9RS85LSZSgmXz1X5JWpWRM7meiB9AGH2P-xz_jUKL3ZevfZetaaqZz2Tnz4u4efxPHdjPw8gAMrh9WF0DHyYxjxqle1_W-qDNemz64qK-_0FoxIpUiJeG34DPEjw</recordid><startdate>19810201</startdate><enddate>19810201</enddate><creator>Dvorcaronak, Jan</creator><creator>McGuire, Patrick E</creator><general>Genetics Soc America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810201</creationdate><title>Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species</title><author>Dvorcaronak, Jan ; McGuire, Patrick E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-e7ea86d510f88eb666510f38bfd857dbd427efbc6582a97bcbab22ab1dd8fc533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dvorcaronak, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuire, Patrick E</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Genetics (Austin)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dvorcaronak, Jan</au><au>McGuire, Patrick E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species</atitle><jtitle>Genetics (Austin)</jtitle><addtitle>Genetics</addtitle><date>1981-02-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>391</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>391-414</pages><issn>0016-6731</issn><issn>1943-2631</issn><eissn>1943-2631</eissn><abstract>Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were observed in the hybrids, indicating that the cultivars do not differ by translocations. Thirty-one Chinese Spring telosomic lines were then crossed with substitution lines in which single chromosomes of the three cultivars were substituted for their Chinese Spring homologues. The telosomic lines were also crossed with Chinese Spring. Data were collected on the frequencies (% of PMCs) of pairing of the telesomes with their homologues at MI and the regularity of pairing of the remaining 20 pairs of Chinese Spring chromosomes in the monotelodisomics obtained from these crosses. The reduced MI pairing in the intercultivar hybrids was caused primarily by chromosome differentiation, rather than by specific genes. Because the differentiation involved a large part of the chromosome complement in each hybrid, it was concluded that it could not be caused by structural changes such as inversions or translocations. In each case, the differentiation appeared to be unevenly distributed among the three wheat genomes. It is proposed that the same kind of differentiation, although of greater magnitude, differentiates homoeologous chromosomes and is responsible, together with structural differentiation, for poor chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Genetics Soc America</pub><pmid>17249077</pmid><doi>10.1093/genetics/97.2.391</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-6731
ispartof Genetics (Austin), 1981-02, Vol.97 (2), p.391-414
issn 0016-6731
1943-2631
1943-2631
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1214400
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Investigations
Triticum aestivum
title Nonstructural chromosome differentiation among wheat cultivars, with special reference to differentiation of chromosomes in related species
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nonstructural%20chromosome%20differentiation%20among%20wheat%20cultivars,%20with%20special%20reference%20to%20differentiation%20of%20chromosomes%20in%20related%20species&rft.jtitle=Genetics%20(Austin)&rft.au=Dvorcaronak,%20Jan&rft.date=1981-02-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=391&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=391-414&rft.issn=0016-6731&rft.eissn=1943-2631&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/genetics/97.2.391&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E15472273%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15472273&rft_id=info:pmid/17249077&rfr_iscdi=true