The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research
The promises of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research and the needs of Canadian scientists to acquire fresh human embryos with which to participate in this important field of inquiry may result in the unintended compromise of the professional obligations of Canadian physicians.1 The strong prefe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2005-09, Vol.173 (6), p.621-622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 621 |
container_title | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) |
container_volume | 173 |
creator | Nisker, Jeffrey White, Angela |
description | The promises of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research and the needs of Canadian scientists to acquire fresh human embryos with which to participate in this important field of inquiry may result in the unintended compromise of the professional obligations of Canadian physicians.1 The strong preference for fresh as opposed to cryopreserved embryos follows the work of South Korean scientists who have derived multiple stem lines using fresh human embryos,2,3 with an efficacy rate much higher than rates reported in studies involving cryopreserved embryos. Canadian scientist Andras Nagy confirmed recently that he indeed used fresh embryos provided by a Canadian physician for his successful stem cell derivation.4 However, since the advent of embryo cryopreservation in the late 1980s,5 physicians have generally not offered their patients the choice to donate fresh embryos to research, since this choice could decrease their patients' chances of pregnancy or increase their risk of harm because of the additional cycles of menotropin drugs and oocyte retrieval surgery that may be required if the current treatment cycle does not result in a child).6 Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) Act7 and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines8 allow physicians to approach patients with the option of donating cryopreserved embryos no longer required for reproductive purposes. Although these documents prohibit the creation of embryos specifically for research purposes,7,8 donation of fresh embryos created for reproductive purposes to research is not considered, nor is this possibility addressed in any Canadian professional practice guideline. A legislative and professional policy grey zone thus exists, which may lead to confusion about the professional obligations of physicians approaching their patients to donate fresh embryos. Physicians may be in a conflict of interest when approaching patients to donate fresh embryos because of subtle imperatives to aid hESC research. These imperatives may be collegial, academic, institutional, financial or altruistic (to help Canadians with conditions that may in future be ameliorated by hESC research). Potential academic and financial conflicts of interest in hESC research are recognized in the AHR Act7 and CIHR's stem cell research guidelines,6 which prohibit physicians who offer the choice of cryopreserved embryo donation from being part of an hESC research team or includ |
doi_str_mv | 10.1503/cmaj.050453 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1197162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A137969158</galeid><sourcerecordid>A137969158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-4d06c7c835b100f1aa55118836abe2a3cb9b3defbf9f8c9cca737e5a454907de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVksGL1DAUxoso7rh68i7Bw4JIx6Rp2uQiDMOqC6sLup5Dmr5MM7TJbNKK-9-bMoM7I3sxOQTy_fI9Xt6XZa8JXhKG6Qc9qO0SM1wy-iRbkJLzvKCFeJotMC9wTkVZnWUvYtzitGhRP8_OSEVYXRfVIru57QCtv67Q2reAvEGXY2d1RMq1aExS650arXezZALEDsHQhHsfkfEBxREGpKHvUZJABd29zJ4Z1Ud4dTjPs5-fLm_XX_Lrm89X69V1rissxrxscaVrzSlrCMaGKMUYIZzTSjVQKKob0dAWTGOE4VporWpaA1MlKwWuW6Dn2ce9725qBmg1uDGoXu6CHVS4l15Zeao428mN_yUJETWpimRwcTAI_m6COMrBxrkV5cBPUVac1YKTMoFv_wG3fgouNScLXPKCp79OUL6HNqoHaZ3xqajegINU2zswNl2vCK1FJQjjD6YnvN7ZO3kMLR-B0m5hsPpR13cnDxIzwu9xo6YY5dWP7__BfjtlL47YDlQ_dtH30xyMeAq-34M6-BgDmL8DIVjOYZVzWOU-rIl-czzDB_aQTvoHC1zgwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204828329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nisker, Jeffrey ; White, Angela</creator><creatorcontrib>Nisker, Jeffrey ; White, Angela</creatorcontrib><description>The promises of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research and the needs of Canadian scientists to acquire fresh human embryos with which to participate in this important field of inquiry may result in the unintended compromise of the professional obligations of Canadian physicians.1 The strong preference for fresh as opposed to cryopreserved embryos follows the work of South Korean scientists who have derived multiple stem lines using fresh human embryos,2,3 with an efficacy rate much higher than rates reported in studies involving cryopreserved embryos. Canadian scientist Andras Nagy confirmed recently that he indeed used fresh embryos provided by a Canadian physician for his successful stem cell derivation.4 However, since the advent of embryo cryopreservation in the late 1980s,5 physicians have generally not offered their patients the choice to donate fresh embryos to research, since this choice could decrease their patients' chances of pregnancy or increase their risk of harm because of the additional cycles of menotropin drugs and oocyte retrieval surgery that may be required if the current treatment cycle does not result in a child).6 Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) Act7 and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines8 allow physicians to approach patients with the option of donating cryopreserved embryos no longer required for reproductive purposes. Although these documents prohibit the creation of embryos specifically for research purposes,7,8 donation of fresh embryos created for reproductive purposes to research is not considered, nor is this possibility addressed in any Canadian professional practice guideline. A legislative and professional policy grey zone thus exists, which may lead to confusion about the professional obligations of physicians approaching their patients to donate fresh embryos. Physicians may be in a conflict of interest when approaching patients to donate fresh embryos because of subtle imperatives to aid hESC research. These imperatives may be collegial, academic, institutional, financial or altruistic (to help Canadians with conditions that may in future be ameliorated by hESC research). Potential academic and financial conflicts of interest in hESC research are recognized in the AHR Act7 and CIHR's stem cell research guidelines,6 which prohibit physicians who offer the choice of cryopreserved embryo donation from being part of an hESC research team or included as authors of related publications. Broader discussion is needed that would inform physicians not only how to "recognize and disclose"1 these and other conflicts of interest, but how to vacate them. For example, should physicians who stand to gain academically or financially from fresh embryo donation ask a colleague to approach their patients about the possibility of donation, rather than approach the patients themselves? Or should the patients of such physicians not be offered such a choice at all? Should it be only physicians with no academic or financial interest in fresh embryo donation who approach their own patients? Or should no patients be approached under any circumstances, since donation of their fresh embryos would decrease their chance of pregnancy and increase their risk of harm? The Assisted Human Reproduction Agency, charged with overseeing the AHR Act,7 will likely address such questions, but it has yet to be created.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0820-3946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1488-2329</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050453</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16157726</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMAJAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: CMA Impact Inc</publisher><subject>Bioethics ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Blood & organ donations ; Canada ; Codes of Ethics ; Conflict of Interest ; Cryopreservation ; Donations ; Embryonic stem cells ; Embryos ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical ; Fetal Tissue Transplantation - ethics ; Human embryo ; Humans ; Medical research ; Physician patient relationships ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Physicians ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Societies, Medical ; Specimen Handling ; Stem Cell Transplantation - ethics ; Stem cells</subject><ispartof>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2005-09, Vol.173 (6), p.621-622</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 CMA Impact Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association Sep 13, 2005</rights><rights>2005 CMA Media Inc. or its licensors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-4d06c7c835b100f1aa55118836abe2a3cb9b3defbf9f8c9cca737e5a454907de3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1197162/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1197162/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16157726$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nisker, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Angela</creatorcontrib><title>The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research</title><title>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</title><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><description>The promises of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research and the needs of Canadian scientists to acquire fresh human embryos with which to participate in this important field of inquiry may result in the unintended compromise of the professional obligations of Canadian physicians.1 The strong preference for fresh as opposed to cryopreserved embryos follows the work of South Korean scientists who have derived multiple stem lines using fresh human embryos,2,3 with an efficacy rate much higher than rates reported in studies involving cryopreserved embryos. Canadian scientist Andras Nagy confirmed recently that he indeed used fresh embryos provided by a Canadian physician for his successful stem cell derivation.4 However, since the advent of embryo cryopreservation in the late 1980s,5 physicians have generally not offered their patients the choice to donate fresh embryos to research, since this choice could decrease their patients' chances of pregnancy or increase their risk of harm because of the additional cycles of menotropin drugs and oocyte retrieval surgery that may be required if the current treatment cycle does not result in a child).6 Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) Act7 and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines8 allow physicians to approach patients with the option of donating cryopreserved embryos no longer required for reproductive purposes. Although these documents prohibit the creation of embryos specifically for research purposes,7,8 donation of fresh embryos created for reproductive purposes to research is not considered, nor is this possibility addressed in any Canadian professional practice guideline. A legislative and professional policy grey zone thus exists, which may lead to confusion about the professional obligations of physicians approaching their patients to donate fresh embryos. Physicians may be in a conflict of interest when approaching patients to donate fresh embryos because of subtle imperatives to aid hESC research. These imperatives may be collegial, academic, institutional, financial or altruistic (to help Canadians with conditions that may in future be ameliorated by hESC research). Potential academic and financial conflicts of interest in hESC research are recognized in the AHR Act7 and CIHR's stem cell research guidelines,6 which prohibit physicians who offer the choice of cryopreserved embryo donation from being part of an hESC research team or included as authors of related publications. Broader discussion is needed that would inform physicians not only how to "recognize and disclose"1 these and other conflicts of interest, but how to vacate them. For example, should physicians who stand to gain academically or financially from fresh embryo donation ask a colleague to approach their patients about the possibility of donation, rather than approach the patients themselves? Or should the patients of such physicians not be offered such a choice at all? Should it be only physicians with no academic or financial interest in fresh embryo donation who approach their own patients? Or should no patients be approached under any circumstances, since donation of their fresh embryos would decrease their chance of pregnancy and increase their risk of harm? The Assisted Human Reproduction Agency, charged with overseeing the AHR Act,7 will likely address such questions, but it has yet to be created.</description><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Codes of Ethics</subject><subject>Conflict of Interest</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Donations</subject><subject>Embryonic stem cells</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>Fetal Tissue Transplantation - ethics</subject><subject>Human embryo</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Physician patient relationships</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>Stem Cell Transplantation - ethics</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><issn>0820-3946</issn><issn>1488-2329</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqVksGL1DAUxoso7rh68i7Bw4JIx6Rp2uQiDMOqC6sLup5Dmr5MM7TJbNKK-9-bMoM7I3sxOQTy_fI9Xt6XZa8JXhKG6Qc9qO0SM1wy-iRbkJLzvKCFeJotMC9wTkVZnWUvYtzitGhRP8_OSEVYXRfVIru57QCtv67Q2reAvEGXY2d1RMq1aExS650arXezZALEDsHQhHsfkfEBxREGpKHvUZJABd29zJ4Z1Ud4dTjPs5-fLm_XX_Lrm89X69V1rissxrxscaVrzSlrCMaGKMUYIZzTSjVQKKob0dAWTGOE4VporWpaA1MlKwWuW6Dn2ce9725qBmg1uDGoXu6CHVS4l15Zeao428mN_yUJETWpimRwcTAI_m6COMrBxrkV5cBPUVac1YKTMoFv_wG3fgouNScLXPKCp79OUL6HNqoHaZ3xqajegINU2zswNl2vCK1FJQjjD6YnvN7ZO3kMLR-B0m5hsPpR13cnDxIzwu9xo6YY5dWP7__BfjtlL47YDlQ_dtH30xyMeAq-34M6-BgDmL8DIVjOYZVzWOU-rIl-czzDB_aQTvoHC1zgwg</recordid><startdate>20050913</startdate><enddate>20050913</enddate><creator>Nisker, Jeffrey</creator><creator>White, Angela</creator><general>CMA Impact Inc</general><general>CMA Impact, Inc</general><general>Canadian Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050913</creationdate><title>The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research</title><author>Nisker, Jeffrey ; White, Angela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-4d06c7c835b100f1aa55118836abe2a3cb9b3defbf9f8c9cca737e5a454907de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Codes of Ethics</topic><topic>Conflict of Interest</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Donations</topic><topic>Embryonic stem cells</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>Fetal Tissue Transplantation - ethics</topic><topic>Human embryo</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Physician patient relationships</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>Stem Cell Transplantation - ethics</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nisker, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Angela</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nisker, Jeffrey</au><au>White, Angela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research</atitle><jtitle>Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ)</jtitle><addtitle>CMAJ</addtitle><date>2005-09-13</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>173</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>621-622</pages><issn>0820-3946</issn><eissn>1488-2329</eissn><coden>CMAJAX</coden><abstract>The promises of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research and the needs of Canadian scientists to acquire fresh human embryos with which to participate in this important field of inquiry may result in the unintended compromise of the professional obligations of Canadian physicians.1 The strong preference for fresh as opposed to cryopreserved embryos follows the work of South Korean scientists who have derived multiple stem lines using fresh human embryos,2,3 with an efficacy rate much higher than rates reported in studies involving cryopreserved embryos. Canadian scientist Andras Nagy confirmed recently that he indeed used fresh embryos provided by a Canadian physician for his successful stem cell derivation.4 However, since the advent of embryo cryopreservation in the late 1980s,5 physicians have generally not offered their patients the choice to donate fresh embryos to research, since this choice could decrease their patients' chances of pregnancy or increase their risk of harm because of the additional cycles of menotropin drugs and oocyte retrieval surgery that may be required if the current treatment cycle does not result in a child).6 Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction (AHR) Act7 and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines8 allow physicians to approach patients with the option of donating cryopreserved embryos no longer required for reproductive purposes. Although these documents prohibit the creation of embryos specifically for research purposes,7,8 donation of fresh embryos created for reproductive purposes to research is not considered, nor is this possibility addressed in any Canadian professional practice guideline. A legislative and professional policy grey zone thus exists, which may lead to confusion about the professional obligations of physicians approaching their patients to donate fresh embryos. Physicians may be in a conflict of interest when approaching patients to donate fresh embryos because of subtle imperatives to aid hESC research. These imperatives may be collegial, academic, institutional, financial or altruistic (to help Canadians with conditions that may in future be ameliorated by hESC research). Potential academic and financial conflicts of interest in hESC research are recognized in the AHR Act7 and CIHR's stem cell research guidelines,6 which prohibit physicians who offer the choice of cryopreserved embryo donation from being part of an hESC research team or included as authors of related publications. Broader discussion is needed that would inform physicians not only how to "recognize and disclose"1 these and other conflicts of interest, but how to vacate them. For example, should physicians who stand to gain academically or financially from fresh embryo donation ask a colleague to approach their patients about the possibility of donation, rather than approach the patients themselves? Or should the patients of such physicians not be offered such a choice at all? Should it be only physicians with no academic or financial interest in fresh embryo donation who approach their own patients? Or should no patients be approached under any circumstances, since donation of their fresh embryos would decrease their chance of pregnancy and increase their risk of harm? The Assisted Human Reproduction Agency, charged with overseeing the AHR Act,7 will likely address such questions, but it has yet to be created.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>CMA Impact Inc</pub><pmid>16157726</pmid><doi>10.1503/cmaj.050453</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0820-3946 |
ispartof | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ), 2005-09, Vol.173 (6), p.621-622 |
issn | 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1197162 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bioethics Biomedical Research - ethics Blood & organ donations Canada Codes of Ethics Conflict of Interest Cryopreservation Donations Embryonic stem cells Embryos Ethics Ethics, Medical Fetal Tissue Transplantation - ethics Human embryo Humans Medical research Physician patient relationships Physician-Patient Relations Physicians Practice guidelines (Medicine) Practice Guidelines as Topic Societies, Medical Specimen Handling Stem Cell Transplantation - ethics Stem cells |
title | The CMA Code of Ethics and the donation of fresh embryos for stem cell research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A55%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20CMA%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20and%20the%20donation%20of%20fresh%20embryos%20for%20stem%20cell%20research&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20Medical%20Association%20journal%20(CMAJ)&rft.au=Nisker,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2005-09-13&rft.volume=173&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=621-622&rft.issn=0820-3946&rft.eissn=1488-2329&rft.coden=CMAJAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1503/cmaj.050453&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA137969158%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204828329&rft_id=info:pmid/16157726&rft_galeid=A137969158&rfr_iscdi=true |