Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application
To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of resin cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics. Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of adhesive dentistry 2022-08, Vol.24, p.279 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 279 |
| container_title | The journal of adhesive dentistry |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira Melo, Renata Marques Özcan, Mutlu Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E |
| description | To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of resin cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics.
Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 resin cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis.
The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments.
Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3290/j.jad.b3240691 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11734295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2703983565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-147b4a859f082b3129e7f81349ddeb538a4b726d3d09ef87fb23708c2ba0767b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRCIlsKVI_KRS7aOncT2CUXp0iIVgfg4R_4Yd73yxsF2Ku3v4Y-SigKLNNKb0bx5bzSD0OuabBiV5HK_2Su70Yw2pJP1E3Re85ZXUgrx9CQ_Qy9y3hPCBOHtc3TGWikIZfwc_dw6B6bg6HBvd5D9PeAvK0y4n-fgjSo-TniNsgN8tSSlffDl-I__0Ip46K8uh_4jvg4q52qApA7eZKxcgYTBr8MJ3xxtii4sMXmDe-Mt3haz89Mdjgl_heAqWGv8OfnDyj6xf4meORUyvHrEC_T9_fbbcFPdfrr-MPS31Uw7Xqq64bpRopWOCKpZTSVwJ2rWSGtBt0yoRnPaWWaJBCe40-sFiDBUK8I7rtkFevdbd170AayBqSQVxnldSKXjGJUf_-9MfjfexfuxrjlrqGxXhbePCin-WCCX8eCzgRDUBHHJI-WEScHa7oH65tTsr8uf17BfWj6TYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703983565</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite ; Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte ; Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de ; Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli ; Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira ; Melo, Renata Marques ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</creator><creatorcontrib>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite ; Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte ; Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de ; Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli ; Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira ; Melo, Renata Marques ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of resin cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics.
Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 resin cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis.
The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments.
Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-9988</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1461-5185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-9988</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.b3240691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35980237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesive Dentistry ; Ceramics - chemistry ; Dental Bonding - methods ; Dental Cements ; Dental Porcelain - chemistry ; Hydrofluoric Acid - chemistry ; Lithium ; Materials Testing ; Resin Cements ; Silanes ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2022-08, Vol.24, p.279</ispartof><rights>2022 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980237$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Renata Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application</title><title>The journal of adhesive dentistry</title><addtitle>J Adhes Dent</addtitle><description>To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of resin cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics.
Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 resin cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis.
The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments.
Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength.</description><subject>Adhesive Dentistry</subject><subject>Ceramics - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Bonding - methods</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrofluoric Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Silanes</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1757-9988</issn><issn>1461-5185</issn><issn>1757-9988</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1v1DAQtRCIlsKVI_KRS7aOncT2CUXp0iIVgfg4R_4Yd73yxsF2Ku3v4Y-SigKLNNKb0bx5bzSD0OuabBiV5HK_2Su70Yw2pJP1E3Re85ZXUgrx9CQ_Qy9y3hPCBOHtc3TGWikIZfwc_dw6B6bg6HBvd5D9PeAvK0y4n-fgjSo-TniNsgN8tSSlffDl-I__0Ip46K8uh_4jvg4q52qApA7eZKxcgYTBr8MJ3xxtii4sMXmDe-Mt3haz89Mdjgl_heAqWGv8OfnDyj6xf4meORUyvHrEC_T9_fbbcFPdfrr-MPS31Uw7Xqq64bpRopWOCKpZTSVwJ2rWSGtBt0yoRnPaWWaJBCe40-sFiDBUK8I7rtkFevdbd170AayBqSQVxnldSKXjGJUf_-9MfjfexfuxrjlrqGxXhbePCin-WCCX8eCzgRDUBHHJI-WEScHa7oH65tTsr8uf17BfWj6TYQ</recordid><startdate>20220818</startdate><enddate>20220818</enddate><creator>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite</creator><creator>Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte</creator><creator>Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de</creator><creator>Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli</creator><creator>Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira</creator><creator>Melo, Renata Marques</creator><creator>Özcan, Mutlu</creator><creator>Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</creator><general>Quintessence Publishing Co Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220818</creationdate><title>Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application</title><author>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite ; Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte ; Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de ; Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli ; Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira ; Melo, Renata Marques ; Özcan, Mutlu ; Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p267t-147b4a859f082b3129e7f81349ddeb538a4b726d3d09ef87fb23708c2ba0767b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adhesive Dentistry</topic><topic>Ceramics - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Bonding - methods</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrofluoric Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Silanes</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Renata Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özcan, Mutlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journal of adhesive dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vila-Nova, Taciana Emília Leite</au><au>Moura, Dayanne Monielle Duarte</au><au>Araújo, Gabriela Monteiro de</au><au>Pinto, Rafael de Almeida Spinelli</au><au>Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira</au><au>Melo, Renata Marques</au><au>Özcan, Mutlu</au><au>Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application</atitle><jtitle>The journal of adhesive dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Adhes Dent</addtitle><date>2022-08-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><spage>279</spage><pages>279-</pages><issn>1757-9988</issn><issn>1461-5185</issn><eissn>1757-9988</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the effect of two surface conditioning methods, namely conventional hydrofluoric acid vs self-etching primer, and the application of adhesive on the bond strength of resin cement to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics.
Blocks (N = 96) (12 x 10 x 2.5 mm) were manufactured, 24 for each tested ceramic type: lithium silicate ceramic (LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (PIC), leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic (FD), and lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic (LD). For bond strength testing, 64 blocks were randomly divided into 16 groups (4 blocks per group) according to the following factors: ceramic: 4 levels; etching: 2 levels (HFS: hydrofluoric acid + silane or Monobond Etch & Prime [MEP]); and adhesive application: 2 levels, with (signified as A) and without. Then for each group, 15 resin cement cylinders (AllCem Dual, FGM) were built up. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (10,000 cycles) and to shear bonding strength testing (SBS) (100 kgf, 0.5 mm/min). Mean shear stresses (MPa) were statistically analyzed by three-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and Weibull analysis.
The mean bond strength of group PIC-HFS-A (28.45 ± 7.6 MPa) was significantly higher than that of groups LS-HFS-A (12.11 ± 2.7MPa) and FDHFSA (20.86 ± 2.0MPa). Group PIC-HFS bond strength (25.02 ± 6.5 MPa) was significantly higher only when compared to group LS-HFS (15.82 ± 4.4 MPa). The LS group presented lower SBS compared to all other groups. No significant differences were found between HFS and MEP surface treatments.
Surface treatment with MEP promotes adhesion similar to that of HFS. Additional application of adhesive after the surface treatments did not improve the bond strength.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Quintessence Publishing Co Inc</pub><pmid>35980237</pmid><doi>10.3290/j.jad.b3240691</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1757-9988 |
| ispartof | The journal of adhesive dentistry, 2022-08, Vol.24, p.279 |
| issn | 1757-9988 1461-5185 1757-9988 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11734295 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Adhesive Dentistry Ceramics - chemistry Dental Bonding - methods Dental Cements Dental Porcelain - chemistry Hydrofluoric Acid - chemistry Lithium Materials Testing Resin Cements Silanes Surface Properties |
| title | Effect of Adhesive Resin Application on the Durability of Adhesion to CAD/CAM Glass-Ceramics after either Hydrofluoric Acid Etching or Self-etch Primer Application |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A55%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Adhesive%20Resin%20Application%20on%20the%20Durability%20of%20Adhesion%20to%20CAD/CAM%20Glass-Ceramics%20after%20either%20Hydrofluoric%20Acid%20Etching%20or%20Self-etch%20Primer%20Application&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20adhesive%20dentistry&rft.au=Vila-Nova,%20Taciana%20Em%C3%ADlia%20Leite&rft.date=2022-08-18&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=279&rft.pages=279-&rft.issn=1757-9988&rft.eissn=1757-9988&rft_id=info:doi/10.3290/j.jad.b3240691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2703983565%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703983565&rft_id=info:pmid/35980237&rfr_iscdi=true |