Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

An unhealthy lifestyle is believed to increase the development and persistence of low back pain, but there is uncertainty about whether integrating support for lifestyle risks in low back pain management improves patients' outcomes. To assess the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Program (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2025-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e2453807
Hauptverfasser: Mudd, Emma, Davidson, Simon R E, Kamper, Steven J, Viana da Silva, Priscilla, Gleadhill, Connor, Hodder, Rebecca Kate, Haskins, Robin, Donald, Bruce, Williams, Christopher M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e2453807
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 8
creator Mudd, Emma
Davidson, Simon R E
Kamper, Steven J
Viana da Silva, Priscilla
Gleadhill, Connor
Hodder, Rebecca Kate
Haskins, Robin
Donald, Bruce
Williams, Christopher M
description An unhealthy lifestyle is believed to increase the development and persistence of low back pain, but there is uncertainty about whether integrating support for lifestyle risks in low back pain management improves patients' outcomes. To assess the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) compared with guideline-based care for low back pain disability. This superiority, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in Australia from September 8, 2017, to December 30, 2020, among 346 participants who had activity-limiting chronic low back pain and at least 1 lifestyle risk (overweight, poor diet, physical inactivity, and/or smoking), referred from hospital, general practice, and community settings. Statistical analysis was performed from January to December 2021. Participants were block randomized to the HeLP intervention (n = 174; 2 postrandomization exclusions) or guideline-based physiotherapy care (n = 172), stratified by body mass index, using a concealed function in REDCap. HeLP integrated healthy lifestyle support with guideline-based care using physiotherapy and dietetic consultations, educational resources, and telephone-based health coaching over 6 months. The primary outcome was low back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] score; 0-24 scale, where higher scores indicate greater disability) at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were weight, pain intensity, quality of life, and smoking. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) as sensitivity analyses. The sample of 346 individuals (mean [SD] age, 50.2 [14.4] years; 190 female participants [55%]) had a baseline mean (SD) RMDQ score of 14.7 (5.4) in the intervention group and 14.0 (5.5) in the control group. At 26 weeks, the between-group difference in disability was -1.3 points (95% CI, -2.5 to -0.2 points; P = .03) favoring HeLP. CACE analysis revealed clinically meaningful benefits in disability among compliers, favoring HeLP (-5.4 points; 95% CI, -9.7 to -1.2 points; P = .01). HeLP participants lost more weight (-1.6 kg; 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.0 kg; P = .049) and had greater improvement in quality of life (physical functioning score; 1.8, 95% CI, 0.1-3.4; P = .04) than control participants. Combining healthy lifestyle management with guideline-based care for chronic low back pain led to small improvements in disability, weight, and quality of life compared with guideline-based care alone, without ad
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53807
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11724347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153922681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-324cf16794180f0e279a95417ba33943cfd924e09c85ef36fb21460aef05b9363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qVUHAV6isnnrJ4r9xzKWCVQuVVqJCcKys2WRcDE68tbOg7advlqWI9jSj8XtvrPkR8pGzGWeMH99BDwOOjynfpxUOM8GEmmnZMPOG7AttVDX1-u2rfo8clXLHGBOMS1vr92RPWmOFbPQ--XGBEMfbDV0Ej2XcRKRzyEgfCj1fhw5jGLA6g4Ldbu5Tpov0SM-gvaffIQwn9JRewdClPvzeiiZDaCHS6xwgHpJ3HmLBo-d6QG6-frmeX1SLy_Nv89NFBaI2YyWFaj2vjVW8YZ6hMBasVtwsQUqrZOs7KxQy2zYavaz9UnBVM0DP9NLKWh6Qz7vc1XrZY9fiMGaIbpVDD3njEgT378sQbt3P9OA4N0JJZaaET88JOf1aT5dwfSgtxjgdO62Lk1xLK0Td8El6spO2OZWS0b_s4cxtGbn_GLktI_fEaDJ_eP3TF-tfIvIPuLySIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153922681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mudd, Emma ; Davidson, Simon R E ; Kamper, Steven J ; Viana da Silva, Priscilla ; Gleadhill, Connor ; Hodder, Rebecca Kate ; Haskins, Robin ; Donald, Bruce ; Williams, Christopher M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mudd, Emma ; Davidson, Simon R E ; Kamper, Steven J ; Viana da Silva, Priscilla ; Gleadhill, Connor ; Hodder, Rebecca Kate ; Haskins, Robin ; Donald, Bruce ; Williams, Christopher M ; Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) for Chronic Low Back Pain Trial working group</creatorcontrib><description>An unhealthy lifestyle is believed to increase the development and persistence of low back pain, but there is uncertainty about whether integrating support for lifestyle risks in low back pain management improves patients' outcomes. To assess the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) compared with guideline-based care for low back pain disability. This superiority, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in Australia from September 8, 2017, to December 30, 2020, among 346 participants who had activity-limiting chronic low back pain and at least 1 lifestyle risk (overweight, poor diet, physical inactivity, and/or smoking), referred from hospital, general practice, and community settings. Statistical analysis was performed from January to December 2021. Participants were block randomized to the HeLP intervention (n = 174; 2 postrandomization exclusions) or guideline-based physiotherapy care (n = 172), stratified by body mass index, using a concealed function in REDCap. HeLP integrated healthy lifestyle support with guideline-based care using physiotherapy and dietetic consultations, educational resources, and telephone-based health coaching over 6 months. The primary outcome was low back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] score; 0-24 scale, where higher scores indicate greater disability) at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were weight, pain intensity, quality of life, and smoking. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) as sensitivity analyses. The sample of 346 individuals (mean [SD] age, 50.2 [14.4] years; 190 female participants [55%]) had a baseline mean (SD) RMDQ score of 14.7 (5.4) in the intervention group and 14.0 (5.5) in the control group. At 26 weeks, the between-group difference in disability was -1.3 points (95% CI, -2.5 to -0.2 points; P = .03) favoring HeLP. CACE analysis revealed clinically meaningful benefits in disability among compliers, favoring HeLP (-5.4 points; 95% CI, -9.7 to -1.2 points; P = .01). HeLP participants lost more weight (-1.6 kg; 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.0 kg; P = .049) and had greater improvement in quality of life (physical functioning score; 1.8, 95% CI, 0.1-3.4; P = .04) than control participants. Combining healthy lifestyle management with guideline-based care for chronic low back pain led to small improvements in disability, weight, and quality of life compared with guideline-based care alone, without additional harm. Targeting lifestyle risks in the management of chronic low back pain may be considered safe and may offer small additional health benefits beyond current guideline-based care. http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617001288314.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53807</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39792385</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Australia ; Female ; Healthy Lifestyle ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2025-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e2453807</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2025 Mudd E et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-324cf16794180f0e279a95417ba33943cfd924e09c85ef36fb21460aef05b9363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39792385$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mudd, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Simon R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamper, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viana da Silva, Priscilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleadhill, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Rebecca Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskins, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donald, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) for Chronic Low Back Pain Trial working group</creatorcontrib><title>Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>An unhealthy lifestyle is believed to increase the development and persistence of low back pain, but there is uncertainty about whether integrating support for lifestyle risks in low back pain management improves patients' outcomes. To assess the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) compared with guideline-based care for low back pain disability. This superiority, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in Australia from September 8, 2017, to December 30, 2020, among 346 participants who had activity-limiting chronic low back pain and at least 1 lifestyle risk (overweight, poor diet, physical inactivity, and/or smoking), referred from hospital, general practice, and community settings. Statistical analysis was performed from January to December 2021. Participants were block randomized to the HeLP intervention (n = 174; 2 postrandomization exclusions) or guideline-based physiotherapy care (n = 172), stratified by body mass index, using a concealed function in REDCap. HeLP integrated healthy lifestyle support with guideline-based care using physiotherapy and dietetic consultations, educational resources, and telephone-based health coaching over 6 months. The primary outcome was low back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] score; 0-24 scale, where higher scores indicate greater disability) at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were weight, pain intensity, quality of life, and smoking. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) as sensitivity analyses. The sample of 346 individuals (mean [SD] age, 50.2 [14.4] years; 190 female participants [55%]) had a baseline mean (SD) RMDQ score of 14.7 (5.4) in the intervention group and 14.0 (5.5) in the control group. At 26 weeks, the between-group difference in disability was -1.3 points (95% CI, -2.5 to -0.2 points; P = .03) favoring HeLP. CACE analysis revealed clinically meaningful benefits in disability among compliers, favoring HeLP (-5.4 points; 95% CI, -9.7 to -1.2 points; P = .01). HeLP participants lost more weight (-1.6 kg; 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.0 kg; P = .049) and had greater improvement in quality of life (physical functioning score; 1.8, 95% CI, 0.1-3.4; P = .04) than control participants. Combining healthy lifestyle management with guideline-based care for chronic low back pain led to small improvements in disability, weight, and quality of life compared with guideline-based care alone, without additional harm. Targeting lifestyle risks in the management of chronic low back pain may be considered safe and may offer small additional health benefits beyond current guideline-based care. http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617001288314.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Lifestyle</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qVUHAV6isnnrJ4r9xzKWCVQuVVqJCcKys2WRcDE68tbOg7advlqWI9jSj8XtvrPkR8pGzGWeMH99BDwOOjynfpxUOM8GEmmnZMPOG7AttVDX1-u2rfo8clXLHGBOMS1vr92RPWmOFbPQ--XGBEMfbDV0Ej2XcRKRzyEgfCj1fhw5jGLA6g4Ldbu5Tpov0SM-gvaffIQwn9JRewdClPvzeiiZDaCHS6xwgHpJ3HmLBo-d6QG6-frmeX1SLy_Nv89NFBaI2YyWFaj2vjVW8YZ6hMBasVtwsQUqrZOs7KxQy2zYavaz9UnBVM0DP9NLKWh6Qz7vc1XrZY9fiMGaIbpVDD3njEgT378sQbt3P9OA4N0JJZaaET88JOf1aT5dwfSgtxjgdO62Lk1xLK0Td8El6spO2OZWS0b_s4cxtGbn_GLktI_fEaDJ_eP3TF-tfIvIPuLySIA</recordid><startdate>20250102</startdate><enddate>20250102</enddate><creator>Mudd, Emma</creator><creator>Davidson, Simon R E</creator><creator>Kamper, Steven J</creator><creator>Viana da Silva, Priscilla</creator><creator>Gleadhill, Connor</creator><creator>Hodder, Rebecca Kate</creator><creator>Haskins, Robin</creator><creator>Donald, Bruce</creator><creator>Williams, Christopher M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20250102</creationdate><title>Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Mudd, Emma ; Davidson, Simon R E ; Kamper, Steven J ; Viana da Silva, Priscilla ; Gleadhill, Connor ; Hodder, Rebecca Kate ; Haskins, Robin ; Donald, Bruce ; Williams, Christopher M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a267t-324cf16794180f0e279a95417ba33943cfd924e09c85ef36fb21460aef05b9363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Lifestyle</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mudd, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Simon R E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamper, Steven J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viana da Silva, Priscilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleadhill, Connor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Rebecca Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haskins, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donald, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Christopher M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) for Chronic Low Back Pain Trial working group</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mudd, Emma</au><au>Davidson, Simon R E</au><au>Kamper, Steven J</au><au>Viana da Silva, Priscilla</au><au>Gleadhill, Connor</au><au>Hodder, Rebecca Kate</au><au>Haskins, Robin</au><au>Donald, Bruce</au><au>Williams, Christopher M</au><aucorp>Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) for Chronic Low Back Pain Trial working group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2025-01-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e2453807</spage><pages>e2453807-</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>An unhealthy lifestyle is believed to increase the development and persistence of low back pain, but there is uncertainty about whether integrating support for lifestyle risks in low back pain management improves patients' outcomes. To assess the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Program (HeLP) compared with guideline-based care for low back pain disability. This superiority, assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted in Australia from September 8, 2017, to December 30, 2020, among 346 participants who had activity-limiting chronic low back pain and at least 1 lifestyle risk (overweight, poor diet, physical inactivity, and/or smoking), referred from hospital, general practice, and community settings. Statistical analysis was performed from January to December 2021. Participants were block randomized to the HeLP intervention (n = 174; 2 postrandomization exclusions) or guideline-based physiotherapy care (n = 172), stratified by body mass index, using a concealed function in REDCap. HeLP integrated healthy lifestyle support with guideline-based care using physiotherapy and dietetic consultations, educational resources, and telephone-based health coaching over 6 months. The primary outcome was low back pain disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] score; 0-24 scale, where higher scores indicate greater disability) at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes were weight, pain intensity, quality of life, and smoking. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. We estimated the complier average causal effect (CACE) as sensitivity analyses. The sample of 346 individuals (mean [SD] age, 50.2 [14.4] years; 190 female participants [55%]) had a baseline mean (SD) RMDQ score of 14.7 (5.4) in the intervention group and 14.0 (5.5) in the control group. At 26 weeks, the between-group difference in disability was -1.3 points (95% CI, -2.5 to -0.2 points; P = .03) favoring HeLP. CACE analysis revealed clinically meaningful benefits in disability among compliers, favoring HeLP (-5.4 points; 95% CI, -9.7 to -1.2 points; P = .01). HeLP participants lost more weight (-1.6 kg; 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.0 kg; P = .049) and had greater improvement in quality of life (physical functioning score; 1.8, 95% CI, 0.1-3.4; P = .04) than control participants. Combining healthy lifestyle management with guideline-based care for chronic low back pain led to small improvements in disability, weight, and quality of life compared with guideline-based care alone, without additional harm. Targeting lifestyle risks in the management of chronic low back pain may be considered safe and may offer small additional health benefits beyond current guideline-based care. http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12617001288314.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>39792385</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53807</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2025-01, Vol.8 (1), p.e2453807
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11724347
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Australia
Female
Healthy Lifestyle
Humans
Low Back Pain - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Online Only
Original Investigation
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy Modalities
title Healthy Lifestyle Care vs Guideline-Based Care for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A50%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthy%20Lifestyle%20Care%20vs%20Guideline-Based%20Care%20for%20Low%20Back%20Pain:%20A%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Mudd,%20Emma&rft.aucorp=Healthy%20Lifestyle%20Program%20(HeLP)%20for%20Chronic%20Low%20Back%20Pain%20Trial%20working%20group&rft.date=2025-01-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e2453807&rft.pages=e2453807-&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53807&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3153922681%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153922681&rft_id=info:pmid/39792385&rfr_iscdi=true