Remote Perioperative Monitoring in Adult Cardiac Surgery: The Impact on 1000 Consecutive Patients

Our remote patient monitoring (RPM) program for adult cardiac surgery patients aims to remove barriers to access, provide continuity of expert care, and increase their time-at-home. The RPM program integrates novel biosensors, an application for audiovisual visits, messaging, biometric data tracking...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of thoracic surgery short reports 2024-12, Vol.2 (4), p.860-864
Hauptverfasser: Lobdell, Kevin W., Crotwell, Shannon, Watts, Larry T., LeNoir, Bradley, Skipper, Eric R., Maxey, Thomas, Russell, Gregory B., Habib, Robert, Rose, Geoffrey A., Frederick, John
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 864
container_issue 4
container_start_page 860
container_title Annals of thoracic surgery short reports
container_volume 2
creator Lobdell, Kevin W.
Crotwell, Shannon
Watts, Larry T.
LeNoir, Bradley
Skipper, Eric R.
Maxey, Thomas
Russell, Gregory B.
Habib, Robert
Rose, Geoffrey A.
Frederick, John
description Our remote patient monitoring (RPM) program for adult cardiac surgery patients aims to remove barriers to access, provide continuity of expert care, and increase their time-at-home. The RPM program integrates novel biosensors, an application for audiovisual visits, messaging, biometric data tracking, patient-reported outcomes, and scheduling with the aim of reducing postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmissions, while simultaneously increasing the rate of patients discharged to home. Our institutional database was utilized for this retrospective review of 1000 consecutive RPM patients who underwent coronary artery bypass, valve, and coronary artery bypass + valve, at 3 hospitals from July 2019 through April 2023. The study cohort was compared with 1000 propensity-matched controls from the same three hospitals (1:1, nearest neighbor matching where propensity scores were generated with RPM as the outcome measure). Patient characteristics, procedures, and outcomes are defined as per The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. RPM patients experienced statistically significant shorter median postoperative length of stay (1 day less, a 16.7% relative difference; P < .0001) and a 33% relative reduction in 30-day readmission (7.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 0.7, P = .027), while 5.6% more patients were discharged to home (97.8% vs 92.2%, P < .0001) when compared with the non-RPM cohort. Patient engagement and management with a RPM platform are feasible and associated with significantly shorter postoperative length of stay, fewer 30-day readmissions, and an increased rate of discharge to home. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.06.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11708505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2772993124002614</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153919690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2105-2b24b745e071ce693f4181689598f8f89575fccacc8bbfc9ebc006bf64b32b873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFrFDEQxoMottT-BYLk0ZfbTjabzUYQKYfaQsWi9Tkk2dlrjt3NmWQP-t-b9mqpLzIPGcg33zfMj5C3DCoGrD3bVianFKsa6qaCtgLWvSDHtZT1SinOXj7rj8hpSlsA4ACdVOI1OeJKKhCKHRPzA6eQkV5j9GGH0WS_R_otzD6H6OcN9TM975cx07WJvTeO_lziBuPdB3pzi_Ry2hmXaZgpKwF0HeaEbnnwuC5WOOf0hrwazJjw9PE9Ib--fL5ZX6yuvn-9XJ9frVzNQKxqWzdWNgJBMoet4kPDOtZ2SqhuKKWEFINzxrnO2sEptA6gtUPbWF7bTvIT8ungu1vshL0r2dGMehf9ZOKdDsbrf39mf6s3Ya8Zk9AJEMXh_aNDDL8XTFlPPjkcRzNjWJLmTHDFVKugSPlB6mIoGHB4ymGg7wHprX4ApO8BaWh1AVSm3j1f8WnmL44i-HgQYDnU3mPUyZUjOux9RJd1H_x_A_4AGBijqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3153919690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remote Perioperative Monitoring in Adult Cardiac Surgery: The Impact on 1000 Consecutive Patients</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lobdell, Kevin W. ; Crotwell, Shannon ; Watts, Larry T. ; LeNoir, Bradley ; Skipper, Eric R. ; Maxey, Thomas ; Russell, Gregory B. ; Habib, Robert ; Rose, Geoffrey A. ; Frederick, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Kevin W. ; Crotwell, Shannon ; Watts, Larry T. ; LeNoir, Bradley ; Skipper, Eric R. ; Maxey, Thomas ; Russell, Gregory B. ; Habib, Robert ; Rose, Geoffrey A. ; Frederick, John</creatorcontrib><description>Our remote patient monitoring (RPM) program for adult cardiac surgery patients aims to remove barriers to access, provide continuity of expert care, and increase their time-at-home. The RPM program integrates novel biosensors, an application for audiovisual visits, messaging, biometric data tracking, patient-reported outcomes, and scheduling with the aim of reducing postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmissions, while simultaneously increasing the rate of patients discharged to home. Our institutional database was utilized for this retrospective review of 1000 consecutive RPM patients who underwent coronary artery bypass, valve, and coronary artery bypass + valve, at 3 hospitals from July 2019 through April 2023. The study cohort was compared with 1000 propensity-matched controls from the same three hospitals (1:1, nearest neighbor matching where propensity scores were generated with RPM as the outcome measure). Patient characteristics, procedures, and outcomes are defined as per The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. RPM patients experienced statistically significant shorter median postoperative length of stay (1 day less, a 16.7% relative difference; P &lt; .0001) and a 33% relative reduction in 30-day readmission (7.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 0.7, P = .027), while 5.6% more patients were discharged to home (97.8% vs 92.2%, P &lt; .0001) when compared with the non-RPM cohort. Patient engagement and management with a RPM platform are feasible and associated with significantly shorter postoperative length of stay, fewer 30-day readmissions, and an increased rate of discharge to home. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 2772-9931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2772-9931</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.06.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39790591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Perioperative &amp; Critical Care</subject><ispartof>Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024-12, Vol.2 (4), p.860-864</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2105-2b24b745e071ce693f4181689598f8f89575fccacc8bbfc9ebc006bf64b32b873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5509-4732</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39790591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crotwell, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Larry T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeNoir, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxey, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Gregory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habib, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Geoffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, John</creatorcontrib><title>Remote Perioperative Monitoring in Adult Cardiac Surgery: The Impact on 1000 Consecutive Patients</title><title>Annals of thoracic surgery short reports</title><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep</addtitle><description>Our remote patient monitoring (RPM) program for adult cardiac surgery patients aims to remove barriers to access, provide continuity of expert care, and increase their time-at-home. The RPM program integrates novel biosensors, an application for audiovisual visits, messaging, biometric data tracking, patient-reported outcomes, and scheduling with the aim of reducing postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmissions, while simultaneously increasing the rate of patients discharged to home. Our institutional database was utilized for this retrospective review of 1000 consecutive RPM patients who underwent coronary artery bypass, valve, and coronary artery bypass + valve, at 3 hospitals from July 2019 through April 2023. The study cohort was compared with 1000 propensity-matched controls from the same three hospitals (1:1, nearest neighbor matching where propensity scores were generated with RPM as the outcome measure). Patient characteristics, procedures, and outcomes are defined as per The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. RPM patients experienced statistically significant shorter median postoperative length of stay (1 day less, a 16.7% relative difference; P &lt; .0001) and a 33% relative reduction in 30-day readmission (7.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 0.7, P = .027), while 5.6% more patients were discharged to home (97.8% vs 92.2%, P &lt; .0001) when compared with the non-RPM cohort. Patient engagement and management with a RPM platform are feasible and associated with significantly shorter postoperative length of stay, fewer 30-day readmissions, and an increased rate of discharge to home. [Display omitted]</description><subject>Perioperative &amp; Critical Care</subject><issn>2772-9931</issn><issn>2772-9931</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFrFDEQxoMottT-BYLk0ZfbTjabzUYQKYfaQsWi9Tkk2dlrjt3NmWQP-t-b9mqpLzIPGcg33zfMj5C3DCoGrD3bVianFKsa6qaCtgLWvSDHtZT1SinOXj7rj8hpSlsA4ACdVOI1OeJKKhCKHRPzA6eQkV5j9GGH0WS_R_otzD6H6OcN9TM975cx07WJvTeO_lziBuPdB3pzi_Ry2hmXaZgpKwF0HeaEbnnwuC5WOOf0hrwazJjw9PE9Ib--fL5ZX6yuvn-9XJ9frVzNQKxqWzdWNgJBMoet4kPDOtZ2SqhuKKWEFINzxrnO2sEptA6gtUPbWF7bTvIT8ungu1vshL0r2dGMehf9ZOKdDsbrf39mf6s3Ya8Zk9AJEMXh_aNDDL8XTFlPPjkcRzNjWJLmTHDFVKugSPlB6mIoGHB4ymGg7wHprX4ApO8BaWh1AVSm3j1f8WnmL44i-HgQYDnU3mPUyZUjOux9RJd1H_x_A_4AGBijqA</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Lobdell, Kevin W.</creator><creator>Crotwell, Shannon</creator><creator>Watts, Larry T.</creator><creator>LeNoir, Bradley</creator><creator>Skipper, Eric R.</creator><creator>Maxey, Thomas</creator><creator>Russell, Gregory B.</creator><creator>Habib, Robert</creator><creator>Rose, Geoffrey A.</creator><creator>Frederick, John</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-4732</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Remote Perioperative Monitoring in Adult Cardiac Surgery: The Impact on 1000 Consecutive Patients</title><author>Lobdell, Kevin W. ; Crotwell, Shannon ; Watts, Larry T. ; LeNoir, Bradley ; Skipper, Eric R. ; Maxey, Thomas ; Russell, Gregory B. ; Habib, Robert ; Rose, Geoffrey A. ; Frederick, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2105-2b24b745e071ce693f4181689598f8f89575fccacc8bbfc9ebc006bf64b32b873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Perioperative &amp; Critical Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lobdell, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crotwell, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Larry T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeNoir, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skipper, Eric R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxey, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Gregory B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habib, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Geoffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frederick, John</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of thoracic surgery short reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lobdell, Kevin W.</au><au>Crotwell, Shannon</au><au>Watts, Larry T.</au><au>LeNoir, Bradley</au><au>Skipper, Eric R.</au><au>Maxey, Thomas</au><au>Russell, Gregory B.</au><au>Habib, Robert</au><au>Rose, Geoffrey A.</au><au>Frederick, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remote Perioperative Monitoring in Adult Cardiac Surgery: The Impact on 1000 Consecutive Patients</atitle><jtitle>Annals of thoracic surgery short reports</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>860</spage><epage>864</epage><pages>860-864</pages><issn>2772-9931</issn><eissn>2772-9931</eissn><abstract>Our remote patient monitoring (RPM) program for adult cardiac surgery patients aims to remove barriers to access, provide continuity of expert care, and increase their time-at-home. The RPM program integrates novel biosensors, an application for audiovisual visits, messaging, biometric data tracking, patient-reported outcomes, and scheduling with the aim of reducing postoperative length of stay and 30-day readmissions, while simultaneously increasing the rate of patients discharged to home. Our institutional database was utilized for this retrospective review of 1000 consecutive RPM patients who underwent coronary artery bypass, valve, and coronary artery bypass + valve, at 3 hospitals from July 2019 through April 2023. The study cohort was compared with 1000 propensity-matched controls from the same three hospitals (1:1, nearest neighbor matching where propensity scores were generated with RPM as the outcome measure). Patient characteristics, procedures, and outcomes are defined as per The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. RPM patients experienced statistically significant shorter median postoperative length of stay (1 day less, a 16.7% relative difference; P &lt; .0001) and a 33% relative reduction in 30-day readmission (7.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 0.7, P = .027), while 5.6% more patients were discharged to home (97.8% vs 92.2%, P &lt; .0001) when compared with the non-RPM cohort. Patient engagement and management with a RPM platform are feasible and associated with significantly shorter postoperative length of stay, fewer 30-day readmissions, and an increased rate of discharge to home. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39790591</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.atssr.2024.06.018</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-4732</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2772-9931
ispartof Annals of thoracic surgery short reports, 2024-12, Vol.2 (4), p.860-864
issn 2772-9931
2772-9931
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11708505
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Perioperative & Critical Care
title Remote Perioperative Monitoring in Adult Cardiac Surgery: The Impact on 1000 Consecutive Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T16%3A47%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remote%20Perioperative%20Monitoring%20in%20Adult%20Cardiac%20Surgery:%20The%20Impact%20on%201000%20Consecutive%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20thoracic%20surgery%20short%20reports&rft.au=Lobdell,%20Kevin%20W.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=860&rft.epage=864&rft.pages=860-864&rft.issn=2772-9931&rft.eissn=2772-9931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.atssr.2024.06.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3153919690%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3153919690&rft_id=info:pmid/39790591&rft_els_id=S2772993124002614&rfr_iscdi=true