Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay

Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microbiology spectrum 2025-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0150724
Hauptverfasser: Goldstein, D Yitzchak, Sasaki, Mark M, Narlieva, Momka, Nhan, Nhi, Liu, Tianxi, Kegl, April, Akter, Tanjina, Dickerson, Tanisha, Thornton, Eriel, Jim, Patricia, Young, Stephen, Lucic, Danijela, Hirschhorn, Julie W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e0150724
container_title Microbiology spectrum
container_volume 13
creator Goldstein, D Yitzchak
Sasaki, Mark M
Narlieva, Momka
Nhan, Nhi
Liu, Tianxi
Kegl, April
Akter, Tanjina
Dickerson, Tanisha
Thornton, Eriel
Jim, Patricia
Young, Stephen
Lucic, Danijela
Hirschhorn, Julie W
description Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) ( = 357), ELITech EBV LDT ( = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT ( = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay ( = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/spectrum.01507-24
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11705799</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5ea007c185d04371b0a7651074a0a7a6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3128977994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-294f367fb129f4d3af7d043798146e72dec4d7b5d1ed9548a118d7ebd15b5d633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9P3DAQxaOqqCDgA_RS-dhLtv4bJ6eKItoiIbWH9lhZk3iy8SqJF9tZab89ZhcQXHryaPzm92w_F8VHRleM8fpL3GKXwjKtKFNUl1y-K844q1RJZaPfv6pPi8sYN5RSxqjiin8oTkWjpNJCnRX_fmPofZhg7pDgDsYFkvMz8T1JA5LBrYcyDcEv62G7JHK_wJxcypodkqvRzS7tyURutjGhm8tvEALZubBEAjHC_qI46WGMePm0nhd_v9_8uf5Z3v36cXt9dVeCkDKVvJG9qHTfMt700grotaVS6KZmskLNLXbS6lZZhjafvAbGaquxtUzlZiXEeXF75FoPG7MNboKwNx6cOTR8WBsIyXUjGoVAqe5YrQ4WrKWgK8WolpArqDLr65G1XdoJbYdzCjC-gb7dmd1g1n5nGNNU6abJhM9PhODvF4zJTC52OI4wo1-iETm-RmelzFJ2lHbBxxiwf_Fh1DzGbJ5jNoeYDX-cWR1nIE7cbPwS5vy2_x349PpGLxbPv0A8ANgztkY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128977994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goldstein, D Yitzchak ; Sasaki, Mark M ; Narlieva, Momka ; Nhan, Nhi ; Liu, Tianxi ; Kegl, April ; Akter, Tanjina ; Dickerson, Tanisha ; Thornton, Eriel ; Jim, Patricia ; Young, Stephen ; Lucic, Danijela ; Hirschhorn, Julie W</creator><contributor>Gitman, Melissa R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, D Yitzchak ; Sasaki, Mark M ; Narlieva, Momka ; Nhan, Nhi ; Liu, Tianxi ; Kegl, April ; Akter, Tanjina ; Dickerson, Tanisha ; Thornton, Eriel ; Jim, Patricia ; Young, Stephen ; Lucic, Danijela ; Hirschhorn, Julie W ; Gitman, Melissa R.</creatorcontrib><description>Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) ( = 357), ELITech EBV LDT ( = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT ( = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay ( = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2165-0497</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2165-0497</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01507-24</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39545735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Clinical Microbiology ; DNA ; DNA, Viral - blood ; DNA, Viral - genetics ; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - diagnosis ; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - virology ; Herpesvirus 4, Human - genetics ; Herpesvirus 4, Human - isolation &amp; purification ; high-throughput diagnostic assay ; High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods ; Humans ; Limit of Detection ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods ; nucleic acid amplification ; Research Article ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; transplant EBV ; Viral Load - methods ; viral load monitoring</subject><ispartof>Microbiology spectrum, 2025-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0150724</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Goldstein et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Goldstein et al. 2024 Goldstein et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-294f367fb129f4d3af7d043798146e72dec4d7b5d1ed9548a118d7ebd15b5d633</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-8421-1558 ; 0000-0001-9717-408X ; 0000-0001-6367-8335 ; 0009-0008-1262-1484</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705799/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705799/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39545735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gitman, Melissa R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, D Yitzchak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Mark M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narlieva, Momka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nhan, Nhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegl, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akter, Tanjina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Tanisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Eriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jim, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucic, Danijela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschhorn, Julie W</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay</title><title>Microbiology spectrum</title><addtitle>Spectrum</addtitle><addtitle>Microbiol Spectr</addtitle><description>Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) ( = 357), ELITech EBV LDT ( = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT ( = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay ( = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.</description><subject>Clinical Microbiology</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - blood</subject><subject>DNA, Viral - genetics</subject><subject>Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - virology</subject><subject>Herpesvirus 4, Human - genetics</subject><subject>Herpesvirus 4, Human - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>high-throughput diagnostic assay</subject><subject>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Limit of Detection</subject><subject>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods</subject><subject>nucleic acid amplification</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>transplant EBV</subject><subject>Viral Load - methods</subject><subject>viral load monitoring</subject><issn>2165-0497</issn><issn>2165-0497</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9P3DAQxaOqqCDgA_RS-dhLtv4bJ6eKItoiIbWH9lhZk3iy8SqJF9tZab89ZhcQXHryaPzm92w_F8VHRleM8fpL3GKXwjKtKFNUl1y-K844q1RJZaPfv6pPi8sYN5RSxqjiin8oTkWjpNJCnRX_fmPofZhg7pDgDsYFkvMz8T1JA5LBrYcyDcEv62G7JHK_wJxcypodkqvRzS7tyURutjGhm8tvEALZubBEAjHC_qI46WGMePm0nhd_v9_8uf5Z3v36cXt9dVeCkDKVvJG9qHTfMt700grotaVS6KZmskLNLXbS6lZZhjafvAbGaquxtUzlZiXEeXF75FoPG7MNboKwNx6cOTR8WBsIyXUjGoVAqe5YrQ4WrKWgK8WolpArqDLr65G1XdoJbYdzCjC-gb7dmd1g1n5nGNNU6abJhM9PhODvF4zJTC52OI4wo1-iETm-RmelzFJ2lHbBxxiwf_Fh1DzGbJ5jNoeYDX-cWR1nIE7cbPwS5vy2_x349PpGLxbPv0A8ANgztkY</recordid><startdate>20250107</startdate><enddate>20250107</enddate><creator>Goldstein, D Yitzchak</creator><creator>Sasaki, Mark M</creator><creator>Narlieva, Momka</creator><creator>Nhan, Nhi</creator><creator>Liu, Tianxi</creator><creator>Kegl, April</creator><creator>Akter, Tanjina</creator><creator>Dickerson, Tanisha</creator><creator>Thornton, Eriel</creator><creator>Jim, Patricia</creator><creator>Young, Stephen</creator><creator>Lucic, Danijela</creator><creator>Hirschhorn, Julie W</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8421-1558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-408X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-8335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1262-1484</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250107</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay</title><author>Goldstein, D Yitzchak ; Sasaki, Mark M ; Narlieva, Momka ; Nhan, Nhi ; Liu, Tianxi ; Kegl, April ; Akter, Tanjina ; Dickerson, Tanisha ; Thornton, Eriel ; Jim, Patricia ; Young, Stephen ; Lucic, Danijela ; Hirschhorn, Julie W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a344t-294f367fb129f4d3af7d043798146e72dec4d7b5d1ed9548a118d7ebd15b5d633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Clinical Microbiology</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - blood</topic><topic>DNA, Viral - genetics</topic><topic>Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - virology</topic><topic>Herpesvirus 4, Human - genetics</topic><topic>Herpesvirus 4, Human - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>high-throughput diagnostic assay</topic><topic>High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Limit of Detection</topic><topic>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods</topic><topic>nucleic acid amplification</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>transplant EBV</topic><topic>Viral Load - methods</topic><topic>viral load monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, D Yitzchak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Mark M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narlieva, Momka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nhan, Nhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Tianxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegl, April</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akter, Tanjina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickerson, Tanisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thornton, Eriel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jim, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucic, Danijela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschhorn, Julie W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Microbiology spectrum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldstein, D Yitzchak</au><au>Sasaki, Mark M</au><au>Narlieva, Momka</au><au>Nhan, Nhi</au><au>Liu, Tianxi</au><au>Kegl, April</au><au>Akter, Tanjina</au><au>Dickerson, Tanisha</au><au>Thornton, Eriel</au><au>Jim, Patricia</au><au>Young, Stephen</au><au>Lucic, Danijela</au><au>Hirschhorn, Julie W</au><au>Gitman, Melissa R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay</atitle><jtitle>Microbiology spectrum</jtitle><stitle>Spectrum</stitle><addtitle>Microbiol Spectr</addtitle><date>2025-01-07</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e0150724</spage><pages>e0150724-</pages><issn>2165-0497</issn><eissn>2165-0497</eissn><abstract>Molecular testing for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is a cornerstone of care to prevent adverse outcomes in immunocompromised patients, including transplant recipients. We evaluated the analytical and clinical performance of the quantitative Alinity m EBV assay for plasma sample testing on the fully automated Alinity m platform. Assay lower limit of detection and precision were determined using commercially available panels in plasma. Alinity m EBV detected 100% of panels at 1.3 Log IU/mL, and precision ranged from 1.9% to 5.2% coefficients of variance (SD ≤ 0.14 Log IU/mL). Remnant-de-identified specimens initially tested with the Eurofins Viracor EBV Laboratory Developed Test (LDT) ( = 357), ELITech EBV LDT ( = 113), University of Washington (UW) LDT ( = 151), or Roche cobas EBV assay ( = 148) were subsequently tested with the Alinity m EBV assay. Comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay and Eurofins Viracor EBV assay demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.762 and mean bias of -0.48 Log IU/mL, comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with UW LDT demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.970 and mean bias of -0.24 Log IU/mL, and comparison of the Alinity m EBV assay with cobas EBV demonstrated a correlation coefficient of 0.964 and mean bias of 0.35 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m EBV assay demonstrated high precision across the analytical measurement range and produced comparable results to the EBV test of record assays. These findings support the utility of the fully automated Alinity m EBV assay in transplant patient management. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and reactivation are associated with increased risk for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in transplant recipients with the development of PTLD occurring predominantly within a year of transplant. Quantitative PCR for EBV is used to monitor the viral load of EBV with a negative result as a good negative predictor of PTLD. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) with high sensitivity and specificity are available on fully automated high-throughput instruments to provide accurate quantitation and improve test result turn-around time. This study evaluates the analytical and clinical performance of one such NAAT, the Alinity m EBV assay.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>39545735</pmid><doi>10.1128/spectrum.01507-24</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8421-1558</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9717-408X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-8335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1262-1484</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2165-0497
ispartof Microbiology spectrum, 2025-01, Vol.13 (1), p.e0150724
issn 2165-0497
2165-0497
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11705799
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Clinical Microbiology
DNA
DNA, Viral - blood
DNA, Viral - genetics
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - diagnosis
Epstein-Barr Virus Infections - virology
Herpesvirus 4, Human - genetics
Herpesvirus 4, Human - isolation & purification
high-throughput diagnostic assay
High-Throughput Screening Assays - methods
Humans
Limit of Detection
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - methods
nucleic acid amplification
Research Article
Sensitivity and Specificity
transplant EBV
Viral Load - methods
viral load monitoring
title Performance evaluation of the high-throughput quantitative Alinity m Epstein-Barr virus assay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A47%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20the%20high-throughput%20quantitative%20Alinity%20m%20Epstein-Barr%20virus%20assay&rft.jtitle=Microbiology%20spectrum&rft.au=Goldstein,%20D%20Yitzchak&rft.date=2025-01-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e0150724&rft.pages=e0150724-&rft.issn=2165-0497&rft.eissn=2165-0497&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/spectrum.01507-24&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3128977994%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128977994&rft_id=info:pmid/39545735&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5ea007c185d04371b0a7651074a0a7a6&rfr_iscdi=true