Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer largely rely on the identification and clinical management of individuals with a pathogenic variant prior to developing cancer. Simulation modelling is commonly utilised to evaluate genetic testing s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2024-12, Vol.16 (24), p.4165
Hauptverfasser: Petelin, Lara, Cunich, Michelle, Procopio, Pietro, Schofield, Deborah, Devereux, Lisa, Nickson, Carolyn, James, Paul A, Campbell, Ian G, Trainer, Alison H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 24
container_start_page 4165
container_title Cancers
container_volume 16
creator Petelin, Lara
Cunich, Michelle
Procopio, Pietro
Schofield, Deborah
Devereux, Lisa
Nickson, Carolyn
James, Paul A
Campbell, Ian G
Trainer, Alison H
description The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer largely rely on the identification and clinical management of individuals with a pathogenic variant prior to developing cancer. Simulation modelling is commonly utilised to evaluate genetic testing strategies due to its ability to synthesise collections of data and extrapolate over long time periods and large populations. Existing genetic testing simulation models use simplifying assumptions for predictive genetic testing and risk management uptake, which could impact the reliability of their estimates. Our objective was to develop a microsimulation model that accurately reflects current genetic testing and subsequent care in Australia, directly incorporating the dynamic nature of predictive genetic testing within families and adherence to cancer risk management recommendations. The populatioN gEnEtic testing MOdel (NEEMO) is a population-level microsimulation that incorporates a detailed simulation of individuals linked within five-generation family units. The genetic component includes heritable high- and moderate-risk monogenic gene variants, as well as polygenic risk. Interventions include clinical genetic services, breast screening, and risk-reducing surgery. Model validation is described, and then to illustrate a practical application, NEEMO was used to compare clinical outcomes for four genetic testing scenarios in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) and their relatives: (1) no genetic testing, (2) current practice, (3) optimised referral for genetic testing, and (4) genetic testing for all BC. NEEMO accurately estimated genetic testing utilisation according to current practice and associated cancer incidence, pathology, and survival. Predictive testing uptake in first- and second-degree relatives was consistent with known prospective genetic testing data. Optimised genetic referral and expanded testing prevented up to 9.3% of BC and 4.1% of ovarian cancers in relatives of patients with BC. Expanding genetic testing eligibility to all BC patients did not lead to improvement in life-years saved in at-risk relatives compared to optimised referral of patients eligible for testing under current criteria. NEEMO is an adaptable and validated microsimulation model for evaluating genetic testing strategies. It captures the real-world uptake of clinical and predictive genetic testing and recommended cancer risk management, which are important con
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers16244165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11674464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821761427</galeid><sourcerecordid>A821761427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0ac9eada8d249db6a8fbddc72510399fd5b9f7e7db5da8c863e5907bdc683b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qUROlOfdWIfXSyyZgMJheqnS1SStlu1K1OSMMYy-RDSnYkfrvg_PVJAocZjQ888IMUxSfCD6mVOITo72BmAgvGSO8elcclFiUC84le__M3y-OUrrCeVFKBBcfin0qBeeYVwdF-gN2MmDRjwg6jUh7izY3Ojrt0fJOH213MUzdDm117GDM6Dl4GJ1BW0ij8903tMp20CMkdJlyAI07QL9Xq_UGrZ2JIblh6vXogkfrYKH_WOy1uk9w9GAPi8uz1Xb5c3GxOf-1PL1YGCrouGixNhK01bUtmbQN13XbWGtEWRFMpWxt1chWgLBNlSFTcwqVxKKxhte0YfSw-H6vez01A1gDfoy6V9cxPzb-U0E79fLEu53qwo0ihAvG-Kzw9UEhhr9TLlcNLhnoe-0hTElRUtE6sxRn9Msr9CpM0ef6MsVkxWbF_1Sne1DOtyFfbGZRdVqX-XcIK0Wmjt-g8rYwOBM8tC7HXySc3CfM3U4R2qciCVbzrKhXs5IzPj_vzRP_OBn0Fok8u9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3149547446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Petelin, Lara ; Cunich, Michelle ; Procopio, Pietro ; Schofield, Deborah ; Devereux, Lisa ; Nickson, Carolyn ; James, Paul A ; Campbell, Ian G ; Trainer, Alison H</creator><creatorcontrib>Petelin, Lara ; Cunich, Michelle ; Procopio, Pietro ; Schofield, Deborah ; Devereux, Lisa ; Nickson, Carolyn ; James, Paul A ; Campbell, Ian G ; Trainer, Alison H</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer largely rely on the identification and clinical management of individuals with a pathogenic variant prior to developing cancer. Simulation modelling is commonly utilised to evaluate genetic testing strategies due to its ability to synthesise collections of data and extrapolate over long time periods and large populations. Existing genetic testing simulation models use simplifying assumptions for predictive genetic testing and risk management uptake, which could impact the reliability of their estimates. Our objective was to develop a microsimulation model that accurately reflects current genetic testing and subsequent care in Australia, directly incorporating the dynamic nature of predictive genetic testing within families and adherence to cancer risk management recommendations. The populatioN gEnEtic testing MOdel (NEEMO) is a population-level microsimulation that incorporates a detailed simulation of individuals linked within five-generation family units. The genetic component includes heritable high- and moderate-risk monogenic gene variants, as well as polygenic risk. Interventions include clinical genetic services, breast screening, and risk-reducing surgery. Model validation is described, and then to illustrate a practical application, NEEMO was used to compare clinical outcomes for four genetic testing scenarios in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) and their relatives: (1) no genetic testing, (2) current practice, (3) optimised referral for genetic testing, and (4) genetic testing for all BC. NEEMO accurately estimated genetic testing utilisation according to current practice and associated cancer incidence, pathology, and survival. Predictive testing uptake in first- and second-degree relatives was consistent with known prospective genetic testing data. Optimised genetic referral and expanded testing prevented up to 9.3% of BC and 4.1% of ovarian cancers in relatives of patients with BC. Expanding genetic testing eligibility to all BC patients did not lead to improvement in life-years saved in at-risk relatives compared to optimised referral of patients eligible for testing under current criteria. NEEMO is an adaptable and validated microsimulation model for evaluating genetic testing strategies. It captures the real-world uptake of clinical and predictive genetic testing and recommended cancer risk management, which are important considerations when considering real-world clinical and cost-effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244165</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39766065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Age ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Comparative analysis ; Cost analysis ; Diagnosis ; Disease management ; Estimates ; Families &amp; family life ; Genes ; Genetic screening ; Genetic testing ; Genetics ; Mammography ; Mastectomy ; Medical screening ; Medical tests ; Mortality ; Natural history ; Oncology, Experimental ; Ovarian cancer ; Population genetics ; Population studies ; Simulation ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2024-12, Vol.16 (24), p.4165</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0ac9eada8d249db6a8fbddc72510399fd5b9f7e7db5da8c863e5907bdc683b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3245-8895 ; 0000-0002-9847-3265 ; 0000-0003-2435-5888 ; 0000-0002-7773-4155</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674464/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674464/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39766065$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petelin, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunich, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Procopio, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickson, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Ian G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainer, Alison H</creatorcontrib><title>Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer largely rely on the identification and clinical management of individuals with a pathogenic variant prior to developing cancer. Simulation modelling is commonly utilised to evaluate genetic testing strategies due to its ability to synthesise collections of data and extrapolate over long time periods and large populations. Existing genetic testing simulation models use simplifying assumptions for predictive genetic testing and risk management uptake, which could impact the reliability of their estimates. Our objective was to develop a microsimulation model that accurately reflects current genetic testing and subsequent care in Australia, directly incorporating the dynamic nature of predictive genetic testing within families and adherence to cancer risk management recommendations. The populatioN gEnEtic testing MOdel (NEEMO) is a population-level microsimulation that incorporates a detailed simulation of individuals linked within five-generation family units. The genetic component includes heritable high- and moderate-risk monogenic gene variants, as well as polygenic risk. Interventions include clinical genetic services, breast screening, and risk-reducing surgery. Model validation is described, and then to illustrate a practical application, NEEMO was used to compare clinical outcomes for four genetic testing scenarios in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) and their relatives: (1) no genetic testing, (2) current practice, (3) optimised referral for genetic testing, and (4) genetic testing for all BC. NEEMO accurately estimated genetic testing utilisation according to current practice and associated cancer incidence, pathology, and survival. Predictive testing uptake in first- and second-degree relatives was consistent with known prospective genetic testing data. Optimised genetic referral and expanded testing prevented up to 9.3% of BC and 4.1% of ovarian cancers in relatives of patients with BC. Expanding genetic testing eligibility to all BC patients did not lead to improvement in life-years saved in at-risk relatives compared to optimised referral of patients eligible for testing under current criteria. NEEMO is an adaptable and validated microsimulation model for evaluating genetic testing strategies. It captures the real-world uptake of clinical and predictive genetic testing and recommended cancer risk management, which are important considerations when considering real-world clinical and cost-effectiveness.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v3CAQhq2qUROlOfdWIfXSyyZgMJheqnS1SStlu1K1OSMMYy-RDSnYkfrvg_PVJAocZjQ888IMUxSfCD6mVOITo72BmAgvGSO8elcclFiUC84le__M3y-OUrrCeVFKBBcfin0qBeeYVwdF-gN2MmDRjwg6jUh7izY3Ojrt0fJOH213MUzdDm117GDM6Dl4GJ1BW0ij8903tMp20CMkdJlyAI07QL9Xq_UGrZ2JIblh6vXogkfrYKH_WOy1uk9w9GAPi8uz1Xb5c3GxOf-1PL1YGCrouGixNhK01bUtmbQN13XbWGtEWRFMpWxt1chWgLBNlSFTcwqVxKKxhte0YfSw-H6vez01A1gDfoy6V9cxPzb-U0E79fLEu53qwo0ihAvG-Kzw9UEhhr9TLlcNLhnoe-0hTElRUtE6sxRn9Msr9CpM0ef6MsVkxWbF_1Sne1DOtyFfbGZRdVqX-XcIK0Wmjt-g8rYwOBM8tC7HXySc3CfM3U4R2qciCVbzrKhXs5IzPj_vzRP_OBn0Fok8u9Y</recordid><startdate>20241213</startdate><enddate>20241213</enddate><creator>Petelin, Lara</creator><creator>Cunich, Michelle</creator><creator>Procopio, Pietro</creator><creator>Schofield, Deborah</creator><creator>Devereux, Lisa</creator><creator>Nickson, Carolyn</creator><creator>James, Paul A</creator><creator>Campbell, Ian G</creator><creator>Trainer, Alison H</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3245-8895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-3265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-5888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-4155</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241213</creationdate><title>Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model</title><author>Petelin, Lara ; Cunich, Michelle ; Procopio, Pietro ; Schofield, Deborah ; Devereux, Lisa ; Nickson, Carolyn ; James, Paul A ; Campbell, Ian G ; Trainer, Alison H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-f0ac9eada8d249db6a8fbddc72510399fd5b9f7e7db5da8c863e5907bdc683b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petelin, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cunich, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Procopio, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schofield, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nickson, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Ian G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trainer, Alison H</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petelin, Lara</au><au>Cunich, Michelle</au><au>Procopio, Pietro</au><au>Schofield, Deborah</au><au>Devereux, Lisa</au><au>Nickson, Carolyn</au><au>James, Paul A</au><au>Campbell, Ian G</au><au>Trainer, Alison H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-12-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4165</spage><pages>4165-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer largely rely on the identification and clinical management of individuals with a pathogenic variant prior to developing cancer. Simulation modelling is commonly utilised to evaluate genetic testing strategies due to its ability to synthesise collections of data and extrapolate over long time periods and large populations. Existing genetic testing simulation models use simplifying assumptions for predictive genetic testing and risk management uptake, which could impact the reliability of their estimates. Our objective was to develop a microsimulation model that accurately reflects current genetic testing and subsequent care in Australia, directly incorporating the dynamic nature of predictive genetic testing within families and adherence to cancer risk management recommendations. The populatioN gEnEtic testing MOdel (NEEMO) is a population-level microsimulation that incorporates a detailed simulation of individuals linked within five-generation family units. The genetic component includes heritable high- and moderate-risk monogenic gene variants, as well as polygenic risk. Interventions include clinical genetic services, breast screening, and risk-reducing surgery. Model validation is described, and then to illustrate a practical application, NEEMO was used to compare clinical outcomes for four genetic testing scenarios in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) and their relatives: (1) no genetic testing, (2) current practice, (3) optimised referral for genetic testing, and (4) genetic testing for all BC. NEEMO accurately estimated genetic testing utilisation according to current practice and associated cancer incidence, pathology, and survival. Predictive testing uptake in first- and second-degree relatives was consistent with known prospective genetic testing data. Optimised genetic referral and expanded testing prevented up to 9.3% of BC and 4.1% of ovarian cancers in relatives of patients with BC. Expanding genetic testing eligibility to all BC patients did not lead to improvement in life-years saved in at-risk relatives compared to optimised referral of patients eligible for testing under current criteria. NEEMO is an adaptable and validated microsimulation model for evaluating genetic testing strategies. It captures the real-world uptake of clinical and predictive genetic testing and recommended cancer risk management, which are important considerations when considering real-world clinical and cost-effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39766065</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers16244165</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3245-8895</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9847-3265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-5888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-4155</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2024-12, Vol.16 (24), p.4165
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11674464
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Age
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer screening
Comparative analysis
Cost analysis
Diagnosis
Disease management
Estimates
Families & family life
Genes
Genetic screening
Genetic testing
Genetics
Mammography
Mastectomy
Medical screening
Medical tests
Mortality
Natural history
Oncology, Experimental
Ovarian cancer
Population genetics
Population studies
Simulation
Womens health
title Reduced Breast and Ovarian Cancer Through Targeted Genetic Testing: Estimates Using the NEEMO Microsimulation Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T23%3A24%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduced%20Breast%20and%20Ovarian%20Cancer%20Through%20Targeted%20Genetic%20Testing:%20Estimates%20Using%20the%20NEEMO%20Microsimulation%20Model&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Petelin,%20Lara&rft.date=2024-12-13&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4165&rft.pages=4165-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers16244165&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA821761427%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3149547446&rft_id=info:pmid/39766065&rft_galeid=A821761427&rfr_iscdi=true