Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions

Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through bounda...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ambio 2025-02, Vol.54 (2), p.285-304
Hauptverfasser: Adem Esmail, Blal, Anderson, Cyrus Carl, Bast, Sigvard, Cortinovis, Chiara, Suleiman, Lina, Kato-Huerta, Jarumi, Högström, Johan, Balfors, Berit, Arciniegas, Gustavo, Geneletti, Davide, Mörtberg, Ulla, Albert, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 304
container_issue 2
container_start_page 285
container_title Ambio
container_volume 54
creator Adem Esmail, Blal
Anderson, Cyrus Carl
Bast, Sigvard
Cortinovis, Chiara
Suleiman, Lina
Kato-Huerta, Jarumi
Högström, Johan
Balfors, Berit
Arciniegas, Gustavo
Geneletti, Davide
Mörtberg, Ulla
Albert, Christian
description Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11662133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3118471929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5cbdf50c484674d931f5a9957db64f11b4258a6727d1e3824c622a8d8dd792303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOJCEUhsnEydi28wIuDIkbN6XcCig3pmO8JSazmHFNKKDa0mpoodD49tK2423hggA53_nP5QdgB6MDjJA4TJgSiSpEWDlI0kr-ABPMa1YJgpoNMEGIlTdjYhNspXSLEOKU0l9gkzaM1JKjCRjOXbAu9XMPxwC1fdDeONiG7K2OT_AxxDvYe5hjqz1cDtr73s-P4AymMdunVejvGMzdTRgWsAsmJ2dh8NDrMUdXtXr1T2HIYx982gY_Oz0k9_v1noLrs9N_JxfV1Z_zy5PZVWVozceqNq3tamSYZFww21Dc1bppamFbzjqM21XzmgsiLHZUEmY4IVpaaa1oCEV0Co7XusvcLpw1zo9RD2oZ-0UZSgXdq88R39-oeXhQGHNOcNnRFOy_KsRwn10a1aJPxg1lAS7kpCjGkgnckKage1_Q25CjL_MViolaYk5JociaMjGkFF331g1GauWmWrupipvqxU0lS9LuxzneUv7bVwC6BlIJ-bmL77W_kX0GM6GrVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3147581632</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Adem Esmail, Blal ; Anderson, Cyrus Carl ; Bast, Sigvard ; Cortinovis, Chiara ; Suleiman, Lina ; Kato-Huerta, Jarumi ; Högström, Johan ; Balfors, Berit ; Arciniegas, Gustavo ; Geneletti, Davide ; Mörtberg, Ulla ; Albert, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Adem Esmail, Blal ; Anderson, Cyrus Carl ; Bast, Sigvard ; Cortinovis, Chiara ; Suleiman, Lina ; Kato-Huerta, Jarumi ; Högström, Johan ; Balfors, Berit ; Arciniegas, Gustavo ; Geneletti, Davide ; Mörtberg, Ulla ; Albert, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-7447</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1654-7209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39425860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Sciences ; Case studies ; Cities ; City Planning - methods ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Credibility ; Data quality ; Decision Making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Environmental Management ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Knowledge management ; Legitimacy ; Physical Geography ; Production ; Research Article ; Sweden ; Urban planning ; Urban studies</subject><ispartof>Ambio, 2025-02, Vol.54 (2), p.285-304</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Feb 2025</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5cbdf50c484674d931f5a9957db64f11b4258a6727d1e3824c622a8d8dd792303</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1377-565X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27865,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39425860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adem Esmail, Blal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Cyrus Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bast, Sigvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortinovis, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suleiman, Lina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato-Huerta, Jarumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Högström, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balfors, Berit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciniegas, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geneletti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mörtberg, Ulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions</title><title>Ambio</title><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><description>Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.</description><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>City Planning - methods</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sweden</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urban studies</subject><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctOJCEUhsnEydi28wIuDIkbN6XcCig3pmO8JSazmHFNKKDa0mpoodD49tK2423hggA53_nP5QdgB6MDjJA4TJgSiSpEWDlI0kr-ABPMa1YJgpoNMEGIlTdjYhNspXSLEOKU0l9gkzaM1JKjCRjOXbAu9XMPxwC1fdDeONiG7K2OT_AxxDvYe5hjqz1cDtr73s-P4AymMdunVejvGMzdTRgWsAsmJ2dh8NDrMUdXtXr1T2HIYx982gY_Oz0k9_v1noLrs9N_JxfV1Z_zy5PZVWVozceqNq3tamSYZFww21Dc1bppamFbzjqM21XzmgsiLHZUEmY4IVpaaa1oCEV0Co7XusvcLpw1zo9RD2oZ-0UZSgXdq88R39-oeXhQGHNOcNnRFOy_KsRwn10a1aJPxg1lAS7kpCjGkgnckKage1_Q25CjL_MViolaYk5JociaMjGkFF331g1GauWmWrupipvqxU0lS9LuxzneUv7bVwC6BlIJ-bmL77W_kX0GM6GrVg</recordid><startdate>202502</startdate><enddate>202502</enddate><creator>Adem Esmail, Blal</creator><creator>Anderson, Cyrus Carl</creator><creator>Bast, Sigvard</creator><creator>Cortinovis, Chiara</creator><creator>Suleiman, Lina</creator><creator>Kato-Huerta, Jarumi</creator><creator>Högström, Johan</creator><creator>Balfors, Berit</creator><creator>Arciniegas, Gustavo</creator><creator>Geneletti, Davide</creator><creator>Mörtberg, Ulla</creator><creator>Albert, Christian</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-565X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202502</creationdate><title>Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions</title><author>Adem Esmail, Blal ; Anderson, Cyrus Carl ; Bast, Sigvard ; Cortinovis, Chiara ; Suleiman, Lina ; Kato-Huerta, Jarumi ; Högström, Johan ; Balfors, Berit ; Arciniegas, Gustavo ; Geneletti, Davide ; Mörtberg, Ulla ; Albert, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5cbdf50c484674d931f5a9957db64f11b4258a6727d1e3824c622a8d8dd792303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>City Planning - methods</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sweden</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urban studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adem Esmail, Blal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Cyrus Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bast, Sigvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortinovis, Chiara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suleiman, Lina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato-Huerta, Jarumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Högström, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balfors, Berit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arciniegas, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geneletti, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mörtberg, Ulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albert, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adem Esmail, Blal</au><au>Anderson, Cyrus Carl</au><au>Bast, Sigvard</au><au>Cortinovis, Chiara</au><au>Suleiman, Lina</au><au>Kato-Huerta, Jarumi</au><au>Högström, Johan</au><au>Balfors, Berit</au><au>Arciniegas, Gustavo</au><au>Geneletti, Davide</au><au>Mörtberg, Ulla</au><au>Albert, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions</atitle><jtitle>Ambio</jtitle><stitle>Ambio</stitle><addtitle>Ambio</addtitle><date>2025-02</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>285-304</pages><issn>0044-7447</issn><issn>1654-7209</issn><eissn>1654-7209</eissn><abstract>Geodesign supports collaborative urban planning by managing ‘boundaries’ between diverse knowledge holders. However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence of its contribution to ‘boundary work’. This paper aims to evaluate how a geodesign process facilitates knowledge co-production through boundary work and to assess the scientific credibility, political saliency, and procedural legitimacy of its outputs in urban planning. We propose a replicable geodesign framework to assess boundary work, and test it in a case study on urban transformations with nature-based solutions in the Skarpnäck district of Stockholm, Sweden. Findings indicate that all geodesign steps facilitated communication by promoting collective reasoning. Participants acknowledged contributions to knowledge co-production and decision-making by mediating between different perspectives. However, data quality and modeling simplicity were identified as critical factors affecting the outputs’ perceived credibility. Future applications should include co-designing the geodesign process, improving capacity and skills, and facilitating more integrated planning.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>39425860</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-565X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-7447
ispartof Ambio, 2025-02, Vol.54 (2), p.285-304
issn 0044-7447
1654-7209
1654-7209
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11662133
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Atmospheric Sciences
Case studies
Cities
City Planning - methods
Conservation of Natural Resources - methods
Credibility
Data quality
Decision Making
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Environment
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Environmental Management
Humans
Knowledge
Knowledge management
Legitimacy
Physical Geography
Production
Research Article
Sweden
Urban planning
Urban studies
title Geodesign to advance boundary work in urban planning: A study in Stockholm focused on nature-based solutions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A39%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geodesign%20to%20advance%20boundary%20work%20in%20urban%20planning:%20A%20study%20in%20Stockholm%20focused%20on%20nature-based%20solutions&rft.jtitle=Ambio&rft.au=Adem%20Esmail,%20Blal&rft.date=2025-02&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=285-304&rft.issn=0044-7447&rft.eissn=1654-7209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13280-024-02083-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3118471929%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3147581632&rft_id=info:pmid/39425860&rfr_iscdi=true