Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real‐world, propensity‐matched analysis

Introduction Real‐world studies comparing safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) to LAAO alone are limited. Methods Patients from a large US hospital system undergoing combined LAAO and left‐atrial CA from 8/2020 to 2/2024 were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2024-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2423-2431
Hauptverfasser: Preisendörfer, Stefan, Ayub, Muhammad T., Sheth, Aakash, Jabbour, George Y., Singh, Madhurmeet, Patel, Chinmay P., Gada, Hemal, Bhonsale, Aditya, Dhande, Mehak, Estes, Nathan A., Kancharla, Krishna, Kliner, Dustin E., Makani, Amber, Naniwadekar, Aditi, Shalaby, Alaa, Singla, Virginia, Voigt, Andrew, Saba, Samir F., Jain, Sandeep K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2431
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2423
container_title Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
container_volume 35
creator Preisendörfer, Stefan
Ayub, Muhammad T.
Sheth, Aakash
Jabbour, George Y.
Singh, Madhurmeet
Patel, Chinmay P.
Gada, Hemal
Bhonsale, Aditya
Dhande, Mehak
Estes, Nathan A.
Kancharla, Krishna
Kliner, Dustin E.
Makani, Amber
Naniwadekar, Aditi
Shalaby, Alaa
Singla, Virginia
Voigt, Andrew
Saba, Samir F.
Jain, Sandeep K.
description Introduction Real‐world studies comparing safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) to LAAO alone are limited. Methods Patients from a large US hospital system undergoing combined LAAO and left‐atrial CA from 8/2020 to 2/2024 were retrospectively analyzed and compared to a control group undergoing LAAO alone. Controls were identified using a 1:2 propensity score match based on LAAO device type (Watchman FLX vs. Amulet), CHA2D2‐VASc and Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio [INR], Elderly, Drugs/alcohol (HAS‐BLED) scores and compared for safety, sealing performance and clinical outcomes at 6 months. Results Patients were younger in the combined (n = 72) than in the control group (n = 144, 70.2 ± 7.3 vs. 76.7 ± 6.9 years, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jce.16466
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11650415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3117074245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-35e2c844bd78bf681a7482d7ab36d1e38085398899fe1670ac9326169b6e183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhSMEoqWw4AVQJDZUIq197ThON6i6Kn-qxAL21sSZNL5y4mA7VNnxCJV4Q54Eh1sqioQ3tsafzxzPybLnlJzQtE53Gk-o4EI8yA5pyUkhqagepjPhZcFkxQ6yJyHsCKFMkPJxdsBqTipO68Psx9YNjRmxzS12MYfoDdgcpgnHFq4wd1rbORg35jC2uYbYY0SfQ2MhrtXJO43t7DHvnL-v4X2_xH4wEM7y89wj2J_fb66dt-3r9VnqEExcUm2AqPvkAEawSzDhafaoAxvw2e1-lH1-e_Fl-764_PTuw_b8stCMcVGwEjdact60lWw6ISlUXG7aChomWopMElmyWsq67jDNg4Cu2UZQUTcCqWRH2Zu96jQ3A7Yax-jBqsmbAfyiHBh1_2Y0vbpy3xSloiSclknh1a2Cd19nDFENJmi0FkZ0c1CM0iqNecNX9OU_6M7NPv13pXhZkppWK3W8p7R3IXjs7txQotakVUpa_U46sS_-tn9H_ok2Aad74NpYXP6vpD5uL_aSvwDi1bcc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3145509175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real‐world, propensity‐matched analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Preisendörfer, Stefan ; Ayub, Muhammad T. ; Sheth, Aakash ; Jabbour, George Y. ; Singh, Madhurmeet ; Patel, Chinmay P. ; Gada, Hemal ; Bhonsale, Aditya ; Dhande, Mehak ; Estes, Nathan A. ; Kancharla, Krishna ; Kliner, Dustin E. ; Makani, Amber ; Naniwadekar, Aditi ; Shalaby, Alaa ; Singla, Virginia ; Voigt, Andrew ; Saba, Samir F. ; Jain, Sandeep K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Preisendörfer, Stefan ; Ayub, Muhammad T. ; Sheth, Aakash ; Jabbour, George Y. ; Singh, Madhurmeet ; Patel, Chinmay P. ; Gada, Hemal ; Bhonsale, Aditya ; Dhande, Mehak ; Estes, Nathan A. ; Kancharla, Krishna ; Kliner, Dustin E. ; Makani, Amber ; Naniwadekar, Aditi ; Shalaby, Alaa ; Singla, Virginia ; Voigt, Andrew ; Saba, Samir F. ; Jain, Sandeep K.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Real‐world studies comparing safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) to LAAO alone are limited. Methods Patients from a large US hospital system undergoing combined LAAO and left‐atrial CA from 8/2020 to 2/2024 were retrospectively analyzed and compared to a control group undergoing LAAO alone. Controls were identified using a 1:2 propensity score match based on LAAO device type (Watchman FLX vs. Amulet), CHA2D2‐VASc and Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio [INR], Elderly, Drugs/alcohol (HAS‐BLED) scores and compared for safety, sealing performance and clinical outcomes at 6 months. Results Patients were younger in the combined (n = 72) than in the control group (n = 144, 70.2 ± 7.3 vs. 76.7 ± 6.9 years, p &lt; 0.001) but otherwise comparable with a mean CHA2D2‐VASc score of 4.2 ± 1.1 and 4.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.26) and HAS‐BLED score of 2.2 ± 0.8 and 2.3 ± 0.7 (p = 0.34). Successful LAAO implantation rates were the same (95.8% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.99) with longer procedure times seen in the combined group (156.5 ± 53 vs. 56 ± 26 min, p &lt; 0.001). Both major (1.4% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.72) and minor (27.8% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.17) in‐hospital complications were similar between the combined and control group, respectively. At 45 days, presence of peri‐device leak (18.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.07) and device related thrombosis (4.5% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.96) on transesophageal echocardiogram did not differ. Finally, all‐cause mortality (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.99), thromboembolic (0% vs. 0%, p = 0.99) and bleeding (6.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.73) events during follow‐up were comparable. Conclusion This large, real‐world analysis indicates comparable safety and efficiency of combined LAAO and CA when compared with LAAO alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-3873</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jce.16466</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39407419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Action Potentials ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arrhythmia ; Atrial Appendage - physiopathology ; Atrial Appendage - surgery ; atrial fibrillation ; Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis ; Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology ; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery ; Atrial Function, Left ; Bleeding ; Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects ; Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation ; catheter ablation ; Catheter Ablation - adverse effects ; Catheters ; Combined Modality Therapy ; combined procedure ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Heart Rate ; Humans ; left atrial appendage occlusion ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occlusion ; Original ; Patients ; Propensity Score ; pulmonary vein isolation ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Renal function ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Thromboembolism ; Thrombosis ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2024-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2423-2431</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-35e2c844bd78bf681a7482d7ab36d1e38085398899fe1670ac9326169b6e183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5815-370X ; 0000-0002-5461-7247 ; 0000-0003-4669-803X ; 0000-0002-2000-7678 ; 0000-0003-2320-5175</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjce.16466$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjce.16466$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39407419$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Preisendörfer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayub, Muhammad T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Aakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabbour, George Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Madhurmeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Chinmay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gada, Hemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhonsale, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhande, Mehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, Nathan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kancharla, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kliner, Dustin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makani, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naniwadekar, Aditi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singla, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saba, Samir F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep K.</creatorcontrib><title>Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real‐world, propensity‐matched analysis</title><title>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Introduction Real‐world studies comparing safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) to LAAO alone are limited. Methods Patients from a large US hospital system undergoing combined LAAO and left‐atrial CA from 8/2020 to 2/2024 were retrospectively analyzed and compared to a control group undergoing LAAO alone. Controls were identified using a 1:2 propensity score match based on LAAO device type (Watchman FLX vs. Amulet), CHA2D2‐VASc and Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio [INR], Elderly, Drugs/alcohol (HAS‐BLED) scores and compared for safety, sealing performance and clinical outcomes at 6 months. Results Patients were younger in the combined (n = 72) than in the control group (n = 144, 70.2 ± 7.3 vs. 76.7 ± 6.9 years, p &lt; 0.001) but otherwise comparable with a mean CHA2D2‐VASc score of 4.2 ± 1.1 and 4.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.26) and HAS‐BLED score of 2.2 ± 0.8 and 2.3 ± 0.7 (p = 0.34). Successful LAAO implantation rates were the same (95.8% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.99) with longer procedure times seen in the combined group (156.5 ± 53 vs. 56 ± 26 min, p &lt; 0.001). Both major (1.4% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.72) and minor (27.8% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.17) in‐hospital complications were similar between the combined and control group, respectively. At 45 days, presence of peri‐device leak (18.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.07) and device related thrombosis (4.5% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.96) on transesophageal echocardiogram did not differ. Finally, all‐cause mortality (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.99), thromboembolic (0% vs. 0%, p = 0.99) and bleeding (6.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.73) events during follow‐up were comparable. Conclusion This large, real‐world analysis indicates comparable safety and efficiency of combined LAAO and CA when compared with LAAO alone.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arrhythmia</subject><subject>Atrial Appendage - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Appendage - surgery</subject><subject>atrial fibrillation</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</subject><subject>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</subject><subject>Atrial Function, Left</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>catheter ablation</subject><subject>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>combined procedure</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>left atrial appendage occlusion</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>pulmonary vein isolation</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Renal function</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhSMEoqWw4AVQJDZUIq197ThON6i6Kn-qxAL21sSZNL5y4mA7VNnxCJV4Q54Eh1sqioQ3tsafzxzPybLnlJzQtE53Gk-o4EI8yA5pyUkhqagepjPhZcFkxQ6yJyHsCKFMkPJxdsBqTipO68Psx9YNjRmxzS12MYfoDdgcpgnHFq4wd1rbORg35jC2uYbYY0SfQ2MhrtXJO43t7DHvnL-v4X2_xH4wEM7y89wj2J_fb66dt-3r9VnqEExcUm2AqPvkAEawSzDhafaoAxvw2e1-lH1-e_Fl-764_PTuw_b8stCMcVGwEjdact60lWw6ISlUXG7aChomWopMElmyWsq67jDNg4Cu2UZQUTcCqWRH2Zu96jQ3A7Yax-jBqsmbAfyiHBh1_2Y0vbpy3xSloiSclknh1a2Cd19nDFENJmi0FkZ0c1CM0iqNecNX9OU_6M7NPv13pXhZkppWK3W8p7R3IXjs7txQotakVUpa_U46sS_-tn9H_ok2Aad74NpYXP6vpD5uL_aSvwDi1bcc</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Preisendörfer, Stefan</creator><creator>Ayub, Muhammad T.</creator><creator>Sheth, Aakash</creator><creator>Jabbour, George Y.</creator><creator>Singh, Madhurmeet</creator><creator>Patel, Chinmay P.</creator><creator>Gada, Hemal</creator><creator>Bhonsale, Aditya</creator><creator>Dhande, Mehak</creator><creator>Estes, Nathan A.</creator><creator>Kancharla, Krishna</creator><creator>Kliner, Dustin E.</creator><creator>Makani, Amber</creator><creator>Naniwadekar, Aditi</creator><creator>Shalaby, Alaa</creator><creator>Singla, Virginia</creator><creator>Voigt, Andrew</creator><creator>Saba, Samir F.</creator><creator>Jain, Sandeep K.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-370X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-7247</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-803X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2320-5175</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real‐world, propensity‐matched analysis</title><author>Preisendörfer, Stefan ; Ayub, Muhammad T. ; Sheth, Aakash ; Jabbour, George Y. ; Singh, Madhurmeet ; Patel, Chinmay P. ; Gada, Hemal ; Bhonsale, Aditya ; Dhande, Mehak ; Estes, Nathan A. ; Kancharla, Krishna ; Kliner, Dustin E. ; Makani, Amber ; Naniwadekar, Aditi ; Shalaby, Alaa ; Singla, Virginia ; Voigt, Andrew ; Saba, Samir F. ; Jain, Sandeep K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3346-35e2c844bd78bf681a7482d7ab36d1e38085398899fe1670ac9326169b6e183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arrhythmia</topic><topic>Atrial Appendage - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Appendage - surgery</topic><topic>atrial fibrillation</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology</topic><topic>Atrial Fibrillation - surgery</topic><topic>Atrial Function, Left</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>catheter ablation</topic><topic>Catheter Ablation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>combined procedure</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>left atrial appendage occlusion</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>pulmonary vein isolation</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Renal function</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Preisendörfer, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayub, Muhammad T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheth, Aakash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabbour, George Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Madhurmeet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Chinmay P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gada, Hemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhonsale, Aditya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhande, Mehak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estes, Nathan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kancharla, Krishna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kliner, Dustin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makani, Amber</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naniwadekar, Aditi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalaby, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singla, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saba, Samir F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Sandeep K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Preisendörfer, Stefan</au><au>Ayub, Muhammad T.</au><au>Sheth, Aakash</au><au>Jabbour, George Y.</au><au>Singh, Madhurmeet</au><au>Patel, Chinmay P.</au><au>Gada, Hemal</au><au>Bhonsale, Aditya</au><au>Dhande, Mehak</au><au>Estes, Nathan A.</au><au>Kancharla, Krishna</au><au>Kliner, Dustin E.</au><au>Makani, Amber</au><au>Naniwadekar, Aditi</au><au>Shalaby, Alaa</au><au>Singla, Virginia</au><au>Voigt, Andrew</au><au>Saba, Samir F.</au><au>Jain, Sandeep K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real‐world, propensity‐matched analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2423</spage><epage>2431</epage><pages>2423-2431</pages><issn>1045-3873</issn><issn>1540-8167</issn><eissn>1540-8167</eissn><abstract>Introduction Real‐world studies comparing safety and efficacy of combined percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) and catheter ablation (CA) to LAAO alone are limited. Methods Patients from a large US hospital system undergoing combined LAAO and left‐atrial CA from 8/2020 to 2/2024 were retrospectively analyzed and compared to a control group undergoing LAAO alone. Controls were identified using a 1:2 propensity score match based on LAAO device type (Watchman FLX vs. Amulet), CHA2D2‐VASc and Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio [INR], Elderly, Drugs/alcohol (HAS‐BLED) scores and compared for safety, sealing performance and clinical outcomes at 6 months. Results Patients were younger in the combined (n = 72) than in the control group (n = 144, 70.2 ± 7.3 vs. 76.7 ± 6.9 years, p &lt; 0.001) but otherwise comparable with a mean CHA2D2‐VASc score of 4.2 ± 1.1 and 4.4 ± 1.2 (p = 0.26) and HAS‐BLED score of 2.2 ± 0.8 and 2.3 ± 0.7 (p = 0.34). Successful LAAO implantation rates were the same (95.8% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.99) with longer procedure times seen in the combined group (156.5 ± 53 vs. 56 ± 26 min, p &lt; 0.001). Both major (1.4% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.72) and minor (27.8% vs. 19.4%, p = 0.17) in‐hospital complications were similar between the combined and control group, respectively. At 45 days, presence of peri‐device leak (18.3% vs. 30.4%, p = 0.07) and device related thrombosis (4.5% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.96) on transesophageal echocardiogram did not differ. Finally, all‐cause mortality (0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.99), thromboembolic (0% vs. 0%, p = 0.99) and bleeding (6.1% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.73) events during follow‐up were comparable. Conclusion This large, real‐world analysis indicates comparable safety and efficiency of combined LAAO and CA when compared with LAAO alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39407419</pmid><doi>10.1111/jce.16466</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5815-370X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-7247</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-803X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2000-7678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2320-5175</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-3873
ispartof Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2024-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2423-2431
issn 1045-3873
1540-8167
1540-8167
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11650415
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Ablation
Action Potentials
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arrhythmia
Atrial Appendage - physiopathology
Atrial Appendage - surgery
atrial fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation - diagnosis
Atrial Fibrillation - physiopathology
Atrial Fibrillation - surgery
Atrial Function, Left
Bleeding
Cardiac Catheterization - adverse effects
Cardiac Catheterization - instrumentation
catheter ablation
Catheter Ablation - adverse effects
Catheters
Combined Modality Therapy
combined procedure
Echocardiography
Female
Heart Rate
Humans
left atrial appendage occlusion
Male
Middle Aged
Occlusion
Original
Patients
Propensity Score
pulmonary vein isolation
Radiofrequency ablation
Renal function
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Thromboembolism
Thrombosis
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Combined left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation procedure for left atrial arrhythmias: A real‐world, propensity‐matched analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A41%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combined%20left%20atrial%20appendage%20occlusion%20and%20catheter%20ablation%20procedure%20for%20left%20atrial%20arrhythmias:%20A%20real%E2%80%90world,%20propensity%E2%80%90matched%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiovascular%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Preisend%C3%B6rfer,%20Stefan&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2423&rft.epage=2431&rft.pages=2423-2431&rft.issn=1045-3873&rft.eissn=1540-8167&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jce.16466&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3117074245%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3145509175&rft_id=info:pmid/39407419&rfr_iscdi=true