Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study

To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare 2024-12, Vol.17, p.5927-5939
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Ying, Xia, Jianlei, Huo, Wenting, Liu, Bangjie, Wang, Zhangyu, Ding, Yanbing, Wu, Keyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5939
container_issue
container_start_page 5927
container_title Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare
container_volume 17
creator Liang, Ying
Xia, Jianlei
Huo, Wenting
Liu, Bangjie
Wang, Zhangyu
Ding, Yanbing
Wu, Keyan
description To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown. A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms. In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool. A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload. This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili. By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.
doi_str_mv 10.2147/JMDH.S485781
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11646458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39678716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p798-f2214023ce9bbec42db9cea31cfdc1e8f4eb1e04b03eaa9da69ec7a80b56200f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF9LwzAUxYMobk7ffJZ8gc6k7ZrUF5mbbspEdMXXcpPebnFdM5p22G9v8R_6cLgXDucH5xByztnQ56G4fHiczofLUI6E5Aekz7mQnh_E7PDP3yMnzr0xFklfimPSC-JISMGjPtm_mgwtfW6gMHVLx86hc1ssawplRsclFK0zjtqczsDVlUVnd2tYIRT0BfOieadT4xAcUlvSxGwSu_lM3pjCqE5XdFJZ57wl6trYDkeXdZO1p-Qoh8Lh2fcdkOTuNpnMvcXT7H4yXng7EUsv97uGzA80xkqhDv1MxRoh4DrPNEeZh6g4slCxAAHiDKIYtQDJ1CjyGcuDAbn-wu4atcVMd70qKNJdZbZQtakFk_53SrNOV3afch6FUTiSHeHiL-E3-rNg8AF9ynbc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Dove Press Free</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liang, Ying ; Xia, Jianlei ; Huo, Wenting ; Liu, Bangjie ; Wang, Zhangyu ; Ding, Yanbing ; Wu, Keyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ying ; Xia, Jianlei ; Huo, Wenting ; Liu, Bangjie ; Wang, Zhangyu ; Ding, Yanbing ; Wu, Keyan</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown. A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms. In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool. A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload. This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili. By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-2390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-2390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S485781</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39678716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024-12, Vol.17, p.5927-5939</ispartof><rights>2024 Liang et al.</rights><rights>2024 Liang et al. 2024 Liang et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0009-0001-6741-2590 ; 0000-0003-1635-9862</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646458/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646458/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39678716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Keyan</creatorcontrib><title>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</title><title>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare</title><addtitle>J Multidiscip Healthc</addtitle><description>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown. A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms. In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool. A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload. This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili. By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>1178-2390</issn><issn>1178-2390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF9LwzAUxYMobk7ffJZ8gc6k7ZrUF5mbbspEdMXXcpPebnFdM5p22G9v8R_6cLgXDucH5xByztnQ56G4fHiczofLUI6E5Aekz7mQnh_E7PDP3yMnzr0xFklfimPSC-JISMGjPtm_mgwtfW6gMHVLx86hc1ssawplRsclFK0zjtqczsDVlUVnd2tYIRT0BfOieadT4xAcUlvSxGwSu_lM3pjCqE5XdFJZ57wl6trYDkeXdZO1p-Qoh8Lh2fcdkOTuNpnMvcXT7H4yXng7EUsv97uGzA80xkqhDv1MxRoh4DrPNEeZh6g4slCxAAHiDKIYtQDJ1CjyGcuDAbn-wu4atcVMd70qKNJdZbZQtakFk_53SrNOV3afch6FUTiSHeHiL-E3-rNg8AF9ynbc</recordid><startdate>20241211</startdate><enddate>20241211</enddate><creator>Liang, Ying</creator><creator>Xia, Jianlei</creator><creator>Huo, Wenting</creator><creator>Liu, Bangjie</creator><creator>Wang, Zhangyu</creator><creator>Ding, Yanbing</creator><creator>Wu, Keyan</creator><general>Dove</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6741-2590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9862</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241211</creationdate><title>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</title><author>Liang, Ying ; Xia, Jianlei ; Huo, Wenting ; Liu, Bangjie ; Wang, Zhangyu ; Ding, Yanbing ; Wu, Keyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p798-f2214023ce9bbec42db9cea31cfdc1e8f4eb1e04b03eaa9da69ec7a80b56200f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Keyan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Ying</au><au>Xia, Jianlei</au><au>Huo, Wenting</au><au>Liu, Bangjie</au><au>Wang, Zhangyu</au><au>Ding, Yanbing</au><au>Wu, Keyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare</jtitle><addtitle>J Multidiscip Healthc</addtitle><date>2024-12-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><spage>5927</spage><epage>5939</epage><pages>5927-5939</pages><issn>1178-2390</issn><eissn>1178-2390</eissn><abstract>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown. A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms. In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool. A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload. This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili. By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove</pub><pmid>39678716</pmid><doi>10.2147/JMDH.S485781</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6741-2590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9862</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1178-2390
ispartof Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024-12, Vol.17, p.5927-5939
issn 1178-2390
1178-2390
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11646458
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Dove Press Free; PubMed Central Open Access; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original Research
title Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A08%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Video%20Quality%20Assessment%20and%20Analysis%20of%20Gastroesophageal%20Reflux%20Disease%20on%20TikTok%20and%20Bilibili:%20Cross-Sectional%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multidisciplinary%20healthcare&rft.au=Liang,%20Ying&rft.date=2024-12-11&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=5927&rft.epage=5939&rft.pages=5927-5939&rft.issn=1178-2390&rft.eissn=1178-2390&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/JMDH.S485781&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E39678716%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39678716&rfr_iscdi=true