Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study
To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare 2024-12, Vol.17, p.5927-5939 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5939 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 5927 |
container_title | Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Liang, Ying Xia, Jianlei Huo, Wenting Liu, Bangjie Wang, Zhangyu Ding, Yanbing Wu, Keyan |
description | To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.
A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.
In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.
A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.
This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2147/JMDH.S485781 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11646458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39678716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p798-f2214023ce9bbec42db9cea31cfdc1e8f4eb1e04b03eaa9da69ec7a80b56200f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF9LwzAUxYMobk7ffJZ8gc6k7ZrUF5mbbspEdMXXcpPebnFdM5p22G9v8R_6cLgXDucH5xByztnQ56G4fHiczofLUI6E5Aekz7mQnh_E7PDP3yMnzr0xFklfimPSC-JISMGjPtm_mgwtfW6gMHVLx86hc1ssawplRsclFK0zjtqczsDVlUVnd2tYIRT0BfOieadT4xAcUlvSxGwSu_lM3pjCqE5XdFJZ57wl6trYDkeXdZO1p-Qoh8Lh2fcdkOTuNpnMvcXT7H4yXng7EUsv97uGzA80xkqhDv1MxRoh4DrPNEeZh6g4slCxAAHiDKIYtQDJ1CjyGcuDAbn-wu4atcVMd70qKNJdZbZQtakFk_53SrNOV3afch6FUTiSHeHiL-E3-rNg8AF9ynbc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Dove Press Free</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liang, Ying ; Xia, Jianlei ; Huo, Wenting ; Liu, Bangjie ; Wang, Zhangyu ; Ding, Yanbing ; Wu, Keyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ying ; Xia, Jianlei ; Huo, Wenting ; Liu, Bangjie ; Wang, Zhangyu ; Ding, Yanbing ; Wu, Keyan</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.
A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.
In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.
A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.
This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1178-2390</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1178-2390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S485781</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39678716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Zealand: Dove</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024-12, Vol.17, p.5927-5939</ispartof><rights>2024 Liang et al.</rights><rights>2024 Liang et al. 2024 Liang et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0009-0001-6741-2590 ; 0000-0003-1635-9862</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646458/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646458/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39678716$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Keyan</creatorcontrib><title>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</title><title>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare</title><addtitle>J Multidiscip Healthc</addtitle><description>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.
A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.
In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.
A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.
This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>1178-2390</issn><issn>1178-2390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF9LwzAUxYMobk7ffJZ8gc6k7ZrUF5mbbspEdMXXcpPebnFdM5p22G9v8R_6cLgXDucH5xByztnQ56G4fHiczofLUI6E5Aekz7mQnh_E7PDP3yMnzr0xFklfimPSC-JISMGjPtm_mgwtfW6gMHVLx86hc1ssawplRsclFK0zjtqczsDVlUVnd2tYIRT0BfOieadT4xAcUlvSxGwSu_lM3pjCqE5XdFJZ57wl6trYDkeXdZO1p-Qoh8Lh2fcdkOTuNpnMvcXT7H4yXng7EUsv97uGzA80xkqhDv1MxRoh4DrPNEeZh6g4slCxAAHiDKIYtQDJ1CjyGcuDAbn-wu4atcVMd70qKNJdZbZQtakFk_53SrNOV3afch6FUTiSHeHiL-E3-rNg8AF9ynbc</recordid><startdate>20241211</startdate><enddate>20241211</enddate><creator>Liang, Ying</creator><creator>Xia, Jianlei</creator><creator>Huo, Wenting</creator><creator>Liu, Bangjie</creator><creator>Wang, Zhangyu</creator><creator>Ding, Yanbing</creator><creator>Wu, Keyan</creator><general>Dove</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6741-2590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9862</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241211</creationdate><title>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</title><author>Liang, Ying ; Xia, Jianlei ; Huo, Wenting ; Liu, Bangjie ; Wang, Zhangyu ; Ding, Yanbing ; Wu, Keyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p798-f2214023ce9bbec42db9cea31cfdc1e8f4eb1e04b03eaa9da69ec7a80b56200f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huo, Wenting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Bangjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Yanbing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Keyan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Ying</au><au>Xia, Jianlei</au><au>Huo, Wenting</au><au>Liu, Bangjie</au><au>Wang, Zhangyu</au><au>Ding, Yanbing</au><au>Wu, Keyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare</jtitle><addtitle>J Multidiscip Healthc</addtitle><date>2024-12-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><spage>5927</spage><epage>5939</epage><pages>5927-5939</pages><issn>1178-2390</issn><eissn>1178-2390</eissn><abstract>To assess the content quality and reliability of Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
Since many people with GERD use current online platforms to search for health information, there is a need to assess the quality of GERD videos on social media. There are many GERD videos on TikTok and Bilibili; however, the quality of information in these videos remains unknown.
A cross-sectional survey on two video platforms.
In November 2023, we retrieved 200 videos from TikTok and Bilibili with the search term "GERD." Basic video information was extracted, the content coded, and the video source identified. Two independent raters assessed the quality of each video using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) criteria, and the Global Quality Score (GQS) tool.
A total of 156 videos were collected. Most of the videos on TikTok and Bilibili came from gastroenterologists. TikTok's GERD video quality and reliability were higher than Bilibili's. The mDISCERN and GQS scores of both platforms were positively correlated with duration, and the GQS score was positively correlated with collection and shares. Bilibili's JAMA score was negatively correlated with time-sync comments, and TikTok's JAMA score was negatively correlated with days since upload.
This study indicated that the content quality scores of TikTok and Bilibili as sources of scientific information on GERD are average, and patients should carefully identify and select to watch GERD-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili.
By evaluating the quality of videos on GERD on the two platforms, this can provide new ideas for health education interventions in the clinic and a relevant basis for improving the quality level of the videos.</abstract><cop>New Zealand</cop><pub>Dove</pub><pmid>39678716</pmid><doi>10.2147/JMDH.S485781</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6741-2590</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1635-9862</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1178-2390 |
ispartof | Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024-12, Vol.17, p.5927-5939 |
issn | 1178-2390 1178-2390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11646458 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Dove Press Free; PubMed Central Open Access; Access via Taylor & Francis (Open Access Collection); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original Research |
title | Video Quality Assessment and Analysis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A08%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Video%20Quality%20Assessment%20and%20Analysis%20of%20Gastroesophageal%20Reflux%20Disease%20on%20TikTok%20and%20Bilibili:%20Cross-Sectional%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20multidisciplinary%20healthcare&rft.au=Liang,%20Ying&rft.date=2024-12-11&rft.volume=17&rft.spage=5927&rft.epage=5939&rft.pages=5927-5939&rft.issn=1178-2390&rft.eissn=1178-2390&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147/JMDH.S485781&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed%3E39678716%3C/pubmed%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39678716&rfr_iscdi=true |