Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery

Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery

To evaluate the potential advantages of combined general and epidural anesthesia for major gynecological oncological surgeries. The data of 690 gynecological cancer were retrospectively examined, and 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The patients were divided in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology 2024-12, Vol.21 (4), p.227-234
Hauptverfasser: Mehmet, İrfan, Kaya Uğur, Berna, Çetin, Furkan, Taşkum, İbrahim, Cesur, Mehmet, Ganidağlı, Süleyman, Uğur, Mete Gürol
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Clinical Investigation
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 234
container_issue 4
container_start_page 227
container_title Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology
container_volume 21
creator Mehmet, İrfan
Kaya Uğur, Berna
Çetin, Furkan
Taşkum, İbrahim
Cesur, Mehmet
Ganidağlı, Süleyman
Uğur, Mete Gürol
description To evaluate the potential advantages of combined general and epidural anesthesia for major gynecological oncological surgeries. The data of 690 gynecological cancer were retrospectively examined, and 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group G (123 patients who received general anesthesia only) and Group C (100 patients who received combined epidural and general anesthesia. The perioperative follow-up data were comparatively analyzed. Operation times in Group G were significantly lower than those in Group C (p=0.018). The blood product replacement rate was higher in Group G (p
doi_str_mv 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.22623
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11635725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3146653411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2093-95bb8a8292c5383e43c02624629b06f9c4edfecad6b69233ae4ced00240c26ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUcFu3CAQRVWiJNrsL6Q-5uItDBgvpyhaJW2lSL20Z4Tx2CGyYQPrSPsZ_ePi7nbT9sSDefOYN4-Qj4yuBNTi0-4ltKveDOhDWgEFsQKQwD-QK2BClYpzenbCAJdkmdILpZSt61oxuCCXXEnJ60pdkZ-bMG5NdCn4InTF7hkL7Dq0u_nWo8dohsJ4TLmSnMmwLWwYG-exLXDr2uk_QtaZRY4vO2eL0XjT44j-oLn3aMMQemdzY_DvOE2xx7i_JuedGRIuj-eC_Hh8-L75Uj59-_x1c_9UWqCKl6pqmrVZgwJb8TVHwS3NWxASVENlp6zANvswrWykAs4NCostzduiFqRp-ILcHXS3UzNia_N82YreRjeauNfBOP1vxbtn3Yc3zZjkVQ1VVrg9KsTwOmW_enTJ4jBk82FKmjMhZcUFY5laH6g2hpQidqd_GNVzqHoOVR9D1XOo-neoufPm7zFPfX8i5L8APRmmLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146653411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mehmet, İrfan ; Kaya Uğur, Berna ; Çetin, Furkan ; Taşkum, İbrahim ; Cesur, Mehmet ; Ganidağlı, Süleyman ; Uğur, Mete Gürol</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehmet, İrfan ; Kaya Uğur, Berna ; Çetin, Furkan ; Taşkum, İbrahim ; Cesur, Mehmet ; Ganidağlı, Süleyman ; Uğur, Mete Gürol</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the potential advantages of combined general and epidural anesthesia for major gynecological oncological surgeries. The data of 690 gynecological cancer were retrospectively examined, and 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group G (123 patients who received general anesthesia only) and Group C (100 patients who received combined epidural and general anesthesia. The perioperative follow-up data were comparatively analyzed. Operation times in Group G were significantly lower than those in Group C (p=0.018). The blood product replacement rate was higher in Group G (p&lt;0.05). Additionally, intraoperative bleeding rates were lower in Group C (p&lt;0.05). Postoperatively, the analgesic requirement time of Group C was significantly later than that of Group G (p=0.0001). The first mobilization time of Group C was substantially earlier (p=0.0001). Thrombosis and cardiac complications were considerably less frequent in group C, although allergic complications were more common (p&lt;0.05). The length of hospital stay was shorter in Group C (p&lt;0.05). Combined epidural and general anesthesia in gynecological oncological surgeries may improve postoperative outcomes, including reduced analgesic requirements, earlier patient mobilization, shorter hospitalization, and decreased rates of complications, particularly cardiovascular and thrombotic events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2149-9322</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1307-699X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2149-9330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.22623</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39663759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Galenos Publishing</publisher><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><ispartof>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 2024-12, Vol.21 (4), p.227-234</ispartof><rights>Copyright© 2024 The Author. Published by Galenos Publishing House on behalf of Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright© The Author. Published by Galenos Publishing House on behalf of Turkish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024 Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2093-95bb8a8292c5383e43c02624629b06f9c4edfecad6b69233ae4ced00240c26ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6868-0434 ; 0000-0002-9644-7688 ; 0000-0002-0720-970X ; 0000-0003-1077-4715 ; 0000-0001-9009-0369 ; 0000-0003-0044-363X ; 0000-0001-5260-2087</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635725/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11635725/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39663759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehmet, İrfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya Uğur, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetin, Furkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşkum, İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesur, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganidağlı, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uğur, Mete Gürol</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery</title><title>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology</title><addtitle>Turk J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the potential advantages of combined general and epidural anesthesia for major gynecological oncological surgeries. The data of 690 gynecological cancer were retrospectively examined, and 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group G (123 patients who received general anesthesia only) and Group C (100 patients who received combined epidural and general anesthesia. The perioperative follow-up data were comparatively analyzed. Operation times in Group G were significantly lower than those in Group C (p=0.018). The blood product replacement rate was higher in Group G (p&lt;0.05). Additionally, intraoperative bleeding rates were lower in Group C (p&lt;0.05). Postoperatively, the analgesic requirement time of Group C was significantly later than that of Group G (p=0.0001). The first mobilization time of Group C was substantially earlier (p=0.0001). Thrombosis and cardiac complications were considerably less frequent in group C, although allergic complications were more common (p&lt;0.05). The length of hospital stay was shorter in Group C (p&lt;0.05). Combined epidural and general anesthesia in gynecological oncological surgeries may improve postoperative outcomes, including reduced analgesic requirements, earlier patient mobilization, shorter hospitalization, and decreased rates of complications, particularly cardiovascular and thrombotic events.</description><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><issn>2149-9322</issn><issn>1307-699X</issn><issn>2149-9330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUcFu3CAQRVWiJNrsL6Q-5uItDBgvpyhaJW2lSL20Z4Tx2CGyYQPrSPsZ_ePi7nbT9sSDefOYN4-Qj4yuBNTi0-4ltKveDOhDWgEFsQKQwD-QK2BClYpzenbCAJdkmdILpZSt61oxuCCXXEnJ60pdkZ-bMG5NdCn4InTF7hkL7Dq0u_nWo8dohsJ4TLmSnMmwLWwYG-exLXDr2uk_QtaZRY4vO2eL0XjT44j-oLn3aMMQemdzY_DvOE2xx7i_JuedGRIuj-eC_Hh8-L75Uj59-_x1c_9UWqCKl6pqmrVZgwJb8TVHwS3NWxASVENlp6zANvswrWykAs4NCostzduiFqRp-ILcHXS3UzNia_N82YreRjeauNfBOP1vxbtn3Yc3zZjkVQ1VVrg9KsTwOmW_enTJ4jBk82FKmjMhZcUFY5laH6g2hpQidqd_GNVzqHoOVR9D1XOo-neoufPm7zFPfX8i5L8APRmmLQ</recordid><startdate>20241212</startdate><enddate>20241212</enddate><creator>Mehmet, İrfan</creator><creator>Kaya Uğur, Berna</creator><creator>Çetin, Furkan</creator><creator>Taşkum, İbrahim</creator><creator>Cesur, Mehmet</creator><creator>Ganidağlı, Süleyman</creator><creator>Uğur, Mete Gürol</creator><general>Galenos Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-0434</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-7688</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0720-970X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-4715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-0369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-363X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-2087</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241212</creationdate><title>Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery</title><author>Mehmet, İrfan ; Kaya Uğur, Berna ; Çetin, Furkan ; Taşkum, İbrahim ; Cesur, Mehmet ; Ganidağlı, Süleyman ; Uğur, Mete Gürol</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2093-95bb8a8292c5383e43c02624629b06f9c4edfecad6b69233ae4ced00240c26ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehmet, İrfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya Uğur, Berna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetin, Furkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taşkum, İbrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesur, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganidağlı, Süleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uğur, Mete Gürol</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehmet, İrfan</au><au>Kaya Uğur, Berna</au><au>Çetin, Furkan</au><au>Taşkum, İbrahim</au><au>Cesur, Mehmet</au><au>Ganidağlı, Süleyman</au><au>Uğur, Mete Gürol</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2024-12-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>234</epage><pages>227-234</pages><issn>2149-9322</issn><issn>1307-699X</issn><eissn>2149-9330</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the potential advantages of combined general and epidural anesthesia for major gynecological oncological surgeries. The data of 690 gynecological cancer were retrospectively examined, and 223 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: Group G (123 patients who received general anesthesia only) and Group C (100 patients who received combined epidural and general anesthesia. The perioperative follow-up data were comparatively analyzed. Operation times in Group G were significantly lower than those in Group C (p=0.018). The blood product replacement rate was higher in Group G (p&lt;0.05). Additionally, intraoperative bleeding rates were lower in Group C (p&lt;0.05). Postoperatively, the analgesic requirement time of Group C was significantly later than that of Group G (p=0.0001). The first mobilization time of Group C was substantially earlier (p=0.0001). Thrombosis and cardiac complications were considerably less frequent in group C, although allergic complications were more common (p&lt;0.05). The length of hospital stay was shorter in Group C (p&lt;0.05). Combined epidural and general anesthesia in gynecological oncological surgeries may improve postoperative outcomes, including reduced analgesic requirements, earlier patient mobilization, shorter hospitalization, and decreased rates of complications, particularly cardiovascular and thrombotic events.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Galenos Publishing</pub><pmid>39663759</pmid><doi>10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.22623</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-0434</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9644-7688</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0720-970X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1077-4715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-0369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0044-363X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-2087</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2149-9322
ispartof Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetric and Gynecology, 2024-12, Vol.21 (4), p.227-234
issn 2149-9322
1307-699X
2149-9330
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11635725
source PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Investigation
title Comparison of the effect of general anesthesia and combined epidural anesthesia on the anesthetic management of gynecological oncological surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A42%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20effect%20of%20general%20anesthesia%20and%20combined%20epidural%20anesthesia%20on%20the%20anesthetic%20management%20of%20gynecological%20oncological%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Turkish%20Society%20of%20Obstetric%20and%20Gynecology&rft.au=Mehmet,%20%C4%B0rfan&rft.date=2024-12-12&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=234&rft.pages=227-234&rft.issn=2149-9322&rft.eissn=2149-9330&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.22623&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3146653411%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146653411&rft_id=info:pmid/39663759&rfr_iscdi=true